Yet Another Green Lantern Review Emerged, Now Rather Mixed!

Yet Another Green Lantern Review Emerged, Now Rather Mixed!

Now from the trades of Variety, another review for Martin Campbell's Green Lantern flick has emerged, more "mixed" rather than the previous "negative." Check it out!

By DCMarvelFreshman - Jun 15, 2011 12:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern
Source: Variety



Following the first two reviews, which were undeniably negative, the folks at Variety have released their thoughts on Warner Bros. and Martin Campbell's Green Lantern flick. Evidently lacking an actual rating, this review seems more mixed, though with the bad barely outweighing the good, read an excerpt below!

Packing so much exposition that some viewers may require maps and flow charts, a sonorous voiceover introduces the Green Lantern Corps, a federation of alien warriors who use their extraordinary abilities for good. But an evil, soul-sucking force called Parallax is spreading its tentacles across the 3,600 sectors of the universe, striking fear even in the intrepid Lanterns, who draw their energy from the power of the will, fear's very antithesis. One of their top fighters, Abin Sur (Temuera Morrison), is mortally wounded by Parallax and realizes he must transfer his gifts to a new Lantern in the time that remains.

For all its industrial-strength visual wonders, "Green Lantern" is marked by a spirit of profound timidity, straitjacketed by its need to satiate its target audience without seeming too geeky for the mainstream.

Pic does show an admirable boldness early on, embracing its material with a po-faced sincerity that may get laughs from the uninitiated; this is especially true whenever Sinestro seeks advice from the ancient Guardians of the Universe, whose pallid, oval-shaped heads and stilted diction suggest a council of Yodas several millennia past their expiration date. Yet the filmmakers mock their own bid for seriousness with a jokey, self-conscious attitude elsewhere that, far from providing knowing comic relief, merely saps the picture of gravitas.

Even the casting of Reynolds, arguably the film's biggest gamble, soon reveals its calculation; the amusingly glib, too-smart-for-the-galaxy actor seems to have been chosen primarily to inoculate the film against its own encroaching cheesiness.
As Hal learns to fly, conjure weapons with his mind and charm the socks off childhood sweetheart Carol Ferris (an underserved Blake Lively), Reynolds looks alternately flabbergasted and self-satisfied, providing little emotional bandwidth for a hero whose sense of wonder the viewer is never allowed to access. It's especially disappointing given the rich psychological dimensions Campbell brought to a very different origin story in 2006's "Casino Royale."

Registering more vividly, as villains often do, are Strong as the never entirely trustworthy Sinestro and Peter Sarsgaard as geeky scientist Hector Hammond, whose exposure to Parallax triggers a descent into psychotic monomania. With yellow eyes and a freakishly engorged noggin, Sarsgaard is feverishly creepy despite inadequate motivation from the script, which makes a perfunctory attempt to set up a tangled backstory for Hal, Carol, Hector and Hector's smarmy-politico father (Tim Robbins). The viewer is left with the annoying sense that the ruling powers of the universe, in their infinite wisdom, have entrusted the fate of humanity to a waspy, overprivileged social circle with major daddy issues.

If it offers little worth listening to in terms of dialogue or music, "Green Lantern" does provide consistent visual diversions in Grant Major's production design, whose otherworldly cityscapes bear some resemblance to the all-digital backgrounds in the most recent "Star Wars" pictures. Even when its fantastical effects look blatantly artificial, the cleanly edited film has an elegance and overall design coherence that bespeak an able craftsman at the helm.

While hardly essential to the viewing experience, the application of 3D is well judged in its occasional isolation of foreground elements, and image brightness was at acceptable levels at the screening caught.



Green Lantern follows a universe as vast as it is mysterious, where a small but powerful force has existed for centuries. Protectors of peace and justice, they are called the Green Lantern Corps. A brotherhood of warriors sworn to keep intergalactic order, each Green Lantern wears a ring that grants him superpowers. But when a new enemy called Parallax threatens to destroy the balance of power in the Universe, their fate and the fate of Earth lie in the hands of their newest recruit, the first human ever selected: Hal Jordan. Starring Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, & Peter Sarsgaard the film releases June 17!
2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why
Related:

2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie Great
Recommended For You:

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie "Great"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
CBMfan001
CBMfan001 - 6/15/2011, 12:41 AM
hmm this one mixed,similar to the hollywood reporter,well looks like critically GL might find it tough but still i will watch it because this looks like a good mix of fun,humour and action.....the way a summer movie is supposed to be :)
TayDee
TayDee - 6/15/2011, 1:13 AM
I just hope this movie makes enough money. Screw the critics.
DrRockit13
DrRockit13 - 6/15/2011, 1:13 AM
some one is not a fan read a comic book d!ck
mk
mk - 6/15/2011, 1:19 AM
that sucks.. oh well either i movie hop or super 8
Berger45
Berger45 - 6/15/2011, 1:21 AM
I don't wanna unnecessary jump on the bandwagon but it seems that the "critics" didn't understand the movie. I am not convinced by any of them yet. It would really seem that this is a movie that only the fans will love. I am even more pscyhed as ever by the negativity! It makes it way more exciting to me, as the possibility that it is pure fanboy-nerdgasm more real!
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 6/15/2011, 1:34 AM
If only the "fans" go see this movie, love it or hate it, it will be the last GL movie we see. The studios make movies to make money, lots of money, so they need the mainstream to go see this. The mainstream read reviews. Thanks Ryan, thanks a lot.
spiderneil
spiderneil - 6/15/2011, 1:34 AM
Lots of reviewers are sick of superhero movie that has over satuated cinema so any excuse to bash a sub par/lack lustre movie and they will take it. Thor and X-men first class were very good so they couldnt bash those movies so theymust be licking their lips with the GL review embargo
spiderneil
spiderneil - 6/15/2011, 1:37 AM
@ MrEko
Watchmen deserved to fail as it was f***ing s***!!
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 6/15/2011, 1:47 AM
mk
mk - 6/15/2011, 2:08 AM
ha thats funny ^
magma123
magma123 - 6/15/2011, 2:13 AM
About the same review Thor got from them.
joekerr93
joekerr93 - 6/15/2011, 2:19 AM
Doesnt really matter if it sucks, anyone who wants DC to keep making more movies needs to go see this. Otherwise all we will get is Batman, Batman, Batman, Batman, Superman, Batman
Killik13
Killik13 - 6/15/2011, 2:37 AM
Well, the Star Wars comparisons have begun. Has anyone told this guy that the Green Lantern corps were introduced nearly 20 years before A New Hope saw the light of day? Reminds me of when I genuinely heard someone claim that Fantastic Four was a rip off of The Incredibles...

Anyhow, the complaints seem consistent so far, and I'm not at all surprised really. Still looking forward to seeing it, if it really as average as reviews suggest then the inevitable sequel might pull an X2 or Dark Knight and dramatically improve, introduction of the Sinestro Corps could transform the franchise from ok to amazing.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 6/15/2011, 2:52 AM
I sense undertones from the reviewer of a hatred towards all things. "geeky"
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 6/15/2011, 2:54 AM
Transformers were already known by the mainstream due to the toys and cartoons, but I get your point.
chopfer15
chopfer15 - 6/15/2011, 2:56 AM
I have read these reviews so far and am only more convinced that it will be good. All I hear is how they think it's cheesy, and that it has visuals like star wars but no psychological twists. Sounds like a good fun summer blockbuster and they wanted artsy fartsy. Not to mention that they have made it painfully obvious that they have never and will never read a single comic. This movie, along with Thor and Cap, was made for a certain audience. These critics aren't it. When I see a review from the target audience I will pay more attention. But, bad or mixed reviews from these critics is ok, they want everything to be a 2 hour journey into the psych of a dying man and his dog starring Javier bardem. Snooooooore. The best movies don't win over critics, they win over the general public, something this reviewer bashs the movie for doing.
catman
catman - 6/15/2011, 3:08 AM
I really hope I enjoy this.. I hate ryan in everything Ive seen him in..blade 3, wolverine..and didnt like the choice here but i kinda said the same thing with thor and first class in terms of the actors. Hopefully Ryan will show hes a actor and act the part..but looking at the lines and he stupid expressions.. I just hope I like this!!! Please dont let him play Deadpool as well!!
DiLusso
DiLusso - 6/15/2011, 3:10 AM
watching it this evening. i'll make my own mind up
ThunderCougarFalconBird
ThunderCougarFalconBird - 6/15/2011, 3:11 AM
It was always a tough one to sell to critics and mainstream audiences. Everyone these days wants realistic, humanised heroes and stories. These guys had the balls to take an unknown hero with powers that aren't easily accessible for the mainstream to grasp and go against the flow. RR isn't the perfect choice for Hal but he is a good choice! His suit and mask don't quite look real, guess what, they're not real! It's a construct of the ring and from what I've seen, they have done a fantastic job!

I don't think any critic will truly grasp the Green Lantern concept. Their reviews might be spot on, but I think it's going to be a movie we need to see for ourselves without listening too much to the opinions of others.
spiderneil
spiderneil - 6/15/2011, 3:46 AM
@ Nephillim

watchmen was rubbish.
the acting (rosharach aside) was dreadful.
the pacing was terrible.
the music was the worst I've ever heard.
a terrible, terrible movie. HACK snyder then went on to direct 'THE' worst movie I have ever seen with sucker punch. If I were a superman fan I would be very worried.
ScRipt69
ScRipt69 - 6/15/2011, 3:47 AM
@teabag I subscribed to Empire for years before I just simply realised all their stuff was on their website for free ;) but I do rate them as they have similar geek employees who tend overrate such films, (star wars, Superman returns etc) so if they give it 2 stars then that is BAD BAD BAD, cant believe its going to suck, i mean £300 million dollars a talented director and all that staff, Johns has a lot to answer for, he should of distanced himself from this but obviously money is a big motivator, thank you for cocking up Green Lantern, looks like ill be re watching Emerald Knights again in protest, how upsetting, maybe WB should let DC go
TheSuperinjunction
TheSuperinjunction - 6/15/2011, 3:48 AM
The more I read of reactions to GL, my worst fears seem to be realised. The lack of 'gravitas' the character seems to have. Yeah the film looks visually good from what I've seen, but Ryan Reynolds does not have the authority or persona to pull off Hal Jordan, which seems to be resulting in a tongue-in-cheek feel for the movie.

Hopefully I'm proven wrong when I see it, but from the sound of it I'm just going to walk away disappointed :-/
spiderneil
spiderneil - 6/15/2011, 3:50 AM
I couldn't care LESS was empire has to say with regards to movies as they haven't got a f***ing CLUE with regards to movie reviews.
TheSuperinjunction
TheSuperinjunction - 6/15/2011, 3:56 AM
Nobody is blaming Reynolds, but it seems like a gamble that hasn't paid off in casting. Get a more serious actor and the cheesy load is immediately lightened
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/15/2011, 4:02 AM
its a shame the critics are destroying this.

it means flash will be put on hold & more f*ckin batman movies.

the star wars of comic book movies,yeah star wars the phantom menance.

so it won't be a good year for comic book movies.

empire reveiws

1.thor ****
2.x-men first class ***
3.green lantern **
4.the priest **
5.green hornet **

fingers crossed captain america & cowboys & aliens deliver.

@ everyone who says empire hasn't got a clue.

if empire had given this movie 4/5 star reveiw,you'd all been jumping on their dick.

but because you don't like to hear the negative reveiws they don't know what they're talking about.
spiderneil
spiderneil - 6/15/2011, 4:07 AM
@ marvel 72

'the star wars of comic book movies,yeah stars wars the phantom menance'

ha ha ha ;D
1 2
View Recorder