KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE - Here's What Critics Are Saying About The "Stylish" And "Grotesque" Sequel

KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE - Here's What Critics Are Saying About The "Stylish" And "Grotesque" Sequel

The first wave of reviews for Kingsman: The Golden Circle are finally here but how does it match up to its predecessor and is the sequel worth checking out this weekend? Hit the jump to find out...

By JoshWilding - Sep 19, 2017 03:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Kingsman
Kingsman: The Secret Service was an unexpected hit in 2015 and paved the way for R-Rated comic book adaptations like Deadpool and Logan. The news that a sequel was in the works was met with a widely positive response, especially as Matthew Vaughn confirmed that he'd be returning to take the helm of the movie. Unfortunately, reviews are clearly mixed based on this first wave of verdicts.

While it definitely sounds like the sequel is fun, Vaughn has clearly upped the amount of lewd humour and over the top action sequences and that's something which hasn't sat well with many critics. 

It's going to be interesting seeing how much of an impact this has on Kingsman: The Golden Circle's box office performance. While it's easy to imagine moviegoers flocking to see the sequel on Friday and Saturday, that could soon change if word of mouth isn't good. What do you think of these reviews? 



As ultraviolent as the first film, and as ultrasmutty, The Golden Circle will leave the Kingsfans grinning, even if its characters have less growing to do this time around. [4/5]

SOURCE: Empire Online

The Golden Circle has a few of the comically brutal spasms of action that gave the first film its caffeinated energy, but they don’t have the same bonkers Oddjob kick of Sofia Boutella and her lethal legblades. Instead, there’s just more of everything else, including Vaughn’s leering boys-will-be-boys humor. If the first Kingsman, at its best, felt like a dry martini of a joke, then this one is more Jack and Mountain Dew — unsubtle, unrefreshing, and unnecessary. [C-]

SOURCE: Entertainment Weekly

Still, there are lessons to be kept in mind: Except for the water-logged Thunderball, all the Connery Bond films ran less than two hours and were better for it, while the initial Indiana Jones and and first two Star Wars chapters were kept within a couple of minutes of two hours either way. If they can do it, future Kingsman outings certainly can, too, and would be better for it.

SOURCE: The Hollywood Reporter

Kingsman: The Golden Circle is as cheeky, cartoonish, and crazy as its predecessor, but it’s also commendably unafraid to demolish what had come before it if it’s in service of the story. The new dynamic between Eggsy and his team is great, and the Statesman prove amusing counterparts to these gentlemen spies from across the pond. [8.5/10]

SOURCE: IGN

Firth, while sidelined for way too much of the film, is as game as ever, and Egerton continues to be a capable leading man, even if his arc is less fleshed-out here. As minor entertainment, it’ll do, but it’s not a slam-bang sensation like the first. If KINGSMAN comes back for another romp, hopefully it’ll be with the same sense of energy and danger the first had. [6/10]

SOURCE: JoBlo


It’s best to think of Kingsman: The Golden Circle as less of a sequel, more an American remix. It’s still a thrilling ride with action sequences unmatched in their high-velocity blasts, but the new additions struggle to conceal the familiarity beneath this secret service. [3/5]

SOURCE: Metro

Despite a whole lot of bet-hedging, there’s still a lot to enjoy about Kingsman: The Golden Circle, including a very hilarious extended cameo and some suitably bombastic set pieces. I’d certainly be happy with more Kingsman movies, because Egerton is a winning leading man and Vaughn’s action direction remains fantastic, but this movie feels like a victim of its unanticipated success. If the first Kingsman left you going “Wow!” this one leaves you saying “Hmm…cool.” And while it doesn’t reach the same hyperbolic heights as the first film, there are certainly worse things than being entertained for two hours. [3.5/5]

SOURCE: Nerdist

Vaughn’s film is overflowing with big set pieces, but all those epic action sequences amount to a running time clocking nearly two and a half hours – and not much else. Like fireworks, they’re awe-inspiring while you’re watching, but there’s little left to marvel at after the show’s over. [B-]

SOURCE: The Playlist

As for the Bond-homaging, a ski-resort interlude tugs its forelock towards the great 007 snow-scenes of yore, but ends with a runaway cablecar sequence that’s straight from the Die Another Day school of leaden, low-stakes CGI. Kingsman: The Golden Circle might stop short of rolling out an invisible car, but you wouldn’t put it past the next one. [1*]

SOURCE: The Telegraph

It’s not like anyone has ever accused James Bond of being realistic, but the “Kingsman” series has gotten so outlandish that “Moonraker” suddenly looks plausible by comparison.

SOURCE: Variety
KINGSMAN 3: Matthew Vaughn Shares Update On Threequel Plans And How Much Of The Script Is Written
Related:

KINGSMAN 3: Matthew Vaughn Shares Update On Threequel Plans And How Much Of The Script Is Written

THE KING'S MAN Home Video Release Has Landed And We're Celebrating With A Giveaway
Recommended For You:

THE KING'S MAN Home Video Release Has Landed And We're Celebrating With A Giveaway

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Kyos
Kyos - 9/19/2017, 3:26 AM
Going on Thursday. Little to no actual hype this time around, but I expect to be pretty entertained.
LexScarhooks
LexScarhooks - 9/19/2017, 3:29 AM
"the “Kingsman” series has gotten so outlandish that “Moonraker” suddenly looks plausible by comparison."

Whoa.
ELAYEM
ELAYEM - 9/19/2017, 3:59 AM
So far 67% on rotten tomatoes, but 29% from top critics... yikes
theFUZZ008
theFUZZ008 - 9/19/2017, 4:07 AM
Great banner photo.

slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 9/19/2017, 4:16 AM
Meh, don't think critics should be taken seriously anymore. There pretentious opinions on cenima are usually unrelatable to me. I think only good directors and producers should be aloud to critique/review other people's films. That way you have a frame of reference as to whose opinion you might actually want to listen to.
Rant aside, I'm looking forward to seeing kingsmen 2. Looks like the first movie which i enjoyed a lot.
EZBeast
EZBeast - 9/19/2017, 5:34 AM
@slickrickdesigns - still would take them over random people who all feel like their opinions have to be heard
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 9/19/2017, 7:17 AM
@MrNegative - but I'll listen to a Tarentino, Gunn, Whedon, Etc over any of the critics and everyone else's who I don't know.
NOVAtheSUPA
NOVAtheSUPA - 9/19/2017, 3:57 PM
@MrNegative - that sounds like a critic?
EZBeast
EZBeast - 9/20/2017, 6:43 AM
@slickrickdesigns - And to me I don't care about what directors have to say because they're always going to promote their work regardless of what critics or people think. If they're mad at reviews then they defend but if people like then they come out thinking now they have to listen to me. Then there are people like me who aren't loyal to any directors but just want a good movie made by them without their politics or constant bantering .

@NOVAtheSUPA - Exactly! People all feel like they're critics now and have to voice their opinions because for some reason they matter, especially online, when in reality they could just be die hards who love a movie no matter how crappy it is, throw universal praise at mediocrity, attack any who don't agree with them, etc.
Legit critics are paid to write their reviews to help show us a different outlook of a movie. You aren't always suppose to agree with them but should take a little of what they say to mind when you see the movie to help you better decide for yourself. Its better than hearing its shit or amazing all the time from constant "people reviewers"
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 9/20/2017, 8:26 AM
@MrNegative - I'm referring to a directors opinion on other people's projects. But to each there own... I only care for a few peoples opinions on this website as well.
Jeight8
Jeight8 - 9/19/2017, 4:20 AM
Vaughn is dangerously veering into Guy Richie territory with each one of his Kingsman movies. I mean, i like style but that's the only thing this movie has.
1 2
View Recorder