ELECTRO: Sony Pictures Rumored To Be Developing Spinoff With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Jamie Foxx

ELECTRO: Sony Pictures Rumored To Be Developing Spinoff With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Jamie Foxx

If you'd asked us if this was a good idea prior to Spider-Man: No Way Home, we'd have probably said "no." After Jamie Foxx's scene-stealing performance, however, this rumour sounds like a great idea...

By JoshWilding - Dec 20, 2021 04:12 PM EST
Filed Under: No Way Home
Source: Murphy's Multiverse

Spider-Man: No Way Home managed to pull off bringing all those different villains from previous movies together, resulting in arguably the greatest Marvel Comics adaptation to date. Jamie Foxx was far from a highlight in 2014's The Amazing Spider-Man 2, but the Oscar-winner clearly jumped at the chance of redemption and delivered a scene-stealing performance as the returning Max Dillon.

According to Murphy's Multiverse, "Sony is now interested in developing an Electro solo project starring Foxx." Of all the bad guys we were reintroduced to in the threequel, this one arguably makes the most sense for his own spinoff, and the consequences of could be huge.

As part of the same world as Andrew Garfield's Spider-Man, the door could be open to his take on the web-slinger showing up to guide Electro in wherever this story takes him. Foxx and Marvel Studios essentially rebooted Max in Spider-Man: No Way Home, injecting some attitude and humour into the rogue and stealing the show at times in the process. 

If this Electro movie happens, then it would join an expanding slate of movies set in Sony's Spider-Man Universe. Morbius is heading our way next year, while the likes of Kraven the Hunter, Madame Web, and Spider-Woman are all in various stages of development. Ultimately, this spinoff sounds like the perfect opportunity to bring Garfield's Peter Parker back to the big screen as well, but we'll have to treat this as a rumor for the time being.

Find out what we thought of Foxx's Electro return in our review of Spider-Man: No Way Home.

Tom Holland Shares Disappointment With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME - I Might Have Done Three Days On Location
Related:

Tom Holland Shares Disappointment With SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME - "I Might Have Done Three Days On Location"

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut
Recommended For You:

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Star Charlie Cox Recalls Cut Reference To 2003's DAREDEVIL During His MCU Debut

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
SpideyPuffsMJ
SpideyPuffsMJ - 12/20/2021, 4:01 PM
I will say this once, Sony. Don’t ruin the goodwill you have built up from No Way Home. Don’t learn the wrong lessons. Like doing something just like this.
MUTO123
MUTO123 - 12/20/2021, 4:03 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - They will.
grif
grif - 12/20/2021, 4:10 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - people paid to see it. this is what they get
DarkDetective
DarkDetective - 12/20/2021, 4:35 PM
@grif - yeah, obviously we all wanted to see NWH because of Elektro
cerrone6
cerrone6 - 12/20/2021, 4:56 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - exactly
The1st
The1st - 12/20/2021, 5:11 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - Yes, the answer...is still no.
Shroombeast
Shroombeast - 12/20/2021, 7:15 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - All of Sony's decisions are made out of the pursuit of money. They'll squeeze the properties they own for everything they're worth, and they never learn from their failures, and the financial success of the Venom movies has only encouraged them.
OptimusCrime
OptimusCrime - 12/20/2021, 4:04 PM
No Sony, Dont!

manofillintent1
manofillintent1 - 12/20/2021, 4:05 PM
Gotta be careful where you fall
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/20/2021, 9:05 PM
@manofillintent1 - You lowkey just won the comments section
LordRyuk
LordRyuk - 12/21/2021, 5:18 AM
@manofillintent1 - 😂🤣😂🤣
KWilly
KWilly - 12/20/2021, 4:05 PM
For someone who loved Jamie Foxx's Electro from even ASM2, this is a dumb idea.
Manmarvel
Manmarvel - 12/20/2021, 5:03 PM
@KWilly - I loved him in this, hated him in asm2, he was a cut and copy past of the Riddler from Batman Forever but Jim did it better and even then it wasn't a great plot point.
Darkknight2149
Darkknight2149 - 12/20/2021, 8:38 PM
@KWilly -
Electro wasn't even really the same character in the two films. In The Amazing Spider-Man 2, he was implied to be a schizophrenic. He had delusions about a friendship with Spider-Man, heard voices in his head (integrated into the soundtrack), and reacted in irrational and paranoid ways. There's a deleted scene where he's talking to himself as Spider-Man and he thinks Spider-Man is going to show up to his birthday party.

In No Way Home, he's a perfectly sane individual for some reason.
PhantomCelery
PhantomCelery - 12/20/2021, 9:45 PM
@Darkknight2149 - Its just Jamie Foxx playing another joke slinging MCU character. It's not only thats its a different character, he's essentially a non character. Another generic villain in the pantheon of MCU villains.
Darkknight2149
Darkknight2149 - 12/20/2021, 10:20 PM
@PhantomCelery -
Honestly, my only complaint with the movie is that all of the multiverse characters were inauthentic and off-base.

• Electro is no longer schizophrenic for some reason.
• The Lizard didn't die in The Amazing Spider-Man, his voice is supposed to be modulated in lizard form, and he seemed way more intelligent and articulate. His motivation from that movie was also ignored.
• Doc Ock willingly sacrificed himself in a redemption arc, and he's suddenly evil again? And wants tritium again after deliberately giving up his dreams for the greater good?
• Why can't Sandman appear human anymore? Other than that, he was alright.
• The Green Goblin was way more cunning and intelligent in the 2002 movie, and he had actual motivations. Here, he seems to be a non-threat generic insane guy. He gets the drop on Spider-Man once and that's it. Tom Holland even effortless beats the crap out of him without a real fight. Anyone whose seen Spider-Man (2002) knows that's bullshit. Norman's reaction to the multiverse was plausible, but other than that. Even the suit seemed inaccurate somehow (was it too shiny?).
• Now that Dock Ock has established that Norman being the Green Goblin and killing himself was a news headline in the Raimiverse, Harry's revenge arc is retroactively hilarious.
• Magic and the Avengers supposedly don't exist in the Raimiverse, but Doctor Strange was mentioned in Spider-Man 2. SMH.

Thankfully, they got Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield right.
IronGenesis
IronGenesis - 12/20/2021, 4:06 PM
Sometimes pieces of a whole of are best when just pieces in the whole , yes?
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 12/20/2021, 4:06 PM
So instead of developing a new movie with Andrew's Spider-Man, they are doing this? I mean he was definitely improved, but a solo movie? Wth
Reeds2Much
Reeds2Much - 12/20/2021, 4:06 PM
SpideyPuffsMJ
SpideyPuffsMJ - 12/20/2021, 4:06 PM
I figured out the issue with Sony’s Spidey movies they’ve been trying since Venom came out. They can’t use Spider-Man so far, so they’re making a cinematic universe centered around villains. But nobody wants to watch six or seven movies about bad guys being bad, at least Hollywood thinks as much.

So they turn them into anti-heroes or in Venom’s case even superheroes. Morbius, Kraven will be more of the same. It doesn’t make sense and something will always feel off about these characters as long as this is their model. This isn’t Suicide Squad. Most of these characters exist to dislike Spider-Man. There’s pitting a sympathetic villain against a hero and then there’s makin a movie about a heroic villain which really hasn’t worked for them so far.
Fogs
Fogs - 12/20/2021, 4:10 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - Nice take. Agreed.
TheWalkingCuban
TheWalkingCuban - 12/20/2021, 5:19 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - Guess they can strap a horn onto Brock Lesnar’s forehead, give en some redemption story, bam, Rhino’s a good guy. Just make em all good why don’tcha Sony
Bdub21
Bdub21 - 12/20/2021, 5:44 PM
@SpideyPuffsMJ - Facts the only true villain story we’ve gotten is Joker
JustAChillFan
JustAChillFan - 12/20/2021, 4:07 PM
Jesus Christ stop wasting the goodwill 🤣. Sony gonna keep Sony'ing
PhoenixBlade
PhoenixBlade - 12/20/2021, 4:08 PM
TASM3 - 100% on board with as long as Marvel have involvement. Electro solo film, not in a million years. Sony need to calm down. Thinking there’s no such thing as too much sugar in a cake. They’re getting excessive again. They’ve got a wonderful opportunity on their hands right now to ride this high. Tom in the MCU. TASM3 and Andrew in the Sonyverse. Then Spider-Verse things with Tom, Andrew and Tobey with possibilities of more villain crossovers and other Spider-People. Don’t be making shit from doors that are now closed.
TheWalkingCuban
TheWalkingCuban - 12/20/2021, 5:23 PM
@SamaelSaint - Guessing he’ll bump into that black Spider-Man he mentioned, who better to train him right, right
tugboy
tugboy - 12/20/2021, 4:10 PM





Iports
Iports - 12/20/2021, 4:10 PM
This is like the third Spider-Man related spin off mentioned

I mean I get it! The film was amazing

But a solo electro spin off ! He’s not even that interesting as a character

Allot of these villains work well with spider man they don’t work well without him

Just my opinion but the two venom movies and I mean I love Tom hardy
But god they are crap lol
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 12/20/2021, 9:11 PM
@Iports - Agreed. As a big Tom Hardy fan and a big Marvel fan you'd think Venom would be one of my favorite movies. But leave it to Sony to deliver something with so much potential as something so underwhelming. I reeeeeally wish Marvel Studios gave us a proper Venom with a proper storyline.

(I've got the Spider-Man NWH vaccine and immune to all spoilers)
Frshcoupe
Frshcoupe - 12/20/2021, 4:11 PM
Sony is like the virgin who finally gets some ass but from a pretty girl…don’t know what to do with himself and now he thinks he’s a bag of chips wit dip!
Itwasme
Itwasme - 12/20/2021, 4:11 PM
These rumors aren't much to shake a stick at. After any success it's worth having some exploratory conversations to see what might be. Doesn't mean they'll move forward and going through that creative process is a great thing.

Plus, if they actually get a really really good idea, and they can execute on it, it always could be a movie we never knew we wanted. Execution is everything.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 12/20/2021, 5:05 PM
@Itwasme - my work is done here
Armageddon26
Armageddon26 - 12/20/2021, 4:12 PM
Ah yes, a spin-off on a villain that has had no real solo stories to pull from, and received a satisfying conclusion. Makes sense.

I wouldn’t mind seeing more of Jamie Foxx as Electro if they’re so keen to bring him back, but a solo project is not the way to do it. Morbius and Venom are one thing, even Kraven I suppose, but I just can’t see how this would work
Fogs
Fogs - 12/20/2021, 4:12 PM
Marvel Studios with the highest grossing launch ever: "Awesome! Let's keep the plan, we're seeing the result is coming!"

Sony with the 2nd highest grossing launch ever: "OMG LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS QUICK A LIST OF ALL THE CHARACTERS WE'RE RELEASING MOVIES ABOUT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM"
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 12/20/2021, 4:13 PM
1 2 3
View Recorder