Star Trek: Less Than Amusing Nostalgia

Star Trek: Less Than Amusing Nostalgia

Hyped-up mediocrity.

Review Opinion
By CBMcontributor - May 11, 2009 05:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek

Just got back from seeing the new Star Trek movie, directed by JJ Abrams. First off, let me just say that I anticipated disapointement, because I have seen what JJ Abrams has accomplished with past work and have been unimpressed. To be honest, I went into this film hoping it would prove me wrong in thinking JJ Abrams should not be directing feature films, but rather, should stick with his crap television shows. (I was a huge fan of Alias, but then it just went all to hell…spiraling into a webbed mess of random crap thrown into the story…and made me angry…I absolutely hate Lost, and Fringe is the most retarded show) —[also, as a side note to those who have seen Alias and Star Trek...red matter look familiar? maybe, the red ball of liquid from season 1 of Alias? hmmm. maybe you should have got different writers...way to rip from yourself JJ...lame.]

I think the whole hype of the film is over two things: First, nostalgic reasons that only true Star Trek fans will appreciate and wannabe fans (who have never seen an episode) will try to get in on because it’s now “cool” and not “nerdy”. And secondly, those brainwashed fans of JJ Abrams, who watch his shows and have no sense of what good camera work or good storytelling really is…they’ve jumped on the bandwagon and if they jump off now, they’ll feel left out.

So, Mr. Abrams, you prove me right yet again, failing to impress me with your new version of old. The Star Trek that I knew as a kid was boiled down to less than amusing nostalgia (with those classic lines like, “I’m givin’ ‘er all she’s got!”) in a whirl of whooshing dolly shots painful enough to make your head spin. (Literally…my mother, whom I shared many old Trek days with when I was a kid, joined me in seeing the film, and walked out with a splitting headache and slight motion nausea)

Perhaps this is what bothered me the most: the amateur cinematography of the film. At one point, I actually thought someone was messing with the film reel in the back, adjusting the frame in small movements, but realized it was just unexplainable camera movement. Yes, I did think to myself, well…this is based on an old tv show, yes, it’s action/adventure sci-fi…so some rapid camera movement is acceptable…but this was just way too much. And I am not a fan of the constant swooping dolly shots or off axis tilting dolly. Very amateur. Just because your shooting a film about an old television series, doesn’t mean you have to shoot it like it’s an old tv series. It’s not the 1960s anymore.

Altogether, I feel the film could have been much better had the camera work had been better.

As far as story goes, I can say it was ok. Predictable, and somewhat boring, but not terrible. Overall, I had only a few real qualms with it. Such as, I would have much rather seen Eric Bana have more to do than just sit around on his spaceship barking orders and threats. The fight scenes where pretty lame altogether, and the creature effects were pretty sub-par as well. I couldn’t help but think of Hellboy, and how Del Toro makes an effort to make every creature so uniquely detailed and real, no matter how small a role…and how Star Trek only scratched the surface of that with only really focusing on the details of the Romulans and Vulcans…which, wasn’t too hard, as they look pretty much human. (for example the creature that hung out with Scotty…halloween costume anyone? someone get WETA over here stat!)

Overall, I’d suggest not wasting your time by seeing this in theater. Wait for DVD and rent it via Redbox. And instead, save that $8 for Terminator: Salvation, Public Enemies or District 9.

Just a suggestion.

STAR TREK: SECTION 31 Trailer And Poster Sees Michelle Yeoh Emperor Philippa Georgiou Assemble A Team Of Spies
Related:

STAR TREK: SECTION 31 Trailer And Poster Sees Michelle Yeoh Emperor Philippa Georgiou Assemble A Team Of Spies

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Recommended For You:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

SGA
SGA - 5/11/2009, 7:27 PM
So you're not impressed with some of the movies he's been a part of. Most of which have been some of the biggest blockbusters like Armageddon (screenwriter), Six Degrees of Separation (actor), Mission: Impossible 3 (director/screenwriter), or Cloverfield (screenwriter)?

You didn't like ANY of those movies...

c'mon
SupahPhreak
SupahPhreak - 5/11/2009, 9:32 PM
I'm pretty sure he Directed cloverfield..
SGA
SGA - 5/11/2009, 11:18 PM
Cloverfield was directed by Matt Reeves
View Recorder