HARRY POTTER Star Daniel Radcliffe Hits Back At Claims He Should Be Grateful To J.K. Rowling For His Career

HARRY POTTER Star Daniel Radcliffe Hits Back At Claims He Should Be Grateful To J.K. Rowling For His Career

Discussing Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling's apparent anti-trans views, actor Daniel Radcliffe has responded to those who believe he should defend the writer for the role she's played in his career...

By JoshWilding - May 03, 2024 06:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Harry Potter
Source: The Atlantic (via SFFGazette.com)

Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling's initial concerns about the trans community divided opinions but seemed to at least come from a place of concern. However, in the years that have followed, her comments have become increasingly controversial and led to fans and peers alike washing their hands of the writer. 

Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson are among the Harry Potter stars who have made a point of disagreeing with Rowling while sharing their support for trans people. Recently, the author was asked if she'd forgive the duo should they make a public apology and whether they're safe in the knowledge she'd do so.

"Not safe, I'm afraid," Rowling responded. "Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding women's hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single sex spaces."

The Atlantic (via SFFGazette.com) recently spoke with Radcliffe and asked him about the current state of his relationship with the woman behind the Harry Potter books and movies he starred in between 2001 and 2011. 

"It makes me really sad, ultimately," the actor said, "because I do look at the person that I met, the times that we met, and the books that she wrote, and the world that she created, and all of that is to me so deeply empathic."

"Jo, obviously Harry Potter would not have happened without her, so nothing in my life would have probably happened the way it is without that person," Radcliffe added, acknowledging recent comments about her role in his success. "But that doesn’t mean that you owe the things you truly believe to someone else for your entire life."

As for Rowling's latest dig aimed at him and Watson, he stated, "I will continue to support the rights of all LGBTQ people, and have no further comment than that."

Some of the Harry Potter franchise's older cast members, such as Helena Bonham Carter and Ralph Fiennes, have defended Rowling, and it's become clear she's not backing down despite frequent fan backlash. However, any valid points she may or may not make are largely overlooked in frequent X posts which appear largely hateful at their core. 

Despite the ongoing controversy, Rowling is expected to be heavily involved in the Harry Potter TV series coming to Max. She's been instrumental in helping pick a creative team and will likely be credited as executive producer who is heavily involved in the 10-season show.

Another of her books, The Christmas Pig, is in the process of being developed as an animated feature and a sixth season of Strike, the adaptation of her Cormoran Strike novels, is also on the way.

HARRY POTTER: Mark Rylance Is Reportedly Being Eyed To Play Dumbledore In HBO Series
Related:

HARRY POTTER: Mark Rylance Is Reportedly Being Eyed To Play Dumbledore In HBO Series

Legendary HARRY POTTER And DOWNTON ABBEY Star Dame Maggie Smith Passes Away Aged 89
Recommended For You:

Legendary HARRY POTTER And DOWNTON ABBEY Star Dame Maggie Smith Passes Away Aged 89

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 6:27 AM
What a class act
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 6:56 AM
@Vigor - JK > this dork. At least one cares about women.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 5/3/2024, 6:58 AM
@Vigor - yep

Dudes been my pick for Nightcrawler for so long and he just further cements it by giving a very Kurt like answer

User Comment Image
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 7:01 AM
@mountainman -

"At least one cares about women."
I believe they call that, a strawman argument. You can care about Trans and women at the same time. Rowling is fighting the most ridiculous of all ant hills lol
bobevanz
bobevanz - 5/3/2024, 7:05 AM
@mountainman - only a sith deals in absolutes, back to watching Newsmax for you
RedFury
RedFury - 5/3/2024, 7:14 AM
@TheVisionary25 - oh man that's great casting; I can very much see that. I bet he could pull off a great German accent if he tried too.
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 7:37 AM
@Vigor - If you allow biological males into female only spaces or sports, you are anti women. If you are against that, it is not transphobic.

