THE BATMAN - PART II Enters Pre-Production; Principal Photography Expected To Begin On January 1, 2026

THE BATMAN - PART II Enters Pre-Production; Principal Photography Expected To Begin On January 1, 2026

Matt Reeves' long-awaited sequel to The Batman has reportedly entered pre-production, and is expected to officially commence principal photography on January 1...

By MarkCassidy - Aug 06, 2025 10:08 AM EST
Filed Under: The Batman

The Batman director Matt Reeves recently revealed that he had finally finished the script for his long-awaited sequel, which he penned alongside co-writer Mattson Tomlin.

The announcement came in the midst of concern that the movie, which does appear to be officially titled The Batman - Part II for the time being, may have been cancelled or been hit with another significant delay, with speculation continuing to mount that DC Studios co-heads James Gunn and Peter Safran might be planning to either introduce a brand-new take on The Dark Knight in The Brave and The Bold, or fold Robert Pattinson's BatVerse take on the iconic hero into the DCU.

Gunn remains adamant that the plan is still to forge ahead with another actor for the DCU's Caped Crusader, but we are clearly going to see at least one more instalment in Reeves' "Epic Crime Saga" as well, and we now have an update on the sequel's progress.

According to Productionlist.com, The Batman - Part II has entered the pre-production phase, and has begun the hiring process for production design, art direction, stunt coordination, costume, VFX, etc. According to the site, principal photography is "confirmed to begin January 1, 2026 at Warner Bros. Studios Leavesden in London, UK."

Gunn only recently got a chance to read the script after being busy with the Superman press tour, but all he would say when asked about the story is: "It's great!"

"It would be a consideration. We’d have to think about it," Gunn said when asked about the prospect of Pattinson staying on as the DCU's Batman during a recent Rolling Stone interview. "We’d have to think about it. It is not like we’ve never discussed it. I would never say zero [chance], because you just never know. But it’s not likely. It’s not likely at all."

It does seem a little odd that Gunn won't just flat out say "no, Pattinson will not be the DCU's Batman," and a lot of fans believe that he is simply covering all bases in case he does ultimately decide to keep the actor on as The Brave and the Bold's Caped Crusader. 

We still know very little about The Batman - Part II, but there have been rumors that plot rumors that Hush and/or Mr. Freeze could end up being the villains. There doesn't seem to be much to these reports, but based on previous comments from Reeves, there is a good chance that the movie will have a winter setting.

In addition to Pattinson, everyone from the first film (with the likely exception of Paul Dano's Riddler) is expected to return, along with some characters from The Penguin.

Colin Farrell Reveals What He Knows About The Penguin's Role In THE BATMAN PART 2
Related:

Colin Farrell Reveals What He Knows About The Penguin's Role In THE BATMAN PART 2

THE PENGUIN Showrunner On Robert Pattinson's BATMAN Discussions, Potential Season 2, Catwoman, & More
Recommended For You:

THE PENGUIN Showrunner On Robert Pattinson's BATMAN Discussions, Potential Season 2, Catwoman, & More

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/6/2025, 10:19 AM
Reeeee should have been sooner reeee should have added him to Superman reeeeee.

I don't give a [frick]. Hyped af for this
DonkeyLift
DonkeyLift - 8/6/2025, 10:26 AM
@bobevanz - yes!
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/6/2025, 2:29 PM
@Forthas - Yes Zack Snyder was a director with experience and success at Warners. That's what got his name included on the list, but it was Nolan who ultimately got to decide on who he wanted to work with. And it certainly wasn't Snyder who changed course, it was Warners. It isn't as if the studio didn't see scripts or hear pitches before hand. Remember, It was after filming, that they cut 30 minutes out of BvS before it's release (because a shorter film allows for more screenings daily), and they didn't bring Joss Wheadon in to just finish Justice League, but mostly rewrite and reshoot it entirely. Look how those decisions worked out. However you may feel about Snyder as a director, there's no denying that people liked his versions of both those movies and hated Warners' cuts in equal measure. Warner Bros. has always had the same problem. You're right, it has cost them a lot of good will with fans, and David Zaslev certainly hasn't helped matters by shelving finished projects entirely.
I actually think that's why Warners decided to operate DC Studios as it's own entity, and hired Gunn(another proven and sucessful CBM writer/director) to run it. They want to otry and regain some of that good will. We'll see if it works. I suppose it will, if they make good movies. But I also recognize that some people will never be satisfied.
Forthas
Forthas - 8/6/2025, 5:18 PM
@Patient2670 -

"...but it was Nolan who ultimately got to decide on who he wanted to work with."

