RUMOR: Marvel Television's JESSICA JONES Revival Has Just Taken A Big Step Forward

RUMOR: Marvel Television's JESSICA JONES Revival Has Just Taken A Big Step Forward

With all signs pointing to Marvel Television reviving Jessica Jones after the character's return in Daredevil: Born Again next March, a new rumour reveals that the mystery project is already taking shape.

By JoshWilding - Oct 21, 2025 05:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Jessica Jones

There have been rumblings about Jessica Jones star Krysten Ritter making her official MCU debut for at least the last three or four years. In May, the actress was finally confirmed to reprise her most iconic role in Daredevil: Born Again Season 2.

Rumours about a Jessica Jones revival started in the summer. The odds of it being a full-blown series or a Special Presentation like the one that Jon Bernthal's Punisher is getting aren't clear. 

According to scooper @MyTimeToShineH, Marvel Studios has now started looking for writers for this mystery Jessica Jones project. This comes after Marvel Television boss Brad Winderbaum strongly hinted that Ritter's hard-edged P.I. would soon get her due in the MCU after reuniting with Charlie Cox's Man Without Fear next March. 

There's no word on who these writers could be. Marvel Television could look to bring back some of those who worked on the original Jessica Jones TV series, of course, but we'll have to wait and see. 

She-Hulk: Attorney at Law and Echo once seemed likely possibilities for a Jessica Jones cameo, and it was widely reported that Ritter came close to shooting a cameo for the latter. Unfortunately, that was scrapped when it became a standalone "Marvel Spotlight" series, branding that Marvel Studios has since seemingly moved on from. 

Regardless, despite the largely disappointing second and third seasons of Jessica Jones, fans are excited to see Ritter get another chance courtesy of Marvel Studios. 

It's hard to say what story a new Jessica Jones series or standalone special could tell, especially as the character doesn't have the longest history on the page. Still, whether it's a reunion with Mike Colter's Luke Cage or just a case that further fleshes out this corner of the MCU, Jessica's return will be welcomed. 

In July, Ritter said she's "thrilled to be back in Jessica's boots. There's more story for her, and it's really exciting." The Breaking Bad alum added, "Oh, it's gritty. It feels big too. The crew's amazing. I've had an amazing experience. I can't say anything, but I love being with Charlie [Cox]. It was as if no time had passed. Like, my first day, I was looking around like we're back."

"But juxtaposing it with Mia [her Dexter Resurrection character] and Jessica has been really creatively fulfilling for me as an artist and just what a big, big banner year I'm having," the actress continued. "I think the fans are going to be very, very thrilled. We're doing some cool stuff."

Daredevil: Born Again Season 2 premieres on Disney+ on March 4, 2026.

JESSICA JONES: Marvel's Brad Winderbaum Confirms New Disney+ Series Coming Sooner Than You Think
Related:

JESSICA JONES: Marvel's Brad Winderbaum Confirms New Disney+ Series Coming "Sooner Than You Think"

Does RED SONJA Have A Post-Credits Scene? Find Out How The Fantasy Reboot Sets Up A Possible Sequel - SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

Does RED SONJA Have A Post-Credits Scene? Find Out How The Fantasy Reboot Sets Up A Possible Sequel - SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

SuperCat
SuperCat - 10/21/2025, 6:17 AM
User Comment Image
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 10/21/2025, 6:57 AM
Marvel has been relying too much on the Netflix stuff even after DDBA S1 flopping.

I want to see a project accurately animating marvel comic stories like how most anime properties are accurately animated from manga. How hard can that be? Id be all in on that.
dragon316
dragon316 - 10/21/2025, 9:09 AM
@vectorsigma - marvel and dc goood vs bad what goood story’s do same thing all time ? Even manga to anime have some changes there all not 100 percent accurate all time I watched anime movie silent voice manga ending is different from movie and anime movie have better ending while manga shows two sisters taking bath together did not expect see it manga glad it was not in anime movie.,

Anime movie how to ride your wave anime to manga anime shows more what girlfriend is doing is manga doesn’t show she’s life guard

?si=J7BowhOhyxK9sZGm
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 10/21/2025, 11:35 AM
@vectorsigma - "I want to see a project accurately animating marvel comic stories like how most anime properties are accurately animated from manga. How hard can that be? Id be all in on that."

The only thing you'll ever get close to this is Invincible, other comics not connected to Marvel/DC, or stuff like DC animated movies pre 2020.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 10/21/2025, 3:00 PM
@vectorsigma - It isn't DD for me anyway until I start seeing that stuff Ben's Murdock was doing in that movie anyway. TV is great, but the fantastical is needed. It's like trying to do Batman on a TV budget. Even WB knows not to do that.
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 10/21/2025, 3:02 PM
@dragon316 - But why are things like LOTR beloved dragon? Because they went "all in", 95% in that case, on the story being accurate and not subverting expectations, I hate that line. See TROP, WOT, and dishonorable mention to The Witcher.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/21/2025, 7:43 AM
If true then cool!!.

Even though the latter seasons of JJ weren’t as strong as S1 , I still found them to be enjoyable (for lack of a better word) to an extent so I would be down to see her arc of her heroism struggling with her cynicism & trauma to continue.

I think it would be cool to have it be a special first that has Jessica investigating a case that ties into the wider MCU so that way you can measure how well it does and if there’s any interest in the character to then have her own show.

Anyway regardless , looking forward to seeing Jessica in DD:BA S2 since i like Ritter’s performance and her version of the character!!.

User Comment Image
6of13
6of13 - 10/21/2025, 7:51 AM
I am looking forward to seeing Jessica return. Given that she has super strength, I am hoping that she is better utilised in the fight scenes in DD:BA S2 compared to the Defenders.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/21/2025, 7:57 AM
@6of13 - they seem to have more of a budget so most likely
6of13
6of13 - 10/21/2025, 8:09 AM
@TheVisionary25—That's good to know. Budgets make a huge difference in these types of superhero shows. And it shows like in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, which looks fantastic.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 10/21/2025, 8:12 AM
Jessica Jones season 1 was ok but I’d rather get a Luke Cage season 3.
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/21/2025, 8:26 AM
To preface this statement I have zero issue with gender equality in all walks of life. However, does it feel like the fact it's a female lead almost guarantee it being greenlit ? I actually work in an industry that is 75%+ female and it makes perfect sense but in the world of entertainment it feels a little forced. Before the offended sensibilities brigade leap down my throat, it's a measured, considered, perfectly valid observation.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 10/21/2025, 11:33 AM
@FallenThomas - To be fair, the show was created in 2015 and was the character was very liked so I don't think that really applies.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/21/2025, 1:35 PM
@FallenThomas - Not REALY that forced when STILL far less than half of all TV shows (ie not specific to JUST comic based) have a female lead when over half of the population are female but get why it can feel that way considering how HUGELY skewed towards male lead it once was.

In regard to films it is still only 30% female lead and more broadly on the stats in films female make up around 32% of speaking roles, 38% of significant roles which are all up on when it was down at 25% or lower a couple decades ago.

Specific to Marvel with the Netflix shows FIVE were male led, only one female and thus far of those the first two to return (as a lead) will be male prior to the one female. IF we get a Luke Cage and/or Iron Fist series remains to be seen (and in the latter case if they will cont with the Female IF as lead or shift back to it being Danny again).

In regards to D+ we had clearly male lead shows with FatWS, Loki, Moon Knight, Werewolf by Knight, Daredevil, getting Wonder Man, VisionQuest and Punisher making a total of eight. Then two where it is only fair to say shared lead with one each male/female having the bulk of screentime with Hawkeye and Agatha. Female leads have been WandaVision, Ms Marvel, She-Hulk, Echo, Ironheart and now getting JJ making SIX to the EIGHT male led ones. NOW, thirty years ago an 8/6 M/F split would be unthinkable, at best you may have had one female lead to every 8 male so the shift is noticeable BUT still skewed male.

Prior to D+ with Marvel TV every time it was a team it was a male led team (AoS, Inhumans, Runaways, The Gifted, Mutant X) had a couple of split male/female lead shows (Cloak&Dagger, Helstrom) and only one female led show with Agent Carter whereas Male led ones over the years we had Spider-man, Hulk, Blade and Legion that readily come to mind.