@bobevanz - never watched it in my life. Any other nonsense from the side that doesn’t know the difference between men and women?
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 8:09 AM
@mountainman - these people think different. They were born male but everything in their minds tells them they're not.

Here's a similar but not exact example. Neurodivergent vs neurotypical people. Where do you stand on hiring autistic individuals for jobs designed for non-autistic peoples? You make reasonable accommodations right?

Why would it not be the same for Trans community?
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 8:21 AM
@Vigor - I am not bashing any person that is trans, but the issue is about female spaces. There are countless women all over the planet, with JK only being the most famous one, that want spaces free of male genitalia. That isn’t hateful. And rapes have occurred in these spaces before so their fears are warranted. This doesn’t mean that every trans woman is a rapist or they are wrong or should be hated. Not at all. It just means that biological females deserve to go into their locker rooms, spas, homeless shelters, rape centers, jails, etc and play their sports, and know that only other biological females are present.

It’s so goofy how this common sense view is fought against or considered hateful in any way. Why should a trans woman’s feelings override biological women’s safety and comfort? How is “feeling like a woman” the standard for womanhood, when we have biological markers that have determined womanhood for all of human history?

It just sucks man. This is such a lame issue. I’m male so this doesn’t impact me personally. If a trans man comes into my bathrooms, locker rooms, or sports, it has zero impact of hurting me. But I do have a wife, daughter and other women I care about. My wife feels the same way about this issue as I do. I do not want her or my daughter hurt. And I promise you that I do not think this issue is more common than a man who isn’t trans hurting women. My wife has the capability of protecting herself and I teach my daughter to do so as well. If this trans women in female sports things continues it will severely impact the direction we choose to take our daughter with the activities she pursues. I don’t want her to face unfair competition.

Looping back to JK, her issue this whole time has been around female only spaces. And to be quite honest these celebrities like Radcliffe do not address that issue at all. They simply parrot their talking points that coincidentally match up with the corporate run media. Funny how that works.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 5/3/2024, 8:23 AM
@mountainman @Vigor - So, this is the problem that so many people have an issue doing. (Not you guys necessarily) People aren't willing to stand in the middle of an issue, look at both sides, and see both the valid points and the fallacies.

For example, I think the LGBTQ+ community deserves to have all the same rights as anyone else. Why shouldn't they? They are still people. They should be able to marry whoever they love, vote, play sports, and anything else that non-LGBTQ people can do. Why would their sex/gender, who they identify as, or who they love play any factor in what rights they have?

But at the same time, the LGBTQ+ community and their supporters also need to understand that there are legitimate concerns that NEED to be figured out. For people's safety, if nothing else.

First they need to figure out what prisons and jails trans people get placed in. It's a tough issue because trans people are going to get treated horribly no matter which prison you out them in, male or female. Seems to me like prisons need man/woman trans sections, separated from non-trans inmates.

Sports need to be figured out. It's not safe for women to be competing against men. We saw that in MMA when that trans woman cracked the skull of her opponent. All because no one knew she was born a man.

Or, it's also not fair for women to have to compete against someone that was born as a man. Feelings don't matter here. Women have their own sporting leagues for a reason. Why are we allowing people born as men with obvious physical advantages to compete against women? It makes no sense.

Public restrooms. There was a news story out of California about a woman taking her 4 year old daughter to the pool at the YMCA and a grown ass man was changing in the women's locker room. His dong exposed for all to see, and the YMCA wouldn't do anything about it. I'm sorry, but a young child should not have to see that. And I know that doesn't mean all trans people would do this, but the problem isn't the majority. The problem is the small outliers that same sex changing rooms will 100% bring out. Because not everyone has a rational thinking mind. Not every trans person is going to be respectful with children around, and not all of them even see a problem with it.

