Community Discussion: Would You Pay A Few Bucks A Month For An Ad-Free CBM?

Community Discussion: Would You Pay A Few Bucks A Month For An Ad-Free CBM?

I'm kicking around an optional subscription that would make CBM completely ad free for a small monthly fee. Before anything gets finalized, I want to know what would make it worth your while...

Feature Opinion
By NateBest - Jul 10, 2026 07:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Community

I've got a question for the community, and I'm asking it before I go any further: would you pay a few bucks a month for a completely ad-free ComicBookMovie.com?

The idea I'm kicking around is pretty simple. An optional subscription that strips every ad off of the site for a small monthly fee, with a discounted rate if you sign up for a full year… Something like 12 months for the price of 10. And as far as pricing goes, I'm thinking somewhere in the $4 - $8 range. Nothing outrageous.

I started coding the bare bones a few years back, but then didn't end up launching it because I got distracted with the sister sites, so nothing has been set in stone.

The free version of CBM you're reading right now wouldn't change. Random visitors see the normal site with ads. Registered users, who are logged into their account, see fewer ads. The new subscription user would have all 3rd party ads removed. Before I jump back into development, I want to hear from the people who would actually use it!

My honest thoughts on ads? I HATE them. I know, I know... they keep the lights on around here, so they're a necessary evil. But I spend a LOT of time on the internet, and reading a site without them is so much nicer.

At the same time, running a site this size isn't cheap. The domain names cost money. The servers cost money. Monitoring costs money. Defending against bots and online attacks costs money. And the members of our Contributor Partner Program earn money through the content they share, so they both make money for the site and cost money. It all adds up.

Ads are what cover all of that today, which brings me to ad-blockers. According to the stats I have available, ad-blocking users make up a very small percentage of users, so they aren't a big problem for CBM. But I've always looked at it this way, and I think I've shared this before: if I owned a restaurant, someone using an ad-blocker is like a customer coming in, eating whatever they want off the menu, and then leaving without paying or tipping the waitress. A subscription would give anyone who hates ads a way to ditch them completely while supporting the site instead. They also wouldn't have to rely on 3rd party software or browser extensions to hide the ads.

Now for the fun part. I've spent the last few years stocking up on limited edition pieces from Sideshow Collectibles with this moment in mind. Take a look at a few of the things that I've put aside:

Sideshow-Examples

And this is just the tip of the iceberg to whet your appetite. There's a lot more and MUCH bigger items that may very well bankrupt me when it comes time to ship them. Yes, they're ginormous!

How would the giveaways work? That's one of the first things I would like your input on. One option is monthly giveaways, where every active subscriber is automatically entered. No entry forms, no hoops, unless you want to enter for free (that's a legal hoop that has to be jumped through so that the giveaway isn't viewed as "gambling").

My other thought is milestone giveaways: a piece goes out when we hit 100 subscribers, another at 500, another at 1,000, and so on. I can see the appeal of both, and I'm all ears. Maybe both?

Either way, the giveaways would be tied to subscribers. The fewer the subscribers, the better the odds of having your username selected, at least early on while the subscriber base is growing.

So, what would make a subscription worth it for YOU?

Is ad-free enough on its own? Do giveaways move the needle? What feels like a fair monthly price? What other perks would you want to see included? And if you'd NEVER pay for a subscription, no matter what was offered, that's an answer I would like to hear as well. Just make sure and share your "why"!

CBM has been created by fans, for fans since day one, and that's why I want your feedback before moving forward with something like this. Sound off in the comments below!

About The Author:
NateBest
Member Since 1/26/2004
ComicBookMovie.com and Best Little Sites was the brainchild of Nate and a friend way back in 2002. Nate initially focused on the back-end programming and front-end design, but now manages the company and its associated sites as well, with a LOT of help from some very talented contributors.

Nate has loved comics from a very young age and continues to read them on a regular basis thanks to subscriptions to various titles (both Marvel and DC). He also loves movies, as his wife and children will attest. He's not overly critical of movies, so his reviews should be taken with a grain of salt as he's much more interested in being entertained and escaping the "real" world for a couple of hours than finding every conceivable plot-hole and character flaw in a film.

