'Member When Ben Affleck Was Batman? Examining When And Where The DC Extended Universe Went Wrong

'Member When Ben Affleck Was Batman? Examining When And Where The DC Extended Universe Went Wrong

It's been a pretty disastrous few years for the DC Extended Universe but where did Warner Bros. go wrong and when exactly did things go so pear-shaped for Superman and company? We take an in-depth look...

By JoshWilding - Sep 26, 2018 06:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Suicide Squad
As the Marvel Cinematic Universe continues to go from strength to strength, things for the DC Extended Universe still aren't looking great. While it does admittedly feel like Warner Bros. is putting this shared world on the right path, a whole lot of damage has been done and things got even worse recently with the sudden and shocking departure of Henry Cavill's Superman (which left fans reeling). 

The question is, when and where did everything go so horribly wrong? Well, that's what we're now attempting to figure out as we take a deep dive into the DCEU's past, present, and future to establish the mistakes made and what could have been done to make things right along the way. So, to check this list out in its entirety, all you guys have to do is click on that "View List" button down below. 


There Was Never A Plan



This is perhaps the biggest issue with the DC Extended Universe. There was never a plan in place and it wasn't until Man of Steel was released and Zack Snyder pitched the idea of introducing a new Batman that a shared universe of sorts started coming together. By 2013, Marvel Studios already had an established Cinematic Universe so there's no excuse for Warner Bros. not attempting to do the same.

Even once Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice was released, there was only a very vague plan in place, something which was emphasised by Suicide Squad's after-credits scene and the many teases we got for storylines which never ended up panning out. Of course, there was sort of someone in charge...

 

They Treated Zack Snyder Like Christopher Nolan



Snyder had a plan for a series of movies which would have essentially taken us into a future where Superman had turned evil and Darkseid has conquered the Earth. Personally, despite how dark that would have been, I would have loved to see the filmmaker's vision play out in its entirety but the studio didn't seem to get the memo, hence why they continued to expand a world with a time limit on it.

Warner Bros. should have established early on what they wanted and realised that Snyder was planning something different and while I do think the director was capable of telling a larger story over four or five movies, someone higher up the food chain should have been keeping a closer eye on him. 

 

Announcing Movies Which Were Never Going To Happen



When Marvel Studios announced a slate of movies, they stuck to all of them and even added more! In one of the most eye-roll-worthy moves of all-time, Warner Bros. chose to reveal the DC Films slate during a conference call and even then it was apparent they had no idea what they were doing. Every member of the Justice League was given a solo outing (I can't imagine anyone really thought Cyborg would be a hit) but nothing specific was said about their two biggest draws: Batman and Superman!
 

Panic!



When Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice was released to a wave of negative reviews, what did Warner Bros. do? They panicked, of course. Rather than remaining on the same course and hoping moviegoers might embrace a darker sort of superhero movie, the studio ordered reshoots on Suicide Squad and brought in a trailer editing company to jazz it up and turn it into a music video/trailer.

The Joker's relationship with Harley Quinn was watered down, while the critical response was just as devastating but mostly because it was hacked to pieces in the editing suite. Panicking this way really backfired on the studio and once again reiterated that a lack of leadership 
was the main problem here.
 

What Is It Called Anyway?



Honestly, your guess is as good as ours. Despite putting a special TV show on The CW, Warner Bros. has failed to give the DCEU an official name. As a result, it's been referred to as the DC Universe, the DC Extended Universe, the DC Films Universe, and more. By not giving it a title, Warner Bros. has left it in a state of flux and thereby never made this shared DC Universe "official" which is downright baffling.

The Fall Of Superman



As fun as it would have been to see Zack Snyder's vision for Superman play out, I really don't think we need a villainous version of the Man of Steel in the dark and depressing world we all live in today.