So rules and guidelines need to he put in place, and it doesn't make anyone a bigot for recognizing that.
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 8:29 AM
@CorndogBurglar - I agree with everything you laid out here. But saying "supporting Trans is anti women" or however @mountainman worded it is a hard stance and leads us down the rabbit hole with no reasonable compromise
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 8:31 AM
@mountainman - I'll get back to you. Asking my wife how she feels about the scenario of a Trans walking Into her public restroom
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 8:34 AM
@CorndogBurglar - Hey I 100% agree with you. I think all people, regardless of race, sex, gender, etc should have equal rights.

But there are still rules around things. I cannot play on female sports or go into a female bathroom because I am male. This is not a violation of my rights.

I also cannot walk into the vault of a bank without proper authority. Just because you cannot do something, it does not mean it is a violation of your rights.

I know this stuff is all new for us and our existing structures may not properly support everyone. Changes have to be made.

But it’s undeniable that biological males have an inherent physical advantage over biological females. This is true even after taking hormone therapy. Estrogen does not shrink bones, shrink the heart, Make the should span thinner, or make the hips wider. It’s just biological that allows men to be stronger and faster than women on average. So the sports thing has to be a no go. Maybe we create an open division I don’t know. But trans women in women’s sports is absolutely unfair to the other women they are competing against and there are plenty of examples of this out there.

When it comes to spaces it’s a much touchier subject due to a) how to enforce it and b) how to satisfy both sides.

Obviously nobody is going to have a genitalia check for bathrooms. And I’d say that any trans woman that passes enough will likely never have an issue walking into a women’s bathroom and using a private stall. But then if it’s someone that doesn’t pass well and quite obviously you can tell they were born male, there might be women in that space that become uncomfortable.

With places that people get naked - like locker rooms, spas and jails, etc. The women there know if someone has a penis. There have been multiple instances of women being uncomfortable with this, trying to report it to management, and nothing being done for fears of lawsuits. The recent Planet Fitness controversy is a great example.

If these are larger spaces that can accommodate it, maybe there is male, female, and everybody type spaces. I don’t know man. I don’t have all the solutions. I just know these are very real problems that absolutely are not driven by bigotry (although many bigots can latch onto these legitimate issues).
ItsNotForMeWahh
ItsNotForMeWahh - 5/3/2024, 8:41 AM
@mountainman - For both sides to feel safe I do think there needs to be a 3rd bathroom option and even better bathROOMs instead of stalls.

A trans female also likely won't feel safe with Cis men. But also having a fully bearded trans male forced to be in the female bathroom also wouldn't feel safe to cis females.

Everyone deserves to feel safe especially in a restroom. At this point I'd say too many people are trying to fit 3 scenarios into 2 instead of making a 3rd
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 8:59 AM
@Vigor - Didn’t mean to be inflammatory and that message was typed in haste.

I think I gave my more nuanced takes in later and longer posts.

I want to make it clear. I do not hate trans people and support each person to life their life as they see fit as long as they don’t hurt others.

I have worked and interacted with multiple wonderful trans people. My only issues as i’ve stated before are around female only spaces and around kids having irreversible treatments. That’s it. There has to be nuance to this conversation to address these concerns while not calling people bigots.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/3/2024, 9:00 AM
@mountainman - Actualy there has never been any law preventing you, as a cisgender man, going into a womans bathroom. If there was already a law the debate on it now wouldn't exist or would be the polar opposite pushing for an exception to said law not for a new one to be created.

There is nuanced discussions to be had around this but that fact needs to be part of it as in why no law was ever put in place regarding cisgender men going into female only bathrooms and why now they are looking at possible legislation the focus is only on transwomen without also looking at the practicality of enforcement and how that factors into things with transmen in most instances.

As it is, whatever side of the debate anyone is on with that aspect of all this we are now in a place where there are reports of cisgender women being attacked for using female bathrooms because they are percieved to look like they were born male when they weren't...

