28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE Test Screening Spoilers Reveal What To Expect From Nia DaCosta's Sequel

28 YEARS LATER: THE BONE TEMPLE Test Screening Spoilers Reveal What To Expect From Nia DaCosta's Sequel

A test screening for Nia DaCosta's (The Marvels) 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple recently took place, and we have details about what to expect from the follow-up and how it compares to Danny Boyle's movie.

By JoshWilding - Aug 26, 2025 09:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: World of Reel (via FearHQ.com)

Danny Boyle's 28 Years Later opened to overwhelmingly positive reviews earlier this year, but it wasn't the box office hit that Sony Pictures likely anticipated.

The movie only managed to gross $150 million at the worldwide box office, a decent result on a $60 million budget, but one which means the filmmaker's planned threequel depends on the success of Nia DaCosta's 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple.

Well, there may be some good news on that front. World of Reel (via FearHQ.com) reports that a recent test screening went well and featured "multiple applause breaks during the film." One attendee even told the site that, "I thought part 1 was outstanding, but this surpassed it."

Despite the mixed response to Jack O'Connell's Jimmy (he debuted in a tonally jarring action scene in the closing moments of 28 Years Later), this screening has seen him touted as delivering the "villain performance of the year."

The site adds, "The central dynamic is essentially a duel between O’Connell and Ralph Fiennes' bone shriner, Dr. Ian Kelson, who has a larger role than in the first instalment and delivers a performance that's 'even better' than the previous film."

The third act—which reportedly features a sequence "that will be talked about for much of 2026"—is similarly praised, as is Alex Garland's script. 

Also of note is the fact that DaCosta hasn't gone down the iPhone/handheld camera route, instead choosing to embrace a more orthodox shooting style. However, with Cillian Murphy only expected to have a few seconds of screentime in 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, whether any of this will help make it a box office draw is hard to say.

Zombies are no longer as popular as they once were, but if Sony can market this follow-up in a way that's perhaps less niche and a tad more mainstream, then odds are a third chapter will happen. We'd bet on Murphy being included in the trailers, anyway. 

"[Nia] gets a bit of Cillian at the end," Boyle said earlier this summer. "All I can say is you have to wait for Cillian, but hopefully he will help us get the third film financed."

"You promise [the studio] Cillian Murphy, that's quite a deflection of any technical concerns, they soon forget," he added. "Yeah, we nakedly used that to get our own way. What better promise could you make?"

"We haven't got the money for the third one yet. It will depend how the first one does, I guess," Boyle noted. "But hopefully if we do ok, they'll give us the go-ahead for the money and for the third one. Everybody's standing by for that, really. Including Cillian."

In 28 Years Later, it's been almost three decades since the rage virus escaped a biological weapons laboratory, and now, still in a ruthlessly enforced quarantine, some have found ways to exist amidst the infected. One such group of survivors lives on a small island connected to the mainland by a single, heavily-defended causeway.

When one of the group leaves the island on a mission into the dark heart of the mainland, he discovers secrets, wonders, and horrors that have mutated not only the infected but other survivors as well.

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is set to be released in theaters on January 16, 2026.

HELD HOSTAGE IN MY HOUSE Star Amy Smart On Surviving Her New Thriller, SCRUBS, STARGIRL & More! (Exclusive)
Related:

HELD HOSTAGE IN MY HOUSE Star Amy Smart On Surviving Her New Thriller, SCRUBS, STARGIRL & More! (Exclusive)

Not-So-Last Rites For The Warrens, As THE CONJURING Prequel Is Officially In Development At Warner Bros.
Recommended For You:

Not-So-Last Rites For The Warrens, As THE CONJURING Prequel Is Officially In Development At Warner Bros.

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Wahhvacado
Wahhvacado - 8/26/2025, 9:42 AM
Man that ending really took a left turn on the last one
TheVisionary27
TheVisionary27 - 8/26/2025, 9:57 AM
@Wahhvacado - Actually I liked it. At first I was like wtf but it grew on me. The whole film is batshit crazy in fact it’s the most ballsy instalment in the series yet. Danny Boyle has a zany approach to his movies. I wouldn’t expect anything less. Also the story comes round full circle. Tommy the boy at the start of the film returned at the end albeit 28 years later LMFAO! 🤣
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/26/2025, 10:19 AM
@Wahhvacado - I really liked the ending, and it made sense. What's the problem
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 8/26/2025, 4:22 PM
@bobevanz - "it made sense"
Okay, explain this Atheist.
How the [frick] does someone perform this forward flip, without a trampoline and while wearing f**king wellyboots.
User Comment Image
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 8/26/2025, 9:47 AM
"Multiple applause breaks during the film."

Just like the "standing ovations" for BVS, right?

User Comment Image
TheVisionary27
TheVisionary27 - 8/26/2025, 9:58 AM
@Feralwookiee - I never clapped during BvS but it’s one of my favourite comicbook films. The ultimate edition not the theatrical version.
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 8/26/2025, 9:48 AM
Judging from her previous output, probably a middling movie.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/26/2025, 10:02 AM
Shouldn't this be 28 Decades Later? That'd be interesting. Far future.

And what about a 28 Hours Later prequel all set in real time or a 28 Months Later inbetweequel.
HelloBoysImBack
HelloBoysImBack - 8/26/2025, 10:03 AM
Joker 2 got a 13 hour standing ovation
ClungeOfSteel
ClungeOfSteel - 8/26/2025, 10:06 AM
Not sure how I feel about this but obviously I'll watch it 😅

This is the first sequel to focus on characters from a previous film. I kinda liked how it was a new set of characters in each movie but oh well.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/26/2025, 10:21 AM
My top five horror movies of the year would be:
Bring Her Back
Sinners
28 Years Later
Together
Companion
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 8/26/2025, 6:56 PM
@bobevanz - I have seen all of these and loved Bring her back and Sinners.
28 years had a great beginning but was a letdown later on.
Together was a creepy love Story and Companion was fun.

I also liked Final Destination 6, but didn't like Weapons.
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 8/26/2025, 10:33 AM
great trailer but the film was awful, dog shit editing and that ending scene ruined it.
User Comment Image
TheShellyMan
TheShellyMan - 8/26/2025, 8:50 PM
@harryba11zack - I walked out of the theater pissed.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 8/26/2025, 10:39 AM
28 Years is EASILY my most disappointing film of the year. I loved 28 Days and thought 28 Weeks was a more than solid sequel.

This one? Was so tonally different from the first two it didn't even feel like the same franchise. Wasn't tense, scary, or entertaining at all. None of the original music except a short bit before the hip-hop dance gang. Oh, and that was the most stupidest, F'n thing ever to put in this movie, let alone the franchise.

Beats me how it got so many good reviews. I literally have ZERO desire to watch the next two; Cillian Murphy or not.
Havenless
Havenless - 8/26/2025, 11:08 AM
What is this movie? Unrelated to 28 years later, an alternate sequel made by a competing company to 28 months later? Or is it a sequel to 28 years later that came out the same year?
Shivermetimbers
Shivermetimbers - 8/26/2025, 11:54 AM
28 years was a bit different than I expected but it was good. Looking forward to see where they take the story with this one.
thedrudo
thedrudo - 8/26/2025, 1:27 PM
I really loved Years and am excited for this new one.

The final few minutes took a weird tonal shift but I get it in relation to where we last see Jack’s character and kind of what inspires the look.

The reveal about Cillian is bizarre though. Why did Boyle even spoil that so early?
dragon316
dragon316 - 8/26/2025, 2:55 PM
Trailer made it look good but very boring past sequels had more action
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 8/26/2025, 4:10 PM
"I thought part 1 was outstanding, but this surpassed it"

User Comment Image

28 years is the biggest dissapointmeant this year followed by Gunn's "super""man" film and thats only because Gunn's film looked like shit from trailers and unfortanately thats exactly what you got from it, Week's trailers looked great but it sold you on a movie that didn't exist.
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 8/26/2025, 4:52 PM
Odd..I just automatically assumed Boyle was directin this one too. Still need to watch this franchise
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 8/26/2025, 6:58 PM
The Infekten were not scary anymore.

I didn't care about the pedo ninja at the end.
BestAtWhatIDo
BestAtWhatIDo - 8/26/2025, 7:43 PM
I loved a lot of 28 years, but the mother subplot really fell flat for me, and the whole thing was super disjointed. The ending was beautifully deranged though, and if there's more of that in the sequel, count me in.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder