ASSASSIN'S CREED Reviews - What Are The Critics Saying?

ASSASSIN'S CREED Reviews - What Are The Critics Saying?

Is Assassin's Creed the video game adaptation to break the curse? Based on this first wave of reviews, no, as critics have taken aim at what sounds like one of 2016's most disappointing blockbusters...

By JoshWilding - Dec 19, 2016 01:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Video Games
Warcraft: The Beginning was supposed to break the bad video game movie curse, but even with a filmmaker as talented as Duncan Jones at the helm, it still disappointed. As a result, all eyes turned to Assassin's Creed and...well, that too has seemingly let down fans based on the first wave of reviews to have surfaced today! One or two are relatively positive, but most really don't go easy on the film. 

Despite having a team behind the camera every bit as impressive as in front of it, it appears as if the decision to focus on setting up a franchise has ultimately hurt Assassin's Creed, though the story and tone honestly don't sound very good either. While fans of the games may end up liking the movie, this reviews are bad news for its chances of box office success, but great for Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.

Have these reviews put you off seeing Assassin's Creed? Let us know in the comments section.



Minus the material with Aguilar and Maria, Assassin’s Creed operates in cruise control. A similar sequence of events happens over and over again, and all you can do is just sit back and look at the pretty picture. And yes, Assassin’s Creed often does look fantastic, especially the costume design and the chase sequences that take place in the 15th Century. But all the riveting roof-top running and hand-to-hand combat in the world won’t make a movie worthwhile if you don’t give a damn about the characters. [C] - Collider

It’s rare to see a film quite so lacking in animus. It exists only to gouge money out of gamers. They might well want to stick to the game. [1*] - The Guardian

2016 has been full of surprises, so in some ways Assassin's Creed, Hollywood's latest attempt to mine gold from an industry that rakes in more dough than it does, is a reassuring tonic: Video game adaptations remain plodding affairs. Directed by Australian helmer Justin Kurzel, reuniting with his Macbeth stars Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard, Assassin’s Creed is resolutely stone-faced, ditching the humdrum quips that are par for the course in today's blockbusters. But this is almost two hours of convoluted hokum that might have benefited from a few self-deflating jabs. "What the f*** is going on," wonders Fassbender at one point. If only you could discern the shadow of a wink. - The Hollywood Reporter

Assassin's Creed has probably done the very best it can with the hand it's been dealt with and, really, this might be the best video game adaptation yet. Mind you, that's not saying a huge amount. [3*]  - The Independent

Since the Assassins are painted as the heroes in this film, is “Assassin’s Creed” implying that maintaining free will means accepting man’s inherent violence? So what of Sofia’s mission to bring an end to violence in general? One suspects that none of the filmmakers gave such ramifications any thought. Instead, it’s all window-dressing for an ending that reveals this alternately goofy and self-serious big-budget Hollywood product to be little more than a two-hour prelude to a potential future franchise. [C-] - The Playlist

Michael Fassbender is a good actor who can carry a franchise, and the film serves as a compelling origin story for Sophia Rikkin, as well as Callum Lynch. Clumsy exposition didn’t ruin a film that had a strong visual identity, fantastic action sequences, and characters that I’m ready to spend more time with already. - Polygon

The 15th Century wasn’t a great time to be alive, and it’s not even such nice place to visit. We went all the way back in time with Assassin’s Creed and all we got was this lousy apple. It’s not even a real one. - Time

Of course, the set-up suggests a sequel may be forthcoming – but the very past/present nature of the Assassin’s Creed games suggests the difficulties that blight this adaptation would dog any future film. Still, credit Kurzel and his regular DoP Adam Arkapaw for recreating the spirit of the series. In an age when Hollywood has apparently little regard for video game tie-ins, Kurzel's team – along with Ubisoft – has tried admirably to protect fan interests. If only they’d had a better script... [3*]  - Total Film

Maybe someday a distant relative of mine will be hooked up to one of these machines, then they can come back and watch me watch Assassin’s Creed. “Oh, look at this human being from 2016,” they will say about me as I watch Assassin’s Creed, “he looks so sad.” They won’t know the half of it. - Uproxx

There’s inevitably a hint of shameless money-grab to any film adaptation of a ludicrously popular video game franchise, especially one that specifically appeals to people who must uncover every secret in the mythos. Still, Assassin’s Creed’s creators have the courage to always take themselves seriously, even when they’re working with material that sounds fundamentally silly. There’s no great leap of faith in Assassin’s Creed, but a surprising amount of the time, it at least finds steady footing. - Verge


As in last year’s “Macbeth,” Kurzel fares best in battle sequences highlighting the ashen ugliness of imagined history in rich detail. When they finally come, sequences in which Fassbender bounds through antiquated environs and lives up to his oath provide a few spare thrills; a public execution, meanwhile, recalls the heightened reality of Ken Russell’s “The Devils” (minus the heresy). Elsewhere, though, “Assassin’s’ Creed” is like playing a bad game and longing for the sweet release of the “game over” screen. - The Wrap

How times have changed. “Assassin’s Creed,” in which Michael Fassbender plays some sort of leaping, fighting, time-tripping — but still moody and sullen — bare-chested historic warrior dude, is a mediocre video-game movie that has branded itself in a most revealing way. The film is coming off 20 years of soullessly trashy and forgettable video-game spinoffs (the “Mortal Kombat” and “Streetfighter” films, “Max Payne” and “The Book of Eli,” the “Lara Croft” series, this year’s “Warcraft”). But “Assassin’s Creed” isn’t fighting the junkiness of that pedigree — it’s using it to prop up its own pretensions. The hook the producers are selling is, “Here, at long last, is a video-game movie that’s a cut above the others.” - Variety
MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Cast In SPLIT FICTION Movie From WICKED And DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE Creative Teams
Related:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Cast In SPLIT FICTION Movie From WICKED And DEADPOOL & WOLVERINE Creative Teams

DOOM: THE DARK AGES New Trailer Is Focused On Story And Gameplay
Recommended For You:

DOOM: THE DARK AGES New Trailer Is Focused On Story And Gameplay

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 12/19/2016, 1:07 PM
So it aint that good. What a surprise
Mrcool210
Mrcool210 - 12/19/2016, 1:12 PM
I was hoping we could get an interesting film on what the animus does to someones mind, and how that could [frick] them up mentally, but it seems having any scenes set in the past and using those scenes as a big marketing strategy hurt the film, since fans and other people went in expecting only the past stuff. Shame, I'll still see it on sunday, cause i want this movie to be good, so much. Plus i've disagreed before, maybe i will again.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/19/2016, 1:17 PM
@Mrcool210 - if you played the games, shouldn't you EXPECT to spend way too much time in the modern day?

I find my self wishing they'd drop the concept of the animus all together.
Mrcool210
Mrcool210 - 12/19/2016, 1:20 PM
@ALostCause - I would agree that people would have a right to be angry if most of the game was in the present, IF they didn't go out of their way telling people again and again that the movie would be doing what i said and exploring what the animus does to someone mentally, and spending most of their time in the modern day, if you went in expecting it to mostly be in the past than of course you're going to be dissapointed cause they didn't set out to make that film.

Although i do agree the animus is boring in the games, but it does have merit in the film to explore interesting ideas.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/19/2016, 1:25 PM
@Mrcool210 - oh I didn't pay much attention to the press surrounding this movie as I was afraid to get too excited.

I was mostly just joking about how annoying it can be when the games switch to the future in the middle of an interesting story in the past.

Probably should thrown a "lol" in there..
Mrcool210
Mrcool210 - 12/19/2016, 1:31 PM
@ALostCause - Ah, my mistake then. Yeah, i do agree with you, it was annoying to switch to the modern day stuff during the interesting past story stuff, guess i'm just in a mood of defending some of the movies choices lol, probably should wait till i see it first XD
GuardianAngel
GuardianAngel - 12/19/2016, 1:13 PM
Anyone who actually thought this would be good has poor judgement when it comes to film.
Mrcool210
Mrcool210 - 12/19/2016, 1:16 PM
@GuardianAngel - That's not exactly fair, may movies have had bad marketing campaigns before, and the movie had a lot going for it, the studio being directly involved, a great cast, great director, an interesting premise, exploring an idea that the games hadn't yet, i'm not saying its going to be amazing to everyone, but there was some merit to have hope for the film to be at least passable.
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/19/2016, 1:23 PM
@GuardianAngel - that's simply not true.

How can you say that about.

There are much worse movies that people hype, but you can't judge a person's taste in films from what they hope will be good.

If that were the case, wouldn't all the people who want justice league to do good be considered morons? The past movie was meh, and the teaser stank, but I guess I'm an idiot for wanting it to do good right? Even though everything is telling me it won't be good?

That's just silly and you know it!
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/19/2016, 1:26 PM
About us*
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/19/2016, 4:36 PM
@GuardianAngel - It looked good from the trailer but saying that so did Batman V.Superman:Dawn Of Justice and Suicide Squad.
GuardianAngel
GuardianAngel - 12/20/2016, 9:38 AM
@Mrcool210 @ALostCause @marvel72

You all just said the same thing. There's nothing wrong with HOPING a movie will be good. I HOPE Wonder Woman will be good, but from the trailer I know for a fact that it won't. I'm a HUGE DC fan, but I called BvS from the day it was announced. There are red herrings. For instance: If a Superman solo movie underperforms and receives mediocre reviews, then in response the studio decides to just chuck in their most popular character in the sequel, but still keep the same director (whose only completely original work was Sucker Punch) then you know it's not a creative choice but a studio one. (But obviously Snyder can'5 say that). On top of that, they make it a VS movie (Name an actual good one) and throw in Wonder Woman, Doomsday, and an odd Lex Luthor. If you still thought it'd be good by the third trailer. You completely ignored all the road signs.

Again, I really wish my favorite characters weren't constantly being butchered on screen with bad movies. I'm not trying to criticize you, just tired of fans overhyping something that is clearly going to be bad. If the last movie sucked, and the new one looks almost exactly like the last one, guess what...
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 12/21/2016, 4:40 AM
@GuardianAngel - I agree with most of that. Except assassins creed isn't a sequel.

And that doesn't explain why you said we have poor judgement in film.
1 2 3 4
View Recorder