...that and without it even going down that way women affraid of other cisgender women in bathrooms due to fear they MAY be trans on appearance alone even if it doesn't get to a confrontation so most of this dialogue from either side isn't realy helping much and if anything making everthing worse for all whatever the actual solutions folk believe should be in place.

...first thing I would say is the current dumb idea to ban completely neutral bathrooms (yes, that is a thing now) needs to be ditched cos a small cafe that only would have one of two toilets shouldn't be an issue if it/they are for anyone and not sex/gender specific (as in the topic should only apply in regard to large toilet blocks not single person bathrooms).
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 9:02 AM
@ItsNotForMeWahh - Having separate spaces works. Single use bathrooms, locker rooms and other places that allow more privacy etc.

The only challenge with those things is the forced extra costs for the facilities that now have to retrofit their bathrooms for this.

It’s all such a messy issue that is still quite new for society. It’s important that we hear out all sides of this, see what people’s various concerns are, and avoid just labeling people as bigots when they bring up concerns.
ItsNotForMeWahh
ItsNotForMeWahh - 5/3/2024, 9:08 AM
@mountainman - Definitely agree. Some people are certainly bigoted but I don't consider you to be at all. I also appreciate how you approach opposition and are respectful of others even if you are receiving disrespect, or plainly disagree.

Others will dig their heels in and ignore their existence which does absolutely nothing toward finding a solution that works for everyone.

There will certainly be costs. Smaller businesses would likely opt into bathrooms instead of stalls. Bigger businesses would be able to accommodate a bit easier.

People are people and deserve rights regardless of their beliefs or how they feel about their body. But in the same vein everyone has a right to safety
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 9:48 AM
@mountainman - we all do it. Type in haste. I'm guilty of it. I respond via my phone after all
I did ask my wife how she felt of trans people going into a piblic restroom shes in, and her responses were:

"No
I honestly couldn't care less
Unless they are in there trying to rape girls and use it to their advantage who gives shit
But that's adults ... now kids in high school that's a whole different ballgame "

Let me add that both my wife and I lived in philly, close to the 'gayborhood' and were around lgbtq a lot. Exposure increases tolerance. I've been to gay dance clubs (I'm straight, but gay clubs have the best energy) where the bathrooms were unisex. And it's a novel thing and kinky ar first but then you ask yourself, wait why isn't everything like this? Now I know a dance club is different than a Target bathroom. I get that. But my point is, people fear what they don't understand. The cases where a woman is attacked by a trans person in a bathroom are miniscule

That's like me not going camping in Pennsylvania because a red fox might bite me. Other than cases with rabies, foxes want nothing to do with me.

The bathroom thing to me is a weak argument. However I think having someone born 1 way and then entering the sports of the opposite gender is absolutely stupidity and there's no argument in the world that would change my mind. It's simply unfair
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 10:03 AM
@Vigor - I honestly believe that a vast majority of trans people aren’t trying to hurt others. The ones who enter those spaces with the intention to hurt others are an extreme minority or are just men taking advantage of the loophole.

That being said, the comfort of women does count too. Even if someone isn’t raping, a woman who doesn’t want to see penises in her changing rooms has a valid point as well.

Like I’ve said before it’s a messy issue with no easy answers. I do think the sports issue is a bit more cut and dry. I understand that trans women deserve to play sports too, but not at the expense of the women who face a competitive disadvantage. I doubt a male is going to dress female with the intention of cheating at sports. It could happen in the extreme rare circumstance but I doubt it’s the norm. But it’s still unfair. You can clearly look at the one of many examples of how Leah Thomas performed in the male division vs the female one. Or the British bike rider (don’t remember the name) who had never come close to winning any male competitions then won a national championship as a woman. It’s indisputable than men perform better in sports than women do. I’d say creating a new “open” division is the ideal solution, but biological women would still not win those either.
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 10:10 AM
@ItsNotForMeWahh - I know my opinions aren’t shared by everyone. I also know that I have at times made posts that weren’t approached in the best way and have done my best to correct that.

We are all here because we love comic content. It’s what we have in common. On some of these culture war issues we may disagree on some details of things. But it doesn’t help us to attack each other.

I have some passionate views about this specific issues. It’s only a few things (women only spaces and kids getting irreversible treatments). Besides those two things, I think all people should live their lives as they choose as long as they don’t hurt other people.

That being said, we should all work to hear out the other side and find common ground on all issues. It seems as if our society and culture is trying as hard as possible to separate us all on these trigger issues. Where as I believe that most people, regardless of their views on politics and social issues have a lot more in common than they’d like to admit.

I know people on the left and right that I love. I know people on the left and right that I do not care for. A person’s views on political or social issues does not define them.
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 10:20 AM
@Apophis71 - I get the legislation and enforcement issues, but it was certainly culturally frowned on for a man to enter a women’s restroom. And a male could certainly not go into a woman’s locker room and get buck naked without a huge outcry. So it does seem like a double standard in those respects (not that I want to do those things).
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 10:21 AM
@mountainman - it's quite the complicated issue. I don't think either presidential candidate wants to touch this one. Leave it up to the states for now
mountainman
mountainman - 5/3/2024, 10:25 AM
@Vigor - In general I’m a huge leave it up to the states guy. It seems silly that the diverse cultures across this country should all be governed based on the same laws for everything.

New York City and Tulsa, OK are very different places.

I’d even go farther and say that individual establishments should set their own policies. If Planet Fitness wants to allow trans women in the women’s locker rooms and another gym doesn’t, then I’d rather the government stay out of it and the customers choose to go where they feel most comfortable.

That being said, I just wish both sides of this issue would realize that there are real humans that are impacted by these policies. And that it is a nuanced issue (like most are) and that extreme to either side is likely not the best path forward.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 5/3/2024, 10:42 AM
@CorndogBurglar - "It's a tough issue because trans people are going to get treated horribly no matter which prison you out them in, male or female."

This is a fair concern. Prisons are brutal places, and no one is safe from physical or sexual violence. There is INTENSE need for prison reform, for people of all genders. This is not a trans issue, this is a prison issue.

"It's not safe for women to be competing against men. We saw that in MMA when that trans woman cracked the skull of her opponent. All because no one knew she was born a man."

Everyone knew that Fallon Fox was trans. Also, she is a violent piece of shit, and was rightfully drummed out of the sport, and hasn't had a match in a decade. That said, brutal MMA injuries are not uncommon, regardless of whether trans people are involved. This is not a trans problem, it's an MMA problem. https://hudsonreporter.com/sports/ufcs-worst-injuries

And yes, in some cases, trans women have advantages over cis gendered women, though it's far as definitive as you make it out to be, and, furthermore . . . elite athletes have genetic advantages. That's the nature of competition. It pushes the sport forward. The only way that I see this as a problem is if one accepts the premise that some men are transitioning SOLELY for the purpose of having a competitive advantage in women's sports, and there's no evidence that this is the case. Rather, if you start from the premise that trans women are women, then they are simply women competing in women's sports. The tallest player in the WNBA is 6'10" does she have an unfair advantage over other competitors due to her height? No more or less so than a trans woman competing in the same sport.

"There was a news story out of California about a woman taking her 4 year old daughter to the pool at the YMCA and a grown ass man was changing in the women's locker room. His dong exposed for all to see"

I think you are conflating a couple of different stories. There was a viral video of a woman complaining of a man in a changing room at a spa; and there was a teenager who complained about sharing locker rooms with trans women. And you know what? Yeah, locker rooms are an issue. Do you know how I know? Because I was absolutely TERRORIZED by other cis gender men in locker rooms when I was in school. Teasing, bullying, "grab ass," and, yes, having to see other dudes dongs. Locker room shit. Locker rooms are [frick]ing terrible. Why are we forcing people to be nude in front of other people? Seems like a solution like showering and changing stalls, like the kind you see at some YMCAs now, would be a better solution.

