Kryptonian Underwear are MEANT TO BE WORN on the OUTSIDE!

Kryptonian Underwear are MEANT TO BE WORN on the OUTSIDE!

Why is that you say? Try it, try it, and like it you just may. This article is for those of you that feel that Superman's Iconic look has come under siege. Threatened by the plague of "everyone else is doing it, so why shouldn't he?".

Editorial Opinion
By naterator - Aug 05, 2011 11:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman

Why am I writing this article? Why am I calling your attention out to something as silly as underwear? But not just to anyone's underwear...this happens to concern the preservation of this iconic figures individual look from the rest of them.

Just yesterday when we signed on to CBM.COM we were pleasantly surprised to see what we had all been waiting for regarding anything SUPERMAN. We saw A FIRST LOOK OF HENRY CAVILL AS THE NEW MAN OF STEEL.



As we continued to look at it and look at it and even look at it three or four more times we asked questions one to another about several things. Where's the S curl? Why does he have a rubber suit on? Is the Shield on the cape? Why is he robbing a bank? etc. Yet, nobody really asked "where are the red underoos?" and I think it's because when it was announced that there was a first image of the new suit, it was altogether assumed that the red underpants were NOT THERE simply because they could not be seen at first glance.

However, this article is for those of you that feel that Superman's Iconic look has come under siege. Threatened by the plague of "everyone else is doing it, so why shouldn't he?". So I'm here to show you why I believe that the RED UNDERroos have not gone astray but may still be here to stay. Here is my proof after brightening the picture almost to its max and I found that there is a difference in color (red) between that of his leg and crotch area.



Why yes, it does looks like they are staying true to the look while modernizing the suit on other ways (the suits material). To me the evidence currently shows that Nolan/Snyder have the red roos in place BUT have purposely made it dark in that area to see what kind of reaction the image will receive once revealed to the public eye.

Does it concern me that this controversial image could in the end reveal that Superman is not wearing his red roos? YES IT DOES, because to me its not a question of whether or not they are currently in place. Evidence to this matter has been seen. My concern is that at this point they could still go either way with the costume design since they are not currently visible in the lighting that was provided.

My hope is that when he comes out of that vault and stands straight up to prepare for take off that the image we see is in the likeness of what we see in the following image.



Everyone here at CBM is great and I for one really enjoy doing articles that present real concerns that exist in the CBM community... and while none of these things that are argued about are things that would change our lives for the better or for the worse....they certainly are regarding topics that help us escape reality if not but for a small moment. Thanks for reading and please take the poll at the bottom of the page.




Naterator out!
We May Know Who The First Big Threat To The DCU Is Already And How They Play Into SUPERMAN
Related:

We May Know Who The First Big Threat To The DCU Is Already And How They Play Into SUPERMAN

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Responds To Rumor He Fired VFX Team And Reveals Hidden Cameo In Trailer
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Responds To Rumor He Fired VFX Team And Reveals Hidden Cameo In Trailer

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
KALel3412
KALel3412 - 8/5/2011, 12:30 PM
your not cool unless you wear your underwear outside your pants!
naterator
naterator - 8/5/2011, 12:39 PM
@kalel3412...hellz ya!

@teabag...i hear ya...its much more interesting that way. ;P
naterator
naterator - 8/5/2011, 1:06 PM
@thegdsuperguy.....why would you have to put undies on ZOD? he didnt have them in Superman2.
LP4
LP4 - 8/5/2011, 1:07 PM
@GDSUPERGUY- Actually what i like about Henry's Super-suit is the fact that is it subtly...sort of like armor but yet it's not at the same time. That scaly material look like chain-mail if I'm not mistaken.

He doesn't need armor obviously...but it just adds to the appearance of Supes in this movie actually looking like more of a badass for a change, while still retaining the basics and staying true to the classic.

As for the underpants I don't care either way. We've had 5 movies with him in underpants. If they ditch it this time around, I won't miss it.
LP4
LP4 - 8/5/2011, 1:08 PM
@naterator- Yep nor has Zod ever worn underpants in the comics either.

If you put undies on Supes, Zod still won't have to.

I feel neutral on the panties situation.
LP4
LP4 - 8/5/2011, 1:10 PM
I don't think he's wearing the underpants though. I mean...Snyder kept it hidden for a reason. I'm thinking that reason must be that this will be the first time on screen we will see an under-less Superman...so maybe Snyder will reveal that in another picture down the road...

but for now he wants to keep it a mystery.

If his Superman had panties on...there wouldn't have been a reason for Snyder to keep it hidden...if i'm mistaken (which I usually am and i'm betting 99% that i am wrong) then...ok. lol
zhonghua
zhonghua - 8/5/2011, 1:22 PM
I have seen the S curl, if you tried to zoom in the image and do some tweaks with the image, you will see the thin S curl of Henry.. :)
zhonghua
zhonghua - 8/5/2011, 1:22 PM
I have seen the S curl, if you tried to zoom in the image and do some tweaks with the image, you will see the thin S curl of Henry.. :)
TheLight
TheLight - 8/5/2011, 1:25 PM
They are ways to make his trunks added to his costume without it looking "outdated" as everyone keeps complaining about. I, for one, want to see the briefs one last time on screen since he'll be changed anyway this September. Without it, there will be too much blue for the overall body suit. I really want to know where's his S curl? He teased it for 2011 Comic-Con, so why not for the actual Superman pose?
Supes17
Supes17 - 8/5/2011, 1:25 PM
DUH! UNDERWEAR ON THE OUTSIDE IS THE LATEST IN KRYPTONIAN FAASHION! :p
Supes17
Supes17 - 8/5/2011, 1:27 PM
Lol the Advertisement in the Superman Pic says Women's Underwear:p
naterator
naterator - 8/5/2011, 1:34 PM
thanks for your comments guys....

@LP4 yeah i dont know what the whole undies and superman has to do with zod....i do hope that they kkeep it classic tho and i think that its a controversial photo specifically made to see what everyone thinks...because i think that he is wearing them now....just with the lighting they still have a chance to remove them if they feel they want to without anybody really noticing.

@zhonghua....cool stuff man...im glad the S curl seems to be there....yeah i wasnt falling prey to the idea that his hair would be slicked back...that wouldnt be very SUPER IMO.

@XENIX...sorry man,,,,i dont really go to other websites ...i just notice what i see here.

ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 8/5/2011, 1:40 PM
On Krypton, the underwear wear's you!
lastsun
lastsun - 8/5/2011, 2:27 PM
I agree on keeping the costume iconic and classic. It was just a publicity photo(shop) not the actual film. Maybe he will wear them. Maybe you guys are focusing too much on Supes' crotch, tho! haha
AlternateNo4
AlternateNo4 - 8/5/2011, 2:28 PM
@scionstorm lmao either you are as old as i am or you spend way too much time youtubing old comedians.
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 8/5/2011, 3:54 PM
A shot of Vodka for ScionStorm!!
Fortress
Fortress - 8/5/2011, 4:01 PM
Leave the red pants on!!

Thats who supes is! keep it classic!

and his hair needs the s curl and bit more gel! :)
hewilldefytheirgravity
hewilldefytheirgravity - 8/5/2011, 4:26 PM
The red drawerz are gone! LOL! I understand the iconic look and all but its time to go with a slightly different look. The new suit is very cool!
naterator
naterator - 8/5/2011, 4:45 PM
@froggy....no its not...its black and white. Theres classic and then....theres not.
JackDexx
JackDexx - 8/5/2011, 5:12 PM
the suit is far beyond being ruined by underwear.
JackDexx
JackDexx - 8/5/2011, 5:12 PM
it doesn't need help.
yohj529
yohj529 - 8/5/2011, 6:40 PM
I don't know.

I'm one for staying true to the comic book, but this aesthetically does not look good.

I don't even like it when hipster kids think they are taking a cue from European fashion walking in their Speedos. In these modern times, red granny panties aren't becoming on anyone.

My stance is neutral I guess. If he has to wear it, so be it. Just no thongs.


JM4Superman
JM4Superman - 8/5/2011, 7:15 PM
Great Article man
Sosa4693
Sosa4693 - 8/5/2011, 7:23 PM
you take out anything from superman's signature look and he becomes something else, the icon for me dwindles away, this is just like what they're doing with the amazing spiderman
LP4
LP4 - 8/5/2011, 7:59 PM
@naterator- Great article man.

@GDSuperguy- I don't think naterator was implying that all kryptonians wear their underwear on the outside.

@scionstorm- Hahahaha you've become quite the celebrity on this article.

@knighstalker- I'll take a shot ;P
THEDARKKNIGHT1939
THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - 8/5/2011, 8:27 PM
there doesnt have to be an underwear. Their could be red pathces like this:

http://www.supermanhomepage.com/images/dulcetpinereboot.jpg
tomwazhar23
tomwazhar23 - 8/5/2011, 9:09 PM
Superman was the first of his kind. He is the most iconic superhero to ever been created and he deserves the suit he was originally designed with. The history of the underwear on the outside of the pants comes from the way weightlifters and strong men were depicted before Superman was even thought of. Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel realized that if Superman had underwear on the outside of pants, he too would fall under the category of “Strong man” thus portraying him SUPER.
No Shorts = No Super
No Super = No Superman
KEEP THE UNDERWEAR!
ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 8/5/2011, 9:21 PM
Take THAT new Super Man!
ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 8/5/2011, 9:23 PM
Also, the boots of his original costume were only ankle-high. Rage about that injustice now please.
ellispart3
ellispart3 - 8/5/2011, 10:21 PM
I feel like there is too much weight put on the wrong thing with superman. I love superman, but the underwear and spit curl aren't necessary, they are comforting. I can dig his hair being a bit looser, but it's not a deal breaker. if we are getting a bit of a more hard nosed bruiser this time i can let it go. the underwear was always silly to me its not a bad thing that they are going.
and the poll question is biased in its wording, theres no getting around it..so i guess "seep" away.
ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 8/5/2011, 11:16 PM
I always thought it was ridiculous to wear your underwear on the outside. . . unless of course as part of some elaborate head dress. :P
tomwazhar23
tomwazhar23 - 8/6/2011, 3:27 AM
I see some other hidden changes
naterator
naterator - 8/6/2011, 9:48 AM
@tomewazhar23.....good stuff...i also noticed the cuffs and extras....it will be interesting to see what it all looks like....i hope that they keep the briefs tho
naterator
naterator - 8/6/2011, 10:14 AM
@lp4.thanks...i know this is a valid concern in the CBM community.....i just would hate for such a dramatic change. Its a big thing...and im really hopin that this doesnt turn into another stylized movie....
iordanisp
iordanisp - 8/6/2011, 11:35 AM
No underwear


1 2
View Recorder