It's Now Possible To Sue Movie Studios For Releasing "Misleading" Trailers

It's Now Possible To Sue Movie Studios For Releasing "Misleading" Trailers

In one of the most bizarre legal developments in recent memory, a U.S. Judge has ruled that moviegoers can now sue studios if they release trailers that are deemed misleading. Find more details here...

By JoshWilding - Dec 22, 2022 01:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Infinity War

We've all seen trailers with scenes that don't end up in the final cut of the movie. That's often a result of reshoots, with Rogue One: A Star Wars Story and 2015's Fantastic Four both good examples of blockbusters that ended up looking vastly different in theatres than they did in any early sneak peeks. 

However, studios may have to start thinking twice about how they promote upcoming titles after a U.S. District Judge has ruled that they can be sued for false advertising if they release deceptive trailers.

The decision was made when two filmgoers decided to file a lawsuit after watching Danny Boyle's Yesterday. After seeing No Time to Die star Ana de Armas in the trailer, they decided to rent the movie, only to learn she had been cut from the final product (the actress had been set to play a love interest, but was deemed superfluous to the story). 

Universal tried to fight back by saying movie trailers are protected under the First Amendment and should be viewed as an "artistic, expressive work" akin to a three-minute story rather than a commercial. The Judge disagreed, and we now find ourselves in a very bizarre position. 

So, does this mean you can sue Disney and Marvel Studios because Avengers: Infinity War didn't include The Hulk racing into battle alongside the rest of Earth's Mightiest Heroes?

According to the ruling, false advertising will only apply when "significant portions" of a trailer don't make it into a movie, meaning it will need to be more than the odd alternate scene or two. As for the two de Armas fans, they're part of a class action seeking $5 million in damages after paying a mere $3.99 to rent Yesterday. 

Seriously. 

We'll see how this story develops, but this may set a dangerous precedent. On the plus side, it could force studios to be a little more careful when it comes to how movies are marketed, ensuring what they promote matches the finished product.

Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments
Related:

Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos
Recommended For You:

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
BassMan
BassMan - 12/22/2022, 1:38 PM
Doesn’t mean they’ll win them lol
Origame
Origame - 12/22/2022, 3:43 PM
@BassMan - actually this precedent means there's a good chance they'll win, barring the trailer is actually misleading.

Closest thing a studio can do in response is use their law teams to tie the lawsuit up to the point the opposition simply can't afford to keep going.
bobbo68
bobbo68 - 12/22/2022, 1:39 PM
This is just stupid pass something that can benefit people.
TheManWithoutFear
TheManWithoutFear - 12/22/2022, 1:41 PM
Can we sue them for that tiny trailer for the trailer at the beginning of the trailer? I hate that.
kider2
kider2 - 12/22/2022, 3:16 PM
@TheManWithoutFear - I think those are for ad purposes. You know when you get that you can skip this ad in 5 seconds. The actual trailer starts after that time. They do it so they can show the trailer as a short ad. This will also increase its view count.
globaltravels
globaltravels - 12/23/2022, 7:11 AM
@TheManWithoutFear - it’s so weird, those 5 second trailers for trailers. It’s like movie studios don’t even trust audiences these days to have the attention space for a 2 minute trailer. It’s so dumb.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 12/22/2022, 1:41 PM
In that case Sony better be careful...
dragon316
dragon316 - 12/22/2022, 3:00 PM
@MCUKnight11 - any movie company picture of this news marvel as well
EarlChai
EarlChai - 12/22/2022, 1:42 PM
Bridge to Terabithia producers:
UniqNo
UniqNo - 12/22/2022, 1:42 PM
I'm sure this means we'll be getting alot more obligatory deleted scenes included with movie releases....

That or they'll stop misleading. I understand the Ana De Armad case to a degree... but avengers? We knew what we were getting even if that scene wasn't I'm the movie....
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 12/22/2022, 1:43 PM
Ok, so sue Suicide Squad for false advertising.
And Josstice League, Spider-Man No Way Home, Infinity War, etc.

FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 12/22/2022, 1:43 PM
This is so dumb. Especially with major movies, first trailers can came out months before the final cut of the movie is locked, meaning that a trailer might feature something that was cut out purely for artistic/pacing reasons, rather than to intentionally mislead people.
L0RDbuckethead
L0RDbuckethead - 12/22/2022, 1:44 PM
lol yeah i'm sure that'll happen.
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/22/2022, 1:44 PM
[frick]in Hell! I no longer want to live in this world....



