Early review for Sherlock Holmes

Early review for Sherlock Holmes

Does Robert Downey Jr do justice to one of literature's earlier heroes?

Review Opinion
By DogsOfWar - Dec 14, 2009 08:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Action
Source: Variety.com

From Variety writer, Todd McCarthy

If you can get over the idea of Sherlock Holmes as an action hero -- and if, indeed, you want to -- then there is something to enjoy about this flagrant makeover of fiction's first modern detective into a man of brawn as much as brain. To say that this is not grandpapa's Sherlock Holmes will be either irrelevent or a plus for most of the intended audience, who know the iconic Victorian/Edwardian-era sleuth by reputation if at all. A good number of Robert Downey Jr.'s "Iron Man" fans will likely follow him here, as he turns the venerable deerstalker-capped and becaped figure into a gym-toned, half-deranged Holmes unlike any seen before. Worldwide prospects look potent.

Their choice was to transform the historically slim, reclusive, intellectual eccentric into an evident manic depressive whose idea of recreation is to slum in what looks like an East End precursor of the fight club. Such Holmes purists as may remain will blanch, but young audiences, particularly males, will likely swill the topped-out serving of sweaty masculinity, flexing muscle, imaginative violence, unusual weaponry, impudent banter and ballsy effrontery.



Once past the nonsensically overloaded martial-artsy opening stretch, a worthy opponent to Holmes announces himself in the person of Lord Blackwood (the ever-impressive Mark Strong). Condemned to die for the murder of several women, this self-possessed practitioner of black magic ominously warns that, "Death is only the beginning," as he is led to the hangman's noose, after which he is duly pronounced dead by none other than Holmes' sometimes partner and chronicler, Dr. Watson, now transformed into a dashing pretty boy by Jude Law.

Unfortunately for Holmes, Watson and the other citizens of London, Blackwood shortly resurrects himself and undertakes to establish his New Order, with part of the plan being Britain's reconquest of that former colony across the Atlantic. Blackwood's organization, a Masonic-like cult with members in high places, also prefigures fascist iconography in terms of greatcoat design, hair stylings and expressive scowling, so at least sartorially, its members have a distinct edge on the disheveled Holmes.

In addition to taking on men twice his weight in hand-to-hand combat, Holmes diverts himself by undermining Watson's relationship with his fiancee (Kelly Reilly) and coping with the return of Irene Adler (Rachel McAdams), a master criminal who has twice bested Holmes in the past and whose personal intentions with him are far from honorable. Curiously, the one area of traditional Holmesiana the script doesn't really transgress is his lack of romantic attachment. Some backstory and offscreen shenanigans with Irene are suggested, but there remains a reticence to doing anything dramatically interesting with this woman, who is not very well integrated into the rest of the story, a shortcoming the normally resourceful McAdams is unable to do much about.

Action scenes are devised to accentuate aspects of turn-of-the-century industrial London, ruffians of notably indestructible stature (particularly a scar-faced giant who just keeps on coming) and deaths of a diabolically creative nature that only the scientifically adept Blackwood could concoct and the encyclopedically knowledgeable Holmes could analyze. After a well-prepared dramatic climax in Parliament, a putative action exclamation point feels hokey and too CGI-dominated.

Olde London town probably hasn't looked this filthy onscreen since David Lynch's "The Elephant Man" and every frame has been crammed with visual stimulation thanks to Sarah Greenwood's detailed production design, Philippe Rousselot's gritty lensing and Jenny Beavan's determinedly creative costume design. Ritchie has never worked on a scale anything approaching this before and, while some of the directorial affectations are distracting, he keeps the action humming.

Still, the single most important craft contribution is Hans Zimmer's score. Overbearing in the opening scene and opportunistic in its lift of a key melodic phrase from Ennio Morricone's "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" soundtrack, it soon settles in to provide not only narrative propulsion, but enormously helpful mood colorings. The orchestrations are particularly fresh, with bracing use of the zither and other unusual instruments introducing surprising textures throughout.

For the complete review and movie cast/crew click on source link below.
GLADIATOR 2 Spoilers: Does Russell Crowe Return As Maximus In The GLADIATOR Sequel?
Related:

GLADIATOR 2 Spoilers: Does Russell Crowe Return As Maximus In The GLADIATOR Sequel?

GLADIATOR II Spoilers: Does Lucius Suffer The Same Fate As Russell Crowe's Maximus?
Recommended For You:

GLADIATOR II Spoilers: Does Lucius Suffer The Same Fate As Russell Crowe's Maximus?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Betty
Betty - 12/14/2009, 11:04 PM
sounds good?
Stumblin
Stumblin - 12/15/2009, 12:52 PM
Um...Yeah, so was it good or did it suck? What the hell is this review? It's like an observation with no opinions on the matter. Todd McCarthy's "review" is nothing more than a reiteration of what happens in the movie without any insight on whether they were good or bad choices. This literally told us nothing that we don't already know.
Betty
Betty - 12/15/2009, 6:58 PM
hahah
StrangerX
StrangerX - 12/15/2009, 9:00 PM
I will def be in the theaters watching this soon. The idea of Downey Jr as holmes is exciting, and even more intersting with Law as Watson.
Spilox
Spilox - 12/16/2009, 2:07 AM
Wow the person that wrote this review is realy a little whiny bitch. So they modernised Holmes. They gave him a little spunk. In the books Holmes was always a good boxer. He wasn't ripped or anything and he prefered mind over matter, but still he could kick ass! And as for turning Holmes in to a depressed madman, that's just bullshit! Holmes is addicted to Heroine (sometimes opium) so he was allready depressed. Why do you think he plays the freaking violin, the most depressing instrument in the world.
And Watson was allways a lady's man. He sure wasn't as slick as Jude Law, but still. He didn't mind some female company. And then the whining about London. In that era London was filthy as hell. I love the victorian romance they put in every story about London, but the fact is, it was damn filthy.
So they modernised Holmes and Watson to draw in the crowds. To make us relate to the characters. Cause half of my generation doesn't even know who Holmes is. It's not a bad thing (i hope). And who knows, maybe my opinion will change when i go see the movie (and i will).
StrangerX
StrangerX - 12/16/2009, 8:01 AM
@Dogsofwar. I'm sorry, but from what i read it seemed as though u are whining about Holmes movie character portrayal. When in fact this is actually how Sir Arthur Conan Doyal portrayed him in his books. The Director is actually staying true to much of the characters essence unlike many of the past tv series, movies etc..
Spilox
Spilox - 12/16/2009, 8:33 AM
@strangeman Dogofwar didn't write this. Somebody at Variety did. So my rant wasn't directed at him :p.

Perhaps they did make Holmes to much of a fighter in this movie, i don't know, i haven't seen te movie yet. But i was just stating some facts about the fictional character as portraid in the original books. I've read the review again. And it seems that Richie realy exaggerated the characters. And that they don't live up to the stereotypical persona that has been established in tv series and movies. They might have made Holmes into an action hero. Just see the movie, i think we're gonna like it :D.
DogsOfWar
DogsOfWar - 12/16/2009, 9:40 AM
Thanks Spilox-I have not seen this yet, just posting the news that you can use! LOL

It looks good to me. I like Guy Ritchie's stuff, as long as I can understand what they are saying.
StrangerX
StrangerX - 12/16/2009, 7:38 PM
My bad @ DogsOfWar.
View Recorder