Character Rights

Character Rights

Who owns what?

Editorial Opinion
By TheIronBat - May 24, 2013 12:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

Upon reading of Bryan Singer's "sneaky" move to "steal" Quicksilver away from Whedon and the MCU it got me thinking about the characters movie rights and the studios that own them.

A few days ago I read that Sony may be selling off their entertainment division so the rights to Spider-Man would be up in the air for Marvel to grab, but upon writing this a few news outlets are saying otherwise. Same with Marvel only just acquiring back the rights to Daredevil, Ghost Rider and Blade.

Now, I'm not an expert on the ins and outs of the movie industry so forgive me if I come off as a tad naive, but, since all these films are released under Marvel Productions doesn't that make them Marvel properties regardless of the studio? The Avengers and Captain America were put out through Paramount does that make it a Paramount property? Doesn't seem like they are.

With the petty squabbling between studios and to a lesser extent fans (no offence intended) is it really a bad thing to cross characters over to give the appearance of an enormous universe?

Or if it's really that nasty, why don't Marvel just buy them back using the Disney money if necessary but still release the movies under the studios as intended like Fox for X-Men, Sony for Spider-Man and so on. It would certainly please the fans having connections like that to have the nice surprise of seeing in upcoming movies and then attendance will go up (as we are a vocal group of people when we see something awesome), and sales of merchandise would go up and so forth, everybody wins!

This is just a fan wanting to see a united universe.

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TheIronBat
TheIronBat - 5/24/2013, 1:11 PM
@beto Exactly. Someone gets it.
ruadh
ruadh - 5/24/2013, 3:39 PM
"A few days ago I read that Sony may be selling off their entertainment division so the rights to Spider-Man would be up in the air for Marvel to grab, but upon writing this a few news outlets are saying otherwise. Same with Marvel only just acquiring back the rights to Daredevil, Ghost Rider and Blade."

Sony also said they'll never, with several "evers", let go of Spider-Man.

"Now, I'm not an expert on the ins and outs of the movie industry so forgive me if I come off as a tad naive, but, since all these films are released under Marvel Productions doesn't that make them Marvel properties regardless of the studio?"

No. Marvel benefits from the use of their characters by other studios, but those studios have the exclusive rights to use the characters in films. Only Sony can use Spider-Man in movies, unless a deal is made.

"The Avengers and Captain America were put out through Paramount does that make it a Paramount property? Doesn't seem like they are."

Paramount distributed.

"Or if it's really that nasty, why don't Marvel just buy them back using the Disney money"

Yes Disney owns Marvel Studios, and benefits from it, but they aren't the same company. Marvel actually runs pretty much on its own. Also, they benefit plenty from movies like Amazing Spider-Man and X-Men DOFP. It'll probably cost more than its worth to buy the characters back, especially since Sony and Fox aren't selling. Which means it'll cost A LOT.

"It would certainly please the fans"

While I'm sure they enjoy pleasing fans to a degree, especially when it means theater ticket sales, it's also a business. Like I said, if the cost of buying back these characters is monumental compared to what they'll make from ticket sales, then why bother with it?

"as we are a vocal group of people when we see something awesome"

A vocal minority. Iron Man 3 proved that.

"sales of merchandise would go up and so forth, everybody wins!"

Merch sells anyway, and everybody is winning right now.
gamecreatorjj
gamecreatorjj - 5/24/2013, 5:17 PM
Marvel doesn't have daredevil back, I think they have Ghost Rider, Blade, and Punisher back

And Sony will not be selling Spiderman, its just a rumor, and a bad busisness move

Fox will never sell Fantastic Four or X Men, NEVER, Sony will hold off on selling spiderman until they go bankrupt and are forced to sell him to the highest bidder
ruadh
ruadh - 5/24/2013, 7:38 PM
Actually, Daredevil went back to them a few weeks ago. They don't have Spider-Man and his supporting cast, the mutants, and the Fantastic Four and their bunch.

It'd be cool to have one big marvel movie universe, but...just not a reality. And not that big of a deal, they're simply separate.
thebearjew
thebearjew - 5/24/2013, 11:14 PM
marvel simply needs to buy back all thier characters before the other studios completley destroy them iREALLY DONT UNDERSTAND WHY THE DONT THEY HAVE SSSOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH CASH FRM AVENGERS COME ON BUY SPIDERMAN BUY FANTASTIC FOUR BUY XMEN CHRIST COME ON
ruadh
ruadh - 5/26/2013, 6:43 AM
@indigobolt956

And it's not as simple as "buy them back". If Sony and Fox aren't selling them, then that means it'll cost A LOT to buy them back. You'd have to offer them some outrageous figure that would get them to consider losing out on all the revenue these movies will bring them in the coming years.

It'd be nice if it were so easy to simply "buy it back". It's like walking up to someone's house and just asking to buy it. If they don't have a for sale sign in the lawn, they probably won't be too keen.
View Recorder