The Not So Brash Review of Green Lantern

The Not So Brash Review of Green Lantern

My review of the highly anticipated movie the Green Lantern. It does have some spoilers but I am guessing most of you have seen this one already.

Review Opinion
By Brashlight - Jun 24, 2011 08:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern

Let me start by saying I did enjoy most of this movie, I don’t regret spending the 20 dollars for my fiancé and I to go see it. The $5.25 on a bottle of water on the other hand…I definitely regret! As much as I enjoyed this film I couldn’t help but sit in the theater and wonder just how good this movie could have been.

My biggest problem with this movie was its lack of focus, likely brought on by the fact that there were 7 screenplay/story writers or maybe a lack of conviction for the character and story by Martin Campbell. Whatever the case, this movie definitely had a lack of center. There were scenes that were way too jumpy and didn’t flow. If you have ever gotten up half way through a movie to go to the bathroom and when you got back you felt like you missed something important? Well I got that feeling 4 or 5 times in this movie. There were times when it felt like an entire scene was cut out, for example when Hal and friend Tom flee the scene of the Abin Sur crash and are speeding away in the Jeep, after a couple of lines about responsibility and a surprising jolt from the lantern, we jump to the next scene with Hal in his apartment trying to figure out this ring/lantern deal. What happened to Tom?!? I mean Hal just discovered an alien space craft and is given this ring and Lantern by a “dying purple alien” and Tom doesn’t stick around to find out what the heck is going on? I’m sorry but if my buddy calls me up to get help with some alien artifacts, I think I might stick around to find out where this goes or at the very least ask a couple questions about what the hell is going on. Tom just disappears and we don’t see him again until the Senators party later in the movie, and even then Tom doesn’t say anything to Hal about the events that transpired earlier. This wasn’t the only scene like this though it’s the best example of it. I’d be lying if I didn’t say this makes me very curious of how the Blu-Ray is going to be like. I also didn’t like the love story between Hal and Carol. It felt unnatural and forced into the story. I wish they had put less focus on them and more focus on developing Hal and the Lantern. I understand wanting to put something in there for women to connect with but not at the expense of the main narrative of Hal and the Green Lanterns.

I also had problems with some of the acting and characters like Hector Hammond were overblown and over the top. I was surprised at how annoying Tim Robbins and Angela Bassett’s Characters were. They bored me immensely and other than Robbin’s being Hector’s father, they felt pointless to the plot and just felt very cliché driven. I felt like I saw those characters in a hundred other films. Blake Lively had her moments but most of the time felt a little forced and her chemistry with Ryan Reynald’s didn’t work for me. I don’t think she did a bad job I just think it could have been better, and that of course could have been poor direction from Campbell. Back to Peter Sarsgaard, I was very happy he was cast as Hector Hammond, I loved him in Jarhead and thought he would do well in this part. Unfortunately I was wrong, his lines and scenes, between him screaming at the top of his lungs, never felt genuine. His character never developed like I would have hoped and I just didn’t like Hammond as an antagonist in this movie. My favorite scene of his is when he is sucked dry by parallax. Its sad but true.

Not all the acting was bad though, Ryan Reynold’s was great as usual, aside from a couple of awful scenes that should never have made it past the cutting room floor, he really shined as Hal Jordan. He was funny and brought a real depth and likability to the character. It was easy to connect with Jordan. Mark Strong was great as Sinestro, he is one of the few reason’s I would be excited about a sequel. Sinestro was tough and dedicated to the Core, but later in the movie showed a lighter side. It will be fun to see what they do with him and the yellow power ring if they make a sequel. I loved the small parts by Michael Clarke Duncan as Kilowog and Geoffrey Rush as Tomar-Re. I would have liked to see more of Tomar-Re in this movie. I felt a surprising connection to that character and would have liked to see more of him.