"Misleading" is a very broad term, and anybody trying this, will need some hard proof and facts. Good Luck
RolandD
RolandD - 12/22/2022, 1:45 PM
@DCfan84 - Perfect gif for this.
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/22/2022, 1:54 PM
@RolandD - I'm just as tired as he is in the GIF. How can a movie trailer affect your life to the point of Sueing them. I know trailers can have an emotional affect on people (BP:WF for example), but impacting your life to the point of litigation? Get [frick]ed. But yea, perfect GIF....lol
MotherGooseUPus
MotherGooseUPus - 12/22/2022, 3:22 PM
@DCfan84 - right there with you bud... i f*cking hate people these days... it really is sad and tiring
Origame
Origame - 12/22/2022, 3:53 PM
@DCfan84 - it depends, yes. But that's a matter of all things. That's why lawyers and judges are involved, instead of just giving the government the evidence and they give you the predetermined money.

An example here being no time to die. Fans of amras would go to see the movie based on the trailer hinting at her being a major part of the movie. And while it's understandable why it was this way, the fact they were mislead is still a problem. And there are plenty of examples from Hollywood of just as bad if not worse misleading trailers.

This is good for the industry. It emboldens the audience to stand up against studio bs and discourages studios from tricking audiences.
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/22/2022, 5:12 PM
@Origame - I get all that, and for the most part, I agree. But does the lack of Armas in the movie really affect you to the point of hiring a lawyer (One that won't laugh at you), and spending more money than what you have? That's what boggles my mind
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/22/2022, 5:14 PM
@MotherGooseUPus - You and me both Brotha!
Origame
Origame - 12/22/2022, 5:20 PM
@DCfan84 - probably not on an individual level, no. After all, it's just 10 bucks per person and a few hours of experience.

However, it's the precedent that matters. You shouldn't have to put up with that in terms of a product you're expected to pay for. And if you don't do anything, companies will keep doing it. And will get worse at it.
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/22/2022, 5:29 PM
@Origame - These Production Companies are a business, and meant to sell there product. I remember the first official teaser trailer at SDCC, where Batman turns his signal on, and Superman's eyes lighting up red. That was bad ass to me, and made me want to see it. Unfortunately, we all know how that movie turned out. Should I sue for the lack of "Badassery" I was anticipating for what turned out to be garbage (Besides the Batman whooping ass and offing people scene that was fire)?
DCfan84
DCfan84 - 12/22/2022, 5:32 PM
@Origame - "I remember the first official teaser trailer ***for Batman v Superman at SDCC"

No edit button, sorry
Origame
Origame - 12/22/2022, 5:42 PM
@DCfan84 - but in the case of batman v superman, you still got what you paid for. A movie where the central conflict is batman fighting superman, and a near recreation of that teaser trailer appeared in the movie.

This isn't about subjective good or bad. THAT would be thrown out in court. This is about objectively being mislead about the actual context of the product.
DPSNUMBER1
DPSNUMBER1 - 12/22/2022, 1:45 PM
Does it apply for Videogames trailers too? like for example that misleading TLoU2 trailer.
ScaryTerry
ScaryTerry - 12/22/2022, 1:45 PM
You can sue for anything, doesn’t mean the case will be tried.
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 12/22/2022, 1:45 PM
Does this mean we can sue youTubers who give false movie information too??? Maybe websites that also give false information as if it’s factual?? Maybe sue article creators? Can we sue for people spoiling movies as well??
BoW
BoW - 12/22/2022, 1:55 PM
@slickrickdesigns - Dear god, please let this be the case for all those clickbait thumbnails for videos.
MrKayDeeBee
MrKayDeeBee - 12/22/2022, 2:38 PM
@slickrickdesigns - Can we also sue article writers who use different pseudo-names? lol
Origame
Origame - 12/22/2022, 3:55 PM
@slickrickdesigns - I mean go for it. You'll probably just end up with their computer and a case of redbull though.
Deadinside
Deadinside - 12/22/2022, 4:11 PM
@slickrickdesigns - Or, how about those channels that make the fake trailers for "upcoming" movies...? Those are annoying...!
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 12/22/2022, 1:45 PM
This world has gone full R word🥲...
1 2 3 4
View Recorder