LILO AND STITCH Has Already Outgrossed THUNDERBOLTS* At The Worldwide Box Office

LILO AND STITCH Has Already Outgrossed THUNDERBOLTS* At The Worldwide Box Office

After less than a week on general release, Disney's Lilo and Stitch has already passed $400 million worldwide, something Marvel Studios' Thunderbolts* didn't manage to do after almost a month in theaters.

News
By MarkCassidy - May 29, 2025 05:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Disney
Source: Via Toonado.com

After breaking the record for biggest Memorial Day opening weekend ever with a massive $183 million debut, Disney's Lilo and Stitch has now passed $400 million worldwide after playing in theaters for less than a week.

The Mouse House's latest live-action remake grossed an estimated $15.3M on Tuesday (from 4,410 locations), bringing its domestic total to just under $200 million. The last update put the movie's global cume at $392.7 million, but it will easily have passed the $400 million milestone by now (we'll bring you the latest figures later today).

This is something Marvel Studios' Thunderbolts didn't manage to accomplish after almost a month in theaters. The antihero team-up movie has now taken in around $360 million worldwide, and analysts believe it may end up costing the studio as much as $100 million after P&A costs are taken into account.

A big win for Disney after Snow White's underperformance, and a sign that we shouldn't be expecting an end to these live-action reimaginings anytime soon.

Have you been to see Lilo and Stitch? If so, what did you think? Let us know in the comments section down below.

The new movie's synopsis reads: "Lilo and Stitch tells the story of the bond formed between a lonely human girl named Lilo and a dog-like alien named Stitch, who is engineered to be a force of destruction. Pursuing aliens, social workers, and the idea of the bond of family figure into the proceedings."

Newcomer Maia Kealoha is set to play Lilo, and Zach Galifianakis, Sydney Agudong, Billy Magnussen, Courtney B. Vance, and original animated movie voice actors Tia Carrere, Amy Hill, and Jason Scott Lee will also star. Chris Sanders will once again voice Stitch.

Dean Fleischer Camp (Marcel the Shell with Shoes On) directs Lilo & Stitch from a script by Chris Kekaniokalani Bright, based on a previous draft by Mike Van Wess. Dan Lin and Jonathan Eirich are producing under their Rideback production banner.

“Lilo & Stitch is the wildly funny and touching story of a lonely Hawaiian girl and the fugitive alien who helps to mend her broken family. The film is directed by award-winning filmmaker Dean Fleischer Camp, with a screenplay by Chris Kekaniokalani Bright and Mike Van Waes, and stars Sydney Elizebeth Agudong, Billy Magnussen, Tia Carrere, Hannah Waddingham, Chris Sanders, with Courtney B. Vance, and Zach Galifianakis, and introducing Maia Kealoha. “Lilo & Stitch” is produced by Jonathan Eirich, p.g.a. and Dan Lin, with Tom Peitzman, Ryan Halprin, Louie Provost, Thomas Schumacher serving as executive producers.

THUNDERBOLTS*: Hot Toys Reveals Lifelike New Figure Based On Florence Pugh's Yelena Belova
Related:

THUNDERBOLTS*: Hot Toys Reveals Lifelike New Figure Based On Florence Pugh's Yelena Belova
LILO & STITCH Director Addresses Controversy Surrounding The Live-Action Movie's New Ending - SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

LILO & STITCH Director Addresses Controversy Surrounding The Live-Action Movie's New Ending - SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
Gambito
Gambito - 5/29/2025, 5:41 AM
No getting around it sadly when you put up the phrase “ it will lose 100 million dollars” then it’s a FLOP and nothing else. Loved the movie though, probably would have done better if they added Ghost rider or the punisher
Mrnorth1921
Mrnorth1921 - 5/29/2025, 5:51 AM
@Gambito - it’s a great movie. It’s just people didn’t know these characters. And after Captain America being eh. Adding a couple well known heroes alongside the main ones could have helped.

AllsGood
AllsGood - 5/29/2025, 6:48 AM
Disney's Lilo and Stitch

User Comment Image
MakeAmericaGrea
MakeAmericaGrea - 5/29/2025, 8:51 AM
@AllsGood -

No way, José.
Kozmik
Kozmik - 5/29/2025, 6:48 AM
And what’s the point? So ‘Lilo and Stitch’ made more than ‘Thunderbolts’ so far?

So what?

I can’t wait for this Twitter-esque hellsite to go up in flames.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/29/2025, 6:50 AM
"But no one goes to the movies anymore"...
FrankenDad
FrankenDad - 5/29/2025, 7:09 AM
That’s a shame, because(Lilo) it was mostly a boring remake. Not even my wife or kids were very invested.
MakeAmericaGrea
MakeAmericaGrea - 5/29/2025, 8:54 AM
@FrankenDad -

I mean.

That was predictable.

But people still go this slop.

This is why they keep making boring remakes.

Stop the cycle.

Stop taking your family to boring slop just because they want to watch boring slop.
FrankenDad
FrankenDad - 5/29/2025, 9:01 AM
@MakeAmericaGrea - It was my bad on this one. I figured I was taking a bullet for the greater good of family entertainment, but we all took one.

Still moving forward with Karate Kid Legends next week. While I know you’ve seen it, I don’t have any questions. 😉
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/29/2025, 9:20 AM
@MakeAmericaGrea - depends who you ask everyone have different likes and interests ?si=d2VtFIHxY2NuOgj1
There is guy on corridor crew YouTube channel says he like Godzilla 97 movie don’t take my word for it watch for your self believe him say it

?si=MqlN6vtbuLJ4uVy-
OrgasmicPotatoe
OrgasmicPotatoe - 5/29/2025, 7:41 AM
What ?! But–but–but I was told by all the rabid Marvel lapdogs that Thunderbolts was a super wholesome chungus massive moneymaker ? They wouldn't have lied to me, would they ?
Batmangina
Batmangina - 5/29/2025, 7:52 AM
MCU SHILLS - LET'S GO MARVEL!!!
User Comment Image

THUNDERBOLTS BOX OFFICE:
User Comment Image

LILO:
User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 5/29/2025, 8:02 AM
What an odd comparison…

The 2025 Lilo & Stitch is based off a popular animated film that started a franchise that had a direct to dvd sequel & animated series amongst other things while Thunderbolts is about a few supporting characters (and Bucky) from movies and D+ shows that are now taking a main role.

I don’t get this article besides it being meant to start a flame war.
Rpendo
Rpendo - 5/29/2025, 8:05 AM
One more time for the cheap seats:

180 million budget
Plus
100 million in marketing
Equals
280 total spend on Thunderbolts

Studio keeps about 45 percent of box office gross

Studio received, per Deadline, 75 million in product tie ins before the film was released
Which brings the total spend down to 205

Movie needs about 425 to break even
Looks like it will tap out at about 380

The movie will lose about 25-30 million at the box office

It will make that back in VOD

It will break even, barely, eventually.

Not a hit by any stretch.
A failure by most objective measures.

But not a flop. It will make Disney a few million when all is said and done. Like, very few. Between VOD, merch, streaming deals, Disney might make like ten to twenty five million over the entire lifespan of the film. Terrible for a Marvel tentpole, but not not a complete and utter disaster like The Marvels. Like Quantumania, it will eventually edge its way into the black.
MakeAmericaGrea
MakeAmericaGrea - 5/29/2025, 9:01 AM
@Rpendo -

It could have made $1.2 billion.

It's still raceswapping and genderswapping girlboss woke Marxist shit.

Thankfully more and more people are becoming redpilled and leaving the communist hivemind every year.

Dial of Dysentery
The Marturds
Craptain UnAmerican
No White
Blunderdolts*

All rejected for their wokeness.
Rpendo
Rpendo - 5/29/2025, 9:03 AM
@MakeAmericaGrea - no one likes you.

Change literally everything about yourself.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/29/2025, 9:23 AM
@Rpendo - Just to add, how much is spent to make a TV film or series that has zero sales anywhere, end of the day they will make enough at the BO to turn it effectively into a cheap TV film they will sell for years to come and stream on D+

All that should realy matter to us is if it is good or not and we enjoy it or not as the list of beloved films we get on TV every year for decades that lost a bucket load at the BO is long (included a link to some of the best below).

Disney is still overall the most profitable film company going last I checked (not even close) so even if some loose money overall they make bank on them and brand trust likely more important than anything else with the current state of cinema ticket sales across the board (NOT a fan of the company, always had many issues with it even whilst enjoying a lot of their content but is what it is).

Sure there are some huge hits still but average BO is still very low, down around 2005 levels which when you consider how inflation has increased both costs to produce and ticket prices since then says a lot about how far there is to go for cinema to fully recover back to anywhere near 2018/19 levels.

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/movies-box-office-flops-good-films-b2728036.html

https://www.boxofficemojo.com/year/
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/29/2025, 9:30 AM
@Rpendo - it is a flop by Marvel standards. Breaking even is not their target because future movies are reliant on the success of this, the reason they renamed it as New Avengers.
Rpendo
Rpendo - 5/29/2025, 9:54 AM
@vectorsigma - I mean, if we are going to move the goalposts because it’s Marvel, sure.

I would argue that if a movie ends up in the black it is not a flop.

The Marvels was a flop. Cap 4 will likely, when all is said and done, be a flop.

This will end up making Disney a few bucks.

I would call it “a disappointment “ more than a flop.

A flop is utter failure. Minor success, even when major success is what’s expected, is still success.

Wouldn’t hold my breath for a sequel, unfortunately.
JosephStalin
JosephStalin - 5/29/2025, 8:12 AM
So Stitch, a character that has been consistently popular in pop culture since 1998, outsold a film about Marvel supporting characters? A character that appeals to children, verses characters who have largely only been seen on Disney+ or not on screen for 4-5 years at least? Thunderbolts was always a punt, but this isn't a fair comparison. Marvel do have a journey ahead of them to get back to their pre-2021 levels of success though.
JosephStalin
JosephStalin - 5/29/2025, 8:25 AM
It smashed mission impossible as well. Is that relevant? Studios need to invest less in these blockbusters. They aren't guaranteed successes anymore, and I'm sure they could be made cheaper, as well becoming more creative by being challenged with restrictions on spending. Look at Godzilla Minus One and look at Thunderbolts. One cost $15mil, the other $180mil. They're both great. But surely the money isn't going into production, it's premiums on brands and talent which isn't necessary when you could shop around (unless you're stuck in contracts) or pay a lot less and it would still be a lot of money for an individual creative. The industry needs to review this because eventually it just won't be viable anymore.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/29/2025, 8:50 AM
@JosephStalin - This is exactly the issue and this keeps getting proven over and over again.

People love saying "but people dont go to the movies anymore" any time one of these Marvel movies flop.

Yet we consistently see movies about characters and stories that people are interested in doing well.

Barbie
Top Gun 2
Oppenheimer
Deadpool and Wolverine
Thor 4
Dr Strange 2
Spider-Man
Guardians of the Galaxy 3
Lilo and Stitch
Minecraft

There are more, but these all made good to amazing money at the theatres.

The ones that barely break even, lose money, or make a small pittance are almost exclusively characters like in Thunderbotls. Characters people just aren't interested in.

This isnt a secret anymore. There's a very obvious pattern with very few outliers.

Ant-Man doing poorly is the one example of a popular character doing bad.

Shang Chi is an outlier of a new character doing decent.

But the pattern is unmistakable at this point.

They need to stick to characters people care about now. Marvel has lost too much interest and cant keep pumping out winners based on the Marvel brand alone anymore.

Stick to characters and stories people know and are interested in, and cast appropriately. These things are blindingly obvious now and we've got all the evidence backing it up. There's no denying it anymore.
JosephStalin
JosephStalin - 5/29/2025, 9:02 AM
@CorndogBurglar - Oppenheimer might be the exception there, but then you've got this absolute superstar filmmaker in Nolan who draws crowds no matter what he makes. They should explore new things or characters in cinema but you've got to earn it for the most part. Shang Chi had the benefit of being a part of the Marvel brand in the midst of Endgame and No Way Home. Thunderbolts might have had indie talent but it didn't have an indie budget. Honestly, that's a film I'd like to see.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/29/2025, 9:33 AM
@CorndogBurglar - Double edged sword however, if you only ever do stuff with a pre-existing huge fanbase how does anything new ever get a big fan base. I am NOT saying your wrong and ultimately the biggest issues is bloated budgets with too many films but I'm never going to be against a studio taking a punt with lesser know characters if it turns out to be a film I enjoy/is quantifiably good to great otherwise almost ALL we will get is constant constant reboots of old films and live action remakes of animated, even sequels tend to make diminishing returns now.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/29/2025, 11:16 AM
@Apophis71 - There's nothing wrong with doing new characters....when the time is right. This is not that time. A lot of these characters we've been getting movies and D+ shows for are side characters. Its not necessary for them to have their own projects.

It was different when anything with a Marvel logo was making gangbusters. But those days are long gone.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/29/2025, 11:19 AM
@Apophis71 - As an example, we got Moon Knight. He's a well liked character. Makes sense to give him a show.

But then we've also got Nova sitting on the back burner for years, who is also a popular character, yet we're getting weird things like Ironheart or Agatha.

These decisions dont make sense.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/29/2025, 1:36 PM
@CorndogBurglar - Well we were talking about films not TV shows, those are differing metrics and opinions on who should be prioritised for a limited TV series will vary A LOT. I'd say TV shows is exactly the sort of place you can test out lesser known characters IF they have a good story pitch to attract wider knowledge and interest prior to considering if you put in blockbuster movie budgets for them.

As is you pointed to Agathas show, one which was generaly well recieved when it landed, that was realy Wiccan's show who has been one of the most popular modern characters since his return to print twenty years ago but the show was under Agatha's name as after also well recieved Wandavision there would be wider recognition for her than for Billy outside of young comic readers.
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 5/29/2025, 8:43 AM
This should surprise no one. Thunderbolts was always going to flop, as will F4.
MakeAmericaGrea
MakeAmericaGrea - 5/29/2025, 9:04 AM
Keep up the boycott, ladies and gentlemen!

We're winning and they're losing!
Rpendo
Rpendo - 5/29/2025, 9:13 AM
@MakeAmericaGrea - Dude, you are not winning at anything in your life. You already know this.

And don’t look now, virgin, but the liberal Marxist Socialists at Disney just released a relatively low budget remake featuring two lead characters who are non-white and female, and it’s going to easily make a billion dollars.
FrankenDad
FrankenDad - 5/29/2025, 9:04 AM
Started Cap4 last night and didn’t get too far before I got bored. Mackie is not killing it in the first half hour. Does he get more invested? He and Ford seem like they’re in a low-talking contest so far.
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 5/29/2025, 9:16 AM
Not Shocking. Lilo and Stitch was always going to print money...Just like that Moana live action soon...
SATW42
SATW42 - 5/29/2025, 9:21 AM
Another way this could've been written is that Lilo And Stitch is making back Thunderbolts money, because they are both Disney and therefore aren't in competition with each other.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/29/2025, 9:34 AM
But can Lilo beat Ne Zha????
grif
grif - 5/29/2025, 11:05 AM
dont care about either movie
supermanrex
supermanrex - 5/29/2025, 11:12 AM
who [frick]ing cares. why the constant dick measuring articles about box offices. lilo and stich beat other movies too, but lets single out thunderbolts because its the hot hate clickbait topic with its ever expanding budget that grows along with its box office receipts.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

Related Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Anime & Manga

Gaming

Horror

Cartoons & Animated Features

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
View Recorder