BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER Star Letitia Wright Unsure When Shuri Will Return But Has An Intriguing Idea

BLACK PANTHER: WAKANDA FOREVER Star Letitia Wright Unsure When Shuri Will Return But Has An Intriguing Idea

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever star Letitia Wright has addressed her MCU future, admitting that while she's still waiting to hear from Marvel Studios, she has some ideas about where to take Shuri next...

By JoshWilding - Jun 13, 2023 04:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Black Panther

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever saw Shuri embrace her role as the MCU's new Black Panther following her brother's death, but the movie ended in a way that left the character's future somewhat up in the air. 

Unlike T'Challa and her mother, Queen Ramonda, Shuri has no interest in taking the throne and appears to have abdicated it to M'Baku. That could leave the door open to Black Panther becoming a full-time Avenger, though it appears Letitia Wright is still waiting for news about her future. 

Talking to ComicBook.com, the actress was asked if she's heard from Marvel Studios about what's next. "No, I haven't," she admitted before adding, "I will know as soon as you know."

In a separate conversation with Inverse, Wright said she's been on a break since the emotional Black Panther sequel was released but shared a unique idea for where Shuri's story could go in future movies. 

"She actually takes on a new form in the future. She really never dies, which is really interesting. She has these amazing crazy superpowers, and she's an encyclopedia of information. She’s Griot times a thousand."

Wright is referring to Ta-Nehisi Coates' "A Nation Under Our Feet" comic book storyline. In that, the hero is preserved in a stasis called "living death" after a battle with Namor the Submariner, but her soul transcends to Djalia, the Plane of Wakandan Memory.

There, she meets spirits called "griots" who are tasked with preserving her nation's history and, when she finally returns to her body, Shuri has been granted a new set of powers that make the hero perhaps even more powerful than T'Challa. 

While that would be an admittedly strange storyline to tackle in Black Panther 3, better exploring the mystical side of Wakanda would be no bad thing. However, we'd hope that doesn't lead the franchise too far from what makes it great as Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania was a good example of why that's a bad idea.

Are you excited for Black Panther 3?

GLADIATOR II Star Denzel Washington Confirms He'll Star In BLACK PANTHER 3 After Ryan Coogler Wrote Him A Role
Related:

GLADIATOR II Star Denzel Washington Confirms He'll Star In BLACK PANTHER 3 After Ryan Coogler Wrote Him A Role

BLACK PANTHER Star Lupita Nyong'o Says Black Doesn’t Sell Myth Had Marvel Shaking In Their Boots
Recommended For You:

BLACK PANTHER Star Lupita Nyong'o Says "Black Doesn’t Sell" Myth Had Marvel "Shaking In Their Boots"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TheVandalore
TheVandalore - 6/13/2023, 4:43 AM
Huh, interesting sounding storyline. If explored in a cool way I might be down to see this. I thought they were saying she would become like an AI, like Jarvis. But coming back from the spirit plain with powers might be cool too. I haven't read the book it's based on but the basic premise sounds cool.
TheVandalore
TheVandalore - 6/13/2023, 4:48 AM
I still wish Wakanda Forever wasn't a Black Panther movie, but just a people of Wakanda movie. I'd feel better if they all came together to stop Namor, then maybe at the very end, decide Suri will become the Black Panther and the film ends with her accepting the duty, but not yet becoming the new Black Panther, just accepting.

Then in the 3rd film it's back to being Black Panther movies. I think Wkanda Forever could and should have been about that transition, with Nanor being the catalyst threat.
TempleRod
TempleRod - 6/13/2023, 5:07 AM
Not much a fan of the black panther franchise, either the first or the second,
But one thing about Wright that I have to respect.
She wasn't afraid to speak her mind.

That means a lot these days.
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 6/13/2023, 6:34 AM
@TempleRod

Deep.
TempleRod
TempleRod - 6/13/2023, 6:38 AM
@regularmovieguy - Not trying to be deep.

Just pointing out my own values. She could've gone a lot of ways there.
Instead she took the path that would present hardships to her career.
I respect that. Nothing 'deep' about it. Just real.
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 6/13/2023, 6:42 AM
@TempleRod

Nothing like sharing misinformation because you’re a religious zealot. More of them need platforms 🤝🏻

She is a talented actress but the video she tweeted was beyond stupid.
TempleRod
TempleRod - 6/13/2023, 6:46 AM
@regularmovieguy - I'm not religious.
Couldn't care less what religion anyone is.
Jew. Christ, Allah. Satan. Buddah. I don't care.
It's all a bunch of shit.

I believe we create ourselves. Outside of any religion. Leticia Wright was speaking her own realizations.
And guess what?
Turned out to be entirely true things to worry about.
If you're taking those vaccines, power to you I suppose. But one day they are going to prove to do more harm than good.
I didn't take any. So I got no skin in this game. But still... Just saying.
It's not going to turn out well.
TheyDont
TheyDont - 6/13/2023, 8:16 AM
@TempleRod - Shouldn't you be religious if you don't "believe" in vaccines?
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 8:44 AM
@regularmovieguy - And she apologized. Within hours. Why do people still make this a thing? Has anyone apologized for trying to bully a person suffering from depression?
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 8:49 AM
@TempleRod - Letitia wasn't speaking her "own realizations". She retweeted a bad video, realized her mistake, deleted it and apologized. She became a victim of an overwhelming misinformation campaign when she was vulnerable, dealing with her chronic depression as well as the loss of Chadwick Boseman, who she loved like a brother. She has moved on, got vaccinated and talks about more positive things now.

You can stop.
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 6/13/2023, 8:57 AM
@Drace24

Her response was most likely mandated by the studio. I’ve never tweeted at or bullied her personally - have just shared my opinion about it on here.

I don’t remember ever hearing her blame it on depression either.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 9:37 AM
@regularmovieguy - What is this shit, man? So she made a mistake, tens of thousends of people assume the right to punish her for it through harassment, insults and threats and when she does apologize you just tell yourself the studio must have forced her? How lovely.
Can I just ask what the shitstorm was meant to achieve then, if apologizing for the retweet and and deleting it doesn't even matter? Kinda leaves me to assume that people really did aim to push her into suicide. Sure was what it looked like.

And no, she didn't use her depression as an excuse. (Could have totally understood that though since that's how misinformation campaigns like anti-vax work. They indoctrinate you when you are vulnerable.) What I'm arguing is that Letitia suffering from chronic depression and experiencing suicidal tendencies in the past is very well known. She was quite open about it throughout her career. And seeing self-rightous mobs of anonymous people treat someone like her in that way sure made me rethink a lot of things.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 6/13/2023, 5:15 AM
We'll probably see her in Kang Dynasty.

But after Secret Wars they should reboot with a new T'Challa.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 8:23 AM
@ObserverIO - God, no!
EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 6/13/2023, 3:19 PM
@ObserverIO - It's the damn multiverse event film; they can literally plunk a T'Challa from another universe. Couldn't make recasting any easier and still respect Chadwick's contribution. They'd have to be morons to not do it.
TheHumanSpider2
TheHumanSpider2 - 6/13/2023, 8:20 AM
If Secret Wars is the soft reboot I'm sure it will be...they need to recast T'Chala.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 8:33 AM
@TheHumanSpider2 - Yeah, they are probably going to gut the most sucessfull cinematic franchise in history and immediately reboot it without iconic actors and the carefully crafted continuity, aka the MCU's two biggest selling points. And they'll recast T'challa while at it, just in case there are some people left they haven't pissed off. That absolutely sounds like something they would do. That could never go down as the most braindead decision in the history of Hollywood.
TheHumanSpider2
TheHumanSpider2 - 6/13/2023, 8:36 AM
@Drace24 - You really think they are keeping the MCU another 15 years without Steve, Tony, or T'chala? yeah, because Phase 4 has worked great...
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 9:21 AM
@TheHumanSpider2 - Phase 4 hasn't worked any less then the other phases did. They all had their duds, but they certainly didn't have as many titles as phase 4 which is definitely much more likely to be a problem than the assumption that general audiences just can't accept new stories without Tony Stark. The MCU could absolutely go on for another 15 years if it continues to innovate. Tell new stories with new characters that speak to a wide variety of audiences.
Phase 4 was Marvel's experimental phase where tried out new things, TV-shows, short films, animation. And lots of new characters. Maybe not all of it worked but for every She-Hulk there was a Shang-Chi.
I've no doubt that Secret Wars will leave its mark on the MCU just like Endgame did. But planning a reboot already, especially with all these new stories emerging, would not just be an extraordinarily stupid decision from a marketing standpoint, but also a complete declaration of creative bankruptcy.
TheHumanSpider2
TheHumanSpider2 - 6/13/2023, 9:31 AM
@Drace24 - SOFT reboot.
The current state of keep bringing back actors in their 60s and 80s, you think it cant last?
There has to be a new Tony Stark. Same applies to Steve, and T'Chala.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 9:48 AM
@TheHumanSpider2 - Not sure what your argument is but how about NOT bringing them back? Tony Stark's story is simply over. Everything has been said. The end. Same for Steve. T'challa's story was unfortunately cut short because of things that Marvel couldn't control. Marvel's decision to not recast the character has been made. And for a reason. Pretty sure they would have just immediately recast if they had plans to do so later anyway instead of going through the hassle of rethinking the entire movie so close before production was supposed to begin. Pretty sure the idea is to have another timeskip at some point and let T'challa junior continue where his dad left off. That sounds like a much more elegant decision than a reboot.
EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 6/13/2023, 3:23 PM
@Drace24 - I will say this. Doing this X-Men the way this MCU is makes no sense. You can't do X-Men without the rich history it inhabits. If not for Tony and Cap, then for the X-Men alone, rebooting might help them a lot.
EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 6/13/2023, 3:30 PM
@Drace24 - Also, having a major event reboot a universe as a very comicbook thing that the MCU hasn't done yet, I think rebooting every after 15-20 years seems reasonable
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/16/2023, 1:10 PM
@EgoEgor - Yes, but big budget multi-billion dollar franchises are very different from little picture books.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/16/2023, 1:17 PM
@EgoEgor - I disagree. If Marvel continues what they are doing now, treating mutants as a new phenomenon and slowly building up them, that would be the best way to tell their story and distinguish it from the FoX-Men. Mutants are an allegory for minorities in the 60's. Just translate that to today. We basically live in the new 60's. The story is more relevant than ever.

The only problem would be keeping Magneto's iconic origin story. In order to be a holocaust survivor he would have to be in his 90's at best. No clue how they could save that, but a complete reboot would not help. At all.
EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 6/16/2023, 3:36 PM
@Drace24 - it just wouldn't translate as well. Thr civil rights movement was built on a few 100 years of history, it didn't just erupt from the ground. Having mutants be coming out of nowhere doesn't really have the same impact; it doesn't have the hate backend, it doesn't have the lore, it's not something that can happen in a few movies or a phase or 2.

The FoX-Men for better or worse has that. The mcu will feel its narrative impacts. Having a reboot helps speed that up and you can truly tell an X-Men story.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/16/2023, 5:38 PM
@EgoEgor - What are you talking about? In the comics and the previous films mutants as a group started appearing in the 20th century. Now we have it be the 21st century instead. What the difference?

And it's pointless to argue about that because we know for a fact that's what Marvel is doing. They introduced that Kamala Khan is a mutant and at the same time that noone knows what mutants are.
EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 6/17/2023, 10:27 PM
@Drace24 - in the first issue of x-men jean grey comes to an already formed x-men. Mutants have been around for a long time, especially considering the age of the group from teens to young adults to men. The history gives the main conflict gravitas.

I think doing this way is ultimately limiting the great stories they could tell but that's just me. I think doing the reboot really allows them to kind of regather all their properties into one cohesive world after FF4 and XMen coming, with the added benefit of Cap and Tony.

If I was Kevin, I'd find that opportunity hard to pass. Especially considering events like these are used to reboot continuity in comics a lot. Why not be the first to do that and in a way that is by choice rather than being forced by mediocrity.

I think the idea is valid, I get you don't like it for whatever reason and it might not be true at all. But I think its a great idea because it really allows them to just reset their footing with all the x-men property that really just doesn't fit.
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/18/2023, 7:52 AM
@EgoEgor - No, canonically speaking, mutants - with the exceptions of some very early precursers like Apocalypse or Wolverine - have been popping up in the early 20th century. The earlier comics even implied that the humanities use of nuclear power had something to do with it. There is really no reason why they can't just do the same thing but with the 21st century.

"If I was Kevin, I'd find that opportunity hard to pass."

Only because you don't think of the just massive ramifications this would have for the MCU from a marketing perspective. The MCU as it exists right now is an absolutely unprecedented success story and that is largely because it puts so much emphasis on its continuity. That's what made it the multi-billion dollar success that it is. It shouldn't need explaining that this works very different from comic books.

What do you mean "whatever reason", I've been making my reasons quite clear for several comments now.
EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 6/18/2023, 1:25 PM
@Drace24 - There would be no ramifications. You keep what you like, you get rid of what you don't need, and add what you think is useful. Keep all the contracts you have, but the story path changes. You have an avatar character who can fill in the blanks naturally.

You're also misunderstanding me. My complaint isn't in ancient history figures like apocalypse, although things like that are missed if they go down the route they are.

I'm talking about mutants being born mutants, and the culture of longstanding hatred for and fear of them is relevant. Otherwise they are no different than Spider-Man or Captain America.

You can't have those elements with the way this story is set. The first issues starts out with X-Men team being already made, haven been BORN mutants, and Xavier being the first mutant born who is probably 35-45 years old and not some young teenager.

Without those 2 elements, being born mutant and societal hatred, you don't have the mutants and you don't have the x-men. And you lose all the amazing stories and characters from the comics. The Ms Marvel explanation is kind of a sideway step.

Everything marvel is doing now with the x-men feels like them putting square pegs into round holes. But resetting allows them to fix that, keep what they want and change what they don't want. And have an avatar character in that new universe which keeps continuity of the old and allows writers to explain what's different through them; mutants and the X-Men being the major one. No need to force anything that doesn't fit(x-men just don't fit), it makes sense and it doesn't have any ramifications. The mutliverse really allows them to have the universe that allows them to tell the best stories. And with DCU resetting, would also be funny to see them do it first too.

If you can't see the benefit of this, I guess we're arguing for its sake. Obviously we don't know what they'll do, I just think this is a genuine good options for them, i really do.
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/13/2023, 8:37 AM
Drace24
Drace24 - 6/13/2023, 8:42 AM
My idea is that she would go into a self-imposed exile to America and become a part of the Young Avengers. And then in BP3 she would have to return to Wakanda when it is in crisis. At the end she would finally be ready to accept her role as queen, with the intention of passing it on to her cousin as soon as he is old enough to beat her at the Warrior Falls.
PC04
PC04 - 6/13/2023, 8:57 AM
@Drace24 - That's a pretty great idea.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 6/13/2023, 9:31 AM
I enjoyed this storyline in the comics and it seems like a natural progression for her to keep embracing the spiritual.
View Recorder