There was some great action in this movie and honestly was the only thing keeping me engaged, which is sad because I love to watch the characters develop and I just didn’t get that here. I thought from the trailer that the helicopter/racecar scene would be goofy and too silly but it actually worked. I loved the back and forth Hal and Tom have about that. The space fight scene between Paralax and Hal was Epic in scope and I can even over look the unconscious Hal floating toward the Sun. Come on people, he should have be Kentucky fried Chicken in a matter of seconds. But maybe his suit was protecting him unconsciously or something. I won’t get in to that. The best parts of this movie all took place in space, either on Oa or flying through black holes, or the three aliens in the lost sector. I know this movie had to take place on earth to bring in the audience. If it had been primarily in space I don’t know if people would have been able to connect as well. But I found myself wishing it had been entirely a space based movie. Some of the CGI was a little poorly done. The mask didn’t bother me but my fiancé hated it and she also didn’t like the CGI suit. I actually liked the suit, but I can see why it rubbed people the wrong way. For some reason all the other suites, especially Sinestro’s looked great but Hal’s never really worked like the others.

To sum it up, and I thank you if you have read this far, I had fun watching this movie and won’t say it was bad but I definitely think it could have been a lot better. With fewer writers and a director who was more dedicated to the movie I think Green Lantern could have been the “Star Wars of Comic Book Movies” everyone wanted it to be, but it ended up just being a fun popcorn flick. I will definitely buy the Blu-ray in the hopes that it has what I was missing, but there are much better films out there this summer and I think this one will get lost in the sea of summer blockbusters. DC and Warner Brothers have a long way to go to catch up to the pace Marvel has set but I am excited and hopeful they do. Here’s hoping Green Lantern 2 is a better movie but as of right now the first installment only gets a 6 out of 10 from me.

6 Out of 10

MAD MEN Star Jon Hamm Reflects On Pitching Role To Marvel And Confirms He Turned Down GREEN LANTERN
Related:

MAD MEN Star Jon Hamm Reflects On Pitching Role To Marvel And Confirms He Turned Down GREEN LANTERN

SUPERMAN: Nathan Fillion On Why He's Perfectly Suited To Play GREEN LANTERN Guy Gardner
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN: Nathan Fillion On Why He's Perfectly Suited To Play GREEN LANTERN Guy Gardner

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Peteyparker
Peteyparker - 6/24/2011, 9:27 AM
Thank you not bad but could have been better
CapFan79
CapFan79 - 6/24/2011, 11:34 AM
GL was EPIC....






EPIC FAIL.
Brashlight
Brashlight - 6/24/2011, 12:46 PM
CapFan79@ Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I for one thought it had a lot of flaws. I'm glad you liked it but I thought it could have been much better.
Brashlight
Brashlight - 6/24/2011, 1:11 PM
Tea@ I knew i was missing something from this review! You complet me!
IanKnapp
IanKnapp - 6/24/2011, 8:48 PM
I really don't see why everyone is hatin on this movie. Sure there was a lot going on, but all and all I thought it was really good. I thought it was just as good as, say, the first spiderman
SpiderFan35
SpiderFan35 - 6/24/2011, 10:32 PM
Blake Lively was dull. Peter Sarsgaard was whiney. Suit was weird. But, some of the action scenes were entertaining enough. Re-cast Carol Ferris and bring on the sequel.
LOL Capfan79.
95
95 - 6/25/2011, 12:32 AM
Space scenes = A+

Earthbound scenes = F-

Hector Hammond = Epic fail.

Hal Jordan = Bad character development on the fault of the writers.

Symbiote suit = Cool, but why would you hire Martin Campbell to do a CGI heavy film? Doesn't make sense.

Musical score = {thumbs down}.

3-D Midnight Premiere w/ friends = An entertaining night.

The "Haters" are comparing it to 'Thor', which I thought was worst, the character's motivations were badly developed, rushed film.

I agree with you, Tim Robbins and Angela Bassett's characters were annoying.

Green Lantern just spent too much time showing Hal and Carol flirt, they could of atleast given us a [frick]ing sex scene!!!

lmfao.

~rm

SpiderRock33
SpiderRock33 - 6/25/2011, 1:52 AM
IanKnapp: Tell the truth i never liked the first Spider-man. It wasn't bad and in someways was as cheesy as this. I mean Willem Dafoe was given some really bad dialog and don't get me started about the people going "Go Spidey" at the end of the bridge scene. Plus Emo Peter Parker having a Super Hard On for Mary Jane annoyed me far more then Hal's Flirting. Ive read a lot of the first Spider-man Comics and i cant remember him acting like that. Overall Spider-man 1 was good. I notice a lot of movies that critics and audience give a pass to. That frankly suck from a story and acting standpoint or are not as great people want them to be. As for the Green Lantern. Was it great, No. But was it the worst thing to happen to mankind. Hell, no.
Tin
Tin - 6/25/2011, 4:21 AM
I know this movie had to take place on earth to bring in the audience. If it had been primarily in space I don’t know if people would have been able to connect as well.

If you think about it a little, if the movie WAS happening primarily in space, then everyone would probably call it the Star Wars of superhero movies.

The earth parts should have probably been a couple of opening scenes in which we are introduced to Hal and then just the third act in which hal battles parallax; the movie should have started at already fast pace: a few of Hal's everyday trivial actions should have been covered, but not in a fast montage, that is - so that the scenes are really happening in only two or three places, but exposed and elaborated fairly. From this trivia you get to know him probably better than from actions that happen to him, but never happened to you - you can't relate to those, meaning you don't have the expirience in those surreal situations so you can't really judge his behaviour in them. On trivia, you very much can. You probably fall in love with him in first five minutes.

Then he's at the seaside, it's a regular cut between the scenes and you don't have any idea what will happen because rythm is the same as it was in the beginning, no sign of anything extraordinary about to happen, you probably think he's meeting someone potentially interesting later in the movie. Then Abin Sur, shit happens, his ship wrecks. You didn't expect it cause there was no rythmic build-up to that. A bit scary, very mysterious, perhaps mystic, if handled properly.

Hal in his flat, not calling any friends to come by, alone, the oath. From there, you're in the space. Coming back to earth suddenly when you don't even expect to come back to it any more, after watching a fair amount of time in space, it gives the earth a special feeling of the presence of a superhero, probably the same feel people had when superhero comic books first started getting published. It was something new. This feeling, I think, is lost by overexposing the earth.

Let me put it this way: the space should feel special, but it already does as you've got a world there to explore and all those great characters, their interaction. You've practically got Star Wars there.

The earth should also feel special in that there is a presence of a superhero not yet felt ever before in the movie or by any of earthly characters.

Imagine a comic book, Spider-man if you will. He first appeared as already "renowned" superhero, and then the appeal of him was finding out who he is. But that appeal appeared later, when readers got tired of just getting to know what he can do, what his powers are, what his morals are. When you get tired from getting to now the superhero, then you want to get to know the person behind the hero. Then the origin story goes and it brings with it a whole new dimension, a fresh take on the same character. Then the emotional bonding with a person takes place. But what took place even before it is feeling the unknown creature.

The same should have been applied in GL. You watch him develop as a person and as a member of alien corps, and by the time he gets to earth again (unexpectedly!), he already is an established personality that underwent a character arc which you watched, but which people in this fictious america didn't.

In short, the appeal could have been made by watching people, humans in the movie react to something that's completely new to them, an established hero that comes out of nowhere. Completely new to them, but not to you. You know Hal by now because you were getting to know him in space so you are bonded with him. You can obviously bond with ordinary people he is now interacting with because you feel you would react the same as they did if you met GL in person. Plus, Hal also is ordinary person in the sense he's still a human being, so when he gets back to earth, how will he react to everybody seeing him, being scared by him, will he be isolated, he too fears that. Great dynamics could have been made here, and all that WHILE battling parallax.
IanKnapp
IanKnapp - 6/25/2011, 12:35 PM
@spiderrock- my thoughts exactly. Not a game-changer, but not deserving of all this negativity
View Recorder