Why MAN OF STEEL was Great

Why MAN OF STEEL was Great

Why I Feel that MAN OF STEEL isn't that Bad as some think, in-fact its Great

Editorial Opinion
By Rohit9876 - Dec 08, 2013 02:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic
Source: ComicBookMovie.com

I know this is not a time but a few days ago i saw MOS again and came up with this Article about How this movie is a great movie and have watched it 3-4 times after that especially During my Semester Exam, Anyhow these are few points that shows why this Movie is great and a bit overlooked or whatever.



1) STORY

The First and Foremost thing about this movie was its Story and i thought it was a great story. it started with a beautiful but soon to be doomed krypton, then in Earth the Build up was great with Clark acclimatizing to the Earth's Atmosphere with Zod seeking revenge and Come to earth and after 100 minute mark, it was all Action.



2) ACTION SEQUENCE

The Main reason for downfall of 'Superman Returns' was the scarcity of action in that movie. there was a great scene of saving a jet Airliner, Lifting a Half-Ship & even Lifting a Small Continent of krypton. but We fans were hoping for a one on one fight with a competent foe of same kind and that's exactly what we got in Man Of Steel, first with Faora & Zod's henchmen against Superman and wasn't it great, that sequence till the last scene of the movie including fight with ZOD was an Adventure for Action Lovers.



3) GENERAL ZOD

In General Zod, Superman got the nemesis what he deserved and also fanboys deserved for many years, He was great in the sense that he had his motives to rebuild Krypton and thus was the reason he was born. He found Earth and eventually Kal-El. He wanted a similar Planet to terraform the krypton and wanted to Kill Superman when he came to know that codex is in his blood & Michael Shannon as Zod Nailed it in all departments and impressive.



4) MUSIC/SOUNDTRACK/SCORE

When it Comes to give score to a movie there isn't any better name than the one & one only 'Hans Zimmer' and when u listen to the score of man of steel, you will feel it. its one of the best music/score, it gives a meaning to each and every scene. In My view its the best score after The Dark knight, X Men: First Class & The Avengers in terms of CBMs.

So These are the things that make this movie A Spectacle and A Must Watch.
DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Related:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film
Recommended For You:

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 12/8/2013, 2:37 PM
Acting is essential to help making a movie good or bad obviously. Acting in Man of Steel, eh. CGI, eh. Not surprised it's not on the Academy's shortlist. Story was fairly generic, even for a superhero movie and as far as the score goes, unmemorable and I really don't remember it. But.... that's just me.
DeathstrokeTerminator
DeathstrokeTerminator - 12/8/2013, 2:47 PM
It was AWESOME!
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 12/8/2013, 3:17 PM
I sort of agree with you on your last 2 points: Zod wasn't a terrible villain, even though they could've expanded and paid more attention to his motivations. Until the very end when he gave his little speech to Kal-el (and I guess the very beginning too, but that was it), they barely even mentioned the whole storyline of how the Kryptonians are genetically bred to fulfill certain roles. That definitely could've been really interesting but they never expanded that at all.

The soundtrack was excellent. No way they could've used the traditional Superman music, so Zimmer invented his own. Definitely a strength of the movie.

As for the story and the action...it worked if you're an action junkie and don't care about the plot so much. For everyone else, the story was pretty terrible.

What was Jor-el's reasoning for sending Kal to Earth in the 1st place? To re-start the Kryptonian race? Because why else would Jor-el put the Codex into Kal's DNA?
If so, Kal failed at that when he basically committed genocide against his own people. Or was it to inspire hope and love to a completely random alien race that he didn't even care about? If so, Kal failed at that, too.

Or what was the point of specifically choosing Earth to terraform and turn into a new Krypton? Why not choose any other random planet? It was never established that the Kryptonian race was so terrible and needed to be killed off, so why couldn't they co-exist peacefully on a completely different planet? Like maybe one of their several scout outposts?

And those are just little "logic" issues with the story. I didn't even begin to cover everything wrong with the characters, their motivations, the completely random and haphazard flashbacks, the incoherent themes, etc etc.

So all in all, nice article. But hardly convincing.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 12/8/2013, 3:18 PM
YES! One of the best films I've ever seen. Nothing but greatness.

It completely owns the sh!t out of Iron Man 3 and The Wolverine. (and I thought of those were great btw) and is way better than Thor 2. (thought it was alright)

Action was great, villain was amazing, story/character arc was great, soundtrack was freakin epic. Overall an AMAZING movie!

All the haters can go screw themselves, this article is very good and the movie was great. It gets hate because of two things 1) almost any non-MCU or non-Nolan directed receives hate and 2) anything Superman-related gets hate.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 12/8/2013, 3:26 PM
@JJ63: I'm not trying to hate on you. Film is subjective but, if Man of Steel is one of the greatest films you've ever seen then, you must not have seen many good movies in your life.
bazinga85
bazinga85 - 12/8/2013, 3:30 PM
MoS was amazing!!!
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 12/8/2013, 3:31 PM
A great score indeed. I hope Zimmer does the sequel. Would love to hear a new Batman theme put on film against that Man of Steel theme.
Rohit9876
Rohit9876 - 12/8/2013, 3:44 PM
I never mentioned its the greatest movie ever but it is quite better and I am satisfied with it, Just wait n watch, Batman or without batman sequel would've done better no matter what and with batman it think and hope it may cross $1 billion Mark. Now that would be amazing.
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 12/8/2013, 4:17 PM
Awesome movie, we finally got to see what happens when two god like people duke it out!

And we actually got to see a Superman that actually fights and not just throw things etc......

GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 12/8/2013, 4:20 PM
@EdgyOutsider
Lol, that's rich coming from the dude who thinks Amazing Spider-Man and Captain America are the best CBMs ever.

FYI, I have seen dozens of great movies. My favorites are The Dark Knight Trilogy, Source Code, Inception, Saving Private Ryan, Jaws, Classic Star Wars Trilogy, Man of Steel, Spider-Man 2, Lord of the Rings Trilogy, X1 and X2, First Class, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Iron Man.

Maybe you hate all of those too. But I really don't give a f%ck.

Anyways, we've been through this like half a dozen times so I don't see the point of doing it again. And if you are trying to start an argument here, I remember you bashing Man of Steel and Snyder before it even came out. Man of Steel has a great character arc, great action, great acting especially from Cavill and Shannon, great soundtrack, you hate it because a) you dislike Superman and you've already said that. b) because you hate Snyder and you've already said that too.

I think you are blinded by bias but I've never once tried to change your opinion on it the way you do. I've said it a freakin billion times: agree to disagree.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 12/8/2013, 4:29 PM
Dang it! Forgot about the Patriot!
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 12/8/2013, 4:32 PM
@JJ63: Captain America and The Amazing Spider-Man are just in my top ten FAVORITE CBM's. Captain America has the best origin story for a CBM. But, Avengers is the best in my opinion. I'm not blinded by bias and quite frankly, I'm not attempting to start an argument nor did I want one. But, if it's a comment that I can't help but laugh at (again, film is subjective and my ignorance admittedly gets in the way at times, as it does here) then, I have to make my voice heard. Man of Steel being one of the greatest is nuts to me. My five favorite movies of all time are: Jurassic Park, Lincoln, Gladiator, Zodiac and Warrior. Even if they weren't my favorites, they are some of the best. I agree with your list of films that you named except Man of Steel, Star Wars and Lord of the Rings. Man of Steel, I won't go there. I would be beating a dead horse. Star Wars, I appreciate the advancements in technology and Lucas' imagination but, I've always found Star Wars boring. Lord of the Rings, I'm still working on that. I started last year but, I don't own any of them.

Yes, I've bashed it before it came out. I will agree, Michael Shannon did a hell of a job and is clearly the best CBM villain of the year. I went in with an open mind and it's the same issues as with most of Snyder's films. I've talked crap after seeing it just cause it's not a good movie to me but, it's enjoyable for what it is. Which is more than I can say about most Snyder films. No character development, off-on visuals, unmemorable score, eh acting and I just don't think it's what fans hype it to be. Again, I meant no argument to get started or anything. I just couldn't help but respond to someone saying Man of Steel is one of the best films they've ever seen. No disrespect towards ya bro.
GuardianDevil
GuardianDevil - 12/8/2013, 4:43 PM
@EdgyOutsider
Okay, sorry for being a bitch.

However I thought Man of Steel was amazing and nothing will change that. Visuals, score and acting were great, character arc was also good. If you think it has no character development, than I don't know maybe we saw different movies because the whole point of the movie was Clark learning to accept his humanity rather than yearn to know where he came from.

Anyways, sorry if I got in your face. On a side not I don't think TASM was bad just pretty good, I thought First Avenger sucked though.
McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 4:46 PM
Yeah Zod was a great villain alright.....



The action was great no doubt. But it was excessive, that Hentai tentacle fight was really un-necessary imo. Zimmer's score was awesome!!! Nice article but you need to proof read this. :)

EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 12/8/2013, 4:56 PM
@JJ63: Na man, it's all good.
MrCameron
MrCameron - 12/8/2013, 5:21 PM
I liked it when I first saw it in the theater, but I thought about it for a while and realized that it wasn't that great. To me, the problem was that it was just to depressing for its own good and the script felt rather muddled. Plus it just didn't have a lot of energy and was dull at parts. Maybe it's because I let my expectations get out of check since the trailers made it look like the second coming of Christ. I also didn't like how the film had too much Batman Begins influence; I swear, there were parts of that film that were lifted directly from BB. Now, there were some good things about it; Henry Cavill is the perfect Superman for one and I though Michael Shannon and Antje Traue (sp?) were great villains in addition to it getting me into Superman comics and helping me gain a greater appreciation for the character. But overall it was one of the biggest disappointments for me recently filmwise. Well, let's hope that Batman/Superman is better and they get rid of David Goyer.
MrCameron
MrCameron - 12/8/2013, 5:44 PM
"Good gosh, just watched the fight to confirm. If Superman had have went to see Jorel instead of the priest and Jorel could have taught him some moves, this movie might've ended 40 minutes earlier. Jorel was bustin Tekken moves on Zod"

McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 6:00 PM
@AnnoDomini

I wasn't nit-picking. That's what happened in the movie. Zod took a cheap shot when he killed him. Jor-El was watching his son's ship take off and he was distracted, Zod then proceeded to kill him. It's just something I found odd that Zod was bred to be a warrior yet Jor-El owned him in that fight and the funny part id Jor-El was bred to be a scientist. This wasn't even the problem with film. Many of the faults in the film lie in the execution and weak scrip imo.

"Good gosh, just watched the fight to confirm. If Superman had have went to see Jorel instead of the priest and Jorel could have taught him some moves, this movie might've ended 40 minutes earlier. Jorel was bustin Tekken moves on Zod"

Lmao xD That priest scene was so unnecessary, instead of going to see his dad, he goes to a priest. Why?
McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 6:04 PM
"The fight was over? So there was a bell that was rung where the fight was over? The referee appeared and called the bout to be over? "

