ecksmanfan reviews Sherlock Holmes

ecksmanfan reviews Sherlock Holmes

How does RDJ's newest series (potentially) stand up?

Review Opinion
By ecksmanfan - Dec 27, 2009 04:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Action

For the most part, we all have a pre-conceived idea of who or what Sherlock Holmes should be: a pipe-smoking, tweed-wearing old man that uses big words. One thing is for sure, Guy Ritchie's version of the iconic literary character is anything but your grandpa's old familiar. This film is a main stream attempt from Ritchie, who typically serves up a quirky, unique style that is all his own. Not to say this is a bad thing, but his true style still eeks it's way to the surface just enough to let you know that he is still there.

From the get go, the film is quite action packed and offers up something a bit different than the martial arts laden films we've been inundated with recently. It has a raw and natural feel to it, helping to pull you into the story, even though it delves into the "magic" world. There is the usual action film fodder, with explosions and hand to hand battles, but there is a bit of the standard Ritchie fare, including some comedy moments that only Mr. Downey could pull off.

On the topic of RDJ, he is on top of his game in this film. His delivery of lines is impeccable. He's the type of actor that you can have him read the phone book and you could be entertained for hours. The pairing of Downey and Jude Law is one that can put a confused look on your face and make you wonder how that'll work out. It's a great combination and it's nice to see Law step out of his box and try something new. Rachel McAdams leaves something to be desired. She can be good, but her character in this film not written well. Although pertinent to the Sherlock Holmes story, at least in this version, and in future films, she could easily have been a lesser character; it's rather odd to me.

The story itself is an original if I remember correctly and it deals with the subject of black magic, which to me is something you wouldn't really expect from a Holmes story. It is a believable idea, but I had a hard time getting into it, just not quite enough to really pull you in.

Guy Ritchie continues to utilize the camera to make his movies entertaining. With many unique angles and the use of different lens types, it adds a new element to the film. There are several amazing slow-motion scenes that are very well done, to the point where it just makes you smile in awe.

With all these outstanding elements, you would think this formula would add up, but it simply doesn't connect. The film has its entertaining moments and is fun to watch, it should have been more than it was. Being that this is Rithchie's first attempt at a more "main-stream" film, he has room to grow with the next installment to this series, which I hope he learns from the little things that don't add up.

Grade: B

LANDMAN Star Ali Larter On Her Fiery Character & Starring Opposite Billy Bob Thornton (Exclusive)
Related:

LANDMAN Star Ali Larter On Her Fiery Character & Starring Opposite Billy Bob Thornton (Exclusive)

LANDMAN Stars Kayla Wallace & Paulina Chávez On Their Character's Unique Journies This Season (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

LANDMAN Stars Kayla Wallace & Paulina Chávez On Their Character's Unique Journies This Season (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 12/27/2009, 9:22 PM
Never really was too interested in this film anyway.
2010warmachine
2010warmachine - 12/27/2009, 9:42 PM
I Like the film.
rockingrich1webb
rockingrich1webb - 12/27/2009, 9:52 PM
hope it does well. ill watch it next year when shows in the Philippines but for now GO AVATAR!!! btw like the review nicely done.
BryEL
BryEL - 12/27/2009, 9:52 PM
Hmm.. either a B or a -A for sure. I want more RDJ f***ing with a violin!
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 12/27/2009, 10:07 PM
I ACTUALLY LOVED IT..IT WAS A NEW WAY TO SEE HOLMES..HE HAD ISSUES BUT THEN AGAIN HE WAS PRETTY INGENIUS..LOVED IT.SEQUEL I HAVE A FEELING WILL BE AWSOME
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 12/27/2009, 10:10 PM

TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 12/27/2009, 10:13 PM
You guys are nutty, THAT MOVIE WAS AWESOME!

RemiMartini
RemiMartini - 12/27/2009, 10:34 PM
so I don't get what you DIDN'T like about the film? It just didn't feel right, is that it? If so that's a pretty lame review
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 12/27/2009, 11:30 PM
i'm seeing it on Tuesday. Cant wait!!!
ecksmanfan
ecksmanfan - 12/27/2009, 11:57 PM
It's hard to explain what I didn't like. As I said, all the elements should have added up, but I came out of the theater with a kind of "ho-hum" feeling. I wanted to like it so much better than I did. It was a decent film, but not up to the level of District 9 or Watchmen though. Maybe I need to go watch it again.
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 12/28/2009, 12:09 AM
Yeah I enjoyed it a lot, and in all actuality what I liked most about it was the fact that it stayed close to the original Holmes mythology rather than trying to ape the old Basil Rathbone movies. Most of what people think they know about Holmes comes from those films or the ones that aped their styles after it. In those films Holmes has a stately demenor about him, but in the stories that doyle wrote about him he is far from that. In the original stories Holmes is an unkept bohemian drug user, and not a very respectable member of society. And Ricrchie's movie is the only Holmes movie to date that accurately captures that, so for that reason alone I think I'd give it an A.
Apoc4all
Apoc4all - 12/28/2009, 1:43 AM
I was pleasantly surprised. The story held to the Sherlock Holmes canon remarkably well, the story bridging the gap between the first set of stories and the second. I had always wondered why and when Watson had left Holmes (the second set of stories beginning with his return). The only diffence this makes is that now Moriarty is brought to their attention earlier then in the original stories.

As to the portrayal of characters, remarkably on point. Holmes, in the stories is indeed a very arrogant, impatient (unless it involves the case), and messy individual. He was a black belt, and he did have a pentiant for ingesting and experimenting with various drugs and alchohols (Sir Author Conan Doyles Holmes was a heroin and cocaine addict).

I still believe that Jeremy Brett portrayed the best Holmes, but Downey comes in with a close second. Both portray Holmes as a dislikable character to those who don't know him, but Downey played up the messier aspects of the character, whereas Brett played more on the arrogant aspects.

All in all, a skillful weaving in of an original Holmes story right smack in the middle (or more 1/3 way in) of the establish Holmes timeline. Entertaining, plenty of mystery, and a brilliant Holmes explanation at the end.
Spilox
Spilox - 12/28/2009, 3:02 AM
ThwhtGuardian is right as always. As a true fan will notice they stayed very close to the original Holmes and Watson. Even the subject of magic is discussed in some holmes story's. For instance in 'The Whitechappel Vampire". Offcourse Holmes dismisses this supersticious nonsens. A rational man like Holmes should not believe in magic.
I thought the film was very entertaining. I can see how people that didn't read any of the story's and just watched the tv shows aren't quite sure what to think of RDJ and the way Richie directed.
What i love the most of this movie is the grimm Victorian London backdrop. The flickering lights, the steaming manholes and the dirty streets. Very well done mister Richie :D.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 12/28/2009, 4:04 AM
YOU GUYS SAID IT WELL..AGAIN I THOUGHT IT WAS EXCELLENT, I'D PAY TO SEE ANOTHER ONE, HONESTLY...

"HOLMES,OH HOLMES.. I KNOW YOU FARTED AND YOU INTENTIONALLY POINTED IT TOWARDS MY CELL KNOWING FULL WELL I HAVE NOWHERE TO RUN FROM IT.."


StephenStrange
StephenStrange - 12/28/2009, 5:43 AM
sweet. Can't wait to see this!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 12/28/2009, 6:50 AM
ECKS @ You da man!!!! ; )

So its a B Grade movie then! : P

Lol, joking..... great review, problem ive had from the start was i always thought RDJ and JUDE LAW got their roles mixed up, LAW looks 100% more and feels and sounds SHERLOCK HOLMES than RDJ ever will!

If i don't catch it at the flicks its one to rent though!!!

Cheers dude!
InFamouslyCool
InFamouslyCool - 12/28/2009, 7:02 AM
real critics gets paid for their opinion. lol great movie. next.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/28/2009, 7:31 AM
Nice review dude. Still haven't seen it..might now though. So im not a big Ritchie fan(putting it mildly!), will that put me off it?
Sonny
Sonny - 12/28/2009, 8:09 AM
Movie SUC'd PERIOD..
Sonny
Sonny - 12/28/2009, 8:17 AM
Movie SUC'd PERIOD..
airbeyonder18
airbeyonder18 - 12/28/2009, 8:21 AM
It was very well done. Robert Downey Jr. has done it again.
PERIOD............
flames809
flames809 - 12/28/2009, 8:45 AM
great review.

and why know are saying this movie wasn't up to the level like watchmen( didn't really like the movie) and District 9( that movie was shit). movies aren't made to be up to a level of a movie or not there made to entertain people and try to make the best movie they could make.

and why do ppl are telling other ppl to lean proper english if we all have a freedom of writing and speech so we could write how ever we want.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 12/28/2009, 9:00 AM
GO WATCH IT ROR, I LIKE YOUR OPINION BECAUSE YOUR PRETTY STRAIGHT FORWARD.
peterparker420
peterparker420 - 12/28/2009, 9:34 AM
NICE REVIEW!..I am seeing the film tomarrow! can't wait!
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 12/28/2009, 9:57 AM
@Sonny. Perhaps you would like to share why the movie sucked.
ecksmanfan
ecksmanfan - 12/28/2009, 10:27 AM
@Ror- This film is quite different than his other films, but you can still tell it's his. It definitley has a more mainstream feel to it though. Go give it a try.
Spilox
Spilox - 12/28/2009, 10:42 AM
@Ror, i'll bet you like it :D
Stumblin
Stumblin - 12/28/2009, 10:47 AM
Nice review man, I agree with you pretty much all the way, it felt a little out of its element with the mainstream touch, but I was quickly drawn into the film. I really enjoyed it.

How did I get so lucky to see two good films in a row?
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 12/28/2009, 12:21 PM
I know this doesn't get discussed much, but did anybody else think the score was amazing? I loved the subtle, mysterious quality it had.
EasterBunnyReject
EasterBunnyReject - 12/28/2009, 12:43 PM
I'm actually really glad you brought up the music, thwhtGuardian. I completely agree. I loved the chaotic violin elements to the music. Very fitting, very fitting indeed : )

I loved this film. It's one of those rare films that I find I like more and more as the days go by after seeing it. Looking forward to taking a buddy of mine ( a fellow Sherlock fan) to see it today.
mwmcintyre
mwmcintyre - 12/28/2009, 12:48 PM
Loved the movie and even though in some ways definitively revisionist, amazingly true to so many aspects of the characters and stories. I think he miscast the ladies though, they should have switched roles, Watson's Mary came across as a much more interesting and compelling character than Rachel McAdam's Adler, and that's not right.
Stumblin
Stumblin - 12/28/2009, 12:53 PM
Good call Guardian! I even forgot to mention the score in my review.
Ryden
Ryden - 12/28/2009, 12:58 PM
I loved this film, it was so much better than Avatar and it I loved how the characters worked and the style of the film in general. However I will admit that Irene Adler was a little under-developed, they'll most likley work on her in the future.
thwhtGuardian
thwhtGuardian - 12/28/2009, 1:18 PM
She was a little under developed, but the fact that she was included at all was amazing. Adler is by far one of my favorite Holmes characters and I'm glad she was included instead of inventing some new hollow love interest.

And just a quick question, have you ever tried that freedom to write how you want argument with your English teacher Flames? There is an expected level of adherence to the common rules of the English language when conversing with other people, and unless English is your second language you deserve a certain amount of ridicule for not conforming to those basic standards...especially when most browsers have a built in spell check.
head
head - 12/28/2009, 1:33 PM
@flames: hahahahahahahaha well said?
ecksmanfan
ecksmanfan - 12/28/2009, 2:35 PM
@thwhtguardian- You nailed with the comment on the score. It was incredible, I failed to mention that part.
CRITIC17
CRITIC17 - 12/28/2009, 3:23 PM
Good review!!! I thought it was good but could have been better...
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 12/28/2009, 4:16 PM
Good review!

I'm not a fan of Ritchie's and the clips I've seen of the movie have not impressed me (the CGI looks as bad as it was in Daredevil!) Think I'll wait for the blu ray with this one!
1 2
View Recorder