And, as many others have said, dudes can already just walk into women's restrooms. If your concerned about that, let's talk about gender neutral, single occupancy restrooms. Let's talk about taking real steps to address the kind of toxic masculinity that makes dudes feel entitled to enter women's spaces. But let's not villify an already marginalized group in the process.

"And I know that doesn't mean all trans people would do this, but the problem isn't the majority. The problem is the small outliers that same sex changing rooms will 100% bring out."

Cis-gendered men assault other cis-gendered men in locker rooms and restrooms. Not all, or even most, but a small minority. Not all cis gendered man is going to be respectful with children around, and not all of them even see a problem with it. What would you propose to address that?

The reason that it's so difficult to have a rational discussion around this issue (or really almost any issue, these days) is an inability to see both sides, and I applaud you for trying. But also, not every issue has two equal sides to it. Global Warming exacerbated by human behavior is real, vaccines are safe and effective, and trans women pose no statistically significant threat to cis women and children. These are facts.
MG0019
MG0019 - 5/3/2024, 11:47 AM
@mountainman - Well said.

Tho, I wouldn’t be as concerned that a trans women would hurt anyone in a locker room; and I know that wasn’t your comment’s intention. I still believe biological women need their own space, and a trans woman should use the biological male spaces.

The sports issue is so bad. It’s happening more often now. My sister’s basketball team played against a neighboring school who had a trans woman on the team; that towered over the other girls! This person was Huge. And the crowd was getting angry; nobody got violent or outburst. But you hear and feel the anger every time this giant shoved aside another girl.

Made me think; what if sports were divided by weight classes? Like in wrestling. As you said, I don’t want to bash that trans kid. Life is tough enough, and trying to be yourself is hard. But you can’t ignore the other issues as well! We can’t prioritize one person’s needs over the masses. And in wrestling we naturally feel the bout isn’t fair if someone vastly outweighs an opponent. That’s all it is. It doesn’t mean we’re transphobic, or hate the trans person. But you have a very clear advantage in this situation. If basketball team were divvied up by weight classes, you’d have mixed genders, and JV and Varsity wouldn’t be a thing; you may even have a big freshman get to play against the seniors.

I don’t know if it’s work; but I feel like the thought is at least trying to solve problems. Rather than silence “other think” and label everyone an -ist.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 5/3/2024, 11:56 AM
@clintthahamster - Can't find the report I read on it but it was discussing the under reporting on abuse by women against women (as in cisgender)...

...I bring it up however as it cited statistic in regard to prisons that showed there is higher rates of abuse by female prison guards on inmates than there is, as a percentage, abuse by male guards on inmates and more abuse cases by women against women in female jails than there is men against men in male ones.

I'll be honest I never bothered fact checking the statistics it cited but it was interesting to see in an article that wasn't even delving into the trans issue at all highlighted something so many don't even think about in the main...

...so yeh, issues in prison or just another of a long list of things that show there is a HUGE need for prison reform across the board for all. Specific to trans in prisons, shouldn't even be a debate realy as there should be common sense answers ALL could agree on with that end of the day and mixing that in with the everday stuff just derails rational dialogue when those isolated prison cases are so statisticaly rare and we likely all agree on them in the main regardless overall differences of opinion outside of those specifics on gender issues .
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 5/3/2024, 12:29 PM
@MG0019 - "a trans woman should use the biological male spaces."

I personally don't think it's worth exposing trans women to statistically inevitable assault to avoid exposing cis women to a statistically unlikely assault.

"what if sports were divided by weight classes"

Man, I can't say how refreshing it is to hear someone offering solutions other than banning trans folks from public life. Like, look at this picture:

User Comment Image

Those are two cis gendered women playing basketball. One CLEARLY has an insurmountable biological advantage over the other, but that doesn't mean she should be banned from the sport, IMO.

"We can’t prioritize one person’s needs over the masses."

Okay, but what about 1.6 million people? Because laws designed to constrain the rights of individuals tend to affect others like them.
Origame
Origame - 5/3/2024, 6:32 AM
Well, f@#$ you then.

All this over disagreeing with what a woman is...

...when Radcliffe is a man by his own definition and Rowling is a woman by his own definition.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 5/3/2024, 6:33 AM
Calling an apple an orange doesn't make it a banana.
User Comment Image
Vigor
Vigor - 5/3/2024, 7:00 AM
@harryba11zack - you have uncannily fantastic gif usage
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/3/2024, 6:42 AM
User Comment Image

Still...i think they should just talk, like actually sit down and talk it out, not by hearing what the other party said in an interview or on Twitter/X.

User Comment Image
Wait...wtf am i even doing here? I don't think i've ever seen a Harry Potter movie from start to finish, lel.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 5/3/2024, 6:47 AM
@Doomsday8888 - If you're ever curious to try again, start with the first and then stop watching after the third.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/3/2024, 6:50 AM
@HashTagSwagg
Guess i'll give it a shot when they'll announce the reboot...inevitably. :P
Origame
Origame - 5/3/2024, 7:03 AM
@Doomsday8888 - honestly I don't think anyone is really expecting him to just abandon his beliefs in service to her. It's just respect.

He doesn't have to publicly condemn her either and state he's never gonna work with her because of those beliefs.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/3/2024, 7:11 AM
@Origame
I can't speak for everyone else but as far as i'm concerned, if i were to put myself in his shoes and i started to view her as the ultimate evil, a threat to my core values, my beliefs, blasting tf outta her would be nothing. :P

Especially because, even as an outsider, someone who doesn't give a shit about Harry Potter, i can totally see how the responsability to make a stand on the matter would fall on his shoulder above everyone else, i'm sure you understand that as well.

Now, IS she actually evil incarnate? Did someone lose things in translation? Are people a bit more nuanced like @ObserverIO put it, ya know, with more layers?

For starters, Daniel ain't even a woman compared to J.K. and that shit alone changes the perspective on things, maybe she's hurt by things that he can't even understand, at least fully.
Origame
Origame - 5/3/2024, 7:20 AM
@Doomsday8888 - maybe, but could it even be reasonable that someone who's done so much good in your eyes is siding with an idea you consider evil at least worth a talk?

Like, I have someone in my life who gave me much to be thankful. And we fundamentally disagree on things, to the point I considered them evil. But we talked about it, why we both believe what we do. I didn't change any of my beliefs. I just understand where he's coming from and politely agree to disagree.

And Rowling has definitely given this snot nosed brat more than my friend gave me.
Doomsday8888
Doomsday8888 - 5/3/2024, 7:26 AM
@Origame
User Comment Image
ComicBandit
ComicBandit - 5/3/2024, 7:47 AM
@Doomsday8888 - Don't understand how anything she said is evil??
She doesn't believe trans men are women. She's not wrong. If they were they wouldn't be called Trans-Men. And making people believe what you believe isn't woke, it's the same dumb shit people have been doing since the beginning of time. There was a time if you didn't believe in God you would either be burnt at the stake, called a satan worshipper or called a heathen. Now she's evil because she doesn't believe a person born as a man can be a woman. The world hasn't changed at all.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 5/3/2024, 6:42 AM
He's right in that he doesn't owe her his beliefs for his success. Gratitude, sure, but not his core values.

But he seems to be having trouble reconciling her as a good person with what he sees as a bad person.

He (as many do) remembers her as being a champion of the oppressed. So how can she be this 'transphobe'? Ergh! Does! Not! Compute!

Maybe people are nuanced. Maybe she's still championing the oppressed and the prevailing social narrative is not always the right one.
1 2 3 4 5

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder