Eva Green Defends Her Controversial SIN CITY 2 Poster; Edited Version Released

Eva Green Defends Her Controversial SIN CITY 2 Poster; Edited Version Released

The MPAA pulled the first poster for "nudity - curve of under breast and dark nipple/areola circle visible through sheer gown". Shocking stuff! So if that offended your sensibilities, there's a tamer version past the jump. Green also comments on the MPAA's decision.

By MarkCassidy - Jun 05, 2014 01:06 AM EST
Source: Via Yahoo

Well, we can all rest easy now -- there's slightly less nipple! While speaking to Vanity Fair about the poster, Eva Green echoes what most of us were thinking at the time of the banning. "I find it a bit odd. It seems like it's all just publicity - a lot of noise for nothing.” She adds that she personally found the original poster 'really sexy' and that it pales when discussed alongside the violence in the movie. “You have so many more violent things in the movie business,” she stated.
Related:

300 And SIN CITY Star Eva Green Looks Red Hot In New Calendar Photoshoot

Recommended For You:

Legendary Actor Stacy Keach On SIN CITY 2 Flopping, Praises GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
remembertheking
remembertheking - 6/5/2014, 1:58 AM
well obviously it was taken down for publicity purposes. someone in the marketing dept for sin city 2 knew someone at the MPAA and told them to take down the poster. This has had a lot of attention. more than it would have if it wasnt taken down. good move.
EmeritusII
EmeritusII - 6/5/2014, 2:04 AM
Yeaaaahhh boyz

spring breakers animated GIF
RamonSuarez
RamonSuarez - 6/5/2014, 2:12 AM
She doesn't have to defend her boobs to me.......ever.
staypuffed
staypuffed - 6/5/2014, 2:14 AM
I see no difference.
Starkasm
Starkasm - 6/5/2014, 2:26 AM
But you can have a shirtless dude in the poster with no dramas.

It's just extra tissue, people.

*insert Craig Robinson meme saying take yo panties off!*
EmeritusII
EmeritusII - 6/5/2014, 2:32 AM
Yo, MantiniumMan


#freethenipple
MightyZeus
MightyZeus - 6/5/2014, 2:37 AM
Are people actually forgetting that kids will see the poster when they walk by the theater?

I guess it's okay to show nudity to under aged children. Damn that woman is dumb. Kid's won't be able to see violence in a film because they won't be admitted into the film.
NostalgicYouth
NostalgicYouth - 6/5/2014, 3:11 AM
Actually @MightyZeus kids now a days don't have to govsee a rated-R movie to see violence, heck they can see it anytime on tv.
Kyos
Kyos - 6/5/2014, 3:14 AM
Yup, kids probably might catch a glimpse of Eva Green's nipples on that somewhat artistic poster. What could the harmful consequences of that actually be?

I'd say younger children simply would not care about it, unless they're specifically brought up in a way to make them uncomfortable about the human body.

Older children/teenagers, who are, you know, actually interested in such things would likely react like... well, teenagers.
sameoldthing
sameoldthing - 6/5/2014, 3:17 AM
Kids grow up sucking the nipple.
Unless your a bottle freak.
sameoldthing
sameoldthing - 6/5/2014, 3:18 AM
I want to breast feed on Eva. Yum!
BoomTubeB
BoomTubeB - 6/5/2014, 3:19 AM
I wish the poster was scratch & sniff!

CrimsonFlash
CrimsonFlash - 6/5/2014, 3:26 AM
I will also defend it
CrimsonFlash
CrimsonFlash - 6/5/2014, 3:27 AM
She's absolutely right though. A slightly naked woman gets banned but a whole bunch of violent men with guns or whatever are totally fine. Priorities are so messed up.
denotsip
denotsip - 6/5/2014, 3:31 AM
"Hit the jump", "Past the jump" …. the hell does that even mean?
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/5/2014, 3:58 AM
censorship [frick]in sucks! :)
mgeoff88
mgeoff88 - 6/5/2014, 4:08 AM
Ummm... her right nipple is more visible than it was in the uncensored poster:



@MightyZeus You're overthinking what she is saying. She is trying to say graphic violence is worse than nudity. She is right.
Robe
Robe - 6/5/2014, 4:11 AM
Double standards male nipples okay while female nipples not okay. If it was the other way around feminists would have it overturned.
mgeoff88
mgeoff88 - 6/5/2014, 4:13 AM
I'm a bit drunk right now, so there's a good chance when I wake up tomorrow and see my comment, I'll think I was stupid for saying it.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 6/5/2014, 4:20 AM
Enphlieuwince
Enphlieuwince - 6/5/2014, 4:23 AM
I can see both sides of the argument. I personally think it's a bunch of fuss over nothing. I mean, she's just standing in a robe. It's not like she is in some sexually provocative pose like a porn ad. 

Much like violence, which has very much become mainstream and acceptable over the last few decades, the human form would cease to be taboo if ppl stop treating as such. Now, I'm not saying that it should be open season on full frontal nudity any and everywhere, however, this is far from being that. 

When we as comic book (movie) fans have become so conservative and politically protective of women that the idea of the iconic Wonder Woman costume, with the simple exposing of thighs and arms, has become unpopular, something is wrong. This isn't about fairness and respect. Like someone else mentioned, if this was a guy with his shirt off, no one would have said anything. That's right. Conan, Tarzan, and Hercules are still running around in leaves and loin cloths but Wonder Woman needs pants to be respectable and to prevent be objectified.

Starkasm
Starkasm - 6/5/2014, 4:34 AM
You can have trashy advertisements that are purposely sexually provocative but a slightly see-through robe is absurd?
Give me a break.

As I said, it's just tissue!
loki668
loki668 - 6/5/2014, 4:42 AM
Nobody puts Eva Green's breasts in the corner!
batcheeks8
batcheeks8 - 6/5/2014, 4:51 AM
Not surprised..

When will America accept that breasts aren't sexual organs?
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 6/5/2014, 4:55 AM
So for the MPAA this is totally cool:



This is NOT ALLOWED




Jer3miah
Jer3miah - 6/5/2014, 5:14 AM
The MPAA are ridiculous. Most of the things they allow, kids should not see, so this is no exception. Hypocrites.

The whole sh*t is backwards. O_o
MCUsDarkKnight
MCUsDarkKnight - 6/5/2014, 5:15 AM
this should help

diabolik
diabolik - 6/5/2014, 5:26 AM
Is the year 2014 and we are still complaining about a nipple siluette
GeekyCheekyChic
GeekyCheekyChic - 6/5/2014, 5:30 AM
the people using the "kids might see the poster at the theater" argument SEEM to conveniently forget some of the disturbing Horror Movie posters that the MPAA has zero problem with:

Decapitation



Torture



Rape before death



"We don't want parents to have to explain the nipple to their kids but this bloody killer is totally acceptable"

DocDangerous
DocDangerous - 6/5/2014, 5:35 AM
The Baroness89-
That's what winning an argument looks like. Well played.
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/5/2014, 5:40 AM
@ thebaroness89

exactly,well said.
1 2 3
View Recorder