Can you provide a link to a credible source?

It was absolutely Zack Snyder who took the studio in a different direction. The following article quotes Zack Snyder himself to make the point (link below).

"You see, according to a recent interview with FilmInk, Snyder explains that certain Warner Bros executives could simply not grasp the idea that the new films were taking place in an entirely different universe than the Christopher Nolan films, and had repeatedly asked whether or not they could get Christian Bale to return as Batman. In order to thwart that idea and make sure it was understood that this was not the Nolan Universe, it seems Snyder wanted to offer Bale a brand new role, like maybe Wayne’s butler Alfred, just to make it 100% clear that this is not the same Batman that Bale played, and to hammer home the different universe notion to the executives. In Snyder’s own words:

“This is a total and opposite reality from the Chris Nolan movies. It’s another universe, so we couldn’t hire Christian Bale if we wanted to, because he doesn’t exist in our world. Maybe we could hire him to play another part. We did talk about that briefly. I just wanted to hire Christian to play another part to make that obvious. Christian could play, like, Alfred with age makeup. No! Of course not. But you know what I mean. Even people at the studio would say, ‘Who are you getting from the other movies?’ And I was like, ‘Hey, come on guys, let’s all understand, it’s a different world.’ In the Batman universe that Chris Nolan created, Superman would have a hard time existing. That that’s why we did a reboot on the universe, so we could allow these characters to exist together. We needed to do that to have Batman exist in this world.”

What is frustrating here is the idea that the suits at Warner Bros seem to have no idea what is going on in their superhero movies, nor understand the reasoning behind the ‘Batman’ reboot going on with ‘Batman V Superman.

https://sciencefiction.com/2016/03/10/bale-out-zach-snyder-discusses-casting-christina-bale-in-dceu-just-not-as-batman/
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/6/2025, 5:41 PM
@Forthas - Here's one:
https://www.slashfilm.com/1742926/christopher-nolan-man-of-steel-director-zack-snyder-tony-scott/?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=6766c6716e4f7e0001ba4883&utm_campaign=feed&utm_medium=Social-Distribution&utm_source=FB-BP-SlashFilm&fbclid=IwY2xjawMAqcFleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFQVmZoUGZnREhtTWVjWEhHAR6jGYy73BWiGnPS9yJ-Hxp3iHQrOTRB1CimeWrIC3fpG9sOgLCKuJ9QJRSeOg_aem_GgW0xkP6zzJN8KSd1ZsxlA

And apparently, it was Nolan whoo didn't want MOS to connect with his Dark Knight Trilogy - according to this from Variety:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/man-of-steel-dark-knight-zack-snyder-christopher-nolan-1234959081/
Not to mention that Bale had said several times that he had no interest in playing Batman again if Nolan wasn't directing.
And again, I agree- The studio was the problem. THey've always had some of the greatest properties and absolutely no idea what to do with them or how to market them. Look at movies like Blade Runner or The Iron Giant. IMO, two of the greatest moovies of all times, both financial failures at the box office.
Forthas
Forthas - 8/6/2025, 7:59 PM
@Patient2670 - Three things:

1) The Slash film article is not hard journalism. It is problematic which i will demonstrate later since the writer is not following certain editorial principals and rely on conjecture rather than facts. The writer in this case literally writes his own opinion at the end of the piece writing "Would Scott's version have been more amenable to Donner? It seems likely, and while pleasing Richard Donner is absolutely not the approach a filmmaker should be taking, I'd argue it might be a tad better than Zack Snyder's "Wake the f**k up" approach to wish-fulfilment fantasy movie-making.";

2) The article makes it seem that Nolan did not get the director he actually wanted and was following a Warner Brothers mandate. It states "Perhaps, then, it was enough for Nolan that Snyder did not share Richard Donner's reverence for Superman, or any superheroes for that matter, as that happened to fit what Warner Bros. was looking for at the time; and

3) If you utilize less credible sources then we will eventually get into dueling articles about what actually happened. For example here is an article that claims Zack Snyder was chosen by the studio for legal reasons.

Zack Snyder Was Never WB’s First Choice for Man of Steel – Studio Hired Him to Avoid Lawsuit as Their Preferred Director Would’ve Taken Years to Develop the Film
https://fandomwire.com/zack-snyder-was-never-wbs-first-choice-for-man-of-steel-studio-hired-him-to-avoid-lawsuit-as-their-preferred-director-wouldve-taken-years-to-develop-the-film/

As for the other points:
The Hollywood Reporter article does NOT identify Nolan as the one who nixed the idea of MOS and The Dark Knight Trilogy. Snyder uses the term "we" but does not identify who that means. Is it his wife who helps produce films or a brain trust set up to bring the film to life...etc.

"Not to mention that Bale had said several times that he had no interest in playing Batman again if Nolan wasn't directing."

That is what EVERY ACTOR says. I could go through the very long list of actors who claimed they were done with a role only for them to come back to it multiple times (Sigourney Weaver's RIPLEY, Daniel Craig's JAMES BOND, Hugh Jackman's WOLVERINE) and so on. In fact Christian Bale himself said he was "not interested" in Marvel films. Take a guess how that turned out. It is a posturing strategy in most (not all) cases so they can negotiate the most favorable contract terms for themselves.

Yes! The studio is the problem because they had a huge hit in the dark Knight films and it is film making malpractice that they did not build on it with a ready made crossover that was perfectly positioned to be an epic start to the DC film universe. But I have to fault Zack Snyder for not going with the obvious direction and choosing to undermine what the studio wanted to do. That is what started the snowball rolling which we still have not recovered from.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 8/6/2025, 10:04 PM
@Forthas - I get it. You disagree. Cool, we're done.
Wahhvacado
Wahhvacado - 8/6/2025, 10:28 AM
Glad this is getting updates and moving forward. It has been reported that Reeves was going through some personal matters and my heart goes out to him and his family.

Excited to see more of this world
MrDandy
MrDandy - 8/6/2025, 10:30 AM
At last! Glad to see this finally getting off the ground.
MisterBones
MisterBones - 8/6/2025, 10:31 AM
User Comment Image
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 8/6/2025, 10:32 AM
It's cold in January, I hope Matt remembers his scarf.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 8/6/2025, 10:36 AM
@Ryguy88 -

How do you expect him to know what month it is when he obviously never even seems to know what year it is?
Thing94
Thing94 - 8/6/2025, 10:34 AM
When in 2027 does it come out again?
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 8/6/2025, 10:37 AM
@Thing94 - October 1st.
Madein93
Madein93 - 8/6/2025, 6:16 PM
@Thing94 - probably the back of the year, I’m telling myself 2028 at the latest. Sh*t always gets delayed
DocSpock
DocSpock - 8/6/2025, 10:34 AM

The first movie was pretty good, though bloated. They could have easily edited a half hour out of it.

Catwoman and Penguin were both very well done. I hope they don't have the Joker as a main character. Hugo Strange and Hush would be a great combo threat.

A young Dick Grayson intro would be a good surprise.


mountainman
mountainman - 8/6/2025, 10:36 AM
@DocSpock - Yes please no Joker in this one. Maybe some hints or an easter egg.

Penguin should be a good secondary antagonist. Hugo Strange or Hush would both be good, and I’m also open to see the Court of Owls.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 8/6/2025, 10:41 AM
@mountainman -

I just hope to see a great adaptation of Neal Adams tragic Man-Bat on the big screen some day.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/6/2025, 11:22 AM
@DocSpock - I did really enjoy the cut scene with him and Joker. I get why the cut it (too similar to The Dark Knight scene) but I’m always down for Batman and Joker interacting and feel no on screen Batman is legitimate until they’ve faced their Joker. Maybe have them face off early after Joker escapes Arkham and we find he was pulling the strings all along at the end after the film focus’ on another main villain.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 8/6/2025, 11:25 AM
@Bucky74 -

I would like the 3rd movie to feature the Joker and Man-Bat.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 8/6/2025, 12:15 PM
@DocSpock - That'd be an interesting transition in this world, but it can fit perfectly for the recent "real world issues" with human bat gene splicing.

KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 8/6/2025, 12:23 PM
@DocSpock - User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image


Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/6/2025, 2:20 PM
@DocSpock - I like that idea but they’d have to work hard to make Man-Bat fit the tone of this series
JFerguson
JFerguson - 8/6/2025, 10:34 AM
Millers work can only be adapted so many times. Excited to finally move past that here
mountainman
mountainman - 8/6/2025, 10:35 AM
Wow this is actually happening. The only news more shocking than this would be to see Blade go into production.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 8/6/2025, 10:37 AM
Finally, this movie is actually becoming a reality. Considering that filming can take anywhere between 4-5 months, is it unrealistic to expect the release date to be sooner than October ? like sometime in the Summer instead ? If the movie wraps filming in May of next year, why would they need a year and a half of post-production on a movie that isn't VFX heavy ?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/6/2025, 11:18 AM
@TheJok3r - It might be VFX heavy. There might actually be a fantastical villain like Man-Bat. Reeves is the guy who gave us two Planet of the Apes movies, he would wanna make sure it's good.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 8/6/2025, 10:38 AM

We'll see a cool Batmobile.

And in the 3rd movie, we'll see a cool Bat mobility scooter.


TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 8/6/2025, 10:42 AM
@DocSpock - Most of us here will be in a retirement home by the time the third one materializes, lol.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 8/6/2025, 11:13 AM
@TheJok3r -

I'll be a heist movie where the Joker makes off with Batman's dentures from his bedside table.
Gambito
Gambito - 8/6/2025, 10:39 AM
DC killing it Matt Reeves handling Batman and James Gunn w Superman top tier talent for the top tier characters
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 8/6/2025, 10:42 AM
@Gambito - Hopefully they get someone equally as talented for Wonder Woman, the third of the trinity.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 8/6/2025, 10:57 AM
X-Files proved you can have sci-fi, supernatural concepts merged with grounded and realistic storytelling. There’s no reason Mr. Freeze, Clayface, or Man-Bat couldn’t fit into this world.
SpideyPuffsMJ
SpideyPuffsMJ - 8/6/2025, 11:00 AM
Bruh, let's get on it with it already.
Nomis929
Nomis929 - 8/6/2025, 11:08 AM
The ONLY reason this movie interest me is the wondeful PENGUIN series is possibly attached to it.

User Comment Image
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/6/2025, 11:11 AM
It was great to finally see the “Detective” side of Batman full-bore but while we’ll made, the plot was full of holes and falls apart under the slightest scrutiny (his plan was to get Carmine Falcone “into the light” but the funeral scene did that already and there were many more ways to do that for example). Cat-woman’s “White privilege” line was pure cringe, they wanted us to feel something for Alfred almost dying in the beginning before we even got to really meet him, and there was no indication that Batman trained at all to be able to beat up so many armed thugs. Patterson also went full emo (you never go full emo). I liked the film and again, it was very well made, but it was not the “masterpiece” many claimed. Far from it. Hopefully this one fixes the problems the first had
elgaz
elgaz - 8/6/2025, 11:32 AM
@Bucky74 - Agree with some of your points, though there was a scene where Alfred mentioned teaching Bruce to fight. I'm assuming like many iterations of the character, this Alfred probably had some military background.

Patterson did indeed go full emo which was a little jarring at first, but by the time we got to the end of the film and we see that he recognises his Batman has to be about hope and not all vengeance/darkness, I think it made more sense then. Be interesting to see if he can maintain that more hopeful attitude in the sequel.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/6/2025, 2:24 PM
@elgaz - I hope they at least strike a balance between the Dark Knight seeking vengeance Batman and the more heroic symbol of hope and justice in Gotham. I’d he reverts back then there is no character growth anymore. Also, after the amazing Penguin series, Oz deserves a bigger role here
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/6/2025, 2:27 PM
@elgaz - I’m also big on training montages, lol. Batman Begins and that scene in Batman Vs Superman where Afleck was doing CrossFit make the idea of a Batman in these films more believable. Alfred teaching him is fine but I also want to see Bruce training. One of the things I loved in Begins was when Bruce wakes up sore and bruised and immediately hits the floor to do push ups. It shows the characters dedication and discipline
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 8/6/2025, 11:16 AM
I really like the first one 9/10 (minus cringiest joker to Leto), BUT I would be fine if they still scrap the sequel. There definitely shouldn’t be a trilogy. We need Batman in the DCU.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder