Hugh Jackman Responds To Ryan Reynolds' Recent Comments About A DEADPOOL/WOLVERINE Team-Up

@mastakilla39 - DP refuses to believe that he's NOT Wolverine, so he stabs him a few times...and kills Hugh Jackman.

@AC1 - i don't see how it would undercut Logan's ending if it takes place in the present, ten years before Logan takes place.

@AC1 - I'm not sure how I feel about the X-Men in the deadpool movies being different from the x-men in the main series. Wouldn't it be weird to have two colossuses? And I do feel like Logan should be the end, but I still think if he did a cameo in Deadpool 2 or 3 it could still work cuz he'd still be alive at that point. But if he did cameo in one of these, Logan would still be the end of his story. The cameo would just be a small part from his past in the new timeline. I kinda like the idea of filling in the blanks on Logan's past in the new timeline. I've also thought about that, if they're not gonna recast, then what the hell are they gonna do to explain wolverine's absence between Apocalypse and Logan? He just disappeared, came back for the new end of DOFP, and then Logan happened? That's what makes me think he can either continue to pop up in small roles or they should recast.

@AC1 - I do think Logan was the perfect end and that him showing up again might be weird, but it could only work in a Deadpool movie since they're kinda disassociated from the main X-Men movies. But i also understand their hesitation and desire not to do it.

Introducing the X-Men as having "always been there" would be extremely tricky. Your idea works really well though. But how could the fact that mutants exist not have come up at all? SHIELD would've known. Scarlet witch and quicksilver are referred to as enhanced individuals. It would be weird to have them not be mutants after mutants were introduced, right? The part that wouldn't work for me would be Charles and Erik's origins. It's a huge part of their origins that they were children during WW2. That worked in the original X-Men movies in the 2000s because Stewart and McKellen were old enough that you could believe they were children in the 40s. If they were to introduce Charles and Erik into the MCU, would they just have to revamp their origins? Maybe they were children in the Vietnam war? But then you don't have Erik growing up mutant AND Jewish and being persecuted. What would they do I wonder.

@AC1 - I guess that could work, but it would be reeeaaaally hard to believe that mutants and x-men existed during all the events between iron man and Infinity War and did absolutely nothing. I thought that the mind stone could be what accessed their latent powers if they decide to go that way. That's an easy fix, compared to the existence of mutants in the past.

I totally agree that Erik needs to be a WWII survivor. I was not aware that his powers slowed his aging, that's pretty cool (not sure how that makes sense, even comic book sense, but that's still cool). I was under the impression that in the comics he aged into an old man, then some mutant turned him into a baby, and then someone turned him back into an adult, but instead of restoring him to an old man, they brought him back to his prime. Does that sound familiar?

Charles was never rooted in WWII specifically, he just kinda was through Erik. I really like your idea of making him like a younger brother to Erik. So if Erik is about 75 - 80, he could appear to be in his forties or fifties? I think that would work.

@Rybaman - A for effort dude, writers should take note