ANT-MAN & THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA - Cassie Lang Battle-Tests Her Suit In New "Jump Tap" Clip

ANT-MAN & THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA - Cassie Lang Battle-Tests Her Suit In New "Jump Tap" Clip

Marvel Studios has released a new clip from Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, and it finds Cassie Lang (Kathryn Newton) attempting to get a handle on her new power-suit. Take a look...

By MarkCassidy - Feb 15, 2023 04:02 PM EST

Marvel Studios' first Phase 5 film, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, is set to hit theaters this Friday, and we have a brand-new clip featuring Cassie Lang (Kathryn Newton) in action.

At this point in the movie, Scott (Paul Rudd) and Cassie find themselves captured by a group of rebels in the Quantum Realm, but they join forces when they realize that they have a common enemy in Kang (Jonathan Majors).

When the Conqueror's forces attack, Cassie decides to help, putting her new suit to the test in battle for the first time. The budding hero is still learning the ropes, so her dad gives her a few pointers; "Jump... tap!"

Check out the new clip in the player below.

Quantumania has received a mixed reception from critics (it's actually become the second "Rotten" MCU movie after Eternals), but is still expected to take in as much as $280 million worldwide this weekend.

Did the reviews put you off seeing it in theaters? Drop us a comment down below.

Super-Hero partners Scott Lang (Paul Rudd) and Hope van Dyne (Evangeline Lilly) return to continue their adventures as Ant-Man and the Wasp. Together, with Hope’s parents Janet van Dyne (Michelle Pfeiffer) and Hank Pym (Michael Douglas), and Scott’s daughter Cassie Lang (Kathryn Newton), the family finds themselves exploring the Quantum Realm, interacting with strange new creatures and embarking on an adventure that will push them beyond the limits of what they thought possible.

Directed by Peyton Reed and produced by Kevin Feige and Stephen Broussard, Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania also stars Jonathan Majors as Kang, David Dastmalchian as Veb, Katy O'Brian as Jentorra, William Jackson Harper as Quaz and Bill Murray as Lord Krylar.

The sci-fi adventure opens in theaters on Feb. 17, 2023.

ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA Actually Did Turn A Profit... Of Around $88K
Related:

ANT-MAN AND THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA Actually Did Turn A Profit... Of Around $88K

ANT-MAN & THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA's Katy O'Brian Officially Joins THE RUNNING MAN Cast
Recommended For You:

ANT-MAN & THE WASP: QUANTUMANIA's Katy O'Brian Officially Joins THE RUNNING MAN Cast

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 2/15/2023, 4:52 PM
Where da review😐,?
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 2/15/2023, 5:13 PM
@AmazingFILMporg - Still didn't get a chance... I might leave it and just do a spoiler review over the weekend or something. If I get time tomorrow, I'll write it up.
AmazingFILMporg
AmazingFILMporg - 2/15/2023, 5:17 PM
@RorMachine -


I get it. Being a grown up sucks. Only so much time in the day.


Look forward to it🤝💪
DudeGuy
DudeGuy - 2/15/2023, 4:55 PM
[frick]. It really does look like Spy Kids 🫢…
Vigor
Vigor - 2/15/2023, 5:49 PM
@DudeGuy - it really does look like spy kids. To the effect I wonder if that's intentional. I mean spy kids is successful, that's why they made so many. Perhaps that's the audience they're hoping to hook in? Idk lol
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/15/2023, 4:56 PM
I don't know now if I'm going to see this at the cinema or not,it'll be on Disney Plus by the Summer.
mountainman
mountainman - 2/15/2023, 4:58 PM
@marvel72 - I bet it will be on D+ quicker than BP2 was. 45 days probably. So by early April we can watch this from the comfort of our homes.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/15/2023, 5:05 PM
@marvel72 @mountainman - I kinda expect each movie to hit Disney+ before the next one is released theatrically. So yeah, April makes sense
mountainman
mountainman - 2/15/2023, 5:10 PM
@bkmeijer1 - Oh yes it will 100% be in April because it'll have to be before GOTG3 comes out in May. But I seem to remember they extended the window for BP2 due to wanting to give it more legs in theaters and to allow for the release in February to coincide with Black History Month.

Those two variables won't apply here. No significant release is needed with this one and it likely won't have the legs that BP2 had. They had been consistently doing 45 days before that movie and I predict they will return to it for this one.

Plus - we still dont have a release date for Secret Invasion do we? I think they want new marvel content on the app. I know Mandelorian comes out in March, but no new Marvel content other than Secret Invasion coming soon.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/15/2023, 5:41 PM
@mountainman - true. Quantumania has nothing to coincide with for ita home release.

As for Secret Invasion, I really expected that to have a release date by now. With the amount of shows planned, Marvel could easily drop one show between each movie until the end of the saga.

If they wait longer, they're gonna have to release episodes in the same week. Kinda like Star Wars will be doing in March, even though they have far less shows and thus don't even have to.
mountainman
mountainman - 2/15/2023, 5:45 PM
@bkmeijer1 - Yeah its odd that we haven't heard anything about Secret Invasion since the trailer dropped. I wonder if they are either doing things behind the scenes or wanted to hold it off to release closer to The Marvels.

And Star Wars is all shows right now while they try to figure out their movie situation so I feel like they can get away with more shows in a shorter period of time.

A lot of people have been talking about MCU fatigue so Disney needs to consider not releasing too much in too short a time.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/15/2023, 5:55 PM
@mountainman - I doubt we'll see that scheduled Star Wars movie this year, so I wouldn't have minded the shows being spaced out a bit more. As for Marvel shows, that definitely isn't the case.

The animated shows like What If, Spider-Man and X-Men might all be alternate realities, but they're still made by Marvel Studios. They could drop those and a live-action show at the same time, but it would still feel to crammed in my opinion.
mountainman
mountainman - 2/15/2023, 5:58 PM
@bkmeijer1 - Man I really am looking forward to X-Men ‘97. X-Men TAS was my childhood.
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/15/2023, 6:19 PM
@mountainman - Tempting.
marvel72
marvel72 - 2/15/2023, 6:21 PM
@bkmeijer1 - If its not connected,they might hold off.

Like both won't feature Kang.
KWilly
KWilly - 2/15/2023, 4:58 PM
The set looks so cheap. Murky brown background with faux dirt floor, sprinkled with some fire here and there. CGI looks like garbage.

I'll be first in line on Friday.
JFerguson
JFerguson - 2/15/2023, 4:59 PM
that CGI and dialogue. holy moly that's bad.
mountainman
mountainman - 2/15/2023, 5:02 PM
Yup, looks like a CGI mess with random faceless goons to take down. The Spy Kids references when the first trailer dropped seemed to be pretty spot on it seems.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/15/2023, 5:04 PM


I will go see this immediately and judge it for myself.

Fingers crossed.

CAPTAINPINKEYE
CAPTAINPINKEYE - 2/15/2023, 5:11 PM
It’s a comedy for the family. Yeahhh!
FilmGuy7878
FilmGuy7878 - 2/15/2023, 5:15 PM
Now THIS is a family picture. I mean that in a not good way.
narrow290
narrow290 - 2/15/2023, 5:23 PM
move aside for the hate-train. Feige teases a bunch of shit in light of this movies low score. Were good Kevin! true fans understand not every movie will be perfect
SheepishOne
SheepishOne - 2/15/2023, 5:32 PM
I'm really missing the days of actual physical sets. I get that it's "the quantum realm" and supposed to feel weird and ethereal or whatever, but imo there's rarely a good substitute for a physical set with physical set pieces to visually define spacial dimensions. When you just keep using CGI walls and floors, the brain eventually picks up on it and it stops feeling like a tangible experience.

One of the things that worked so well with the first Ant-Man was Scott spending most of the movie running around in a house, or a building. Sure, there were big CGI pieces for the shrinking scenes, but you usually would get cuts back to "normal" reality here and there to set physical boundaries and reset your brain's sense of space. Nothing about this clip feels real to me.

I'm still looking forward to seeing this, but we're at a weird point in CGI where the uncanny valley is getting wider and deeper every time a movie like Avatar comes out and pushes the limits. Marvel either needs to pony up on the CGI costs or take a step back and do more street level films.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/15/2023, 5:45 PM
@SheepishOne - agreed. Scott drumming while Woo enters his house to check if Scott is actually there get's more excitement out of me than them running around the QR.

Same reason I the first Thor kovie as well. It's not the best movie, but stiff like him trying to raise his hammer in that rainy SHIELD compound looked great. Remember more from that than from L&T.
SheepishOne
SheepishOne - 2/15/2023, 7:31 PM
@bkmeijer1 - Absolutely. Yea, I enjoyed the moon scene in Thor 4 with the b&w/color juxtapositions, but I think the scene of Thor trying to lift Mjolnir in the rain is way more iconic, and it probably cost a fraction of what the moon scene did.

It's kind of the same way I felt about a totally CGI Iron Man nano suit vs the more practical suit they filmed Tony with in the first couple of Iron Mans. I get that RDJ wasn't the most comfortable in it, but the alternative is a more cartoonish visual.

CGI is a great tool to enhance a film, but when it starts becoming a way to cut corners, and you start writing scenes around it instead of the other way around, it starts feeling lazy.

Not lazy from the vfx artists' perspective, of course. But lazy in terms of creativity and cinematography.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/16/2023, 3:14 AM
@SheepishOne - that's a good point. Iron Man looked so much better in 2008 than he did in 2018.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 2/15/2023, 5:37 PM
Looks so intangible
grif
grif - 2/15/2023, 5:37 PM
wow the cgi on those suits is. not good
TheLobster
TheLobster - 2/15/2023, 5:43 PM
I’m not trying to be a sensationalist but perhaps Marvel should have rebooted after Endgame because everything since then has been largely embarrassing and mediocre as [frick].
1 2
View Recorder