NO TIME TO DIE: MGM Wanted $800 Million For The Streaming Rights To The Movie At One Point

NO TIME TO DIE: MGM Wanted $800 Million For The Streaming Rights To The Movie At One Point

It turns out that MGM did indeed take part in talks to have No Time to Die on a streaming platform, but only one was seriously interested, and they weren't willing to pay as much as $800 million...

By JoshWilding - Oct 27, 2020 03:10 PM EST
Filed Under: James Bond
Source: The Hollywood Reporter

There's been a lot of chatter in recent days about what's happening with No Time to Die, and while the movie is currently dated for a theatrical release on April 2nd, 2021, The Hollywood Reporter confirms that talks with streamers did indeed take place. However, only Apple took such a deal seriously, throwing out an offer in the range of $350 million to $400 million. 

That's wasn't good enough for MGM, though, and fell short of the $650 million - $700 million the studio wanted. In fact, one source tells the trade that $800 million was even mentioned at one point! 

How did they reach that number?

Well, No Time to Die cost $250 million to produce, at least $50 million has been spent on marketing so far, licensing fees must be paid to a multitude of studios, and there are box office bonuses which also need to be paid out to the likes of Daniel Craig and director Cary Fukunaga. 

Ultimately, streamers don't feel it's worth sinking that much money into a James Bond movie when they can produce their own blockbusters for a fraction of the cost. EON Productions' Barbara Broccoli, the longtime producer of the franchise, is a traditionalist, and was not a fan of the idea of skipping theaters.

For now, No Time to Die is coming to theaters in 2021. Some insiders believe another delay is imminent, and it will ultimately depend what happens during the first few months of next year. 

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old
Related:

MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Is Leaving The Door Open To Playing James Bond Despite Claims He's Too Old

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors
Recommended For You:

Aaron Taylor-Johnson's Quest To Become The Next 007 Gets Ringing Endorsements From Two Former BOND Actors

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 10/27/2020, 3:06 PM
From what I've read the streamers were the ones approaching MGM about release.


When someone comes up and asks "Hey, can I take your massive 50+ year franchise and put it on my service for an uptick in subscribers and revenue and popularity" you shouldn't be shocked when that franchise has a price tag. It'd be like if disney+ didn't exist and this was happening around Endgame. Disney probably would have been like "pay us $1 billion for a one year streaming contract and we might talk"
DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 10/27/2020, 3:07 PM
Of course, Endgame wouldn't have gone streaming anyway, but that aside
dracula
dracula - 10/27/2020, 3:10 PM
No way any service is going to pay that, that is around the movie’s potential box office gross.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 10/27/2020, 8:06 PM
@dracula -
The movie will gross virtually nothing when/if it is released.
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 10/27/2020, 3:40 PM
I mean, the Marvel shows have a budget of around $150m per season, and Soul’s budget is said to be $150m+. Netflix said they spent $159m on The Irishman.

There was never a reason for any of them to spend $600m-$800m on James Bond when that could fund 5 major projects instead. Apple’s problem is a lack of franchises to build on, so I could see them overspending some, but come on...
heyy1
heyy1 - 10/27/2020, 5:42 PM
@Chewtoy - apple's biggest problem is that you have to pay to rent indivisual films except Greyhound, and the show library is so tiny on AppleTV+
1 2
View Recorder