The Secret of Fight Sequences and the Failure of the Star Wars Prequels.

The Secret of Fight Sequences and the Failure of the Star Wars Prequels.

The common argument in defense of the Star Wars Prequels is that the Action segments are "Exciting" and "Cool" and "Awesome". I'm here to debunk that rumor.

Editorial Opinion
By Geektality - Aug 01, 2012 11:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars



The Star Wars Prequels ruined so many of our beloved childhoods. However, for a large number of the populace (the juvenile and mentally retarded), the Prequels were "Awesome" because they had some "cool action scenes" and "cool lightsaber duels". I REJECT THAT!!! The Star Wars prequels had some of the worst action ever seen in a major motion picture. They failed so miserably that it's actually kind of hard to stomach the legions of fanboys who try to defend the Prequels. They failed because they lacked any emotional involvement from the audience.

Most Movies have some type of emotional connection to the audience. It could be a character like Batman, who we can identify with because we all experience loss and all try to find a way to channel that anger and grief, or a character like James Bond, because the character has a personality and exerts human emotions, or a character like Rhett Butler, because of the passion of the performance and the energy the role requires.


However, it is fundamentally impossible to connect emotionally with anyone in the prequels. We can't connect to Qui-Gon Jin because of the emptiness of the role and the lack of passion from Liam Neson. We can't connect emotionally to Mace Windu because all he does is spout skeptical exposition and fight people. We CERTAINLY can't connect with Jar Jar because he's more annoying than anything else on Planet Earth.

Now, I know what most of you are thinking: What About Anakin and Obi Wan? What about Yoda? What about----- Now I'm gonna stop you right there for one extremely important reason: We as an audience cannot be expected to give any thought to these characters because there is a 0% Possibility of any of them dying. When a character has a Plot Shield around him, it's very difficult, if not impossible, for the audience to care at all for him.

Part of the thrill of an action scene is the possibility of death. The possibility that one wrong move could lead to the loss of an arm, or the death of a main character. You could say that the more there is to lose, the more thrilling the fight scene. When there is absolutely no possible chance for a character to die, the fight scenes become monotonous and boring. They lose their thrill. They lose the sense of danger. There is no thrill in an action scene if there is no possibility of failure. Now, I understand that this is a prequel and we are expected to care about the events surrounding movies. However, building these movies on pre-existing characters and boring, lifeless new characters means we as an audience have nobody to either A)relate to or B) root for.

The possibility of death or failure is what makes fight scenes work, but a fight scene without emotion is even worse than one with no danger. When you take away not only the suspense but also the emotion of a fight scene by choreographing it so precisely that there is not one single move that doesn't connect and the moves are so fast that the actors have no chance to play up a reaction to anything occurring in the fight, the fight scene fails again. The core of action is the danger and the emotion, and when you take the emotion of the fight away, or prolong the fight to where the emotional thrill becomes butt-numbing boredom, the fight ceases at being entertaining and becomes a long, unbearable experience.



Take X-Men: First Class, which is very similar in concept to the Star Wars movies. However, what kept this film from falling into the same trap the Prequel Trilogy fell into is the inclusion of dynamic and well-written original characters that the audience could connect to, characters such as Havok, Darwin, Banshee, Sebastian Shawe, and Moira McTaggett. We as an audience can connect to these characters because they are interesting, well written, and they aren't boring to watch.

When the climax to X-Men: First Class came around, there was a real feeling of suspense as the possibility of the new characters dying started to creep in. The battleships all aimed their artillery at the X-Men team. Tension mounts as the explosives fly through the air towards the main characters and suddenly....Erik Lensher stops the artillery with his magnetic powers. The climax is thrilling because of the strength of the performance, the power of the writing, and the talent of the director.

All these things are lacking in the prequels. Take the Mustafar Battle from Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. Here we have Anakin, the former student of Obi-Wan Kenobi, fighting his former master on the slopes of a volcano planet. This scene is so boring because 1) It is literally impossible for Obi-Wan to slip up and get horribly burned, or for that matter, either of them die in ANY way, 2) The two characters up until now have interacted in a hostile manner towards each other, despite them supposedly being best friends, however, how they have suddenly decided that they are the worst of enemies and vowing to kill one-another, and 3) The Digital Effects in this scene are so uselessly shoved in the audience's face that the entire scene feels like a bad modern-day Full Motion Video game. Nothing about this scene has any tension to it because the only thing on the audience's mind is "HOW LONG 'TILL WE SEE DARTH VADER?!!?" This scene is especially angering because, when we see Darth Vader for the chronological first time, he does this:







And with that, Star Wars finally lost all dignity.
STAR WARS: Taika Waititi's Movie Reportedly Shelved; ROGUE SQUADRON Now In Active Development
Related:

STAR WARS: Taika Waititi's Movie Reportedly Shelved; ROGUE SQUADRON Now In Active Development

STAR WARS: THE MANDALORIAN & GROGU Casts Jeremy Allen White... As Jabba The Hutt's Son!
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: THE MANDALORIAN & GROGU Casts Jeremy Allen White... As Jabba The Hutt's Son!

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 8/1/2012, 12:24 PM
I agree with almost everything here. The action scenes in the prequels were almost all terrible. When the clones attack for the first time and all the Jedi are fighting at once in episode 2, the choreography is awful, and the extras in the background are laughable.

That was pretty much par for the course in all the prequels, with one exception.

You even put a picture of it in the article, yet failed to mention how truly awesome it was, but the fight in Episode 1 with Darth Maul, Qui Gonn, and Obi Wan had everything you mentioned good fight scenes needed. It even had a Jedi master get killed when he slipped up for just one second. Anyway, that fight was truly the best choreographed fight scene in all 6 Star Wars movies. In all honesty, most of the action in Episode 1 was done very well. It was the story that sucked.

I have no defense whatsoever for the crapfests of Episodes 1 and 2 though.
marvel72
marvel72 - 8/1/2012, 12:29 PM
the lightsabre duels is all that i enjoyed in the star wars prequels.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 8/1/2012, 12:37 PM
* No defense for episodes 2 and 3 i mean.
kong
kong - 8/1/2012, 12:38 PM
The light saber fights are much better in the prequels. In the originals they move to slow.
Geektality
Geektality - 8/1/2012, 12:42 PM
@CorndogBurglar
the fight sequence in ep. 1 sucked because we as an audience cared nothing for Qui-Gon, Obi-Wan, or Darth Maul. Qui-Gon was boring and lifeless, Obi-Wan couldn't die because of his own PLOT ARMOR, and Darth Maul had no character. We as an audience had no emotional connection to anyone present in the movie.
ralfinader
ralfinader - 8/1/2012, 12:49 PM
I agree with this article alot. Star Wars episodes 1-3 are examples of lazy film making at it's worst for all the reasons you stated. I played SWG forever, and alot of my friends defended that steaming pile of shit, and it was always the action arguement, but most of them admitted, over time, that it was the choreography they liked, not any feeling of suspense.

I think that lack of suspense is actually true with any prequel. Even X-Men First Class. There is no tension/excirtement if you know the charactors are going to be around in the movies the prequels are wasting film trying to elaborate on. You connected with the charactors introduced in the latest X-Men entry, but I didn't, and from some of the comments I have read, not everyone else did. For me, the only interest the finale of First Class was: How does Xavier get crippled.

Good editorial, and I whole-heartedly support any and all prequel bashing (Star Wars most of all, as a property led by a jackass that only knows how to go backwards with his creativity, or lack thereof, and not forward where the true excitement can lie: the unknown)!
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 8/1/2012, 12:53 PM
@ geektality

I would have to chalk that up to the story telling though. The fight scene in itself was fantastic. The camera was steady so you could see every movement, the choreography was top of the line, and the special effects were great.

Not caring for the characters is not the fault of the fight scene itself. Especially one that doesn't even happen until the end of the movie. If you don't care about the characters, then blame the story telling and the rest of the movie leading up to it. But not caring about the characters has NOTHING to do with that last scene. The scene itself was near perfect.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 8/1/2012, 12:55 PM
Thats like saying the opening scene to X-Men 2 with Nightcrawler sucked because we knew nothing about Nightcrawler at that moment. But you would be hard pressed to find one single person on this site that would ever say that Nightcrawler scene sucked.

Its probably the single best scene in every X-Men film. And at that point, no one knew anything about Nightcrawler. So I see some flaw in this logic. You're beef is with story telling, not fight scenes.
Geektality
Geektality - 8/1/2012, 1:02 PM
@CorndogBurglar
In X-Men 2, you WANTED to know why this Na'vi looking dude was invading the Whitehouse. The scene was dripping with mystery and it worked to kickstart the plot of the movie. The character of Nightcrawler was able to convey all the necessary details without saying a single word and we as an audience want to know what chain of events led to this moment. There is no fault in my logic.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 8/1/2012, 1:03 PM
Basically, its not a fight scene's job to make you care about a character. That is up to the rest of the story and writing.

I'm not denying that a fight scene IS enhanced when you care about the characters, but you can't say a fight scene is poor because the story telling prior to that scene failed to get you attached to a character.
BarnaclePete
BarnaclePete - 8/1/2012, 2:50 PM
I feel bad for anyone who`s childhood was ruined by the Star Wars prequel. You must have had the worst childhood of all time. If Star Wars Episode 4 was never release in the 70`s but instead came out today it would be laughed at. These are movies that are loved because of nostalgia. I`m not saying it`s a bad thing, it`s just the way it is. I`m kinda surprised you don`t get why Obi Wan and Anakin were fighting at the end. Anakin just murdered 100`s of people. Part of the problem with the fight though is that we knew how it was going to end. I still thought it was a good lightsaber battle though. The problem with prequels though is that we know where it is all leading. That takes away a lot of the suspense right there. For kids watching it the first time, a lot wouldn`t have seen the originals so they are seeing them with completely different eyes. Also, look at Jedi with the inclusion of the Ewoks. It can be seen right there that George was leaning in a more kid friendly world.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 8/1/2012, 9:42 PM
I think the only cool lightsaber duel from the prequels was the last bit between Ewan McGregor and Ray Park. The two had great intensity - and unfortunately it only lasted about 15 seconds.

Everything else looks too fake. Maybe it's the effect with the lightsaber trails being completely digital, but the movement looks animated. Which is actually kind of sad, considering how much Ewan and Hayden trained with swordplay.
Geektality
Geektality - 8/2/2012, 1:21 PM
@fangz
My favorite fight scenes all include the danger of failure. Without the possibility of defeat, it's just masturbation with lightsabers. There's no danger of getting hurt, so you can't fail.
Geektality
Geektality - 8/7/2012, 6:11 PM
@fangz I disagree because good movies still can carry suspense after you see them once.
View Recorder