Superman is supposed to be a beacon of hope and not someone who kills his enemies and agonises over heroic acts. I really enjoyed Batman v Superman but the movie handled the character poorly and even his death was somewhat underwhelming and far too soon as we'd never been given the opportunity to actually care about this version of Superman before he was suddenly taken from us.

The downfall of Superman should have never been the goal here but Warner Bros. let it happen.

 

Panic. Again!



Justice League had pretty much finished shooting by the time Warner Bros. realised that the superhero ensemble wasn't the movie they wanted. Somehow that didn't occur to them when they read the screenplay or when shooting was taking place; it took seeing a rough cut to realise Snyder was telling a story which was too dark and set to take the DCEU in a direction which didn't suit their new vision.

The success of Wonder Woman (which was an amazing movie) didn't help because its lighter tone once again made Warner Bros. think that they needed to change things and that led to an epic disaster...

 

Justice League Disaster



While it's been said that Zack Snyder chose to step down from directing Justice League because of a family tragedy (and I'm sure there is some truth to that), there has to be more to this than meets the eye and I get the feeling that it wasn't entirely his choice to not stick around for those reshoots. 

Regardless, Warner Bros.' big idea was to get Joss Whedon to take charge of things, writing new scenes and later directing them. He made two epic successes with The Avengers and Avengers: Age of Ultron but he was limited here and trying to mash together his take on the Justice League with Snyder's was never going to work. As a result, we ended up with a critical and commercial disaster last November. 

As a result of the studio's failing, what should have been their most profitable franchise is now dead. 

 

Attempted Course Correction



Since last year, Warner Bros. has started taking the DCEU down a different route and while Aquaman looks promising, it's been in development for a while so could honestly go either way. Shazam! is ditching the darker tone of past movies and looks like a full-on goofy comedy, while Wonder Woman 1984 is seemingly a standalone adventure which may well end up ignoring the first instalment.

Meanwhile, a number of other projects are in various stages of development but reliable sources have said on a number of occasions that Warner Bros. isn't committing to an entire slate. In other words, if their next couple of releases flop, that could be it for DC superheroes on the big screen. However, I guess it will mean they'll go back to prioritising The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter?! Great...

 

Keeping Things Vague



As I mentioned above, Warner Bros. isn't committing to anything right now and that leaves the DCEU in a state of flux. While you can appreciate the studio wanting to be careful after past mistakes, the studio making things up as they go along is what got them into this mess in the first place and it's unfortunately far too easy to imagine a lot of these projects falling apart in an embarrassing fashion. 

Joker, Joker, And More Joker



Because who wants movies about Batman and Superman when you can just focus on The Joker instead? Right now, there's a standalone origin story in the works starring Joaquin Phoenix, while Jared Leto is also expected to receive his own solo outing. Throw in that rumoured Joker vs. Harley Quinn adventure, Suicide Squad 2, and Birds of Prey, and both he and Harley Quinn are dominating the DCEU.

I'm not sure what's convinced Warner Bros. to put so much effort into the Clown Prince of Crime but I would have thought that the most money to be made would come from pitting him against Batman.

 

Too Many Versions Of The Same Characters



Warner Bros. is moving ahead with a lot of TV shows, possibly because they've had far more success on the small screen than the big one. Unfortunately, this is creating two or three versions of the same character and while most people are smart enough to figure out they're not one and the same, it's bound to be confusing for a large percentage of moviegoers and really muddies the water to boot. 

It also leads to storylines being repeated, certain characters not being allowed to appear on television which hurts those shows, and generally too much of a good thing. It's baffling, really, and with the studio ploughing a lot of money into the DC Universe streaming service, chances are it'll get worse.

 

Superman, No More



How could Warner Bros. let this happen? While there is, of course, a chance it's all just a way of negotiating in public for a new contract, Henry Cavill should have never been allowed to walk away from the role of Superman because no matter how terrible his CGI mouth looked in Justice League, his Man of Steel was finally starting to show promise. That's all been thrown away following his departure.

Then again, with the studio reportedly not looking to develop another Superman project for "several years," what was there for him to do? A bigger priority is said to be a Supergirl movie, a character we've watched develop on the small screen for the past four years. Makes perfect sense, right?

 

Goodbye Batman



Oh, and let's not forget that all the signs are pointing to Ben Affleck also walking away from the DCEU. Once upon a time, he was supposed to direct The Batman with his version of The Dark Knight battling it out with Deathstroke but Warner Bros. somehow didn't allow that to happen which is insane. In fact, it's almost as dumb as Disney firing James Gunn from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 this year.

Nothing is official as of yet but don't be surprised if his departure is made official by the end of 2018.

Do you think the DC Extended Universe can be saved or should Warner Bros. just give up and, I don't know, let the rights revert to Marvel Studios?! Let us know your thoughts in the usual place. 

SUICIDE SQUAD Director David Ayer Won't Stop Talking About The Ayer Cut: I Think You Deserve To See It
Related:

SUICIDE SQUAD Director David Ayer Won't Stop Talking About The Ayer Cut: "I Think You Deserve To See It"

SUICIDE SQUAD Director David Ayer Claims Warner Bros. Never Screened His Cut To Test Audiences Before Overhaul
Recommended For You:

SUICIDE SQUAD Director David Ayer Claims Warner Bros. Never Screened His Cut To Test Audiences Before Overhaul

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 9/26/2018, 6:41 AM
No examination needed, they messed up with BVS. MOS was mixed but had "potential" to be great like every MCU origin film. If they had made a MOS sequel they just needed to show a Superman that inspires humanity positively and show off Cavil's charm/acting ability as Clark Kent. They could have course corrected the DCEU by making more solo films before an ensemble to hype up the JL. It's hard to build hype for a universe that has terrible films and unknown characters. Tom Cruise could have told you that after The Mummy flopped and murdered the Dark Universe.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 6:41 AM
Examining When And Where The DC Extended Universe Went Wrong

When Zack was hired. I say that because Zack was the studio’s favorite but actually like Nolan’s 8th pick. DIrectors Nolan wanted were Del Toro, Zemeckis, Matt Reeves, Duncan Jones, & more

Also the cluster[frick] that was Batman v Superman was where everything went wrong

The whole “there was no plan” is complete bullshit. Nolan didn’t plan out the Dark Knight trilogy, Raimi didn’t plan out the Spider-Man trilogy, Lucas didn’t plan out Star Wars. Can’t tell me he did when Leia was giving Luke tongue
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 7:19 AM
What I would do to see a Del Toro or Zemeckis Superman film
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 9/26/2018, 7:38 AM
@LEVITIKUZ - Notably, Nolan, Raimi, and Lucas all fell apart in the third film, and all three had some kind of reluctance, resistance, or even hostility toward the franchise by that point.

If there are any general rules to be gleaned about cinematic universes from the MCU and the various shortcomings of other studios it's this: Producers plan, directors execute.

And both parts of that equation are important. Producers genuinely need to be creative forces, who care about the story and bring a perspective to the material. They can't just apply their MBA and some focus test results to paste together a marketable film slate and hand it off to a writers' room.

And directors need to get over their drama queen shit and understand that they're one part of a larger ensemble. Yes, you'll get to play your solo, but you also need to play off of the same sheet music as everyone else.

And there's a lot of communication and blurring of roles involved there (studios need to hire directors who they can work well with, directors need to be able and eager to involve themselves in each others' films, actors can themselves become curators of their characters and keeping them consistent. The whole endeavor is built on respect, restraint, and collaboration. Once it becomes about "whose job" something is, it all falls apart into turf wars and ego fights.)
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 9/26/2018, 7:46 AM
We talk about "directors" as if it's actually a defined job. But it's really a bunch of different jobs, and every director has variable strengths.

Ridley Scott can be a great director when he's handed material to simply execute. He's occasionally a great director when he's involved in the creative process of generating that material.

But Scott would probably burn Feige's office to the ground if he was forced to work hand-in-glove in an environment like Marvel Studios.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 7:59 AM
@Spock0Clock - I actually disagree a bit in those 3 directors falling off in the 3rd films

With Raimi, I can’t really blame him. There is a lot that worked with Spider-Man 3. I think Sandman even works & ties very well into the theme of forgiveness the film was trying to do

The problem was Venom. Raimi wanted Vulture & based on his originals pitch Vulture would’ve been connected rob Harry. Also Sandman & Vulture would have met in prison & busted out together. When you think about all the stuff people disliked:

Jazz scene
Emo Peter
Venom
Eddie Brock
Gwen

That’s all tied to Avi Arad forcing Venom into a script that wasn’t meant for him to be in. In fact, I’d say Raimi suffered way more studio interference than Snyder ever did.

With Nolan, he was just done. I think DKR is still a fine & good film. Not as good as the first 2 films but you could tell he did the film solely to end the series

With Lucas, he was going through a divorce & stress but I still really love Jedi. There are issues but in my opinion it was one of the greatest final acts ever to a trilogy mostly because of the emotional strength of Emperor & Vader vs Luke. I do also think because of the epic ness & special effect of the space battle which still hasn’t been matched

I don’t think they are at all bad films. Just ok/good films that could’ve been better

I still don’t think you need to plan your trilogy or series out. In fact, I kind of don’t like knowing where a film will go. Not at all hating on the MCU but we all knew Thanos was the endgame since 2012. I’m fine with teasing an audience like that but I just look at how DKR had Bane & nobody expected Nolan to choose Bane as the main villain. I like that shock (and I do think Bane works as a role similar to the mutant leader in TDKReturns as being a physical opponent to an older Batman).

Get what I sort of mean. Like I don’t want to bring up the new Star Wars trilogy but you always hear people say Disney has no idea where they want to go despite JJ saying before TLJ that he wished he was directing TLJ just because he loved the script that much. People think Disney has no plan when JJ clearly does & has for a while

I think it’s more an effect of the MCU (not blaming them) where nowadays audiences demand to know about where future films are going and not focused on the film right now & studios do this & plan an entire universe before releasing a single movie

That’s just my opinion. I don’t mind the MCU but I don’t think we need to judge every film franchise but using the MCU as a benchmark where there is more than 1 way to plan a franchise.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 9/26/2018, 8:09 AM
@LEVITIKUZ - Avi Arad is the worst.

But when someone says "Do Venom" and your response is to throw a hissy-fit on screen because you were so dedicated to some dumb amnesia bullshit story...

....You know what... it's probably best we just not talk about Sam Raimi anymore because I'm just going to say some really unkind things about people who keep defending him.

LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 8:09 AM
I mean look at the reboot Planet of the Apes series

Is there hints towards future films leading to a complete Planet of the Apes reboot? Yes there is. However these films don’t feel as planned out as say the MCU films. No offense to marvel but again it’s like we don’t know what will happen in every Apes film & they’ve all been great & well executed
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 8:15 AM
@Spock0Clock - There’s a complete difference to just “Do Venom”. Raimi has a script completed, concept art completed, suits being worked on for Vulture along with Sir Ben Kingsley verbally agreeing to play Vulture

Then you have Avi come in like “I want Venom because kids love Venom & Venom toys sell so do Venom or you are fired”

I mean who wouldn’t be angry at that?

Then when Raimi was trying to write Spider-Man 4, he had a script with Black Cat but Sony said no because she’s to similar to Catwoman so he has to change the script to involve a female Vulture character to replace Black Cat

Then Sony said they want him shooting ASAP but Raimi wanted more time on the script to make sure the film is great to make up for Spider-Man 3.

I mean how can you be upset at Raimi especially after he’s created 2 great films that made the studio a boatload of money & an Oscar? I’d say he’s allowed some creative control at this point
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 9/26/2018, 8:23 AM
@LEVITIKUZ - "It's not _____'s fault, the studio didn't give him the complete control his genius obviously required!"

Fill in the blank with Raimi, Snyder, or really anyone else, but it's all the same personality-cult bullshit.

LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 8:38 AM
@Spock0Clock - Except theres a major between Snyder & Raimi

Regardless of Bvs & JL; Snyder got complete creative control on his films. Even JL would’ve ended the same way with Snyder as he was there when they filmed Superman’s final scene

With Raimi, we had someone being forced to cut a character & rewrite a script halfway through pre production to add a new character into a script not meant for that character

I’m not at all saying Raimi would’ve been a genius since I never saw his original Spider-Man 3 script but I do know that there’s no way to defend someone like Avi Arad to interfere with your film for the sole purpose of putting a character into your film to sell toys

Like you are missing my entire point Spock & your bias against Raimi is clouding your judgment here

Like you say producers plan. Raimi was trying to plan Spider-Man 4 before going into production to make up for Spider-Man 3. We then had Sony reject his ideas & then tell him to go into production ASAP when he didn’t feel like the script has been polished enough

I mean, how can you sort of be against what Raimi was trying to do & compare them to Snyder? Im not saying “Sony hindering Raimi’s genius”. I’m saying “hey, adding a character who isn’t in the script halfway in pre production after forming concept art, suits, & casting the character you need to cut isn’t a good idea. Also forcing a halfass script into production when the director wants to spend a bit more time perfecting it so it doesn’t turn out like the last film isn’t a good idea”

You are smarter than this & your Raimi bias is clouding your judgment. You know Snyder & Raimi are 2 different situations but you treat it as the same
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 9/26/2018, 9:46 AM
@LEVITIKUZ - Snyder and Raimi are different situations, but the impulse and mode of their defenses by defenders are the same. The director takes his frustrations out by lashing out and that hurts the experience for the audience, and then people in the audience defend him for it. That's the cult I'm talking about.

If a chef spits into my soup, it doesn't matter to me if he was only forced to put that soup of the day on his menu because the manager is a dick who told him to. He's the one who fouled it up, and he did so out of spite. Period.

As for Raimi's other Spider-Man films, they're okay, but far from great. They're painfully derivative of Donner's Superman in tone and approach. It reduces the traditional supporting cast into either flat maudlin simps or the chattering muppet harlequinade that was the Daily Bugle. I get that some people liked the first two, fine. They were marginally better than the other third-party Marvel films of the era, but "great" is ridiculous.

And you have to be drinking the Raimi cult kool-aid to look at Spider-Man 3 and see how the tangential inclusion of Venom was the problem. Remove him and the black suit, what have you got? Soap opera amnesia stories when people get bonked on the head like Fred Flintstone? An insulting retcon about Ben's murder? Omelettes?

Spider-Man 3 is terrible for all the reasons that people refuse to admit that Spider-Man 2 is overrated.

I don't wanna talk about it anymore, I'm getting worked up, and I don't like getting worked up...
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 9/26/2018, 9:49 AM
@LEVITIKUZ

TDKR is great. Not as good as BB or TDK but it wraps the trilogy up in a satisfying manner.

And seeing it in IMAX was incredible.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 9/26/2018, 11:21 AM
@Spock0Clock - so let me ask you, why was it ok for Feige to clash with Perlmutter?

Feige is the chef of the MCU & Perlmutter was his manger & Feige forced Disney to get him out of the movies

All of what you said could be relayed to Phase 2 of the MCU & how films like IM3, Thor the Dark World, AOU, & Ant-Man turned out
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 9/26/2018, 6:44 AM
Atomicockroach
Atomicockroach - 9/27/2018, 12:27 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Lol, its like Ben is in denial here. Like a peek inside his brain, seeing him rationalizing his previous Daredevil fail and his even bigger Batman fail in the future. I remember finding this scene funny at the time, but now it's just sad. Its a damn shame what he did to his life. Hope he gets himself together someday. Sure Ben, it's not you, it's the internet's fault.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 9/27/2018, 2:25 AM
@Atomicockroach - It's just a movie, dude.

And Affleck has become a very successful director and has any number of acting projects coming up and under his belt. So, I don't think it's a damn shame what he did to his life, especially just because a host of people didn't like him as Batman.
Atomicockroach
Atomicockroach - 9/27/2018, 8:28 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Your own comment refutes your own logic. Dude's a drunken alcoholic. His wife dumped him because he's such a mess and a cheater to boot. Still has to take him to his therapy or he won't go. But he directed a couple of decent movies a while back, so its all good, right? "It's just a movie, dude." Indeed. Dude's a f*cked up mess. Hope he gets help.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 9/27/2018, 5:59 PM
@Atomicockroach - If a Jay & Silent Bob Strikes Back gif makes you feel sad...come on.

However, of course his life is clearly semi in the weeds and certainly in a large personal downward-spiral. Sad stuff to see. But he'd have been an alcoholic either way regardless of his career choices.

Whether you meant it or not, your initial comment came off as suggesting that his comic book films led to this would-be downfall. Apologies if you didn't mean that or if I offended you. Genuinely. I want no bad blood. I'm an un-proud alcoholic myself, but a Holden McNeil gif was meant to be a goofy joke. I legitimately meant no offense, but god bless, my friend.

Atomicockroach
Atomicockroach - 9/28/2018, 8:56 PM
@MosquitoFarmer - Naw, I'm just kidding around here mostly. I'm not offended and didn't mean to offend you. It's fun to take shots at Affleck because he kinda freaking ruined Batman (for me anyway). I really do hope he gets his sh*t together. I miss the old, good natured, snarky Ben Affleck that we saw in movies like Dogma.
Peace.
KWilly
KWilly - 9/26/2018, 6:45 AM
DC article... Check

Manmarvel
Manmarvel - 9/26/2018, 6:47 AM
I don't agree with the TV/movies being an issue. I think this is where dc does better than marvel. Dc jumped into the movies to catch up and that hurt them but marvel did the same with the TV segment. Dc and marvel have multiverses, dc decided to play that side while marvel TV plays by rules mcu doesnt have to.
Nebula
Nebula - 9/26/2018, 6:47 AM
newmutantsRETURNS
newmutantsRETURNS - 9/26/2018, 6:50 AM
Another "whats wrong wuth the DCEU" article? LMAO

and I see the same fools commenting .. they must have copy and pasted from the last post.

Move on already. .. WB seems to have...
DellRusk
DellRusk - 9/26/2018, 6:51 AM
Sister Sunday rant incoming. Brace yourselves lads!!!!
SisterSunday52
SisterSunday52 - 9/26/2018, 7:10 AM
@DellRusk - Oh, yes. Be prepared. I'm typing it right now.
DellRusk
DellRusk - 9/26/2018, 7:12 AM
@SisterSunday52 -


OH GOD NO!!!!!
IronMandarin
IronMandarin - 9/26/2018, 7:46 AM
@SisterSunday52 - Please don't. There's no need for any of that.

Stop typing, get up from your computer, go make yourself a cup of coffee and relax. There is nothing left that needs to be said about the DCEU that has not already been said. Do not fall for what is clearly a clickbait article. Be smarter than that.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 9/26/2018, 7:50 AM
@IronMandarin - "There is nothing left that needs to be said about the DCEU that has not already been said."

"Shut it down."

Specifically, it needs to be said by Kevin Tsujihara.

GwenLantern
GwenLantern - 9/26/2018, 9:04 AM
@Spock0Clock -
1 2 3 4
View Recorder