James Cameron Discusses Putting the "Heart and Soul" into Avatar's Aliens

James Cameron Discusses Putting the "Heart and Soul" into Avatar's Aliens

The celebrated director says that the goal of the technology behind Avatar was to make it "disappear."

By bsprecher - Oct 05, 2009 12:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi
Source: CanMag

When James Cameron introduced footage of his new 3-D sci-fi film, Avatar, at the San Diego Comic-Con (SDCC), he said that the idea for the movie had been in his head for over fourteen years, but he waited a decade to begin developing the project because he had to wait until technology caught up to his imagination.

Cameron, tight-lipped about Avatar until SDCC, admitted that creating realistic characters was the "biggest challenge of the film."

"No matter how much art and technology we threw at this thing, if it wasn’t in the eyes of the characters – if you didn’t see a soul there – it would just be a big clanking machine."

Cameron said that they spent "a lot of time on the charcter design," but that ultimately it was the technology and the performances of the actors that allowed the digital characters to come to life.

"In theory, [actress Zoe Saldana] doesn't appear photographically in the film but we wanted the character to be based on her, the way her mouth and face and eyes look and then we just kind of stretched and dilated it. Her eyes are four times the size of a human eyeball by volume. They're huge. We knew that being driven by the performance that she gave that it'd still have heart and soul which was the critical thing. I think that after the first few minutes you forget that they're blue. I mean, really, it was a fine line to walk between making them too alien.

"The ideal movie technology is so advanced that it waves a magic wand and makes itself disappear. I think that's what we tried to do on Avatar."


Avatar was written and directed by Cameron and also stars Sam Worthington, Michelle Rodriguez, Sigourney Weaver and Giovanni Ribisi.

Avatar opens December 18th!


Click HERE for an Avatar picture gallery!
THE DARK TOWER Gets A Promising Update From Mike Flanagan As He Vows Not To Let Stephen King Down
Related:

THE DARK TOWER Gets A Promising Update From Mike Flanagan As He Vows Not To Let Stephen King Down

A Third REBEL MOON Film Would Take An Act From God, Says Zack Snyder Collaborator Kurt Johnstad
Recommended For You:

A Third REBEL MOON Film Would Take An Act From God, Says Zack Snyder Collaborator Kurt Johnstad

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

NataliaRomanov
NataliaRomanov - 10/2/2009, 10:18 AM
I think this movie looks delish!!! I can't wait to see it!!!
bsprecher
bsprecher - 10/2/2009, 10:20 AM
I must admit, this movie has got me pretty excited. It's been a loooong time since a sci-fi movie really captured my attention. I think the original Matrix was the last sci-fi flick that made me sit up and take notice.
Shaman
Shaman - 10/2/2009, 10:29 AM
As fun as a martini glass full of jelly beans...

The aliens in Galaxy Quest looked more alive in every way. CGI sucks.
DDD
DDD - 10/2/2009, 10:32 AM
The premise of this actually looks quite intriguing! I'll go see it! I love classy sci-fi!
NataliaRomanov
NataliaRomanov - 10/2/2009, 10:35 AM
Oh, give it a chance Shaman!

[I love GQ BTW!]
StephenStrange
StephenStrange - 10/2/2009, 10:38 AM
3 positive comments in a row! That's probably a new record for this movie. sheesh.. It seems like all I ever read or hear is h8ing
bsprecher
bsprecher - 10/2/2009, 10:43 AM
I thought the 3-D CGI shown at SDCC looked incredible! I was totally hooked after watching that teaser footage. It's very Aliens meets Dances With Wolves...with mechs and dragons thrown in, for good measure!
DrDon
DrDon - 10/2/2009, 10:46 AM
Avatar looks okay, better than that crap Surrogates I just wasted my money on.

Galaxy Quest was the best Star Trek movie ever made, period!
StephenStrange
StephenStrange - 10/2/2009, 10:55 AM
lmao
ClintEastwood
ClintEastwood - 10/2/2009, 11:00 AM
Can't wait.
Shaman
Shaman - 10/2/2009, 11:05 AM
Natalia- Yeah GQ was the shit! Avatar looks meh is all i'm saying. It could be amazing ;)

Brent Sprecher- Aliens meets Dances with Wolves LOL I like that!

bsprecher
bsprecher - 10/2/2009, 11:20 AM
@Shaman: Yeah, that's the impression that I got from it. All of the "human" stuff reminded me of Aliens, the military, the gear, the lab, but when Worthington's character is discovering the Na'Vi, it's like a scene with Kevin Costner and the natives in Dances With Wolves.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/2/2009, 11:34 AM
The plot is basically Dances With Wolves! It looks like it could be a decent movie, I just cant get over how non ground breaking the "ground breaking CGI" is. Yeah I get that i haven't seen it in all its glory in 3d, but I mean, couldn't they have at least made the standard CGI look as good as District 9? A movie which cost about 1/4 of this to make!
bsprecher
bsprecher - 10/2/2009, 11:40 AM
@Ror: I think that's a problem that they run into when they're "filming" digital characters in a completely digital world; it comes off looking a little cartoony. When you see the Na'Vi interacting with the humans it looks as "real" as D9.
Shaman
Shaman - 10/2/2009, 11:47 AM
No amount of CGI can make a huge smurf look real. If they had stuck with more realistic features or more "human" like, it would look more real. But when you get plenty of scenes with humanoids that have exagerated features, it looks like a cartoon. That's where prosthetics are better IMO. Hense my Galaxy Quest remark. Their aliens looked not only real but really bad ass!
skidz
skidz - 10/2/2009, 11:49 AM
I think this movie has a LOT going in its favor. A motivated director with one hell of an imagination, a good cast, staggering special effects (a staple of Cameron films) and an underlying point to say.
Deadpaul
Deadpaul - 10/2/2009, 12:13 PM
if any one can pull this off i think cameron can just look at terminator 2 the t100 was the mutts nutts
Shaman
Shaman - 10/2/2009, 12:22 PM
So far, no one can pull off a fully CGIed being that looks believable. Not even Cameron. CGI effects kick ass like the T1000 but for facial movement, texture and lighting, prosthetics are obsolete. I still don't know why it can't look as real but then again, i'm not a programmer to star with.
Bandrews1
Bandrews1 - 10/2/2009, 12:36 PM
I cannot wait to see this.
WelcomeMat
WelcomeMat - 10/2/2009, 2:08 PM
Maybe its the kid in my but I can't wait for this flick - I thought the trailer looked great.
Minotauro
Minotauro - 10/2/2009, 2:41 PM
Glad too see peoples moods have changed?

@Brent - Good article! ;)
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 10/2/2009, 2:44 PM
In the words of the great Homer Simpson, "MEH"
Deadpaul
Deadpaul - 10/2/2009, 3:04 PM
what i meant was when t100 was CGIed technology wasn't as good as it is now. with a film that relys heavily on it you'd think that they would spend a little extra time getting it right. there have been a load of decent and believable cgi coming out of hollywood in the last few years look at the incrdible hulk cgi on that was amazing and as Cameron really relys on cgi for a lot of his movies all that can really be done is sit back and enjoy the ride. if he screws it up then he screws it up but if he gets it right he's be selling a shit load of tickets either way he's gonna make the big bucks. But granted i do see your point. you have got to have faith.
InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 10/2/2009, 3:12 PM
I hope he has put "heart and soul" into the movie. That's the make or breaker for me, along with the plot, which I haven't been sold on either.
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 10/2/2009, 11:24 PM
the only thing he poured into this movie was special effects. I remain unconvinced. I hope I'm proven wrong
Betty
Betty - 10/3/2009, 1:19 AM
With those huge eyes you'd think she was designed by Shaman. Sorry Shaman.
MatchesMalone
MatchesMalone - 10/3/2009, 9:25 AM
This movie does nothing for me. The cgi looks pretty standard to me (maybe it'll be better in 3D), the story seems derivative and hacky, and I really just expected more from one of my favorite directors that hasn't done jack shit in 12 years. Couldn't he have found other projects to work on while he was "waiting for technology to catch up to his imagination." What a f*ckin' ego on this guy!
Minotauro
Minotauro - 10/3/2009, 10:33 AM
@Tea - I love the Smurfs!!! ;D
View Recorder