Smallville: Forgetting 9/11?

Smallville: Forgetting 9/11?

Neal Bailey is an impassioned writer who has written thousands of words of commentary on each episode of Smallville over at the Superman Homepage. To say he has lost faith in the show is an understatement, but "Persuasion," he feels, has rocked the foundation of not only the series, but the Superman character as well.

By EdGross - Feb 23, 2010 05:02 AM EST
Filed Under: Smallville
Source: Supermanhomepage.com

"There is something that strikes me to my core with rage at seeing Superman garbed entirely in black destroying twin towers in what is essentially New York," writes Bailey. "Flaming towers at Superman's hands. There is something terrifically abominable in that. I am utterly, totally aghast. Rocked to my core. I don't think I can watch this show any more. I could spit tacks right now. Does he check for people inside the building? Does he not destroy the mechanisms before the building for a reason? I'm asking what we see, not what we as fans can interpolate. What do we see? What is SHOWN?

"We see an act of terrorism. He doesn't demolish the building. The scene is set so that, just as nine years ago, the mid to upper floors are left in flames. Not an unfamiliar image. I refuse to believe they were not cognizant of what this entails and is loaded with. At the same time my gut tells me that any show that would have SUPERMAN blow up TWIN TOWERS in a city that is the COMIC ANALOGUE OF NEW YORK and then watch as they BURN and FALL without any effort toward saving innocents, and present it as HEROIC? That's not something I want to waste my time on any more. At that point all considerations of character and story go right the hell out the window, don't they? I can't see any turning back from that."

Later he adds, "They have taken our icon, run him raw, and now, they have destroyed him. They put Superman in black and had him blow up buildings, sending news reporters screaming for their lives. What broader social point is served here?"

Creatively, this season Smallville has had a nice bit of reinvigoration, but Bailey has written an excellent, powerful analysis of the episode, and it should be read in its entirety. Just follow the link.

And please share your thoughts on Bailey's point of view below.

SMALLVILLE Star Tom Welling Reveals Alternate Series Finale Ending And Makes Shocking Costume Revelation
Related:

SMALLVILLE Star Tom Welling Reveals Alternate Series Finale Ending And Makes Shocking Costume Revelation

SMALLVILLE Star Tom Welling Reveals What It Will Take To Make Animated Revival A Reality At DC Studios
Recommended For You:

SMALLVILLE Star Tom Welling Reveals What It Will Take To Make Animated Revival A Reality At DC Studios

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
DiLusso
DiLusso - 2/23/2010, 5:07 AM
dude... its not real life. there are many more offensive tv programs around
EdGross
EdGross - 2/23/2010, 5:11 AM
Indeed there are, but his point seems to be that once such imagery becomes a part of popular entertainment, its import is lost.
Jaxim
Jaxim - 2/23/2010, 5:21 AM
I thought the same thing when I saw this episode. The writers should have at least showed Clark using his X-Ray vision to ensure that there were no people in those buildings.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 2/23/2010, 5:25 AM
Well, I havent watched this episode yet because I just cant be bothered to watch the show anymore - the DC cameos were fun to begin with but I just find it boring waiting for something remotely Superman to show its face - them using the same old scene of the cape we saw in season 1 in that "Justice" special was pretty much the last straw for me!

I can understand why some people may be upset or offended by this image in the show though...probably would've been a good idea for the producers to consider that in all honesty!
MatchesMalone
MatchesMalone - 2/23/2010, 5:45 AM
I'm a fan of Smallville and missed this episode as well. Consider that the producers of this show were at odds about releasing it in 2001 because it was so close after 9-11 and they weren't sure if people wanted the escapism. Well, they released it anyway and it became a huge hit because people were actually ready to see a reimagining of the Superman mythos. Because he's Superman. This just seems in really poor taste.
NEXUS
NEXUS - 2/23/2010, 5:55 AM
When i saw it i was shocked, but didnt think of the twin towers. Just thought to my self he's Super Man he cant do that. there had to be another way to stop ZOD. but im not offended nor pissed about the episode, theres no way he would let some one get hurt from it. kneel b4 the blurr
IrvineGray
IrvineGray - 2/23/2010, 6:08 AM
Interesting and an excellent find Ed! This'll definitely cause some ruckus in the community.

I saw the newest episode, the one to which Mr. Bailey refers, and at the time only made the vaguest of connections to 9/11. However, after reading this article and the main link, it seems fairly obvious that he's right. It's true. Superman committed an act of terrorism. And I do actually recall thinking to myself as I watched, that it was surprising to see Superman blow up a building. That did seem very out of character for him.

However, I shall now try to mount a defense FOR Smallville. So. Here goes:

It goes without saying that there have been many changes made to Superman's origins when it comes to 'Smallville'. Smallville has always, *always*, been considered a re-imagining of the character of Superman/Clark Kent and the events surrounding his early years before becomin the Big Blue Boy Scout.

Now does that mean that the creators of Smallville feel that they have free reign with the character and can do with him as they please? Certainly not. The characterisitcs that make Superman are there, in full, and have been for the last 8 seasons. He's still Kryptonian. Still grew up with the Kents. Lex Luthor is STILL, (even after leaving the show), shown to be Clark's main rival. Still had Pete Ross for a best friend, fell in love with Lana Lang, and is deathly weakened when exposed to Kryptonite. And he still stands for Truth, Justice, and the American way. And over the last 8 seasons we've seen Clark do just about everything in his power to keep the peace.

This latest act, the destruction of a twin-tower structure, taken out of context, certainly evokes images of pain and anger that, still, have not fully healed since 9/11/01. Even in-context, (*SPOILER* Clark destroying the towers so as to stop Zod and the Kandorians gaining Clark's powers while leaving Clark himself powerless *SPOILER*), is a bit weak when it's SUPERMAN, (the Big Blue Boy Scout fer chrissake!) doing the destruction. It doesn't feel like something Superman would do. I admit it. Hell, I agree full-heartedly.

But does one image ruin a show? Can one misdeed condemn the life of a man who, otherwise, is considered good and just? Actually, yes, it can. But only if you let it. Let's be honest people. This rant that Mr. Bailey is going on and on about is just one of many we've all heard before; someone hating on 'Smallville' for not following continuity.

Superman would never destroy a building in a blaze of flames like that. I don't deny it. But like I said, since when has 'Smallville' ever even really *tried* to keep continuity when it could simply re-create it itself? Yes, ladies and gentlemen, that's exactly what I'm getting at. The creators of Smallvile knew exactly what they were doing when they had Clark destroy the towers. They knew full well Clark would look like a terrorist. They knew full well that it was a very Un-Supermanly thing to do. But what if that was the point?

What if, and perhaps this *is* a big 'if' to swallow, but what if that's exactly the kind of reaction the creators were looking for? Outrage. Anger. Revulsion. How could Superman blindly destroy a building like that? Such a wonton act of destruction, even with a noble purprose, simply is NOT Supes' style. But we also don't know the ramifications of Clark's actions. The scene its self, when the towers come down, is the LAST scene of the episode. The last image we see is Clark atop an adjacent building to the towers watching its destruction. We don't know WHAT,(granted--if any), ramifications Clark will face in his decision of destroying the towers.

If there is ANY redeeming characteristic of both Superman and 'Smallville' it is the fact that, while Kryptonian, Superman/Clark, at his core, is human. He makes mistakes. He makes misjudgements. And then he deals with the consequences accordingly. If Superman didn't make the occasional misstep, my God, what a boring character he would be! So. I'm going to take this on faith that the creators of 'Smallville' understand that Clark's decision to destroy those towers was not an easy one, was out of character for him, (because it was), and that there will be consequences to his actions.

Like I said. Mr. Bailey isn't *REALLY* arguing anything new here. He's just found a new reason to point out 'Smallville's flaws. And that's fine. Good for him. But it seems to me, and as Ed pointed out, that Mr. Bailey has NEVER been a very large supporter of 'Smallville'. Which then begs the question: why in the f*ck would he watch it if all he's going to do is be upset at what he sees? Is he a masochist? I dunno. Can't say as I've never personally met the guy, but, why anyone would submit themself to, (apparently), such a constant discomfort, as to see their Hero displayed in a way they dislike, is beyond me.

I did not feel any rage when I saw Superman/Clark blow up those towers. I didn't even really see the image of Clark as a terrorist. And perhaps that's because I knew his intentions were good; that, in the end, it was a necessary action for the greater good. But also. I think it just has to do with the fact that *Superman* AND *Terrorist*....just doesn't compute with me. Superman is not, and never has been, in any incarnation (alternate realities/clones/bizzaro/etc. excluded) been a terrorist. Ever. And he never will be in my book.

So, Mr. Bailey, in closing, let me just say that if you let 'Smallville' ruin the image of Superman for you, then that is your prerogative. I, on the otherhand, will not allow an image that lasted all of 5 seconds in a T.V. show that has almost no effect on the actual continuity of the character, be ruined for me. Thank you.
ErikBauer
ErikBauer - 2/23/2010, 6:12 AM
I live in Italy and yet have to see that episode.
I've red the page nonetheless and my opinions are in contrast.
On one side...yes I'm thinking they should not have done this...
On the other side... well this is not the first time Superman blows down entire buildings if not quarters of Metropolis.
Shall we talk Superman Vs Doomsday animated movie where he impacts Doomsday against several buildings and then lands it as a comet in the center of Metropolis?

Shall we talk about Superman Vs Cap.Marvel where the two heroes destroy entire buildings to show who is stronger?

Moreover: Smallivlle is a new take on Superman's origins. With big powers come big responsabilities and Supes does have VERY BIG powers, maybe this episode is intended to make him take notice of what he can do if he does not contain himself, a larger version of Uncle Ben's death if you want. I'm sure Smallville writers are not THAT bad (ok, sometimes they are bad, but not THAT bad) to let Superman grow up as a murderer.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 6:13 AM
The only offensive thing on SMALLVILLE is =

[frick]ing CHLOE!!!!



: P


Still with all the DC cameos, this show is fantastic again and beats SUPERNATURAL which is becoming a bore, still both main cast members need acting lessons lol!


CHLOE NEEDS TO BITE THE BIG ONE..... Like now! : D


LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 6:14 AM
IrvineGray
IrvineGray - 2/23/2010, 6:27 AM
@ Lee: You don't like Chloe? Ha ha, that's funny. I love her! But maybe that's just because I find Allison Mack incredibly cute. That girl is the hottest nerd I've ever seen! =P
SuperPowered
SuperPowered - 2/23/2010, 6:30 AM
IT'S A MAKE BELIEVE TV SHOW BASED ON A COMIC BOOK. As far as Clark killing people for 9 seasons he's preached about not harming people and saving everybody even bad guys. I was happy to see Clark actually take some action on that building. It was a good episode.
Toxin
Toxin - 2/23/2010, 6:37 AM
So does this mean that no one can ever show a building being blown up on a T.V. show with out being chastised? I realize that 9/11 was a horrible act of terrorism and changed not only America, but its people too, it affected many other countries (mine included, Canada). I know the devestation i watched the news reports, saw the bare skys as planes were grounded(which was odd being so close to a major airport),I even had a sobering moment when my friend told us that his trip that got canced was to NYC and he was supposed to be in the WTC at the time of the attack, we all know the after math. However, does this mean that we can never show an buildings ever being blown up again, we show images, jokes in some cases, relating to Concentration Camps, Teniman Square and other horrific events and people don't bat an eye. and need i remind you that ITS SMALLVILLE, they most likely didnt even put 2 and 2 together. Plus lets assume the FAKE TV SHOW is real, I am sure that the building would have been empty due to the fact it was night, also clark could have done any number of thing, run through and not been detected, Chloe could have dont a thormal sweep, or checked security cams. In the plot he had to destroy the tower , and for how long have we been hearing on the show "By any means nessesary". i think people, Mr. Bailey and every other person that gets their panties in a knot over every little thing to do with this show need to realise ITS JUST SMALLVILLE, A FAKE T.V. SHOW, IF YOU DONT LIKE IT AND HAVE NOT LIKED IT FOR YEARS THAN STOP WHINING AND STOP WATCHING!!!
Charged4ever
Charged4ever - 2/23/2010, 6:38 AM
I never thought of this now Oh well it's not real and he did it to save the world so ya
ngu13
ngu13 - 2/23/2010, 6:39 AM
i thought it was a bit much clarke doing a ....9..11
Sigmax
Sigmax - 2/23/2010, 6:54 AM
Watched it last night. The first thing that went through my mind was, did he xray the building to make sure there were not civilians in there? Why not just super speed through the building and take out the machinery? Never crossed my mind that it was 9/11ish. I also wondered, did he speed off the roof top to save any people standing on the ground near the building.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 6:57 AM
TEA @ Heh heh ; D

Hey man, i would be up for CW replacing WELLING!!! ; p

Hey, they did it on the SUPERBOY show! : P


IRVINEGRAY @ I feel for you buddy, i truly do!! : D

DEATH TO [frick]ing CHLOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sigmax
Sigmax - 2/23/2010, 7:07 AM
Lee @ for once I have to agree, I am getting kinda tired of Chloe. But on the flip side, she does serve a purpose in the watchtower, they are trying to make her the Oracle it seems, but yes she can be soooo annoying.
chasingtheflash
chasingtheflash - 2/23/2010, 7:19 AM
i have defended smallville all along, and will continue to do so. maybe that wasn't the best image to show and i must admit that i cheared when he finally took them out. i am slightly ashamed to say that the twin towers never crossed my mind while i watched. i agree that it may have been the wrong way to go with that particular plot however it has not swayed my faith in smallville. i have always enjoyed the show and will continue to do so in the future. and yes, chloe sucks! i wanted her die a few seasons ago. i thought it was coming after the legion told clark that they had never heard of chloe sullivan before.
niknik
niknik - 2/23/2010, 7:22 AM
I don't think the point was that no one can show buildings being blown up, or that they are insensitive to 911. I think the main point (which I happen to strongly agree with) is that this is abhorent behavior for Superman. You can't argue that one. He just blasts away with heat vision and causes thousands of tons of rubble to rain down on screaming innocents while he stands there watching......satisfied. There is no way you can try to argue that with destruction on that scale that no one was injured. No way.

They really blew it! That one act totally goes against everything that the man of steel stands for. Sloppy, SLOPPY writing here. This tells me they no longer have any concept of what that character is SUPPOSED to stand for. They've completely lost their way. You can argue all you want about how this is a different universe from the comic book version, and I get that, but that doesn't excuse Clark being this wantonly destructive with such little regard for innocents. That much of the real Clark Kent still needs to be present in this version. It used to be. Just a few seasons ago the writers would never have him doing something as stupid as this. Can you imagine the response from Johnathan Kent?

No. They have totally lost their way with this character and are now doing more harm to it than good in my opinion. Clark\Superman in ANY universe where he's supposed to be a "HERO" would not blow up a sky scraper in a busy downtown district. Period!

It's just crappy television writers pissing all over Siegal and Shusters graves.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 7:23 AM
chasingtheflash @ I thought that too, pity she didn't lol!

Sigmax @ SUPER MAX all the way!!! ; D

Yeah, your right, shes a poor Oracle, and i wish she'd [frick] off to GILMORE GIRLS where her annoying ass belongs! : P

We don't need her as WATCHTOWER, never did, GREEN ARROW should've been all that!
hawkngo
hawkngo - 2/23/2010, 7:25 AM
lol, this guy saying its the twin towers, they werent even twin towers, they were connected at the middle. one had a sharp point at the top..whatever i thought that was a good episode especially with the tess/bath
RIKSHAWRenegade
RIKSHAWRenegade - 2/23/2010, 7:25 AM
Neal Bailey is reading way too into it and doing nothing more then creating a big stink about nothing. I think he just wants something to complain about so he can get some attention all riding on the 9/11 coat tails. It's a t.v. show and quite enjoyable to many people. I think he just wants it canceled so he can look like some 9/11 hero or some crap. He may be a good writer to some but this in my opinion is just plain rediculus. Lets leave some of our realities out of these ficticious worlds. Thats why we watch these shows! To escape the horrors of are real world for an hour. So we can find hope in watching a hero save the day. Not to relive these horrible things over and over again. That episode had nothing to do with 9/11 and I'm appauled that he would even make such a reference. Save it for the anti-war rallies, Oh yeah, we're still in a fraked up war that should have never started. Oops, now I and everyone else have to be reminded of all that carnage everytime we watch this episode. Thanks a lot D-BAG, I hope your happy with your shotty journalism. Just my opinion. Sorry if I affended anyone, but maybe you needed to be affended. And one more thing Neal(FRAK YOU)!!!!!

A really PISSED OFF, R.R.

P.S. It's a T.V. Show, GET OVER IT!!!!!!
continuezero
continuezero - 2/23/2010, 7:35 AM
Wow someone needs to relax. It's a TV show and I personally loved to see that side of Supes. I could just picture him in a movie destroying the Tower and then the show rewarded us by having him do it in the show. Such a bad ass moment, a movie would have had the budget to make it look deadly but love to see that side of him. Think about it, Smallville went where all the movies didnt have the guts to go. The ZOD character has been so well done and the character arc between him and Clarke is so well done. Love it. Hope they keep doing it. People need to relax cuz it`s just tv...nothing was intended by it...
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 7:44 AM


Vote time, one final time,,, if you havn't voted, vote for CHLOE's fate!!!

: P



The results still ain't too good at this present time!

; D
hawkngo
hawkngo - 2/23/2010, 7:46 AM
@ LEEE777, Dewd I met this chick in prague! She's hot!
SpockJenkins
SpockJenkins - 2/23/2010, 7:49 AM
(Gotta love all the grammatical and spelling errors in this thread; speaks volumes about the educational and developmental level of those who write, including me!)
Its a TV show; show business. Nothing more. All the sentiments reflecting disgust at evoking images of 9-11 are justified but more a commentary on personal hang ups. I did not see any 9-11 reflections in the show until I read this thread. See, no baggage. Generally, people wail and moan over tragedies, not because of the loss of life, but because there is guilt over not having done more beforehand. Neal Bailey's rant bears witness to his own feelings of powerlessness over something like 9-11. If you live long enough, you'll die too :). Be caring, just, and dutiful. Keep a promise when you make one. Tell those whom you love that you do every day. And death won't be so...tragic.
hawkngo
hawkngo - 2/23/2010, 7:53 AM
@ SpockAli- Thrusters on full.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 8:00 AM
hawkngo @ DEATH to CHLOE!!!! ; D
Nemeres
Nemeres - 2/23/2010, 8:02 AM
Can't believe it took him this long. I started hating the show when Lana became a reincarnated witch-type person and fought Clark in "China". Then they introduce Ollie Queen, one of the most carismatic and rebellious heroes in the comics, in the form of an inexpressive model-turned-actor and pair him up with Lois, who will, somehow, after having spent so much time with Clark and memorized his face, not recognize him as Superman when he eventually dons the costume. SUCKS!
DDD
DDD - 2/23/2010, 8:03 AM
Clark can burn those towers right to the ground with his
heat vision and not harm anything around it! He can see
everything happening around the towers cuz he can see
right through everything! He was in total control of the
situation!

If something was gonna fall and hurt someone or another
building he could just disintegrate it before it hit
anything! What's the BFD??? He's superman! He's nearly
a god!

So he destroyed some evil towers that evil Zod built in
the fictitious city of METROPOLIS! It's fantasy folks!
It's fiction mister! Grow up dude! Your rant doesn't hold
water! It has nothing to do with the twin towers and
911 and you know it!!!

Whatever happened to growing up and being in control of
your emotions and knowing the difference between fantasy
and fact! Get over yourself idiot! Your way too personal
about a fantasy comic book show! GET A CLUE YOU IDJIT!!!
DDD
DDD - 2/23/2010, 8:12 AM
I happen to like Chloe, no offense to anyone else!
I think she's a real hot cutie nerd-girl! I say
keep her until the show ends at the end of next year!
Killing her off before the complete end of the show
would serve no purpose!

She's been in there forever and has always been
Clark's sidekick! So what? If they were going to get
rid of her it should've been at the beginning!
hawkngo
hawkngo - 2/23/2010, 8:18 AM
Hey look it's Catwoman! I bet she can meow! She can pur me any day!

airbeyonder18
airbeyonder18 - 2/23/2010, 8:19 AM
@LEEE777: I agree, by the way Dr. Fate said in the Smallville movie that Chloe "Had the same 'Fate' as him." Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Sigmax
Sigmax - 2/23/2010, 8:21 AM
While I am not fond of Chloe, if we kill her off, then who becomes the intel in the watchtower? Ollie can't and that goofy doctor can't so she is needed, but its just some of her lines. I think she needs a better writer. I really don't think its her skill as an actor but more of the writting she is working with.
SlyckNic
SlyckNic - 2/23/2010, 8:34 AM
I just want to say I agree 100% with Toxin. I can't stand people who complain about this being the worst thing on tv. Like he said it if you don't like it stop watching it. No one cares to hear all the bad about it if you could care less. I love the show they could do things differently but all in all it has been doing something right to last this long. Thank you.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 2/23/2010, 8:34 AM
hawkngo @ Im blind!!!!!!!

Though she does look better with a mask on! : P

AIRBEYONDER @ Good call bro, good eye! ; )

TEA @ [frick]ing hell yeah, we only need a few vote ppl, [frick] Chloe and [frick] Gilmore Girls, be a man, vote DEATH OF CHLOE!!!

; D
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/23/2010, 8:35 AM
i hate smallville 90210, all the differences with the show to the comics,does really piss me off don't get me wrong lois lane & all the other great females this show delivers is cool,but i want to see superman in full costume kicking ass not this bullshit.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 2/23/2010, 8:37 AM
LEE: LMAO!!! Did you just say that Supernatural is becoming a bore in comparison to a piece of shit like Smallville!?! Bwah-hahahahaha!!! Smallville should've been killed off years ago!

At least Supernatural has developed a story and characters unlike Superman-lite which has turned Chloe from a weak version of Lois Lane to being posessed by Brainiac and now running the Watchtower and being practically a genius...even though she never finished college, lol! Yeah, there's the signs of a great show right there - they dont even know what to with their characters, they just make it up as they go along! ;D

I have to agree with you about killing Chloe though - hell, if she's as irritating as her character in real life I'd be happy to kill Alison Mack!
1 2 3
View Recorder