Jor-El had Zod at his knees at gun point. The fight was over.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 12/8/2013, 6:07 PM
Okay, for everyone who whines about Jor-el beating Zod, you need to watch the extras on the Blu-Ray. Part of the idea they had for Krypton was that it was warrior society. While everyone was bred for a specific function, scientist, leader, worker, whatever, they were all also given training as warriors. Being a warrior was part of everyone's DNA, it's just that the soldiers had extra training and were made even more to be warriors. This is shown by the fact that all Kryptonians had that basic garment and they all had battle armor that went over the basic garment. And Jor-el was able to get ahead in that fight at first because his fighting style was different from that of a soldier, which was something Zod wasn't prepared for at first. But Zod does ultimately win, because as a soldier he had equipped his armor with an extra, hidden weapon and he knew to use it when Jor-el was distracted.
McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 6:27 PM
"you need to watch the extras on the Blu-Ray. Part of the idea they had for Krypton was that it was warrior society. While everyone was bred for a specific function, scientist, leader, worker, whatever, they were all also given training as warriors."

As far as I remember, that wasn't shown or explained in a movie so that's invalid. Jor-El owned Zod in that fight. I mean Zod was at his knees and he's suppose to be this trained warrior. I didn't care about this at all watching the film, I just found it odd.

"And Jor-el was able to get ahead in that fight at first because his fighting style was different from that of a soldier, which was something Zod wasn't prepared for at first."

Wut? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Zod trained his whole life to be a warrior and he doesn't even recognise the fighting skill that a scientist has learnt? lol How is the fighting style different from that of a trained soldier? Surely Zod would have known the fighting technique Jor-El was using since you know, he's a warrior and has practiced various styles of hand to hand combat. Zod should have been able to counter Jor-El's blows.I'm sorry but that's a dumb excuse you gave right there.

McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 6:52 PM
@AnnoDomini

What does this have to do with BB? Even so, Bruce and Ducard was training. Zod vs Jor-El was the real thing. Jor-El had Zod on his knees at gun point. There's was nothing else Zod could have done at that point. Zod was pretty much defeated, if it wasn't the fact that Kal's ship was leaving and Jor was distracted.Here's the fight scene just to re-fresh your memory, and tell me that Zod isn't getting owned in that fight by Jor-El.

ForeverPowerful
ForeverPowerful - 12/8/2013, 6:58 PM
I think there should be a #5 devoted only to this jewel:

McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 7:23 PM
"With this case, there was no call for the fight to end and while Jor-El actually killed some soldier previously himself, he decided to not do anything to Zod when he was facing a soldier."

Zod killed Jor-el by using a cheap shot, Zod was getting owned in that fight and he was receiving way too much blows. In fact, Jor-El looks and fights more like a warrior more than Zod does. My point is, how the [frick] did a scientist bring a trained warrior down to his knees at gun point? This wasn't about Zod killing Jor-El, it was about Zod getting the shit kicked out of him by a scientist. How the heck did that happen?

"That's like say Batman was getting owned by Bane since Batman only won by getting lucky by breaking Bane's mask."

Uummm yeah because that's what happened. In fact, Batman didn't even defeat Bane, Catwoman did lol xD So Batman didn't win that fight.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 12/8/2013, 7:24 PM
IMO, you guys are arguing about the wrong thing. Honestly I doubt even the filmmakers put as much thought into this fight scene as you guys are. They wanted a B.A. Jor-el who was able to throw down with Zod, so they created the character to do so. Whatever excuses they came up with after the fact to justify that, almost doesn't matter. They wanted to squeeze in another fight or two, so they did so. End of story.

Stop focusing on these little "logic" problems, start asking yourselves why the filmmakers decided to do these things. Was the fight necessary to the plot? Or did they just want to pile on the action scenes and cool visuals? I think you guys can answer that...
McNyagano
McNyagano - 12/8/2013, 7:29 PM
@SauronsBANE1

I wasn't bothered by it but I found it odd that Zod taunted Supes by saying he was bred to be a warrior and trained his whole life and whatnot but Jor-El, a scientist mind you, kicked his ass. It didn't take me away from the film but I just thought about after I watched the film in theatres.

"Was the fight necessary to the plot? Or did they just want to pile on the action scenes and cool visuals? I think you guys can answer that..."

Let Anno answer that lol :')
1 2
View Recorder