As to Marvel films again mostly all male solo films the FOUR exceptions being one Elektra, Cpt Marvel, Black Widow, Madame Webb and the second Black Panther (can add in a couple of team movies but vastly out numbered by male led teams tween F4, GotG, Xmen and Avengers).
.
Meanwhile with male led films we had Howard, three Blades, three Wolverine films, soon to be nine Spider-man, two Ghost Rider, DareDevil, two Hulk films, three Punisher films, three Iron Man films, four Captain America films, four Thor films, three Antman films, two Doctor Strange films, the first Black Panther movie, three Deadpool movies, three Venom movies, Morbius and Kraven of all the ones I can think of.

Again, the shift from ALL male to including SOME female led is relatively new so CAN feel forced (esp if they aren't great films or shows) but the numbers of male led V female led is still not indicative that female led are more likely to get greenlit than male led ones.

I realy am NOT getting at you with this, there has been a shift from almost entirely male led to a bigger share of female led (oft with not enough care taken to make them good) which can thus FEEL forced, but statisticaly STILL a major skew in the film and TV industry towards male lead and male characters over females. Simply so much content we tend to mostly hear about stuff more when likely to trigger certain groups thus reporting can cause a perception skew that the increase of female led is more than what it realy has been.
YonnyLayna
YonnyLayna - 10/22/2025, 12:22 AM
@FallenThomas - In her case she was 1 lead out of 5 leads in the Netflix subuniverse besides that her comicbook series ALIAS was a highlight from the early 2000s and her Character is very interconected to Daredevil Like Cage and Iron Fist
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/22/2025, 11:43 AM
@Apophis71 - Yawn. It doesn't just 'feel' forced. I work in the industry and it's a directive. The truth of this has zero to do with your opinion. What you're missing from this diatribe is 1) The majority of the intended audience is MALE 2) This forced shift is laughingly apparent to even the casual onlooker 3) The female lead participation should have nothing to do with the population, just the intended audience 4) This very real directive is costing money in falling receipts. Everyone in the industry knows this but cannot speak up for fear of losing their livelihood.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/22/2025, 2:31 PM
@FallenThomas - NOT saying there isn't an industry directive and that there isn't change but likely more trying to slow the drop in viewership by trying to draw in previously underserved audiences more than trying for equal opportunities for actors cos ultimately studios only tend to care about the numbers/profits in the main.

I'm just saying by the math it is hard to say it is THAT forced if still a LONG way off from parity. As I say however, quality of the content is way more the issue than the shift, a push for better representation without the work to ensure it is well crafted is the problem more than anything else thus fueling skewed perceptions.

IF talking specificaly CBM's, yes the audience has historicaly been majority male, that has shifted over time with the gap closing and to offset the general decline in viewership part the reason of directives is to try and to attract more females to offset the more rapid decline in younger male movie regulars, they just haven't done a good job of it.

However the number of young males watching TV AND film has been dropping faster than female viewership and roughly even share male/female with viewing figures currently for TV and a platform called Disney is likely to skew more female by a long way if not for Marvel and Star Wars.

In regard with film viewership the gap is now only a 9% differance between non-genre specific viewership across the board, male viewership and esp young males has been dropping faster than any other demographic. In addition in the last decade or so females have increasingly been switching more to action over romcoms and the like, the opposite being true for male audiences shifting more towards comedies and romantic films so even if STILL mostly majority male CBM film viewers, the gap is shrinking and may flip if trends continue.

Now, we can nitpick all day about the reasons for the shifts and if a good or bad thing, ALL I was saying is if over half the population is female but still not even a third of speaking roles in films are female characters it isn't exactly forced, even if obviously shifting be that naturaly or by industry directives.
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/23/2025, 5:03 AM
@Apophis71 - Another lengthy reply Apophis, you've clearly far too much spare time. Sorry but too narrow a view to change my perspective. You can only look at female speaking roles as a percentage by movie genre, not movies overall as the huge amount of action led movies will always skew that number. How ever much we try, aside from the odd anomaly, we just can't force women in to action lead roles. It's implausible. Ironically, when it comes to speaking roles women should have 70% of the market as they dominate most human dialogue.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/23/2025, 7:14 AM
@FallenThomas - Hardly implausible when specificaly talking a genre of superhumans and aliens and I'm not saying it should be 50/50 either but less than 25% female specific to CBM's was shit a decade ago and felt more forced towards male than female. It realy hasn't shifted that much when in films it is still, specific to CBM where being enhanced removes a lot of the restraints you COULD argue apply to normal humans, in films it is STILL only at best a third female.

TV is a whole other beast and more movement made, but even if the audience is mostly male, men like girls too so give them a great film/show with decent looking women it can still appeal to real men.

Make your mind up however as if working in the TV/Film industry which you claimed there is ZERO way your working in an industry that is 75% female as behind the camera the numbers are even MORE skewed male than onscreen and my reply was WAY more on the maths of it all than an opinion that there NEEDS to be more representation, I was OK with only one in six Avengers female, just never been against more females either as I'd take an Ellen Ripley or even the first Lara Croft movies over a Star Lord or Scott Lang as a lead any day IF overall the film is enjoyable.
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/23/2025, 8:10 AM
@Apophis71 - I think the problem is that female lead franchises have (in the main) been weak - Marvels, Ms Marvel, Ironheart, BP2 etc. I actually thought Black Widow was strong, largely due to the talent and Charisma of Scarlett and Florence. For your information I work in DNR (Design & Research for makeup and wardrobe development). No CBMs, unfortunately, mostly period pieces and at least 75% female.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/23/2025, 8:49 AM
@FallenThomas - Why I explicitly stated the problem is more that the statisticaly few times they have gone with a female lead they didn't put enough effort in to ensure it was worth doing, and thus make it great. Even Black Widow could have been far better if done WAY sooner prior to Nat's death as a full on spy drama over a more by the numbers action film like we got. What most of us wanted indeed was in phase two giving us the origin story of Black Widow and seeing what went down in Budapest with Hawkeye.

Heck by ALL metrics the MCU Wasp (as in the daughter) was a FAR better character than Scott's Antman, being shown as higher IQ actual scientist taking after her Dad as well as more skilled with the tech (plus able to fly) but they wasted her in favour of doubling down on bungling heist narratives with a more goofy lead and Hope barely there even when sharing the film title. Pepper as Rescue could be just as great as a hero in regard to action, ie putting aside the inventing stuff aspect, as Tony as Iron Man but we got hardly any of that after setting her up as a potential hero in IM3 (Rhodey was wasted in the Iron Man films too for that matter and never got his dues).

In regards to pre D+ TV first season of Agent Carter and first season of JJ were both fantastic, in the latter case I'd argue that first season of Ritters was better than ANY season of Iron Fist, Luke Cage or Punisher and better than at least two seasons of DD too for me (as well as better than defenders). Trouble was they didn't come up with a strong enough narrative for her following two seasons after (nor for Agent Carters second season). Opting to fully kill Purple Man rather was a mistake rather than leaving room to do the Purple Baby storyline and/or intro the Purple children or some such (ie that he was in a coma being used by the powerless Purple Child to gain abilities and thus allowing Killgrave to return fully for a latter season). That or shifting to a double act with Luke Cage fully for a season or two rather than ditching their relationship so quickly.

Give men a well written CBM with great action and a female lead they can lust after they'll be there for it every time but if going there they NEED to put the effort in to make it good and not water down what the main draw of CBM's tends to mostly be trying to second guess what female viewers want (cos a female viewer of a CBM will want just as much action, just maybe better dialogue and character development which dudes wouldn't be averse to either).

In regards to this specific character however, if switching to more standard multiple season TV, doing a gumshoe show is something the industry knows how to do well, far better track record with investigation type drama over comic book action stuff (which more oft than not have a first one or two season that are good not great then go downhill fast). As such, IF well written, a series for her has a lot of potential although I don't trust them not to mess it up (but DO love the character and Krysten was great in the role even when the latter seasons went downhill).
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/23/2025, 9:07 AM
@Apophis71 - haha I'm buried under a barrage of verbosity. Don't disagree with most of what you're saying but still think people are trying to force an rather unnecessary rebalance, which leads to poor product and eventual audience resentment. Let's just hope 'they' find a way to redress any perceived imbalance with quality, rather than just volume.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/23/2025, 9:22 AM
@FallenThomas - Volume over quality has by FAR been the biggest problem across the board with ALL TV and film, regardless what/who the lead is and not just with CBM's (just more noticeable specific to comic based fiction as that HAD become the big thing of the last couple decades).
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/23/2025, 9:50 AM
@Apophis71 - Finally a digestible, single paragraph reply :-D agreed
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/23/2025, 10:16 AM
@FallenThomas - I over compensate for mild dyslexia and autism A LOT, so yeh am very prone to waffle trying to avoid misinterpretation from poorly worded with typos concise replies :D

As I say I wasn't against one of six Avengers being female or two of eight either when they added Wanda/Vision but Superpowers should if done well remove most the unbelievabilty aspects for almost all viewers with female heroes hence why not against increasing their share IF well made esp as with comics I was more drawn towards female Supes back in the 80's (for a lot of the most base reasons, I WAS a Teen boy after all, lmao). NEEDED is a strong word, we don't NEED any CBM's, just don't feel the push for more was any more or less forced with females than the push for more Antman, Captain America and Chris' Thor post Endgame, quality was lost in the push for quantity across the board. Meanwhile, for me, female led Thunderbolts is in my top three Marvel CBM's post 2019 so...
FallenThomas
FallenThomas - 10/23/2025, 10:32 AM
@Apophis71 - Well that explains the verbal diarrhoea and lack of punctuation :-D (Joke)
Thunderbolts is pretty good to be fair but that's mostly because of Red Guardian and the outstanding ability of Florence Pugh. It just seems to me that so far the weakest characters and performances have been mostly female - Captain Marvel, Ms Marvel, Monica Rambeau, Echo, Iron Heart, She-Hulk, Shuri's BP, America Chavez, Wasp, Ghost etc. However, I have LOVED Wanda, Black Widow, Yelena, Gamora, Valkyrie, Nebula and even Kate Bishop in short measure.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/23/2025, 11:32 AM
@FallenThomas - Bad ones being let down more by scripts than anything else.

Cpt Marvel on paper should I'd argue should be an easier character to do well than Iron Man considering her backstory in the USAF/powers and on paper the actor should be up to doing far better. No reason going by her first comic run Ms. Marvel couldn't be as good as early (as in High school years) Spider-man and in print/animations I actualy liked She-Hulk more than the main Hulk and Tatiana is IMO the most talented actor they have after what she pulled out the bag on Orphan Black. I have no clue why they messed up with Wasp so much too, why they sidelined such a potentialy great character with a brilliant actor (I mean she was probably one of the two biggest standout characters from Lost on her acting alone even when the seasons went downhill in quality).

For me Echo, Chavez and Ghost were always supporting character material however at best (they skipped entirely doing the probably the best aspect of Echo as a love interest of DD's) and TBH prior to the MCU using her didn't realy know much about Iron Heart (only what others told me about her or google). Rambeau's version of Cpt Marvel only realy worked for me in print as an Avengers team member, same with Shuri as a supporting character for T'Challa in BP stories which if not for the death of Chad she'd likely have remained (and not sold on the actor in the latters of those cases) but again in the MCU both let down a lot by poor scripts.

All of that said, other than maybe America who I was never sold on in print at all (her powerset only realy good for one thing making her a Heimdall type with less potential than him BEYOND doorman), on paper they could all have been far better than they have been thus far and as good as ones like the original Cpt America given better material to work with considering powersets etc.
Astroman
Astroman - 10/21/2025, 8:38 AM
JJ season 1 is solid but after that she was better as a side character. I like Ritter in the role a lot but S2 and 3 were boring and I think demonstrate my point that she’s a great supporting character but hard to build a whole season around her. Happy to be wrong if a new season emerges and it’s great.
YonnyLayna
YonnyLayna - 10/22/2025, 12:26 AM
@Astroman - problem With her series is that her cómic was a procedural 3 isues arc out of a 12 isues run not an elongated 13 hours movie
JstaKIDfrmBKLYN
JstaKIDfrmBKLYN - 10/21/2025, 8:41 AM
It's gonna be a special like The Punisher.
Spike101
Spike101 - 10/21/2025, 9:01 AM
Bring it on, but make it hard hitting like the Netflix show and not a Disney romp-com.
hue66
hue66 - 10/21/2025, 10:58 AM
I actually like season 3 though in the minority.
YonnyLayna
YonnyLayna - 10/22/2025, 12:30 AM
I actually think her character should Get serius Character development not as autodestructive as the series, also maybe they could get a revamped Hellcat maybe got a deal to work for goverment.
MrDandy
MrDandy - 10/23/2025, 12:05 PM
First season was killer, following two seasons were duds. Adapt Purple Children and I’m all in.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder