HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON: A First Look At Hiccup And Toothless From Live-Action Remake Has Leaked Online

HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON: A First Look At Hiccup And Toothless From Live-Action Remake Has Leaked Online

The first trailer for the live-action How to Train Your Dragon movie is now playing in theaters and we have a first look at Hiccup (Mason Thames) and Toothless recreating an iconic scene from the orginal.

By JoshWilding - Nov 15, 2024 07:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Animated Features
Source: Toonado.com

UPDATE: Empire has now shared an official look at Hiccup. Talking to the site, director Dean DeBlois says, "[The movie is] so dialled-up in terms of stakes - having a fully credible, photo-real dragon stomping around trying to kill him."

You can see the still below and, beneath that, you'll find the original leak. 


The first trailer for the live-action How to Train Your Dragon movie is already playing in select theaters and, according to our sources, will be released online imminently. 

For now, we have a few leaked images from the teaser (via Toonado.com) showing Mason Thames' Hiccup meeting Toothless in a scene which looks identical to the one from the critically acclaimed animated movie.

Also of note is the fact Toothless hasn't undergone any sort of radical reinvention, ensuring he looks every bit as adorable as his cartoon counterpart. There was always a chance he'd become a little more "realistic" in this setting, but the filmmakers clearly decided against heading down that potentially controversial route (look at Sonic the Hedgehog's backlash).

Nico Parker plays Astrid in the new How to Train Your Dragon and recently addressed how loyal to the animated movie this remake will be.

"I think it’s very much its own thing, but I’d like to think so much of that magic is also prevalent in this one. But I think it’s its own film, and it’s its own interpretation and everyone has their own version of a character. It’s important not to get too wrapped up, especially because the animated ones are so brilliant. It’s like, let’s not try and just do a play by play of that. And if anyone wants that, they can watch the animated ones. I think it’ll be wonderful, and if it isn’t, I’m having a wonderful time making it anyway. I’ll think it’s wonderful, no matter what."

Universal Pictures has assembled an impressive cast for the movie that includes Mason Thames, Nico Parker, Gerard Butler, Nick Frost, Julian Dennison, Gabriel Howell, Bronwyn James, Harry Trevaldwyn, and Ruth Codd.

Dean DeBlois, who wrote and directed Lilo & Stitch and the How to Train Your Dragon trilogy alongside Chris Sanders helms this remake, possibly explaining reports that it's been described as a Lion King-style shot-for-shot adaptation following test screenings.

In the animated How to Train Your Dragon, Hiccup, a young Viking who dreams of being a brave dragon killer, strikes up an unlikely friendship with one of the flying beasts after wounding it in battle. Together, Hiccup and his new friend - whom he dubs Toothless - must unite their cultures in a fight against a giant evil dragon known as the Red Death. 

How to Train Your Dragon is set to be released in theaters on June 13, 2025.

SHREK 5 Gets A New, Later Release Date As MINIONS 3 Is Moved Up By An Entire Year
Related:

SHREK 5 Gets A New, Later Release Date As MINIONS 3 Is Moved Up By An Entire Year

New Trailers And Posters Released For DreamWorks Animation's THE BAD GUYS 2 And Pixar's ELIO
Recommended For You:

New Trailers And Posters Released For DreamWorks Animation's THE BAD GUYS 2 And Pixar's ELIO

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Chasekeane
Chasekeane - 11/15/2024, 7:36 AM
This seems even more pointless than the disney ones, at least the disney cartoons don't look like live action...
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 11/15/2024, 2:10 PM
@Chasekeane - First people complained that the Disney ones lacked character because they looked too live action. Now people are complaining this lacks live action because it looks too character. I don't get you people
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 11/15/2024, 7:06 PM
@SonOfAGif - Its simple man...like with everything else....They just want a carbon copy....just in live-action. Ridiculously unfeasible
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 11/15/2024, 7:39 AM
Neat, I hope Shrek is next
User Comment Image
Razorface1
Razorface1 - 11/15/2024, 7:48 AM
This looks exactly like the other movie what is even the point
MotherGooseUPus
MotherGooseUPus - 11/15/2024, 8:17 AM
Some of my favorite animated movies are all getting the live action remake and i could not be more upset. for f*ck sake can't you think of anything original these days? Stop taking animated classics and ruining them. sincerely, anyone over 30yrs old
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 11/15/2024, 11:10 AM
@MotherGooseUPus - I don't them remaking animated movies, but they shouldn't be doing the popular one. Get the cult favourites to a wider audience instead
TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 11/15/2024, 1:28 PM
@MotherGooseUPus -

The silver lining is that the animated versions still exist, and you're still allowed to watch them, and even better is you can make the decision to not watch the live action version if you don't want to.

Nothing's ruined, stop being so dramatic.
LilJimmy
LilJimmy - 11/15/2024, 8:32 AM
"What's the point of this?"

User Comment Image
dragon316
dragon316 - 11/15/2024, 9:53 AM
@LilJimmy - Therese comments are copied from Quora

Here’s the reality of Disney remakes:

Cartoons aren’t as popular as they used to. 3D animation has pretty much taken over. There’s no money in showing old films in theatres.
There’s a huge demographic of people who haven’t seen the original cartoon films, especially young audiences.
Copyright has a limited timeframe. At some point old Disney movies are going to become public domain.

The same reason that people watch Disney's animated movies which are mostly adaptations of popular fairy tales, books and legends, the journey is far more entertaining than the destination. Come to think of it, many kids watch the same Disney movies repeatedly for years.

Furthermore, Disney has learned that these live-action remakes, when done properly, make a lot of money. As a for-profit corporation, the financial objectives is probably the main reason for any movie.
24 views
View 1 upvote
dragon316
dragon316 - 11/15/2024, 9:53 AM
@dragon316 - and money
mountainman
mountainman - 11/15/2024, 8:48 AM
I love the fact that our isolated viking community is racially diverse. Seems like they are focused on the important things with this one. At least we still have the amazing animated trilogy.
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 11/15/2024, 9:18 AM
@mountainman - You mean the isolated Viking community that deals with dragons? That very real thing that means this movie has to follow realistic racial diversity?

Why do you guys just pick and choose when ‘reality’ has to come into play?
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/15/2024, 9:52 AM
@mountainman - IF talking actual Vikings, not just native Norse who didn't travel around the world in ships...

A víkingr was someone who went on expeditions, usually abroad, usually by sea, and usually in a group with other víkingar (the plural).

They were oft more diverse than most realise as they would replace dead crew with locals of the places they visited/raided which included Africa. Also recently been signs from archeological digs that those non-Germanic crew members were treated as equals as no signs their diet differed or indications of any restraints used or other such signs associated with being slaves or made to work any harder than anyone else on the longboats.

I mean, I DO get the critique of it all, but history is oft more complex and interesting than most realise.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/15/2024, 10:03 AM
@CerealKiller - It doesn’t matter if it’s real or fantasy, an isolated community won’t be diverse. This is just how human genetics work.

When I’m watching the Witcher, I know that this world has monsters and magic. If in a larger city in that world, diversity would make sense. But when every tiny village looks like Manhattan, it loses its immersion.

Is this a major gripe that would ruin the movie? No it isn’t.

But it’s a move made for political hiring quotas rather than what is good for the production. Fun fact - I also thought the animated movies use of Scottish music and accents was also dumb. It really isn’t difficult for a fictional show or movie to do a little research and ensure that any inspirations from our real world are accurate ones.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/15/2024, 10:05 AM
@Apophis71 - The How to Train Your Dragons people were not depicted as world travelers (maybe in the later movies but that was to magical dragon lands and not other continents).

They seem to be an amalgamation of Viking/Norse/Scottish cultures.

I get that this children’s series isn’t a history lesson, but the bigger issue here is that isolated communities are almost never diverse. Isolated communities in our world are almost always homogeneous.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/15/2024, 10:23 AM
@mountainman - As I say, get the critique, but then with fictional kids fantasy with Dragons that never existed...

...but the word Viking was used, which does refer to those who travelled around the globe thus acquired more diverse crews thus if they are Vikings not JUST natives of the Germanic regions (even if settled for a while) then there is a built in excuse in fiction.

For instance there were settled 'Vikings' in the UK who had acquired African crew members during raids who then lived alongside them in mainland Britain, Scottish Islands and Ireland from contempory records and archeological evidence.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/15/2024, 11:10 AM
@Apophis71 - Astrid is a member of their community not some person picked up in a journey to another land.

But regardless, I have no desire to continue discussing this. I think it’s dumb, it isn’t “ruining” the movie for me, I am honestly skeptical about a live action adaptation of this series anyway, and had only come here to say that I think its dumb.

If you don’t, that’s fine. I do. Our opinions may differ. As someone who has 100% of their ancestry come from Northern Europe, I’m quite familiar with the history of that region.

You during obscure references to the very rare instances of non-white people in Norse culture doesn’t change the fact that this is odd.

If these movies suck, at least we will always have the underrated and great animated trilogy.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/15/2024, 11:29 AM
@mountainman - Oh I am not saying it was incredibly common, only that specific to UK Viking settlers it did occur and in a number of instances/locations they then lived alongside each other raising families for generations in the British Isles after they had done doing raids of North West Africa according to historical documentation and archaeologic/genetic evidence.

Thus if merging Celtic/Gaelic and Norse there is a slim window to push beyond the more conventional take on those cultures...

...even if narratively speaking their time of raiding was a generation or three in their past, called creative licence :D

Most important thing however is if they do the animations justice when adapted as to me feels too soon to do so unless they have an interesting angle to warrant retreading the stories.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/15/2024, 11:34 AM
@Apophis71 - Now that last point to me is more important than the racial makeup of the cast.

This series is younger than even Harry Potter, and I’m even skeptical of that retelling is needed at this time.

The dragons are going to require tons of CGI (especially if they adapt the 2nd and 3rd animated movies later on) so parts of this will feel as “live action” as The Lion King did.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/15/2024, 1:22 PM
@mountainman - Never got why they did Lion King too, I get it with anything over 30yrs ago but stuff within my kids lifetime whilst still in their 20's...

...different matter with something like jungle Book, a lot older and went far closer to the source than the animated one did.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/15/2024, 1:41 PM
@Apophis71 - They did it because it made bank and for no other reason. Hollywood is largely bankrupt of ideas. Adaptations, sequels, reboots, and franchises are all the have.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/15/2024, 2:02 PM
@mountainman - Oh I get that but to my mind for max fiscal returns and appeal you want to allow time for the 10yr old to grow up and take their own 10yr old to watch thus 25yr gap minimum as late 20's to early 30's has become more the norm for having kids these days (or for the 10yr to grow up and take their grandchildren to it for bigger gaps of time).
dragon316
dragon316 - 11/15/2024, 8:55 AM
Looks good disappointed all of it be cgi crap can’t do what Jurassic park did cgi Dino’s half animatronic lazy hollywood even micheal bay used props to simulate parts of transformers arms and legs and frenzy was puppet most of time close up shots
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/15/2024, 9:00 AM
This is the FIRST ACTUAL LEAK on this site, not some made up BS rumor. Congrats. Now cite the actual source, which was r/LeaksAndRumors...
solskulldeath
solskulldeath - 11/15/2024, 8:11 PM
Another pointless shit remake.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder