New THE HOBBIT: TBOTFA Promo Pic Reminds Us That The Movie Is Just 1 Month Away

New THE HOBBIT: TBOTFA Promo Pic Reminds Us That The Movie Is Just 1 Month Away

Actually, just less than a month! The defining chapter of Peter Jackson's Middle Earth saga hits theatres on December 17th, and in anticipation of that, after the jump you can see new images of Gandalf, Bilbo and some of their feathered friends.

By MarkCassidy - Nov 17, 2014 03:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
Embedded image permalink

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies” brings to an epic conclusion the adventures of Bilbo Baggins, Thorin Oakenshield and the Company of Dwarves. Having reclaimed their homeland from the Dragon Smaug, the Company has unwittingly unleashed a deadly force into the world. Enraged, Smaug rains his fiery wrath down upon the defenseless men, women and children of Lake-town. Obsessed above all else with his reclaimed treasure, Thorin sacrifices friendship and honor to hoard it as Bilbo’s frantic attempts to make him see reason drive the Hobbit towards a desperate and dangerous choice. But there are even greater dangers ahead. Unseen by any but the Wizard Gandalf, the great enemy Sauron has sent forth legions of Orcs in a stealth attack upon the Lonely Mountain. As darkness converges on their escalating conflict, the races of Dwarves, Elves and Men must decide – unite or be destroyed. Bilbo finds himself fighting for his life and the lives of his friends in the epic Battle of the Five Armies, as the future of Middle-earth hangs in the balance.


Starring Martin Freeman, Ian McKellen, Richard Armitage, Evangeline Lilly, Lee Pace, Luke Evans, Benedict Cumberbatch, Ken Stott, James Nesbitt, Cate Blanchett, Ian Holm, Hugo Weaving and Orlando Bloom, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is set to be released on December 17th.
About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
Link Revealed! Legend Of Zelda Movie Image Leak Sends Fans Into A Frenzy
Related:

Link Revealed! Legend Of Zelda Movie Image Leak Sends Fans Into A Frenzy

Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey Runtime Will Be Under 3 Hours Confirms Producer
Recommended For You:

Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey Runtime Will Be Under 3 Hours Confirms Producer

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 11/17/2014, 4:20 PM
Can't wait for the reboot.
ForcedAccount
ForcedAccount - 11/17/2014, 4:21 PM
EEEEEAAAGGLLEE
marvel72
marvel72 - 11/17/2014, 4:31 PM
@MisterBatfleck

can't see a teaser being attached to a movie that is coming out in 2016.
Kyos
Kyos - 11/17/2014, 4:32 PM
Urm...
Interestein
Interestein - 11/17/2014, 4:36 PM
Wonder how long before Jackson does the Silmarillion.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/17/2014, 4:51 PM
Watched the fist two movies again over the last few days with the Mrs and aside from a few flaws here and there, I love the hell outta them. Tolkien purists can [frick] right off...Jackson actually improves on the book in many ways so put that in your old toady pipes and smoke it.
HulkOnion
HulkOnion - 11/17/2014, 4:52 PM
Old toady pipes is something only a true Brit would say
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 4:56 PM
"Jackson actually improves on the book in many ways..."

...
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 4:56 PM
Speechless Ror. I'm literally speechless =P
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 5:06 PM
@ckal Agreed, for the most part. Are PJ's changes much worse than what was already in the book? I strongly believe that...but that's not the main reason these movies don't work. Forget about being an adaptation of the book. These movies flat-out don't function as standalone films. They're really THAT bad.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/17/2014, 5:12 PM
SauronsBAN, it's a fact. I love The Hobbit because it was one of the first books I ever read and I still have a lot of affection for it. But, at the end of the day it's a pretty basic kid's story with hardly an ounce of character development beyond Bilbo and maybe Gandalf. All of the Dwarves bar Thorin and perhaps Balin are completely interchangeable, and are not fleshed out in the slightest. At least by making 3 films Jackson was able to make us give a shot about some of them.

SPOILERS ahead...

This is how Tolkien decribes the deaths of Fili and Kili at the end of the book. (paraphrasing).

"Thorin was gravely wounded, and because Fili and Kili were his nephews they died trying to defend him"

Woah, got me right in the feels there JR! Hankies at the ready.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 5:20 PM
@RorMachine Here's the thing though: I agree that the book doesn't really flesh out any of the characters other than Bilbo, Thorin, and Gandalf. But would you say that the movies have done any better?

The only reason anyone knows the name of Kili (or is it Fili) is because of that awful love triangle. That's not exactly a defining character trait. The only reason anyone knows who Bombur is is because he's the fat one. He literally hasn't had any lines of dialogue. That goes for a HUGE chunk of the Dwarves, too. The only way we can tell them apart is because one has that axe in his head, and 2 of the others are ridiculously attractive, and Thorin looks like Aragorn, and Bombur's fat, and there's a really tough-looking one.

But other than those superficial differences...does any of that count as character development? I really don't think so.

At least Tolkien had a point in not making the Dwarves fleshed out: he realized the focus was on Bilbo. It was HIS story, not the Dwarves. Not Thorin's. Not Gandalf's. Jackson doesn't understand that, unfortunately. And that's exactly why these movies have screwed over its own main character so badly. For a trilogy of movies called "The Hobbit", Bilbo is hardly ever the focus. I've never seen a trilogy of movies that treated its own main character so carelessly. He's constantly thrown off to the side in favor of more hints about the Necromancer, or more scenes with Azog and Bogl, or delving into Gandalf and Radaghast's side-quest.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 5:24 PM
Forget the obviously padded-out scenes that are clearly filler (the river chase, the Benny Hill-esque chase with Smaug, etc etc), forget the video-game CGI overload, forget changes to the book. The real reason these movies don't work is because it's never focused on Bilbo.

Lord of the Rings managed to juggle ALL the characters who made up the Fellowship, while still managing to keep a focus on Frodo and Sam, the obvious main characters. The Hobbit hasn't managed to find that balance, IMO. Bilbo always gets the shaft, because Jackson is too busy trying to make this as "epic" as the Lord of the Rings was.

Had he recognized that this was a simple children's story and a COMPLETELY different story from The Lord of the Rings, this trilogy could've been fantastic. But Jackson obviously doesn't see it that way. He just looks at it as a prequel to Lord of the Rings, when it really had the potential to be so much more.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/17/2014, 5:30 PM
Yes, that does count as character development. Any scenes in which the characters are conversing at all equals more character development than there was in the book! So what if there's a love story? Or he cast a handsome dwarf or 2? It works..or at least it did for me. Do you know how boring the films would be if we just stuck with Bilbo and the Dwarves journeying to the mountain? Movies have to deviate from a novel's structure. LOTR didn't because they were structured like that anyway. Sure if he just made one movie he could have adapted the story as is, and that'd be that. I for one am glad he chose to add in the orcs, and the elves, and all the rest. Plus, the Bilbo being sidelined thing is ludicrous...how so? What does he do in the book that he hasn't done in the movies? They haven't taken anything away from him they've just added more around him, so yes, it's more of an ensemble now...again, so what?
spiderman620
spiderman620 - 11/17/2014, 5:33 PM
I liked the fact that some of the aspects of the book changed for the film. For example the part where the dwarves actually fight inside Ereabor (plz forgive my spelling) rather then hiding within like cowards. I think it makes it more interesting and heroic that way
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/17/2014, 5:40 PM
All of that stuff is made more interesting and cinematic by certain additions. Tolkien actually took the piss with his battle descriptions. How many times did he have a Hobbit character get knocked unconscious so he didn't have to go into the details? Yet he was happy to spend 10 pages describing the color of a [frick]ing Dwarf's hood elsewhere!
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 5:55 PM
@RorMachine I'd argue that dialogue doesn't automatically equal character development, and never has. How many times have the Dwarves actually had lines of dialogue and all it consisted of was exposition? People like to get on Nolan for that (for good reason), but Jackson has the same problem. To me, character development is about giving them personalities, and a sense of history, and actual character arcs. By that definition, Thorin has definitely had character development, I agree. But who else? I don't know why Fili (or Kili) is in love with Tauriel. I don't know why Tauriel would ever be interested in him. Or why Legolas is so smitten with her. Or what defining character trait Gloin has, other than name-dropping his son Gimli that one time. Or Bombur, other than being fat.

My point is, Jackson's movies have had a LOT of the exact same flaws as the book. But again, at least Tolkien did that intentionally. Jackson obviously didn't - he made a HUGE point about how the Dwarves need to be distinguishable from each other...but they're really not, apart from their appearance.

And as for the whole Bilbo thing - it's unfortunately true. Every time Bilbo is allowed to have a glimpse of a meaningful moment in the movies, it's immediately taken away from him because the focus has to shift to the other characters. Think of that chapter in the book where Bilbo ventures ALONE into Smaug's lair. It's described as the defining moment for him, because he has to face his uncontrollable fears and choose whether to keep going or turn back. In the movie, he goes in alone too...but then ALL the Dwarves rush in right after, leading to that obnoxious, time-killing chase scene that did nothing to advance the plot. Having the entire Company there takes away from a moment that should've been purely about Bilbo.

