Russo Brothers Explain Why CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Didn't Kill [SPOILER] And Address "Insurgent" Steve Rogers

Russo Brothers Explain Why CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR Didn't Kill [SPOILER] And Address "Insurgent" Steve Rogers

The Russo Brothers talk in detail about Captain America: Civil War's ending and why they decided against adapting a key moment from the comics. Kevin Feige meanwhile teases Bucky's MCU future...

By JoshWilding - May 13, 2016 06:05 PM EST
Source: Empire
Both the Civil War comic book and Captain America: Civil War may have concluded with The Avengers disassembled, but they were still very, very different. The biggest alteration is of course the fact that Steve Rogers isn't murdered, and while the movie's writers have already addressed why they took things in that direction, now the Russo Brothers have weighed in. "Frankly, it just seemed like an easy ending," Joe said of deciding against adapting the Death of Captain America. "We thought a more complicated ending would be more interesting -- to see the ramifications of that moving forward. Killing Cap ends that conceptually. There would be guilt on Tony's part." Anthony elaborated on that point, explaining: "We were saying to ourselves, the genre -- and perhaps the MCU -- has gotten to a point where the audience are sensing the patterns in the genre. Joe and I have always been about: how do we subvert genre? The more difficult and more interesting place to leave a family fight is: can these important relationships ever be repaired? Is this family broken permanently?" 

Kevin Feige went on to reveal that there were some at Disney who wanted the movie to end with the team reunited to take on a common foe, but it was the protestations of the Russos which ensured that didn't come to pass. Talk then turned to why exactly Steve left the shield behind after defeating Iron Man and what that means for his future. "Dropping the shield is a rejection of the Captain America identity and a choice to embrace the Steve Rogers identity," Anthony Russo said. Joe went on to explain that he's now a "full-blown insurgent," and that "The most interesting thing you can do is to take him from a patriot in the first film to an insurgent in the third movie." That's obviously going to be very interesting to watch play out, and Feige went on to tease another character's future; what exactly is next for Bucky now that he's on ice in Wakanda? "It... remains to be seen," the Marvel Studios boss said of Sebastian Stan possibly showing up in Black Panther in 2018. "He's certainly in stasis there. Where and when he comes out? I'm not sure..."

What do you guys think? 
SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down

F1 Driver Esteban Ocon Reveals Epic CAPTAIN AMERICA Helmet Ahead Of This Weekend's Las Vegas Grand Prix
Recommended For You:

F1 Driver Esteban Ocon Reveals Epic CAPTAIN AMERICA Helmet Ahead Of This Weekend's Las Vegas Grand Prix

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
xfactor
xfactor - 5/13/2016, 7:05 PM
I was hoping they didn't kill off cap. I would've been pissed if they pulled that off
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 5/13/2016, 7:32 PM
@xfactor -
If they pulled it off, IF they did (and I'm sure they could've), I wouldn't be pissed. But I'm really glad they didn't. They made the way smarter choice. It's annoying how so many people want or expect the big comic book moments or modern story points, when the comics went for a much longer time before these events happened. I'm glad the MCU is going it's own path and not rushing their storytelling.
xfactor
xfactor - 5/13/2016, 7:44 PM
@MosquitoFarmer - Honestly for me, I've loved all of Chris Evans performances as Captain America. And them pulling that off would've been a major disappointment for me. He reminds me a lot of Christopher Reeve's Superman.
Menks123
Menks123 - 5/13/2016, 8:17 PM
@xfactor - I really don't like the 100% comic to movie depiction. I like them to take little ideas here and there, like they did with Civil War.....and if they decide to kill make it someone we don't expect and meaningful. Like in AoU, Quicksilver had so much potential, but we didn't get attached to him to feel anything when he died.....just disappointment.

Why would people want to already know who is going to die based off comics? Seems kind of silly to me. If they killed anyone in CW and it ended up being someone like Ironman, Black Widow, Hawkeye.....that would be a good death because we are invested in them since the start and would not really expect it.
xfactor
xfactor - 5/13/2016, 8:35 PM
@Menks123 - Honestly, it wouldn't have served a purpose to the story. And it would've just definitely come off as something cheesy. We don't need comic book accurate adaptations as you mentioned, but hey some people are picky like that. But i feel that move would've just pissed off everyone in the general audience. So it was definitely a smart move.
Menks123
Menks123 - 5/13/2016, 8:49 PM
@xfactor - Definitely agree. I can see him dying in say IW part 2 totally heroically, but then I can see him being the face of the MCU for years to come....taking over for RDJ because of age and $$$. I mean Evans owns the role just as good as RDJ imo, and gave us the best trilogy of the MCU and arguably of all time for CBMs. His popularity has skyrocketed and you know Marvel will take advantage of that.
xfactor
xfactor - 5/13/2016, 9:20 PM
@Menks123 - Absolutely, this by far has been the comic book movie trilogy. The casting has been phenomenal from start to finish and everyone involved has done a fantastic job. Which is why I'm really hoping Feige can see about getting the Russos on board for another sequel. I know they'll have their hands tied with Infinity wars 1&2, but just for the sake of it I would love to see more of Captain America and winter soldier. Hopefully we can get a cameo of sorts in Black panther with Bucky.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 5/13/2016, 10:32 PM
@xfactor -
Chris Evans as Captain America is my favorite character in the MCU (though Scott Lang is shaping up to be very special). Evans is great, and they've done so much great work with the character, in both his sincerity and just how incredibly awesome they have made him. He was very different in The First Avenger, but that was well deserved and really wonderful. It was a very different time in history and they nailed it. But he is now arguably the most badass Avenger and he is still patriotic as hell. Marvel, plus the writers of the movies just made it work so well, cause it could so easily seem really goofy.
bbporto
bbporto - 5/14/2016, 2:03 AM
@xfactor - I just wanted to thank you for not writing "would of"
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 5/14/2016, 9:02 AM
@xfactor - I pretty much agree with almost everything you have said. I have been saying for years that comic storylines should NOT be directly adapted to the screen just because some fanboys think that doing otherwise is "disrespecting" the source material. No, you do NOT have to kill off a character in a movie just because he was killed in the comics. (I will say that I expected to be very angry if DC killed off Superman in BvS, but I actually think it fit the overall story and the direction they want to take with Justice League, so I ended up being ok with it.)

I do, however, have to strongly protest your comparison of Evans to Christopher Reeve. Sorry, but imo Reeve is seriously overrated as Superman, and I hate his take on Clark Kent. (There is a difference between being mild-mannered and being a bumbling idiot.) Evans is far superior to Reeve.
xfactor
xfactor - 5/14/2016, 9:23 AM
@Lhornbk - I respect your opinion, but to me Christopher Reeve is the actor who set the standard for all cbms. And Chris Evans to me is an embodiment of that. As for the decision of bvs to kill off superman, I detested that move. That should've been for the solo Superman films with Cavill, but they destroyed any chance of that happening now with that. I'm hoping they pick it up in Justice League, because BvS left much to be desired for my taste.
kakinurmawth
kakinurmawth - 5/20/2016, 12:22 AM
[frick] this shit. Easy ending? Bullshit. [frick]ing bullshit.
kakinurmawth
kakinurmawth - 5/20/2016, 12:27 AM
i haven't been this upset at a Marvel movie since IM3.
Shenron
Shenron - 5/13/2016, 7:05 PM
Who'd have thought the Russo's would become such powerhouse players in the CBM game. Theyve done very well.
xfactor
xfactor - 5/13/2016, 7:05 PM
And first....lol
four20smoke
four20smoke - 5/13/2016, 7:06 PM
@xfactor -
xfactor
xfactor - 5/13/2016, 7:06 PM
@four20smoke - lmao!!
BloodyBed
BloodyBed - 5/14/2016, 4:57 AM
@xfactor -

four20smoke
four20smoke - 5/13/2016, 7:05 PM
Thank the lord they didn't kill him...It was a pretty awesome flow that they did with everything.
PantherKing
PantherKing - 5/13/2016, 7:07 PM
It would have been really stupid if they killed him. I hate how people are calling to kill a character when their story isn't done yet and then say "there are no consequences in the mcu".
Vuec97
Vuec97 - 5/13/2016, 7:11 PM
@PantherKing - to the plot of the movie, yeah it would have been very dumb if cap died. It made sense for the comic books but how they ended things for that story was much better. The name civil war for the movie is just that, a name. They could have called the movie something else, it didn't deal too much with what the comic did. Just touched upon.
PantherKing
PantherKing - 5/13/2016, 7:12 PM
@Vuec97 - neither did Age of Ultron or Winter Soldier
Vuec97
Vuec97 - 5/13/2016, 7:25 PM
@PantherKing - i mean, yeah it should have been called Ultron instead. Seems civil war ends up being a decoy to the end game to trick the audience. If that's the case, well done
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 5/13/2016, 7:43 PM
@PantherKing - @Vuec97 I dont know, i would had find, really brutal and perfect, to see how Tony kills Bucky (instead of cutting his arm) and later Steve goes to kill Tony in revenge and when he is about to hit with the shield the Reactor in his armor, Tony put his hands above his face and shots by instic his repulsors killing Steve.

Only to see how at the end, he had the shield nailed in the middle of the suit.

That would have been really brutal to watch, because it would have make sense and it would have been a really sad way to end the movie, with Tony full of Guilt, with Steve and Bucky death and with half of the Avengers taking the Sokovia Accords.

Of course, it would destroy the MCU, but it would be a great way at less for me to end this story.

But no, we need to see Thanos breack Steve shield and later kill him with a punch, of course we need dat shit.

By the way, the name of the movie is a trick, the movie isnt about "Civil War", the movie is around other themes, Steve wants to stop a "Terorrist" and clean the name of Bucky.

While Tony wants to redeem himself and clean the disaster they have done, both have right, great movie, shitty ending...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
View Recorder