Outside of his guilty "nerdy" pleasures, Nate enjoys spending time with his wife and three boys, CrossFit, playing guitar, coaching youth sports and MMA (he spent a couple of years in the cage as an NHB fighter, but is now MUCH too old).
THE MINISTRY OF UNGENTLEMANLY WARFARE Now Available On Home Video And We're Celebrating With A Giveaway
Related:

THE MINISTRY OF UNGENTLEMANLY WARFARE Now Available On Home Video And We're Celebrating With A Giveaway

Spider-Woman Comic Book Relaunch Will See Jessica Drew Become Carnage's New Host
Recommended For You:

Spider-Woman Comic Book Relaunch Will See Jessica Drew Become Carnage's New Host

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6
NateBest
NateBest - 7/10/2026, 7:00 AM
TO CLARIFY FOR THOSE THAT DIDN'T ACTUALLY READ THE POST AND JUMPED STRAIGHT TO THE COMMENTS...

This would be an add-on. Everything else for the site, as it currently works, would remain the same. Meaning that the site content, articles, commenting, etc., would still be accessible and people would still be able to register for the current free accounts, comment, etc.

NO revenue isn't down. This is an idea that I have been kicking around for 8 or 10 years (other sites have been doing it since the early 2000s and since ad-blockers, which syphon resources and cost websites money without giving anything back in return, became a thing).
Dahulk2001
Dahulk2001 - 7/10/2026, 10:04 AM
@NateBest - .At what point does repeating other people's reporting stop being scooping and become little more than echoing people with better sources? I honestly can't remember the last time your site set the conversation instead of simply following it.

When the handful of original scoops you're actually allowed to publish become locked behind a paywall, it won't signal exclusivity—it will signal scarcity. You can't build credibility by rationing the very thing people visit your site for. You're not running a premium publication; you're charging admission to an increasingly empty room.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/10/2026, 10:27 AM
@Dahulk2001 - I posted a few scoops/exclusives back in the day, but quickly realized it just wasn't worth the hassle. Most people just assume we're making stuff up for clicks, and even if/when something is verified later on, nobody remembers where it originated. You really need to post consistent scoops to build a track record, and I never had a source that delivered on that front.

Even so, you're still getting plenty of exclusive interviews, etc, from the guys... and tbh, we're far from the only site (of the ones that are still active) that don't share much in the way of scoops. Insiders like Jeff Sneider have branched out on their own, and Daniel Richtman and his ilk have done the same. The trades are really the only sites that post consident breaking news.
KennKathleen
KennKathleen - 7/10/2026, 11:15 AM
@NateBest - User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image



User Comment Image
NateBest
NateBest - 7/10/2026, 11:41 AM
@Dahulk2001 - Who said anything about locking content behind a paywall? The question is does removing ads and having monthly giveaways enough to entice someone to pay for a small monthly subscription?

As far as exclusives go, there's plenty of exclusive content, editorials and interviews. You can usually find them under the "Exclusive" tab (https://comicbookmovie.com/exclusives/).
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/10/2026, 12:01 PM
@MarkCassidy -

"Most people just assume we're making stuff up for clicks"

This is one of the examples of "writing culture" i mentioned found here that disheartens future visitors/writers @JoshWilding @NateBest

Quality articles are important
AgentSmith
AgentSmith - 7/10/2026, 4:42 PM
@NateBest - First - thanks for actually asking your audience instead of just implementing. Shows you care about the community. Second, I'm reading A LOT of shade in the comments. I see it everyday. You all have a choice people. If you aren't happy with the content, then go somewhere else. It isn't the best sourced news or articles, I agree. You aren't asked to be here. If you don't care for it, then go. I don't click on all of the articles, just the ones that interest me. And I don't generally post because I find the political jargon, hate, and banter to be just boring IMO. Why people bother to simply be negative and complain instead of, oh, I don't know, how about contribute to the site and write an article yourself, is way behind me. But its SO much easier to sit here and post personal agenda and complain then to take matters into your own hands. If anything brings this site down and separates our community, its what gets posted in the comments anymore. It isn't the ads.
bcom
bcom - 7/10/2026, 6:10 PM
@MarkCassidy - I don’t mean to be rude, but I think the reason a lot of people think things are made up on this site is due to Josh Wilding’s tabloid article style. He floods this site with ‘Daily Mail’ type articles which seem focussed more on firing up rage bait in the comments section rather than offering any type of journalistic integrity. I mean, just look at the onslaught of negatively driven Supergirl articles he’s flooded this site with in the past few weeks.

Originally, this site championed superhero movies. Lately it seems like it’s driving more negativity than positivity and it feels like articles are purposely written that way purely to ignite the comments section.

Yes, I am singling out Josh, but I’m doing so because his articles are the reason I would not consider paying to use this site.
Equivocal
Equivocal - 7/10/2026, 9:03 PM
@NateBest -

why paying when I'm gonna still see those misogynistic, racist, homophobic, extreme far right and hatred comments ???

and NOTHING related to actual Comic Book Movies ??

User Comment Image
alten2345
alten2345 - 7/10/2026, 7:08 AM
Ad revenue must be down
stealthboy
stealthboy - 7/10/2026, 7:12 AM
No. This site is awful and zero content is worth paying for. I just come for the silly reactions in comments.
CrimmLives03
CrimmLives03 - 7/10/2026, 9:58 AM
@stealthboy -

Nate must be delusional if he thinks the content on this site is content that people would pay for.

Josh cant even make it a week without plastering the front page with spelling errors or clickbait, and 95% of every article here is just reposted news from somewhere else.

No one is going to pay for that lol
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/10/2026, 10:34 AM
@CrimmLives03 - this site should be paying ME to deal with Josh’s bullsh*t every day
NateBest
NateBest - 7/10/2026, 12:38 PM
@CrimmLives03 - I think you missed the point... It's not about the content. It's whether or not removing ads, and potentially monthly subscriber giveaways, is worth a small subscription each month/year.
Winston19
Winston19 - 7/10/2026, 3:45 PM
@WingDing11 - I never sign on and comment anymore but this had me laughing so hard because it’s true 😂😂
evilbastard
evilbastard - 7/10/2026, 7:14 AM
User Comment Image
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/10/2026, 7:19 AM
Id pay it every week if Josh doesnt write here again. And id know if he uses another name
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/10/2026, 10:35 AM
@vectorsigma - THIS. Seconded.
rebellion
rebellion - 7/10/2026, 7:26 AM
i'll pay you if you fire Josh, and not surprised Im not the first to say it.
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/10/2026, 10:36 AM
@rebellion - Fully agreed
epc1122
epc1122 - 7/10/2026, 7:27 AM
I honestly wouldn’t pay for this site. With all the negativity it’s getting tougher to even come on and post.
cham2119
cham2119 - 7/10/2026, 7:27 AM
Short answer: no. Long answer: Hell [frick]ing no i barely like this site free. Wtf would i ever pay to visit a site where the majority of it’s users are racist or dumb racist children?
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 7/10/2026, 8:36 AM
@vectorsigma - Okay, I’ll go, but only because I’ll enjoy seeing you pay for an empty website. 🤣
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/10/2026, 8:57 AM
@JoshWilding - lolz man, dont think no one will write here if you leave.

Id be up for that taskif it happens. And there will be more if the culture of writing here changes.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 7/10/2026, 11:16 AM
@vectorsigma - Okay, you mean like earlier this month when the other regular writers contributed a grand total of 2 articles over 3 days? (no judgement, just facts - I know my buddy Rohan has been super busy at his day job, for example).

Anyhoo, I post at least 400 articles a month-that includes breaking news, features, editorials, exclusive interviews, and reviews-so you’re going to be a busy boy. Let me know how you get on, fella! 👍🏻
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/10/2026, 11:39 AM
@JoshWilding - dude, you cant be proud of your quantity if the quality ot your writing is very low.

There may be a lot of people with writing potential here that will surely get disheartened when they see the culture of writing here.

I am not the only one calling out your lack of journalistic integrity. And you might be too numb already to notice.

I think the question is, what is @NateBest doing about it?
DrCigarettes
DrCigarettes - 7/10/2026, 12:02 PM
@vectorsigma - Josh has me blocked because he can’t take the facts I speak. Is he boasting about his six figure income again?
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/10/2026, 12:06 PM
@DrCigarettes - he will be careful to flaunt it here. It's the boss' article 😂
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 7/10/2026, 12:49 PM
@vectorsigma - This feels like another conversation with you that’s a dead end, but CBM has a ton of great contributors, and I even saw some good pieces moved to the front page yesterday from a user whose name I didn’t recognise from the comments. The real examples of people getting disheartened that I see is when they realise writing an article isn’t the same/as easy as writing a comment. There was another user like you earlier this year with the exact same attitude - he posted two articles, full of factual and grammatical errors, got roasted in the comments, and deleted his account. Seems like you guys might be the problem in that case?

As I said, I look forward to the quality “ot” your writing when you take over the site, but it’s strange, despite you confusing your opinion with facts, this site’s visitors just continues to increase, which would not be happening if people were unhappy with the quality or quantity of the content (this is why sites like SHH, ComicBook, PWMania, HeyUGuys have fallen off the map/seen a sharp decline in traffic). But what do I know? I’ve only been doing this successfully for 17 years. You’re the expert. 👏🏻
JabbaTheSus
JabbaTheSus - 7/10/2026, 2:26 PM
@JoshWilding - Hola that was me :)
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/11/2026, 7:32 AM
@JoshWilding - lolz, youve been doing TMZ levels of articles for 17 years. Journalistic integrity is nowhere to be found on your articles. Just in this article alone, a lot of peoole hate you for it.

It takes good education yo have it so yoyr writing speaks volumes there.

So yeah, live on your own echo chamber that you are a good writer 😂😂😂
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 7/11/2026, 10:21 AM
@vectorsigma - “peoole,” “yoyr,” “on your articles.” Will there be a translation for you inane ramblings when you take over the site? Asking for a friend. 😭

User Comment Image
DCasAhobby
DCasAhobby - 7/10/2026, 7:28 AM
🚫nope. Imagine actully paying for a site ran by shills. Banning people, labeling them trolls if they refuse to go along with the current agenda or latest narrative being shipped.

Paying for a site where clean, honest speech is completely censored is asinine. The days when this site was worth a paying for are long gone.
NateBest
NateBest - 7/10/2026, 8:52 AM
@DCasAhobby - Would you mind sharing some examples of where "Banning people, labeling them trolls if they refuse to go along with the current agenda or latest narrative being shipped." has happened?

Disabling users for trolling, attacking other users, encouraging self-harm, spam, or porn happens, but I can't say when I've ever disabled a user for refusing to go along with the current agenda (whatever that might be).
WingDing11
WingDing11 - 7/10/2026, 10:37 AM
@NateBest - Josh is the problem Nate, not you or anyone else on here lol
DrCigarettes
DrCigarettes - 7/10/2026, 12:01 PM
@WingDing11 - Josh absolutely is a problem. Smarmy, arrogant, bad writer, boast about his six figure income, and uses it as an excuse not to do his job (basically, proof read before publishing). There’s a reason no one likes him.
Snow43214
Snow43214 - 7/10/2026, 2:25 PM
@NateBest - wait, is that why my comment was removed? Harsh, it was deep and insightful
NateBest
NateBest - 7/10/2026, 4:13 PM
@Snow43214 - Sorry, which comment are you referring to? I don't remember deleting any comments today...
Snow43214
Snow43214 - 7/10/2026, 4:51 PM
@NateBest - it just said nope and was the first comment which is the only reason I realised

D.w about it Hun, I'm just yanking your chain anyway, IDC if it's gone haha
NateBest
NateBest - 7/10/2026, 6:04 PM
@Snow43214 - Oh yes, sorry about that! I didn't realize that this was going live at 5am my time (7am EST), so I hijacked your first comment for the PSA to the users who skipped straight to the comments.
1 2 3 4 5 6

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder