TERMINATOR: Linda Hamilton Is Done With Sarah Connor; Thinks It's Time For The Franchise To End

TERMINATOR: Linda Hamilton Is Done With Sarah Connor; Thinks It's Time For The Franchise To End

Linda Hamilton has confirmed she played Sarah Connor for the final time in Terminator: Dark Fate and admits to being confused by the decision to once again relaunch the long-running sci-fi franchise...

By JoshWilding - Feb 22, 2024 04:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Terminator
Source: SFFGazette.com

After helming Deadpool, Tim Miller quickly became one of Hollywood's most in-demand filmmakers. When creative differences with Ryan Reynolds led to the filmmaker walking away from Fox's planned sequel, he set about rebooting the Terminator franchise alongside James Cameron, welcome news after the disaster that was Terminator Genisys.

Cameron gave that movie his seal of approval in a featurette, sharing comments he's since admitted regretting due to what a colossal mess it ended up being. 

While Dark Fate received positive reviews from fans and critics alike, it didn't make the necessary impact at the box office. With only $62 million in North America and $261 million worldwide, the blockbuster was deemed a flop and put the iconic franchise back on the shelf.

Cameron, who helmed Terminator and Terminator 2: Judgement Day, has previously shared his hopes to do something new with the franchise, and revealed last year that he'd started writing a reboot which he's put on hold due to the real-life rise of A.I. 

Arnold Schwarzenegger has previously said he's "done" with the franchise, noting that "I got the message loud and clear that the world wants to move on with a different theme when it comes to The Terminator." 

Now, Sarah Connor actress Linda Hamilton has shared similar sentiments in an interview with Business Insider (via SFFGazette.com), confirming she too has no interest in returning to the sci-fi series. 

"I'm done. I'm done. I have nothing more to say. The story's been told, and it's been done to death," she said, echoing Arnie's 2023 remarks. "Why anybody would relaunch it is a mystery to me. But I know our Hollywood world is built on relaunches right now."

As for the character's legacy, Hamilton added, "I truly feel like, and felt like, Sarah Connor is not an icon. She's a woman in hell. She makes some really bad choices. She's not a good mother, she's a good fighter!"

"So you sort of try to parse the details out and go 'Well, they respect her strength and her power, and I did create a warrior, but she's very imperfect. She's an imperfect person.' So it was hard to sort of come to terms with all that and then just go, 'Okay, I can accept it,' because I've heard it now for so many years, people actually treat me like I saved the future."

"If you could see how utterly hapless I am during my life and my daily life!" she concluded. "But it's pretty cute, and I have no complaints, it's delightful."

Hamilton first played Connor in 1984's Terminator and reprised the role in T2: Judgement Day seven years later. She then bid "Hasta la vista" to the franchise before agreeing to return alongside Schwarzenegger in 2019's Terminator: Dark Fate.

Let us know your hopes for the Terminator franchise in the comments section below.

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Director Admits Killing John Connor Was One Of The Movie's Biggest Mistakes
Related:

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Director Admits Killing John Connor Was One Of The Movie's Biggest Mistakes

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Producer James Cameron Explains What He Thinks Went Wrong With Tim Miller's Sequel
Recommended For You:

TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Producer James Cameron Explains What He Thinks Went Wrong With Tim Miller's Sequel

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Beer85
Beer85 - 2/22/2024, 4:46 AM
The first 2 movies are the only real ones. That fan-fictiony Sarah Connor TV show was somewhat enjoyable. Stop ruining good movies Hollywood.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/22/2024, 9:55 AM
@Beer85 - I would fight for T-3 until my grave. You are correct; the first two are gold (tho, I felt the 2nd one dragged on a bit too long).
I loved T-3. The aftermath of destroying skynet, John's life off the grid, the freaking car-chase-big-crane-truck was awesome; beat the hell outta Matrix 2's highway scene, and the ending was so heart-breaking with John and Cate in the bunker realizing they are there to survive, not beat the enemy. It was also fast paced and got to the point.

Yeah, it had it's goofy moments, but I still loved it.

