3 THEORIES. Or, The Three Act Structure Across AgeOfUltron/AntMan/CIVIL WAR

3 THEORIES. Or, The Three Act Structure Across AgeOfUltron/AntMan/CIVIL WAR

Where will the amount of heroes realistically required for Civil War will come from? Why did Downey Jr get chills reading the final page of AoU? Where exactly does AntMan fit and why did EDGAR WRIGHT leave the project? Enter, as we attempt to tie all this up into a neat little bow.

Editorial Opinion
By CarinaShot - Oct 29, 2014 04:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Comics


The big news from the Marvel Phase03 announcement connected a few dots that have been bouncing around my head for a while.


What follows is and idea of how I believe we'll get from AoU to Civil War by way of AntMan.


Theory 1/ The word 'Inhuman' will be dropped in Age of Ultron. Scarlett Witch and Quiksilver will be on a 'journey of discovery', seeking who they are etc. We see in the teaser trailer they appear in cahoots with Ultron himself - Classic case of bad guy promising truth for co-operation from future good guy..? What SW and QS will learn is that they are 'Inhuman' - ie. Their full Kree-experiment origin/bloodline/history.

Downey has said the last page of Age of Ultron gave him 'chills'. Hemsworth said none of them were on it -

WHAT IF - By the end of Age of Ultron, something akin to the terrigen bomb (of the recent Marvel Comics Infinity series) is detonated and the MIST CLOUD SPREADS AROUND THE WORLD.

That 'chills' scene is a montage of Inhumans the world over getting their powers.

RESULT - A LOT of unregistered superheroes for Cap and Stark to fight over in CIVIL WAR.

At this point, even including AoS, we have only a handful of Supers. I realise it was stated during the Marvel Event that it won't follow comics/unmasking exactly, and be about distrust of these people. But surely not JUST the 10-15 people we currently have.

The MCU Civil War needs a lot more supers than it currently has. It needs Inhumans.

THEORY 01 - Terrigen release at end of Age of Ultron creating multiple 'supers' for Civil War and beyond.


Theory 2/ AntMan is release just 2.5 months after Age of Ultron.

When the plans for Phase Three were solidified (I'd imagine after the astonishing Guardians of the Galaxy box office proved cosmic was the way to go..) it meant AntMan needed some revision. It became a pseudo direct-sequel to Age of Ultron and it needed to, at least on the outskirts, deal with the fact A LOT of superpowered Inhumans just sprung up all over the world.

This was a BIG deviation from what the AntMan script was at the time. Changes NEEDED to be made.

THEORY 02 - Edgar Wright left the AntMan project due to 'Inhuman fallout from Age of Ultron' forcing a massive deviation from the original mandate.


Theory 3/ A large chunk of the AntMan cast will appear in Civil War, along with a large chunk from the rest of the MCU, even if only in cameo. This is the big Marvel film the year of BvS. The film compared to BvS by the end-of-year-critics. Civil War will be a movie as big as an Avengers movie in everything but title. Where exactly does AntMan fit?

THEORY 03 - Scott Lang will play the Spidey role - ie. Volentary unmasking, aligned with Stark.


-

Of side note - The Inhumans film could tell the big broad story of the Royal Family, so none of the above renders that film obsolete.


-

Would be interested to hear if anyone else thinks there's anything to any of that!
“ALAMU: Diary of a Street Lagosian” Is The Bold New Motion Comic Redefining African Urban Drama
Related:

“ALAMU: Diary of a Street Lagosian” Is The Bold New Motion Comic Redefining African Urban Drama

BLACK CAT: Marvel Comics Reveals Full Gallery Of Covers For New Series As Felicia Hardy Enters Her Hero Era
Recommended For You:

BLACK CAT: Marvel Comics Reveals Full Gallery Of Covers For New Series As Felicia Hardy Enters Her Hero Era

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ruadh
ruadh - 10/29/2014, 5:34 PM
Yep, those sound plausible.
kong
kong - 10/29/2014, 5:40 PM
This is laid out so weirdly....
Zeek
Zeek - 10/29/2014, 6:03 PM
1. Problem here for me is the 4 year gap between AoU and Inhumans. Can't drop the storyline for that long as the Inhumans are completely hidden from society.
2. I thought the Black Panther's presence in Civil War and how it was all revealed showed that BP would be the Spidey sub.
3. See 1.
ruadh
ruadh - 10/29/2014, 6:11 PM
@Zeek, I get your point, but when the studio keeps seeding Thanos and the infinity stuff for apparently seven years before having a payoff...
MileHighRonin
MileHighRonin - 10/29/2014, 6:54 PM
Like your idea for Lang replacing Spidey in the Civil War arc. I really hate the idea of T'Challa being indecisive or being tricked into one side. T'Challa must not take Spideys place, he should have the same stance he had in the comics. His first focus is always Wakanda and he knows the entire registration idea is nothing but trouble, for both sides. He is too wise to be the unsure middle man. And to intelligent to be tricked to pick a side. If T'Challa takes spideys place than they have already failed with T'Challa in my opinion.
jeddtobee023
jeddtobee023 - 10/30/2014, 3:18 AM
Having Black Panther introduced in the Marvel Event and said to be on multiple films... confirms that BP will be the Spidey alternate in Captain America: Civil War
ruadh
ruadh - 10/30/2014, 8:07 AM
Not really. It just confirms he will be in a few movies.
CharlesLord
CharlesLord - 10/30/2014, 10:07 AM
I think T'Challa having a major role in Civil War could mean anything. Hell Feige himself said that it keeps in line with the comics in that something happens and that divides everyone. Maybe AoU gets the world to start not entirely trusting The Avengers and in Civil War, Wakanda is attacked or something like that? It could be taking the place of the school zone that was blown to hell and he could have a big role simply choosing neither side but protecting his people.
CarinaShot
CarinaShot - 10/30/2014, 5:48 PM
@npamusic - I do remember reading that quote now you post it, but - Straight up lie? To definitely intro Inhumans within the next couple of years, then also explain a SEPARATE superpower/mutant origin (unless SW & QS are UNIQUE) seems a bit too much.

Sure there's all sorts of origins and sub-species going on in the comics, but we're talking a finite amount of movie screen time. Which is why I lean toward EVERYTHING like this falling under the Inhuman banner. Backdated as well - Any smaller, powered characters on AoS could retroactively be labelled as Inhuman offshoots.

@Zeke / MileHighRonin - Gotta agree with Ronin. That's not Black Panther they're parading up there on screen if in his first appearance he unmasks for Stark. And Lang at that point would be intro'd to the audience through his own film, so they already know of him existing prior to unmasking. BP being bought in for solely that reason would carry the same weight.

---

I'm really viewing AoU / AntMan / Civil War as singular three-act structure.

AntMan's gotta fit into the big picture somehow. It's not going to be through a sequel anytime soon. And again Civil War needs a significant number of people on each side. We need to see Tony have locked some people up en mass. At this point, even including AoS, we have only a handful of Supers.

I realise it was stated during the Marvel Event that it won't follow comics/unmasking exactly, and be about distrust of these people. But surely not JUST the 10-15 people we currently have. The MCU Civil War needs a lot more supers than it currently has. It needs Inhumans.

---

@Crab - I'm assuming Johnson and Olson didn't escape the infamous multi-picture-contracts. And so again, with no immediate solos planned, gotta assume both SW & QS will be popping up elsewhere (more than once) during Phase3. Pietro/Crystal romance surely on the cards for Inhumans solo and moving into Infinity War.

re skepticism - Inhumans will change the MCU landscape more so than any other release, that's for sure. It's effectively all of a sudden dumping mutants into the middle of all this, if all the mutants looked a lot more like Beast than Kitty Pride.
View Recorder