Character Portrayals in the New Superman Movie

Character Portrayals in the New Superman Movie

Part 6 of my series in which I share my vision of the Superman franchise. In this article, I give my take on how the characters should be portrayed in the next movie.

Editorial Opinion
By BIGBMH - Apr 18, 2011 07:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Superman

Know that these portrayals are based on the very specific story that I've described in the earlier articles of this series (specifically my case for the origin and conflict articles). However, there's still a decent amount of general stuff that can be applied to whatever story they choose to tell so you don't necessarilly NEED to have read the others. It will just make a lot more sense if you have..

If you haven't read them yet, please click the pictures to check out the two preceding articles in this series.

Case for the Origin




Conflict





Character Portrayals and Story Arcs


So far, we have a Superman movie that would definitely be action-packed and have a pretty good story. However, one of the things that separates great movies from action blockbusters is heart. The audience needs to connect with and relate to the characters or it will feel like something is missing. One of the things that made Christopher Nolan's Batman movies better than what had come before was the fact that there were multiple well developed characters with interesting stories. After leaving this movie, audiences should feel like they have seen these characters in a new way and know them on a deeper level. This section is about some of what the movie makers should think about when they're bringing these character to life. I also have a few casting ideas.

Superman/Clark Kent/Kal-el



"I got called upon to give my all. To have purpose. Like I was finally part of something rather than standing alone on the sidelines. Like I was connected to the world. And man, I want to feel that way again. That means no longer running from who I really am."- Clark Kent, Superman Birthright

There's a lot of pressure on the actor who plays Superman. Christopher Reeve's performance was one of the things that made people love Superman: The Movie. He was so likeable and fully embodied everything people thought Superman should be. It's not much of an exaggeration to say that the reception of the movie rests partly on the ability of this actor to make people like him. Not to mention the fact that he's playing an icon who has been portrayed by several people over the past 70 years.

The way the portrayal of any character turns out depends partly on the writing/direction and partly on the actor. The interesting thing about Superman is that there are so many sides to the character. On the basic level, you have Superman, the hero, and Clark Kent, the mild-mannered reporter. Traditionally, Clark Kent is the disguise and Superman is the real personality, but when you look closer there's more than that. He's also Clark Kent, son of Jonathan and Martha Kent. This is the person he has been his whole life, before the dual identity so it's the most true to who he really is. There's also Kal-el, the son of Jor-el and Lara and the last son of Krypton. Since he has been searching for the truth about where he came from for his entire life and he has found out that he is the last thing that remains of the entire Kryptonian civilization, he has a desire to embrace this part of his identity. Combining these last two parts of his identity gives you the true personality of Clark Kent. The script needs to provide enough scenes of Clark being himself so the audience truly understands who he is. I feel that previous Superman movies (Superman Returns especially) haven't done very much of that.

When he's at the Daily Planet, he's playing the role of mild-mannered Clark Kent. I want it to be convincing that people would not figure out that Clark and Superman are the same person, so the actor should play them as two completely different characters. As much as I love Christopher Reeve's performance as Superman, I feel like he played Clark as Superman pretending to be Clark. It was slightly over the top. I want the actor to play Clark as if that's who the character really is. He's a very boring guy that you would just kind of ignore. He slouches, he wears clothes that are slightly too big, and he speaks softly. The point of the Clark Kent identity is to keep a low profile so he doesn't get noticed. To emphasize how much people don't notice him there could be a scene with some of the workers of the Daily Planet talking about "Lois and uhh... what's that guy's name again?" There can still be hints of him being wimpy, nerdy, and clumsy but it should be subtle and believable.

When he's out saving people as Superman, he's much closer to his real personality, but he's not fully himself. Every person acts differently according to the situation they're in. A person is one way on the job, but slightly different when they're among friends and family. Being Superman in public is kind of like a job for Clark. This movie is about him seeking acceptance when the concept of someone with super powers is new to the world. He would carry himself a bit more formally and professionally because his early days as Superman are almost like a job interview. He's not trying to fake something, but he's trying to present the best of himself to the world. He has very good posture and his voice is stronger and deeper than Clark's. When Clark meets Lois as Superman, he feels that he can trust her so he lets his guard down a bit and shows her more of his relaxed, true self. Another way to do this is by having more scenes with his parents. These scenes, in which the audience gets a feel for who Superman really is, are crucial to having them connect to the character. A problem people have with Superman is that they feel they can't relate to him. The movie needs to make Superman feel like a real person.

In the early scenes, before he creates the dual identity, he's being himself, but he's more unsure of who he is and where he came from. I don't want him to start off weak and self-doubting, but he shouldn't be exactly at the place where he's the Superman we know and love until the end. As he becomes more comfortable in his new role, he becomes more sure of himself and his confidence grows. As for the personality of Superman, the actor must be able to convey his strength and toughness, but also make him feel kind, warm, and caring. He's should seem like a person that you would really want to know and be around in real life.

When casting Superman, I would probably go for an actor in his late 20s to early 30s. He can't be too young because Superman feels like a mature character. In my opinion, traditional Superman seems to be in about his mid-30s, so since this is the beginning he needs to be younger to capture a bit of how he comes to be the character audiences are used to. He also can't be too old. Like I said before, this is the beginning. Also for practical purposes, if you want a franchise, you have to cast young so the actor doesn't seem too old by the end. I've seen suggestions for actors like Jon Hamm to play Superman. He's 39, so he's already pushing it to the upper limits for how old Superman should be. To cast him in what would hopefully be a franchise doesn't make sense. Before the casting of Henry Cavill, I was really leaning toward Matt Bomer for Superman. He's 32, but he looks pretty young. I'm haven't seen him in much, so I'm unsure about his acting ability, but he definitely had the look I'm going for. After I started liking him for the part of Superman, I found out that he's even played Superman in a few car commercials. I also saw quite a few fans who were with me on this one.






While I would have liked to see Brandon Routh get another chance, I'm afraid I have to say no to a Routh-boot. It's a new story and a new Superman so it really just doesn't make sense to have an actor from an unconnected story. Plus, if you bring back Routh, would that mean bringing back everyone else? If not, then having one actor reprise his role, playing a different version of the same character while surrounded by a new cast playing different versions of their characters is just weird. Sorry, Routh. Blame Singer for not making a Superman movie that would have gotten a sequel.

In the end, Henry Cavill was chosen to play Superman. I really don't know much about him so I can't say if he's a good choice or not. Cavill is currently 27, so he's definitely young like I wanted the character to be. However, he has a mature face and doesn't look too young so I think he's a perfect fit age-wise. Some of Cavill's credits include The Count of Monte Cristo, Stardust, and The Tudors. It's still early, but I've got a good feeling about him.



Lex Luthor



"I'm the only sane inmate of asylum Earth. I'm not eager to hand tomorrow over to an interplanetary extremist with laser eyes. There's only room on this world for one leader, Superman. When I'm finished with you, every last gibbon out there will know you for the menace you are and they'll realize that Lex Luthor is their savior."- Lex Luthor, Superman Birthright

Most of what I have for Lex's story arc is already included in the conflict section so I won't repeat much of that. I think the best point of reference for the actor playing Lex is Clancy Brown's portrayal from STAS. (Michael Rosenbaum's Lex from Smallville is also a pretty good take on the character, but most of what the show focused on was before Lex was actually a villain)The version of Lex I want to see is the powerful businessman/ genius scientist. Lex is Superman's arch nemesis, so he has to seem like a formidable opponent. Lex's greatest strengths are his mind and his unlimited resources so he has to be incredibly intelligent but with a definite slyness. Most of the time he has an air of arrogance because he feels like he's in control. He does what he wants without anyone really challenging him. He controls a lot of Metropolis, including a good portion of the press, so he's able to control how he's perceived by the public.

When Superman shows up, people are suddenly interested in someone else. Lex isn't nearly as interesting to write about as some guy who can fly. To make things worse, Superman doesn't want to tolerate Lex's behavior. He dares to stand up to the most powerful man in the city. He's someone that Lex can't buy off or control so it angers Lex. Throughout the movie, Lex tries to hold on to his calm, smooth demeanor, but you see him slip at times. When Superman refuses to work with Lex and tells him that he will try to bring him down, you see Lex angry after Superman has left. However, he always has a plan so you can see his slyness and tell that he has something up his sleeve. You only see him truly lose it at the end when his plan has fallen to pieces around him. In the scene where he beats Superman, you get a sense that he's truly a cruel and hateful person. Lex should be in his late 30s to early 40s. I really have no idea who I'd cast for Lex. I know what I'm looking for, but can't think of anyone who fits it exactly. There have to be a few big names in this movie, so Lex would likely be one of them. My difficulty casting Lex is partly due to the fact that you have to look at an actor, then imagine him bald to get Lex.

Lois Lane



"Lois, everything you've written since you've been here may be full of passion and misspelled words, but they all tear something down. Sometimes those things deserve it sometimes they don't. Sometimes, believe it or not, something that looks good is actually that- good."- Perry White, Superman: Secret Origin

Lois Lane, like the two other major characters in the movie, is more than meets the eye. There are two major sides to Lois. First, there's the tough side of her that comes to mind first when anyone thinks of the character. She's very driven, and wants to prove herself as a reporter. Even with her focus on her career, she has a good sense of integrity. In her job, she sees a lot of the negativity in the world, so she's grown to be a very guarded and distrusting person.

Lois tends to see Clark as an annoyance. She doesn't treat him well so both Clark and the audience perceive her personality as abrasive near the beginning. She doesn't buy into the lies that Lex Luthor has put out to fool the world into believing he's a good person. Lois has a strong desire to figure out the truth and wants to expose Lex as the evil person she knows he is. When Superman arrives, she has a natural interest in him as a story, but isn't as quick to jump on the Superman popularity bandwagon as some people. When she goes to interview Superman, she fully expects to drill him like she would anyone else and prove that this guy really is too good to be true. This is different than things have been in the past, but I think it really makes sense. In Superman: The Movie and many other versions, Lois seems to fall for him right after he saves her and has shown what he can do. Having her be so taken with him so soon makes it seem more like she's attracted to him more for what he can do than the good person he is. She has about as much reason to be attracted to him at this point as anyone who has seen him on T.V.

This brings me to the other side of Lois. When Lois actually meets Superman, she is taken aback when she realizes that he's such a genuinely good person who wants to help other people. She begins to let her guard down and show Clark who she really is, and as they get to know each other Clark sees that the rude Lois Lane he thought he knew is about as much of a disguise as the Clark Kent she knows. Deep down, Lois is a very caring person. They both feel a connection and because Clark is comfortable around her, he is able to be himself. Superman renews Lois's belief that there is good in the world and helps her to find more of a balance between her tough side and her inner kindness. When she reaches this point, she's still a very strong character, but she comes off as less of a b!+(#. Lois should have attitude and spunk, but still be likable. Her feelings for Superman grow from the time she meets him, so when Lex begins his scheme to make people think that Superman can't be trusted, she doesn't believe it. This kind of shows that she has come a long way over the course of the movie. She starts off looking for the bad in everything, but now she has come to the point where she wants to believe in good. Lois doesn't abandon Superman and cares enough to risk her life to save him.

When casting Lois, I'd look for someone who went well with whoever was cast as Superman, so it would be someone in her late 20s or early 30s. My ideal choice for Lois would have been Rachel McAdams.



However, Amy Adams was chosen. Although, I've got nothing against her, I'm still not quite sure if she's the perfect choice for Lois, but she is an accomplished and well-respected actress. Some of her credits include Enchanted and The Fighter. Fun Fact: Amy Adams appeared on Smallville back in 2001 for the season 1 episode "Craving."




Jimmy Olsen



"My parents lived above a newsstand. Every morning I'd sneak down and buy a copy of the Daily Planet. I'd cut out every picture in it. I had scrapbook after scrapbook of all these interesting places. I made a picture in my head of Metropolis, but like most of my photographs, it was out of focus."- Jimmy Olsen, Superman: Secret Origin

I don't have much to say about how they should do Jimmy in the movie, other than that I just want to see more of him. Give him more of a back story and show more of why he wants to be a photographer. In Superman Secret Origins, Jimmy revealed to Superman that his parents didn't believe that he could make it in Metropolis. This was a really interesting idea because it sets up a motivation for Jimmy and shows that he has a desire to prove himself and become someone great. Most of the scenes with Jimmy would probably be with Clark and Lois. Jimmy feels like he can talk to Clark because since Clark is the new guy and Jimmy is the "kid," they both are in a similar position of trying to gain respect. In this movie he should meet Superman and probably be one of his biggest supporters, but I'm not sure how much Jimmy/Superman interaction would fit into the story. The scene I mentioned from Secret Origins with their conversation would probably be a good main scene with them for the movie. They're on the roof and Jimmy feels depressed because of the thing with his parents, so Superman offers him some words of encouragement and allows Jimmy to take the first good picture of him. It's pretty amusing because Superman is standing regularly and Jimmy tells him that the picture feels like something is missing. He then asks Superman to put his hands on his hips (in the iconic Superman pose) and Superman makes a remark about how it feels strange but complies. The scene works on several levels: giving Jimmy more depth and more of a story, establishing their friendship, whatever Superman tells Jimmy can serve to show him as an inspirational figure/nice guy, and has the humor of the pose being a nod to the whole Superman history.

Casting Jimmy, I would go for someone in their early to mid 20s. They can be a little bit older as long as they look young enough. I don't think I've ever seen a live-action Jimmy Olsen I haven't liked. My top choice for Jimmy in this movie is Anton Yelchin. He's another one who has a lot of fan support behind him for this role, and for good reason. Something about this guy just screams Jimmy Olsen!



Jor-el

"Be brave, my son. Remember who you are and the legacy you carry inside you."- Jor-el, Superman The Animated Series



I talked a lot about Jor-el earlier, so I won't restate too much. He's much more emotional than versions of Jor-el we've seen in the past. He knows that his world is ending but no one will believe him. The feeling of powerlessness is torture for him so you see him in a frustrated, almost a panicked state. Later in the movie, when Clark sees his message, you can see the sadness in him and you realize the pain he feels in knowing that he will not be able to be there for his son and see him grow up. Like I said before, my version of Jor-el would be younger than many of the previous versions and take inspiration from the animated series Jor-el. My top choice for Jor-el is Matthew Fox. Fox's role as Dr. Jack Shepherd shows him in kind of a heroic leadership position, which works for what I have in mind for Jor-el. He also bears a good enough resemblance to STAS Jor-el and looks passable as Henry Cavil's father.



Thanks for reading! Please check out the video version of this article here! As usual, it's a little more flashy than the article and it's a nice alternative for people who don't feel like reading everything. If you enjoyed this article, please help me out by pushing the like button! Even if you completely disagree, comment anyway and tell me your ideas for how things should go! I'm always up for a civilized debate.



DISCUSSION: Which Movie Has The Best Superhero Costumes — SUPERMAN or THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS?
Related:

DISCUSSION: Which Movie Has The Best Superhero Costumes — SUPERMAN or THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS?

SUPERMAN: Jimmy Olsen Actor Skyler Gisondo On The Casting Process And Bonding With David Corenswet
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: Jimmy Olsen Actor Skyler Gisondo On The Casting Process And Bonding With David Corenswet

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 4/18/2011, 7:40 PM
Thanks for reading earzmundo! To me, Birthright flows like a movie much moreso than Secret Origin. Geoff Johns is a good writer, but Secret Origini felt uninspired to me, like he was just taking a little bit here and there from past origin stories instead of really thinking about who the characters were and taking them on a journey. The climax was pretty weak, the whole Superboy story doesn't apply to movies (it just works better if he was never Superboy in movies), Lex wasn't very interesting. My two favorite things about Secret Origin were the Jimmy story and the idea of Superman inspiring good in people (though the execution was a bit heavy handed). Not that Birthright doesn't have it's flaws too. The aura vision and the radio signal vision were kind of unnecessary additions. However, I think the reason why I love Birthright so much is that it manages to make the story of Superman's origin into a great story of a man finding his place in the world moreso than any other version I've ever read or seen. (Smallville doesn't count)
golden123
golden123 - 4/18/2011, 8:46 PM
Great read!
The film can only be so good without great characterization. I mean the biggest complaints the X-Men and Spider-Man films have is poor characterization. I've always loved Superman's humungo supporting cast but if they're not portrayed as who they really are on screen then whats the point of having them.
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 4/18/2011, 9:14 PM
Thanks golden123! He does have a pretty big supporting cast, doesn't he? I know there are a lot more characters that should be included in the movie, but since these were the ones I had clear ideas about how to flesh out and some of the most significan to the story, they're the ones I focused on.
Name
Name - 4/19/2011, 4:23 AM
Just read earth 1 and have to say if they use aspects of that such as clark searching for his role in metropolis finding many jobs, the costume, the hair not being a product of a ridiculous amount of gel just him flying fast or whatever then this film should be good. Haven't read birthright yet but i have it. I believ lex luther should be in the film and be portrayed similar to how is in All star superman. Perfect interpretatin in my eyes. Genuis level intellect, arrogant as f*** and is a serious threat to superman not someone interested in real estate. I like your choice for jimmy and i would give him the signal watch he has in the comics because if there was a franchise that needed to go back to its roots it would be this.
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 4/19/2011, 5:30 AM
Thanks for reading Name!
LP4
LP4 - 4/19/2011, 10:36 AM
With Lex they just need to ditch the damn goofy real-estate scams. And they need to make Lex a bigger threat. Not one film has he ever made me cringe. He had goofy, lame plots...he surrounded himself with total idiots just to make himself feel superior (comparing yourself to an idiot doesn't make you smart, just petty) i mean Otis was fat and had the mind of a 12 year old. Tessmacher was a dumb broad mole and Lex himself...was just way too goofy. I want this new Lex to be serious and dark.

As for heart? Look I'm all for a damn good story BUT EVERY GODDAMN SUPERMAN FILM has been all-heart.

I am seriously fed up with all the mooshy-gooshy crap with Superman. Drop the heart and allow him to finally fight someone.

FU*K heart, I'm sorry but we're already 6 Superman films in and the studio JUST BARELY realized they need to have Superman fight a person. That is pathetic.

No more moosh. I want BALLS TO THE FU*KING WALL ACTION in this movie. I don't want to fall asleep during this film just like I did when i first saw "Superman Returns" in theaters with my dad. Another thing they need to seriously update in Superman films is just how cosmic he is. He was raised on earth but he is STILL an ALIEN. None of the films went too in-depth into cosmic stuff. I want this movie to go in a much more cosmic route.

Have Superman fight Zod in space or something cool for a change. DO SOMETHING at least, I mean fu*k is it really too much to ask for? Fu*k this damn franchise is on serious life-support. They NEED to do something new with the guy for a change. DROP reeve, DROP donner, DROP love-dovey BULLSHIT and bring Superman back to being what he was initially meant to be- A GODDAMN SUPERHERO. This film needs to compete with all the other MODERN DAY superhero films coming out.

Again- LIGHTEN UP ON THE HEART ASPECT. Sick of it. Sick of him pining after Lois in every god damn film, sick of him constantly avoiding any real actual fights or confrontations. That is the DONNER and SINGER universe for Superman and it is GONE people, fu*king GONE finally! I mean obviously there must be SOME heart because he is Superman. But sacrificing 'action' in favor of 'heart' in every Superman film is ridiculous and it alienates an entire movie going crowd. This film has the potential to stand above the rest as it SHOULD.

This is a NEW Superman film for a NEW era.

I personally can't wait to see how great this film will be- A GODDAMN LANDMARK FOR SUPERMAN FINALLY.
LP4
LP4 - 4/19/2011, 10:50 AM
To those I've offended with my comment, I apologize but i mean fu*k i said it all from the heart. Some things need to be said.

@BIGBMH- My comment was in no way an attack on you, sorry if it came off that way. Sometimes I just need to fuse out about these things. A lot of things about the Superman films have been really bugging me big time. And I just need to fuse it out here.
TheLight
TheLight - 4/19/2011, 10:54 AM
@BIGBMH - You made some good points on the "cleansing" of these iconic characters. Lex should at least be in his 30s if he's going to go toe to toe with Big Blue, Jimmy should have a little more screen time with his RED HAIR! They never get Jimmy right. Lois was always the tough as nails reporter and Clark should see her as a annoyance as well as attractive. As for Clark, his Metropolis persona should as least be a little closer to the "Lois and Clark" identity. The mild mannered routine is today's everyday man now. He doesn't have to show everything, just that he's " that guy at the office party".
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 4/19/2011, 11:52 AM
@LP4, Thanks for reading! I don't think you quite understood what I meant by "heart." When I say heart, I don't mean mushy. IMO, TDK had a lot of heart. It wasn't sappy, but the characters felt like real people with real motivations. I use it in contrast to action blockbusters like Transformers where you're not that engaged, partially due to the lack of depth in the characters and emotion in the story. Superman can be in a rage, and throwing down as long and it's still heart to me if the audience can relate to that anger. Check out my conflict article! I definitely want to see action too!

@TheLight, Thanks! I love Dean Cain's Superman. He was really the first version of the character I knew, but to me, I think his Clark was a little bit too cool. There wasn't very much separation between his Clark and Superman. Same voice, same manner of speech, etc. It's hard enough to make people believe that the glasses disguise would work, but without a very clear separation between the way Clark and Superman act, it'll seem completely infeasible.
rocdmike
rocdmike - 4/19/2011, 12:41 PM
A good read MH, we are certainly on the same page in terms of casting particularly Clark and Lex. Like I said before, I'd love to see Clark's understanding of his history and powers develop during the next film. It'll greatly help with something the last film failed at doing; having the audience relate to Clark as person.
Part of the reason Spiderman is so successful is the amount of regular crap he has to cope with in addition to being a superhero. It may be helpful to show Clark functioning like a normal person outside of the Daily Planet and outside the still developing 'personality' that will be Superman.
It sounds like the new film is taking this direction, so that's a good sign for the franchise. (http://www.tgdaily.com/entertainment/55448-superman-man-of-steel-will-tie-into-the-comics-more-than-expected)

I also agree with earzmundo, Lex should be a growing threat over the course of a trilogy, not the first main villain. If your plot line theories on the character were combined with excellent casting and proper modernization of his technological prowess, there is no reason the the next big screen version of Lex Luthor couldn't be the greatest interpretation of the character ever.

Ps: Btw, I just read this interview with Bryan Singer, thought you might appreciate it. Turns out he and I are in agreement about why the last movie failed to connect with audiences. To sum it up: too nostalgic.

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/usmovies.thehollywoodreporter.com/bryan-singer-why-superman-returns-didnt-work
rocdmike
rocdmike - 4/19/2011, 12:51 PM
ps: LOVE the idea of casting Aton Yelchin as Jimmy. Perfect.
golden123
golden123 - 4/19/2011, 1:32 PM
@Name: You do know that Earth One and All-Star Superman are elseworld tales? Right? Personall I think this Superman reboot should follow the DC universe version of Supes. There's more source material there and people are more familiar with it since it's been around longer.
LP4
LP4 - 4/19/2011, 4:40 PM
@BIGBMH- Ohhhh ok sorry I get what you mean then. Yeah TDK did have heart with every scene. Transformers are very flat and just a bunch of explosions. I totally get what you mean. Sorry again dude for the misunderstanding.
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 4/19/2011, 4:53 PM
@rocdmike, Thanks for reading! Since it looks like we're getting Zod this time, it's unlikely Lex will be the main villain so it looks like the appropriate thing to do now is have him as a growing threat like you and earzmundo suggest.
@LP4, No problem. You're just saying what you feel. Seems like we're pretty much on the same page in terms of tone.
LP4
LP4 - 4/19/2011, 11:36 PM
@BIGBMH- Yeah dude, Transformers is just all explosions...very shallow. But yeah I totally get what you're saying and it makes sense. Hopefully MOS won't turn into simply a Transformers-blow-em-up no heart type of film.

Superman NEEDS to have sympathetic/relatable reasons for WHY he donned the cape and why he is doing what he's doing. I think Snyder said after seeing the movie, we'll understand why he chose to become Superman and said that we'd relate to it in the sense that "yeah I'd be Superman in THAT situation too"

So hopefully the tone you mentioned will be in the film.
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 4/21/2011, 8:05 PM
@LP4, yes, Superman needs to have sympathetic/relatable reasons for doing what he does, but he actually needs to DO something. Heart has its place but Superman premiered in ACTION comics....soooooo......
View Recorder