T-4: Complete, boring garbage.
T-5: Stupidest story ever, too many goofy moments, horrible casting for Kyle, and turning John into a terminator was just purely a sh1t idea.

T-6: I actually really liked Dark Fate. Mostly, I just loved Sarah had to work with the Terminator that killed her son.

Just my opinions.
JayBarrick
JayBarrick - 2/22/2024, 4:52 AM
She is right, but also wrong.

Sarah Connor isn't perfect, it's flawed.

But that's exactly why she is an icon. It's a fleshed out character, has deph, has moral issues, has internal growth.

And yes, Terminator is a burned out franchise, any new installment would really need to let go of nostalgia and bring something new to the table. Sadly, Hollywood is not famous for being brave and inventive nowadays.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 2/22/2024, 6:29 AM
@JayBarrick - I don't know why no one has stepped up and said, "Hey! You know that awesome scene in T2 that shows the humans balls deep in a battle against the machines? Let's make THAT!"

I could picture a trilogy of the future war very easily, and still tie it into the original 2 movies.

The first movie could be about them sending John Conner back to stop the Terminator from killing Sarah. But we see it from THEIR point of view. Meaning we never see any flashbacks or scenes from the past. Because we already saw that in T1. Instead we see the humans send Kyle Reese back and continue fighting their war. Halfway through they learn Reese died in the past but saved Sara. Then the machines send back the T1000 and the humans send back their own T800.

When they learn that both Reese and the T800 completed their missions in the past, but nothing changed for them in the future, the movie ends with them realizing that nothing they do in the past will prevent Judgement Day from happening. John Conner realizes that Sara's "No fate" comment is BS, and that the human race is destined to be thrown into this machine war, no matter what.

But that also means that John Conner actually is the savior of humankind that they talk about in the original 2 movies. Stopping his birth or him being allowed to live and become this great general isnthe entire reason the machines sent terminators to the past to begin with.

So, while John and the people in the future may not realize it, the audience knows the humans have a fighting chance.

The next two movies would continue with just the humans vs machines in that dark, war-torn setting with humanity eventually winning.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 2/22/2024, 6:30 AM
@CorndogBurglar - *the first movie would show the humans in the future sending Kyle Reese back. Not John Conner lol. That's what I meant.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 2/22/2024, 7:25 AM
@CorndogBurglar -
JustAWaffle
JustAWaffle - 2/22/2024, 4:54 AM
We all think the franchise should end. The first two still outweigh everything that came after (though T3 was a serviceable sequel to finish the story, and Salvation was a fun “what if” kind of movie).

But I think it’s the mystique of the AI war of the future that draws more fear and intrigue by not showing too much of it.
Mugens
Mugens - 2/22/2024, 6:02 AM
The only way I would ever look forward to another Terminator movie is if James Cameron himself came back to write and helm it, and even then I would be a bit wary. Other than that, let it go.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/22/2024, 6:27 AM
The reboot will be creatively overseen by Skynet.

AI actors, script, marketing, production design, etc. etc. etc.

It's only fair that they let AI do it instead of humans. It's AI DEI.
Batmangina
Batmangina - 2/22/2024, 7:14 AM
T2 closed the loop just fine.

Rise of the Machines wasn't bad at all - just kinda unnecessary.

The TV show was surprisingly decent.

Everything else eats bagfuls of dicks.
Twenty23Three
Twenty23Three - 2/22/2024, 7:19 AM
It was done for a long time, then she appeared in the most creatively bankrupt and boring film of the lot.
Repian
Repian - 2/22/2024, 7:44 AM
The Terminator reboot should address the hours leading up to Judgment Day.

Isolated, far from this technological world, Sarah Connor lives with her son John in a Neo-Luddite community located in a forest. She is a fugitive accused of terrorism. Anna Torv to play Sarah.


When the FBI raids the Neo-Luddite community, Sarah and John escape. They are chased by an agent. She is played by Gwendoline Christie. She has a neurological implant and she is in contact with the A.I. defense (Skynet) through the neurodevice. Skynet controls the agent because she does not disobey the A.I.'s orders. Because of the neuroimplant, Skynet manipulates her brain, eliminating the sensation of pain and fatigue. She is unstoppable.
TheloniousJay
TheloniousJay - 2/22/2024, 8:03 AM
I'm in the minority that would like to see another Terminator film being made. However, where can they go with it now? How can they get us to care about a new group of actors/characters so that we can let go of Arnold and Linda? Unless there's a REALLY good idea, or James Cameron comes back to direct, I don't see the franchise returning for a couple decades.
philinterrupted
philinterrupted - 2/22/2024, 8:13 AM
I can’t think of anything new that a rebooted terminator franchise would bring.

Linda is right. It’s time to put the dog down.
dragon316
dragon316 - 2/22/2024, 8:14 AM
Should have ended with terminator two
CAPTAINPINKEYE
CAPTAINPINKEYE - 2/22/2024, 8:22 AM
If there is one thing that capitalism has taught us is that if there’s money to be made then they’ll keep making them. Star Wars is the perfect example. Jurassic Park, Transformers.
Toecutter
Toecutter - 2/22/2024, 8:22 AM
Terminator 2 was the last one—end of story.

Forthas
Forthas - 2/22/2024, 8:36 AM
If they are going to reboot the franchise, I think that they should go back and forth between the past and the future. they could add some twsit to it, like maybe there is a human behind Skynet and he is the one who actually decides to send Kyle Reese back in time.
Timerider
Timerider - 2/22/2024, 9:26 AM
I think it needs a reboot.

First film: Start with the war in the future, think of it like Saving Private Ryan, but it’s John Connor looking for Kyle Reese. John saves Kyle Reese from being killed.

Second film: 2 years later…This film is about learning who Kyle is and John Connor’s relationship with his dad. We see him complete missions like a special forces soldier would. Kyle Reese sees a lot of soldiers die, male and female. The end of this movie he receives the infamous Sarah Connor picture. John tells him, she’s my mother.

Third film: 1 year later…New Terminators arrive, these have real skin, sweat, bad breath, everything. John asks for a volunteer, one where he won’t return from, it’s a death sentence, and he tells his men that. One man steps up, it’s Kyle Reese, the man who saved his life in the first film. John tells Reese that the mission is in the past and his target is to find his mother and protect her.

The film is dark, figuratively and literally. It can be made into a series or films. The world it’s set in is exactly like James Cameron’s first Terminator film in the future flashbacks scenes. It’s bloody, it’s disgusting, not made for children to watch. These Terminators pull arms and heads off with ease.

If you remember in Cameron’s first film, the Terminator punches that punk in the stomach and leaves a hole. You need to bring that horror element back to the series. In Aliens, he brought that same horror element to that movie as well. That horror element was not there in the sequels that followed in the Terminator franchise after T2.





Izaizaiza
Izaizaiza - 2/22/2024, 10:05 AM
Time to move on. The movie was so fresh when it came out in 1984. Then they broke new effects ground with Terminator 2. After that, its been all downhill.
zeon00
zeon00 - 2/22/2024, 10:11 AM
While Dark Fate received positive reviews from fans and critics alike. No!! Fans don’t like it
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 2/22/2024, 1:31 PM
@zeon00 - He knows, Joshy boy normally uses sh1t talk like this to get more plp to comment on his articles.
LeonNova
LeonNova - 2/22/2024, 2:27 PM
It’s okay to just let things be over.
KNIGHT3OOO
KNIGHT3OOO - 2/22/2024, 7:31 PM
Honestly she is right. 1 - 4 are the perfect time-loop they were going for to begin with. Telling a cohesive story that made perfect sense. Everything after with all the alternate timelines were garbage no matter how good the action was. It was truly mindless and only spoiled the franchises integrity to the core.

They in truth had the potential to explore life after Judgement Day in the ruined future Kyle Reese came from, but instead vouched for more silly truck chases in modern day L.A. that go no where.

Most people including the film makers of 5 and 6 never got the point of TERMINATOR to begin with, and it shows. And it hurts.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder