A Look Back on 2003's Daredevil

A Look Back on 2003's Daredevil

Was it really THAT bad?

Editorial Opinion
By slimybug - Apr 19, 2015 07:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil

Well, the new Daredevil series is finally out on Netflix, and it has officially blown everyone’s mind! While the series is getting praise heaped upon it, many are thankful that ther eis finally another adaptation besides the notorious 2003 film. But all this go tme thinking that this would be the perfect time for a look back on that very film. After all, is it really that bad?

Altough it’s experienced nothing but lambasting for the past 12 years, I’ve always felt like there’s more good stuff in Daredevil then people give it credit for. When I first saw the film, at the tender age of fifteen, I thought it was great. For years, I constantly defended it against any critics. Over the past decade, however, I have taken note of it’s major flaws, and fully admit to the major ways that it did not succeed in being an adequate portrayal of the character.

That being said, I still have a much brighter outlook on it than most people do, and I think the general populace has been way too hard on it. After my entire history of watching movies, I have ultimately come to the conclusion that it’s not always about good movies and bad movies. Sometimes it’s about good moments and bad moments. Daredevil has plenty of both.

THE BAD

There are two real death-blow failings that mar this film beyond forgiveness. One of them, people have been talking about since the film came out. The other I am always surprised how little it is on people’s lips.

1) Daredevil Murdering People – Yes, this one is fairly dubious. For a character who’s moral code of not taking human life has been a major source of drama for so long, this turned many major fans away less than a half-hour into the film. Not exactly something that should be a writer’s goal.

2) Jennifer Garner as Elektra – This is a major contender for the most inappropriate casting in the history of comic book movies thus far, yet it is the complaint I hear voiced the least. It is nothing against Jennifer Garner, who is a fine actress, and for the character she plays, she actually has but Elektra is a character with a very distinct look, and one that is important to get right. It’s fairly shocking to see the exotic, raven-haired Greek beauty be played with an American accent by someone who couldn't look less like the part.

(that said, the character she does play does play at least has solid chemistry with Affleck. Gee, I wonder where that led...)

These are, of course, many other smaller flaws throughout the film. For instance, there’s some truly ludicrous fight scenes. The scene on the playground, while I'm not opposed to the idea of it, got fairly stupid after a while. Full-on backflips on a seesaw? Even in the better fights, there will so often pop up a rubber-looking CGI monstrosity that puts a damper on an otherwise good scene. But I digress. Even these do not negate the entire movie’s quality. It is really the above two points that make it a bad movie, or at least, a bad Daredevil movie.

The first of these two flaws is the one that merits the most discussion. As stated, for years, I actually defended it. “It’s about how he learns to not kill," I would tell anyone who listened. The film tries to tell a story about a man slipping into darkness, who has to turn himself around to become a true hero. In the end, he is the non-murderous character we all love.

Then one day I think I just turned around and said to myself “Wait, ‘that’s how he learns not to kill?’ That’s bull****!”  Yes, they wanted to tell the story of a man on the brink, but so blatantly disrespecting the comics was not necessary. They could have simply had him becoming more violent, more leaning dangerously towards that line, instead of already being over it. (but enough about the Netflix series...)

With those two blights on record, I can’t say I can honestly blame any Daredevil fan for hating this movie.

However, I cannot help but feel that there are those make the film out to be so much worse in their heads. People make it out to be the worst thing since Howard the Duck! I can't help but think that this has to do with the film coming out right around the time of Gigli, Bennifer, and the start of Affleck's 9-year career slump. It's like there is an actual hype around it's badness that colors interpretation. It’s like looking at the movie through hate-goggles. So I’d like to next move into what I found good about the movie.

THE GOOD

1. The other casting

My super-smell is detecting overly harsh criticism!
My super-smell is detecting overly harsh criticism!

Yes, I’m going to say this. No, really, I am. I never saw any problem with Ben Affleck as Daredevil.

Put the gun down. Put it down! Just listen. I did, I liked Affleck. Perhaps there’s something truly terrible about this performance that I’m just not seeing here. But there are a lot worse casting decisions out there, and I thought he embodied the tortured personal of Matt Murdock quite well.

Then we have Michael Clarke Duncan as Kingpin. I remember the change of race as an issue at the time, but let’s face it, the color of his skin is not the first thing you notice. Not only are there no major actors out there who can so perfectly fit Wilson Fisk’s body type, who could have honestly pulled off his last fight scene, but Duncan, may he rest in peace, was also just a darn good actor.

Then there's Colin Farrell. It’s odd to think that this was so many people's introduction to him. It's still a terrifically fun performance to watch, almost as fun as Farrell visibly had playing it. I’m honestly not sure of who could have done a better job. (but there's a good chance we'll find out next season on Netflix)

2. The Tone

 

As I said, sometimes it’s not about a good or bad film, but about good or bad moments. And no matter what else this film has that is bad, there are moments in it that I will always be able to re-watch on DVD.

One of the major high-marks of the film was the “Shadow World” that they innovated, to show us how Matt Murdock sees. This was a downright terrific invention, and one I think even the film’s sharp critics have to enjoy.

That aside, many of the fight scenes, at least for me, are The first of these begins when Matt first transforms into Daredevil. As Daredevil suits up, jumps off the building, and does some high-flying stunts over Hell’s Kitchen, all to a definitive score by Graeme Revell. This segues into the first major fight scene in the bar also carries exactly the right feel. In fact, many of the fight scenes in the film, including the aforementioned final confrontation with Kingpin, do a fair job of capturing the tone of the Daredevil comics.

In fact, the ending has remained one of my favorite superhero-movie-endings ever. A downright iconic monologue laid over by Fuel’s Won’t Back Down, ending on a closing shot of the hero taken right from the comics (as was the opening image). I will repeat it one more time: It’s about good and bad moments. And it’s the good ones that, twelve years later, I still remember.

But enough of that, we have a NEW, and so beloved version of Daredevil. So, stay tuned as next time I will discuss the highs and lows of this latest incarnation of the Man Without Fear!

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Still Features Familiar Faces From Netflix As Charlie Cox Shares New Story Details
Related:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Still Features Familiar Faces From Netflix As Charlie Cox Shares New Story Details

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN's Fired Head Writers Are Now Only Credited For A Single Season 1 Episode
Recommended For You:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN's Fired Head Writers Are Now Only Credited For A Single Season 1 Episode

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

McGee
McGee - 4/19/2015, 7:47 PM
slimybug
slimybug - 4/19/2015, 8:18 PM
Yeah,the Director's Cut def has it's own strengths.

BTW guys, I'm trying to get ad space on my pages, but CBM hasn't responded to my emails about doing so. Can anyone help me with getting advertising on my page?
WYLEEJAY
WYLEEJAY - 4/19/2015, 8:51 PM
I liked this movie. If the play ground fight wasn't in it I would like it more. As far as him killing, that's the whole point. By the end of the movie he has found faith not just in religion, but in himself and what's right. That's why he let the Kingpin live. "I'm not the bad guy"
slimybug
slimybug - 4/19/2015, 9:39 PM
@WYLEEJAY - Yes, that's true, but they didn't have to blatantly disrepect the comics, alienating much of the fanbase within the first act alone. I just amended the article to add that they could have simply shown him being on the edge, moving toward that line. And ironically, that's exactly the plotline the Netflix series ended up taking!
WYLEEJAY
WYLEEJAY - 4/19/2015, 9:54 PM
Yeah I like the way the show did it better too. Season 2 will be the definitive Daredevil I bet. Will still always like the 2003 movie though. I own the original and Directors cut of the film. I like the Directors cut more, but I can see why they cut it down for the theatrical release. The extra scenes do kinda mess with the pacing a bit.
SnapperCarr
SnapperCarr - 4/19/2015, 9:56 PM
It was that bad. And the Elektra movie was even worse.
slimybug
slimybug - 4/19/2015, 10:05 PM
@SnapperCarr - LOL, I knew that response was coming!
AgentZero
AgentZero - 4/20/2015, 1:38 AM
@slimybug I think this feature has been removed. Seems like Nate wants all the money for himself
r3negade
r3negade - 4/20/2015, 8:52 AM
I did hate Elektra, and don't get me started on her spin-off film. But I kinda liked it. Call it a guilty pleasure. But in comparison, the show completely destroys it.
Bearjew
Bearjew - 4/20/2015, 10:50 AM
Yes, yes it was
Brainiac13
Brainiac13 - 4/20/2015, 3:16 PM
The suit is the best thing about the movie.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 4/20/2015, 4:24 PM
*sigh* more fanboy whining about disrespecting the comics. *sigh*

I always liked it. Not loved, but liked. Don't give a rip about the comic or about having someone who looks like Electra playing Electra.

At some point, you fanboys seriously need to realize that you don't have exclusive ownership of these characters. General audiences have just as much a right to a film they will enjoy as fanboys have a right to a film that is 100% faithful to the comics (in fact, imo the GA has the greater rights because they are the larger group.) And often, being 100% faithful to the comics means making a film that only fanboys will enjoy. Daredevil wouldn't have been any better with someone other than Garner, and wouldn't have been more appealing by having Daredevil refuse to kill from the start. It wasn't that successful because, frankly, Daredevil is at best a C-list character that didn't appeal to general audiences. Which is why he is on Netflix instead of a movie now.
AlexdoxA
AlexdoxA - 4/21/2015, 5:49 AM
Mia Vardalos for Netflix' Elektra!! come on fans, let's make it happen!!!
AlexdoxA
AlexdoxA - 4/21/2015, 5:51 AM
BTW good article, I did like the movie when I first watched it. It was the type of comic book movies of that blurry era. Now that they have truly found their niche, we can all sit back and enjoy the ride along with them.
RobGrizzly
RobGrizzly - 4/21/2015, 4:25 PM
Yep. Love this movie
turdfergusonshat
turdfergusonshat - 4/22/2015, 12:07 PM
@Lhornbk...I disagree with you on adherence to the source material. The General Audience that did not read a Daredevil book did not do so because the source material wasn't compelling or well-developed. Rather it was because those individuals are not comic book readers or are but read other characters' books.

For instance, I have never read an Aquaman comic, but I would hope that any movie would represent that character for those that love the character (and obviously love him because of that source material, not because of the Super Friends). That could lead me to further investigate the character and see what all the fuss is about. That happened for me with Guardians of the Galaxy, and I both consumed and adored those comics upon reading them in anticipation of the film (which I subsequently also loved).

So, if making a film based on a character that has a storied history with fleshed out characters whose personalities, motivations and relationships are well-established and whose appearance, because comics is a visual medium, of said characters is accurately reflected, I should think the General Audience that was unfamiliar with the character in the first place would react in line with the "fanboy" who loves the source material, therefore loving or hating the film together. The difference is, if done correctly, the General Audience may just also discover a love for comics, which may just lead to more films, hopefully that are more consistently well-made, featuring these and other characters, C-List or B-List or even A-List.

Imagine if "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" was the only depiction of Lincoln ever to grace the silver screen...

View Recorder