When it came to Spider-man in film, everyone has their own opinion of which movies are good and which are bad. I get fed up with "This one is better because this thing is true and everyone who disagrees is dumb". Which is the majority of editorials on CBM. It's not exactly like Spidey is the talk of the town right now, but I thought I'd post these two articles from a movie blog I used to write for, mostly because I wanted to bring up some aspects of the movies that really aren't things you can question. It's not "Andrew Garfield is a better actor than Tobey and if you disagree you don't deserve an opinion", instead it pertains to who really portrayed their comic-book characters in a way more fitting to the way they were intended to be. Take these two articles how you will, I just want to throw my two cents in and try to class up this editorial section a little bit.
Why Do a Re-boot?
http://reallyobsessedwithfilm.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-did-spidey-need-reboot.html
Why Was TASM a Good Re-boot?
http://reallyobsessedwithfilm.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-was-amazing-spider-man-successful.html