Or think of how Bilbo is the one who bravely (yet foolishly) creeps up to the 3 trolls, tries to prove his worth as a burglar and steal something from one of them, and then he gets caught and puts his entire group in danger. Tolkien lets him act rash, make a mistake, and learn from it. In the movie, it's nothing more than an opportunity for an all-out battle scene and a chance for Gandalf to show off some magic. It's apples and oranges, and it happens over and over and over again.
Greengo
Greengo - 11/17/2014, 6:10 PM
I'm so stoked for this movie!

I'm gonna do the Hobbit marathon and watch them all in HFR 3D!!!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/17/2014, 6:20 PM
You're singling out the wrong dwarves. No, Gloin's had nothing..nor has Bombur, Ori, Nori, Bifer...well, I'll save time here: Balin, Dwalin, Kili, Bofur and Thorin have al been well rounded out and given proper personalities and characters..well beyond simply looking different. Also, the Dwarves don'r rush in after him he meets them on his way back out of Smaug's lair. But that's irrelevant anyway because you're forgetting that this is a movie adaptation and those "irrelevant" scenes you're talking about are action scenes that are an integral part of any big budget fantasy adventure film! Sure all that running around Erebor was pointless but every film needs a climax, and it wouldn't exactly have been very exciting if they'd just ran out now would it? End of the day I prefer the movies to that book, and mainly because of what Jackson added. Emotional investment is the most important thing to me in this type of film, and like I said when..

SPOILER

the Dwarves are killed at the end of the next movie I expect I'll care quite a bit..I didn't while reading the book...and I was 7!
Greengo
Greengo - 11/17/2014, 6:26 PM
Kyos
Kyos - 11/17/2014, 6:27 PM
Damn, a SauronsBANE vs Ror debate about The Hobbit? Why oh why do I have to go to sleep? :(






Also I'm with SauronsBANE on this. ^^'
spiderman620
spiderman620 - 11/17/2014, 6:46 PM
Tolkien purists go to hell
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 6:54 PM
@RorMachine Even if I agreed with you about those particular Dwarves being fleshed out, given adequate character development, and having definable character arcs...are we supposed to be patting Peter Jackson on the back for properly characterizing 5 Dwarves...out of a total of 13? Is the bar set so low that we should praise the movie for actually managing to develop a grand total of 4 more characters than an admittedly simple children's book?

I mean, what happened to the Peter Jackson who was able to portray NINE completely different heroes in The Lord of the Rings, each with different motivations, backstories, and personalities, and ALSO give ample screen-time to secondary villains such as Saruman and Wormtongue, make Gollum such a compelling character, force us to sympathize with relative unknowns such as Eomer, Eowyn, and Theoden, all while simultaneously giving us exciting, sweeping, epic (but most importantly, character-driven) action sequences that managed to be meaningful, important to the plot, poignant, and emotional? I couldn't possibly describe anything in The Hobbit using the compliments I just gave. It's like night and day.

It seems we're both pretty set on our opinions and at the end of the day, we'll have to agree to disagree. But I just take issue with these Hobbit movies being described as such a step up from the source material. I suppose I can see these movies being mindless entertainment and a way to showcase the high frame-rate technology (which isn't even close to being as bad as people make it out to be), but anything beyond that is VERY hard for me to believe, given everything I just laid out. I mean, the book wouldn't be considered such a classic today if it were as flawed as you seem to think it is.

Time will tell, but I believe that the book will be the defining version of the story of The Hobbit in 10 years time, rather than the movies. Say what you want about them, but it's pretty clear that they haven't had quite the same impact on pop culture as The Lord of the Rings movies had. And that's putting it mildly. At the very least, I suppose I'd ask you to concede that The Lord of the Rings movies are on a MUCH higher level of quality than these Hobbit movies. But again, agree to disagree I suppose.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 6:58 PM
Still, I very much enjoyed this whole conversation Ror! It's always nice to be able to talk movies with someone on this site without having the whole thing devolve into trolling and childish insults =) Cheers!
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 11/17/2014, 7:01 PM
@Kyos Haha I could've used you as backup! Ror is a tough person to argue with =P
royroy
royroy - 11/17/2014, 8:17 PM
Mrcbm56

Don't joke about a reboot. The evil reboot gods will hear you and make it come true.
datNAMEtho
datNAMEtho - 11/18/2014, 7:13 AM
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSS

Hobbit Marathon in IMAX here I come!!!!!!! SO PUMPED
View Recorder