NO TIME TO DIE: Talks Of A Streaming Debut Stalled After MGM Wanted $600 Million For A One-Year License

NO TIME TO DIE: Talks Of A Streaming Debut Stalled After MGM Wanted $600 Million For A One-Year License

Over the weekend, it was reported that No Time to Die could head to a streaming service, but more details appear to confirm that talks fell apart after MGM asked for a massive $600 million license fee!

By Nighthawk01 - Oct 26, 2020 06:10 AM EST
Filed Under: James Bond
Source: Deadline

COVID has wrecked any hopes of major studio films being released in 2020, and No Time to Die is one of the biggest casualties. The first blockbuster to move in response to the pandemic, it was recently shifted from November to next April, creating another chain reaction of release date changes in Hollywood.

Over the weekend, it was reported that MGM had considered a move to streaming for the next James Bond film, but Deadline has shared more details about why those talks ultimately stalled.

Meetings were held with Netflix, Apple, and Amazon with the hope of exploring a possible streaming debut, with the studio shopping around a $600 million one-year contract. That would mean one of those services would have exclusive rights to the film for a 365-day period, giving MGM the option to then shop it around again, while also exploring DVD/Blu-ray release options.

Streamers weren't willing to pay that, however, with only half of the sum being offered. No Time to Die producer Barbara Broccoli then nixed the idea completely, so a theatrical release is once again the plan.

Talks happened back in September before the movie was pushed from November, so it seems any chance of this happening have now gone out the window. MGM clearly hoped to recoup its costs with this $600 million premiere, but it wasn't worth spending that amount for an increase in subscribers.

Click HERE for more No Time to Die news from CBM!

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old
Related:

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors
Recommended For You:

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
GhostDog
GhostDog - 10/26/2020, 6:33 AM
MGM said
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 10/26/2020, 9:50 AM
@BlackBeltJones - Apple can afford it but not netflix. They can sell anything including a $999 stand
IronGenesis
IronGenesis - 10/26/2020, 6:34 AM
Really no reason to rush.
heyy1
heyy1 - 10/26/2020, 7:14 AM
@IronGenesis - employees want to get paid, shareholders want revenue, every delay costs them doing entire marketing campaigns.
mastakilla39
mastakilla39 - 10/26/2020, 10:01 AM
@heyy1 - Employees have already been paid, its just greedy execs who want their bonuses to write off taxes and buy their next private island. The loan on the film can just sit until the US Govt bails them out with the new 200 billion dollar film & art reform bill.

MGM is just baiting streaming companies and overcharging.
With that price tag, if anyone of them does buy it they will probably buy exclusivity for the whole franchise rather than just that 1 final film though.
Se4M4NSt4ine
Se4M4NSt4ine - 10/26/2020, 6:34 AM
MGM:
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 10/26/2020, 6:36 AM
Ha! MGM wanted all the profits of a $1.2b run upfront, eh? Hard to believe that nobody jumped on that.
Origame
Origame - 10/26/2020, 6:44 AM
More reason why streaming isnt profitable for these blockbusters. If everything was fine and this movie released, earning 600m it would be considered a failure. Yet asking for this much for a full year contract on streaming is considered too high.
TheCoonII
TheCoonII - 10/26/2020, 6:57 AM
Its not happening get the [frick] over it
1 2
View Recorder