Nailbiter Reviews MAN OF STEEL: Lots Of Superman Action & Little Character Development

Nailbiter Reviews MAN OF STEEL: Lots Of Superman Action & Little Character Development

Warner Bros. can breathe a huge sigh of relief, Man Of Steel is a huge hit at the box office. But, what did I think? Was it the Superman film I always dreamed of, or was it disappointing?

Review Opinion
By nailbiter111 - Jun 16, 2013 07:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman



I figured this as good of a spot as any to post my own brief review of Man Of Steel. I liked it, but didn't love it. Its big on action, with plenty of WOW moments, but weak on character development.

Most of the blame for that falls upon screenwriter, David Goyer. Most glaringly, three great actors: Christopher Meloni, Laurence Fishburne and Richard Schiff, are left with underutilized and underdeveloped roles. Which is surprising since David Goyer had worked on Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy. For those films there were always plenty of witty dialogue and meaningful scenes for supporting actors, like Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, and Morgan Freeman. Because of that, we ended up caring for Alfred, Gordon, and Lucius Fox, just as much as we did for Christian Bale (Bruce Wayne/Batman).

But, not every character is underdeveloped. I was delighted with Kevin Costner's performance as Pa Kent, and the way the character was laid out over a handful of flashback sequences. Because of that, I felt like I knew who the character was, and had a solid grasp of his relationship to Clark. That made it so much easier to empathize with Clark as he watched his father get swallowed up by a tornado. Leaving quite the lump in my throat.

I loved Henry Cavill as Superman. He was perfect. Amy Adams' portrayal of Lois Lane was spot on. Although, the romantic relationship between the two comes off as forced. Sure, there was some light flirting going on between them, but not nearly enough to warrant the Romeo and Juliet-like kiss at the end.

Visually, the film is stunning. Zack Snyder never disappoints when it comes to visuals. Which is no surprise to anyone that has seen his past offerings, Watchmen and 300. But with Man Of Steel he upped his game. Pretty much every iconic Superman pose that has ever been conceived in comic books is realized on the big screen. The flying scenes are glorious.

How about the action? Some scenes are jaw-droppingly good, while others carry hardly any weight, a byproduct of not being emotionally invested in the characters. The action sequences come at such a frantic pace, reminding me of The Matrix Reloaded at times. I just wished the director had pumped the brakes a bit, instead of keeping his foot on the accelerator.

As for the the climactic battle between General Zod (Michael Shannon) and Superman. It was one of the few times that the film was able to establish a perfect balance between drama and action. A fully satisfying conclusion, that packs an emotional wallop.





In the pantheon of superheroes, Superman is the most recognized and revered character of all time. Clark Kent/Kal-El (Henry Cavill) is a young twenty-something journalist who feels alienated by powers beyond his imagination. Transported years ago to Earth from Krypton, a highly advanced, distant planet, Clark struggles with the ultimate question 'Why am I here?' Shaped by the values of his adoptive parents Martha (Diane Lane) and Jonathan Kent (Kevin Costner), Clark discovers having extraordinary abilities means making difficult decisions. When the world is in dire need of stability, an even greater threat emerges. Clark must become a Man of Steel, to protect the people he loves and shine as the world’s beacon of hope – Superman.



Man Of Steel was directed by Zack Snyder, from a script written by David Goyer. The cast includes: Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Russell Crowe, Ayelet Zurer, Kevin Costner, Diane Lane, Michael Shannon, Antje Traue, Christopher Meloni, Harry Lennix, Laurence Fishburne and Richard Schiff. In theaters June 14th, 2013!
James Gunn Teases SUPERMAN Sequel That's Not SUPERMAN 2; Weighs In On Toxic Fans Following SDCC Threats
Related:

James Gunn Teases SUPERMAN Sequel That's Not SUPERMAN 2; Weighs In On Toxic Fans Following SDCC Threats

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Faces A Steep Decline At The North American Box Office This Weekend
Recommended For You:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Faces A Steep Decline At The North American Box Office This Weekend

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
Ven0m
Ven0m - 6/16/2013, 7:36 AM
You are trying to compare a trilogy vs 1 film. It really wasn't that big a deal that those 3 characters were not developed given this is about Clark Kent and Superman's development which I felt was awesomely done. This was a great movie and probably the best superman movie we have ever had. As for the action. I don't feel there was enough. It didn't get real intense till the end unless you count krypton.
MJPETTY7
MJPETTY7 - 6/16/2013, 7:37 AM
^HA!
tonytony
tonytony - 6/16/2013, 7:38 AM
@blackandyellow lol.
muzillu
muzillu - 6/16/2013, 7:38 AM
i agree wholeheartedly with this review... i would also give MOS a 3.5 star rating
thingrock4
thingrock4 - 6/16/2013, 7:39 AM
I thought this movie had perfect balance for not getting stale s an origin story by KICKIN ASS WITH ACTION!! LOVED IT.
kalelhawj
kalelhawj - 6/16/2013, 7:40 AM
Best CBM orgin ever... I look at it as a trilogy and not an individual film. This movie was all about Superman baby... the Sequel is where we will get a TDK kind of story and character development with Clar/Kal-EL. Just be happy WB finally get what Superman is about and that this leads to more DCU and a world record breaking BO hit team up in World Finest before JL.
Ven0m
Ven0m - 6/16/2013, 7:40 AM
agree ^^
tonytony
tonytony - 6/16/2013, 7:41 AM
Solid 1st movie im sure in sequels we will get more. I would give it 4 out of 5 stars. By no means perfect but hugely entertaining
CavEl
CavEl - 6/16/2013, 7:41 AM
I wouldn't cry if they took Goyer off the pen.
MrReese
MrReese - 6/16/2013, 7:41 AM
Great film
CavEl
CavEl - 6/16/2013, 7:41 AM
Love Cavill though, his glasses wielding Clark Kent was great.
SAZMD
SAZMD - 6/16/2013, 7:41 AM
Totally spot on about the kiss. I actually liked how the relationship played right up to that point. Even afterward it was good, like when she holds him after the Zod resolution. They should have made it an almost kiss that gets interrupted, like they did in Smallville.
CavEl
CavEl - 6/16/2013, 7:42 AM
Can wait to see that version of Clark in the sequel.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/16/2013, 7:43 AM
I would say that the characters you mentioned were really just minor supporting roles, there to fulfill a purpose rather than for us to really get to know them. Gordon, Alfred and Lucious were major supporting characters. But I agree that everyone could have used a bit more screen time for sure..I'd have taken one less punch up over more Kent family any day..Diane Lane wasn't in it enough.
sirchrisdaniels
sirchrisdaniels - 6/16/2013, 7:45 AM
Good review, praise where praise is due. Anybody saying the character development of supporting characters doesn't matter is, well, lets just say I'm glad they don't write. There was awesome action, and some bland action.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 6/16/2013, 7:48 AM
Ok I finally saw it, and I loved it. I agree though that the action was overwhelming and it should've been toned down a but, but besides that this is the perfect movie.

What I don't like is the fans though. You claim the only reason this movie wasnt as great was because of Goyer script. But yet most of you bash Michael Bay for his films. Does Bay write the scripts? No. So according to some of you, Bay is a great director who is just doing what the script tells him. Hypocrisy of the fans...Snyder=Bay.
sirchrisdaniels
sirchrisdaniels - 6/16/2013, 7:48 AM
They can't get rid of Goyer. Goyer is the nerd that's deciding what comics and stories to pull from, while the director and producers put the meat and potatoes on the film. They don't know the mythos like Goyer. He should have more help on the screenplays though like in Dark Knight
Sosa4693
Sosa4693 - 6/16/2013, 7:48 AM
To the critics i say this: it is a SUPERMAN MOVIE. it should be mainly about clark kent/ superman and his journey towards being the world's greatest hero. imo the movie was perfect, no gripes
Brainiac13
Brainiac13 - 6/16/2013, 7:49 AM
Nice review but agree with ROR!
ekrolo2
ekrolo2 - 6/16/2013, 7:49 AM
@KryptonianAbominationClone

Why do you hate him so much? He did a great job on the Nolan Batman movies and a fantastic job with this one. Besides who the hell else is left to write the scripts? Marvel and Disney have pretty much taken everybody.
SAZMD
SAZMD - 6/16/2013, 7:50 AM
Have Goyer do the story, but give the actual screenplay to someone else. That way we get his comic nerdiness without his crappy dialogue and poor transitions.
DRMidNite
DRMidNite - 6/16/2013, 7:50 AM
^What Ror said!
Facade
Facade - 6/16/2013, 7:51 AM
Once fanboys come off their sugar rush, they'll see it's really only a 3 to 3.5 at best.
ekrolo2
ekrolo2 - 6/16/2013, 7:53 AM
@Facade

Because its insane for some one to like the film and think its worth a 4 or 5? Please stop passing of your own opinion on it as fact that everyone needs to follow like the 10 commandments.
Supershadowbat
Supershadowbat - 6/16/2013, 7:53 AM
@Nails, nice review, fair review. While I agree that the three actors you mentioned we're not given the most meaningful dialogue, they were not that essential to the story. I agree Diane Lane should have been utilized a little more, though she was in a pivotal scene. All the main characters were great, Cavill gives Superman a powerful presence which comes off without feeling forced. Thoroughly enjoyed MOS. A great cbm to start the DCCU.
TheDominicanBoy
TheDominicanBoy - 6/16/2013, 7:54 AM
sorry i use google traducto..

criticizes talk about this movie, and the question is, a critic aria a better job writing and directing this movie, because for my part I think is that they Deven shut your mouth, this is the best comic movie has its emotions, the Man of Steel has heart, the story touches every point of the character, I think this movie is 6 star, 6/6 if you did not like the film, then stay silent, and continue watching the movie shit iron man 3
thebeatnut
thebeatnut - 6/16/2013, 7:54 AM
Do you think you could just stop posting bloody reviews on this film? They all say the same thing and it's all a bit samey really. If people thought the film was a 3.5 would they be flocking to see it? No. It just highlights to me how divided public opinion and critics opinions are. Go see the film, enjoy it for what it is, make a cup of bloody tea and get on with your day. (I loved it btw, it was frickin epic).
FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife - 6/16/2013, 7:55 AM
BAD CGI, TOO MUCH CGI, TOO MUCH ACTION, NO STORY.
THIS IS TRANSFORMERS 3!!!
DRMidNite
DRMidNite - 6/16/2013, 7:55 AM
MA Kent! Yowza!


ekrolo2
ekrolo2 - 6/16/2013, 7:56 AM
@thebeatnut

No one is ever universal about any film or anything, for example most people hate Spider-Man 3, I kind of like it, most hate Wolverine Origins, I think its a good film with a lot of problems. I hate Spider-Man 1 while the majority love it, everyone has his/her opinion on something and people will never universally agree on something.
FrederickSmyth
FrederickSmyth - 6/16/2013, 7:56 AM
It's funny that in a 2.5-hour movie, the main complaint is that there wasn't enough of something - in this case, character development. The fact that it left us wanting more is a good thing - there is plenty to expand upon in sequel(s).
TheDominicanBoy
TheDominicanBoy - 6/16/2013, 7:57 AM
mi texto original.

los críticos hablan de esta película, y la pregunta seria, un critico aria un mejor trabajo, escribiendo y dirigiendo esta película, pues por mi parte lo que pienso es que ellos deben callar su boca, esta es la mejor película de cómic, tiene sus emociones, el hombre de acero tiene corazón, la historia toca todos los puntos del personaje, creo que esta película es 6 estrellas, 6/6 si a usted no le gusto la película, pues quédese callado, y siga viendo la mierda de película de iron man 3
ekrolo2
ekrolo2 - 6/16/2013, 7:59 AM
@Netman0007

You're really complaining about a quarter of a scene? Did it really bother you THAT much? I thought it was there to show off some of the wildlife of Krypton. Don't you think you're being a bit nit picky?
sirchrisdaniels
sirchrisdaniels - 6/16/2013, 8:00 AM
I'll agree that what I and many others feel the film lacked isn't that bad because they leave a lot of room to improve upon. Even though I didn't love this one, I'm totally convinced the next one will blow this out of the water.
1 2 3 4 5 6
View Recorder