AVENGERS: ENDGAME - 20 Major New Spoiler Questions Answered By The Movie's Writers And Directors

AVENGERS: ENDGAME - 20 Major New Spoiler Questions Answered By The Movie's Writers And Directors

In this brand new interview with Avengers: Endgame's writers and directors, they address everything from the "Thanus" theory to Iron Man's final scene, why dead characters won't be rebooted, and much more!

By JoshWilding - Jun 08, 2019 03:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Endgame
Avengers: Endgame may end up falling slightly short of Avatar's record-breaking haul at the worldwide box office, but it's still the highest grossing superhero movie in history and the #2 spot isn't that bad! Now, directors Joe and Anthony Russo and writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely have addressed a huge number of spoilers. 

While we've already featured a number of interviews with all four filmmakers on the site, there's a lot here that they haven't previously spoken about. 

For example, they talk in detail about why Iron Man didn't have any final words after the Snap, how the events of Endgame change Avengers: Infinity War, why the 2014 version of Thanos is known as the "Warrior," alternate scenes, comic book homages, and much more. 

So, to check out these fresh details, simply click on the "View List" button down below!

The "Thanus" Theory



Before Avengers: Endgame was released, a very unique theory started doing the rounds online asking why Ant-Man couldn't travel up Thanos' butt and expand from the inside, killing the Mad Titan in the process. This got so much attention that even cast members addressed it, but there's a very good reason why it wasn't include...aside from it being completely ridiculous, of course!

"Thanos could take a punch from the Hulk, we've seen that. And it stands to reason his whole body is at least as strong as that," Markus explains. "If Ant-Man expanded, he would be simply crushed against the immovable walls of Thanos’ mighty rectum." There's an image we won't be getting out of our head this weekend...
 

Don't Blame Star-Lord For The Snap

Star-Lord


"If you’re standing in front of your girlfriend's father and find out that he just killed your girlfriend, you're gonna hit him in the face!" argues Markus when asked whether fans really should blame Star-Lord for Thanos wiping out trillions of lives.

"I just think it's totally emotionally understandable, particularly when you add in the scene where [Quill] was supposed to kill her," McFeely agrees, pointing out the failings of the other heroes. "[Star Lord] is one of many reasons why they don't win. All you've got to do is cut his head off – Thor's at fault. Tony and Steve, if they got along there's a good chance. There's a lot of blame to go around."
 

How The 2014 Version Of Thanos Differs



Asked how the past version of Thanos differs to the 2018 version who is beheaded by Thor, Anthony explains that he was dubbed "Warrior Thanos, the version of the character before he put down his armour and became enlightened and wanted to search for the stones."

"He's angrier – it might be his flaw in the film, that he's a little bit more precocious and self-confident, not quite as enlightened." As for how the writers view the 2014 Mad Titan, Markus adds: "He is, oddly for all the damage he does in Infinity War, a mellowed-out, philosophical Thanos. And we wanted the warlord in this movie, who hasn't quite worked out all the nuances yet."
 

Why Thor Reunited With Frigga Instead Of Jane Foster

Frigga


When Thor returns to Asgard circa 2013, he has an emotional reunion with his mother, Frigga - but why didn't we get to see him interact with Natalie Portman's Jane Foster? According to McFeely it boils down to the fact that "it wasn’t a romantic relationship he needed to repair."

Markus agrees: "He had some Jane Foster time in one draft. But that didn't seem like his issue. He's reduced to a childlike state in his cabin over there in Norway, and he needed advice from his mom, basically. Someone needs to go, 'You're OK. You're a f*ck-up, and you're OK."
 

Robert Downey Jr. Improvised A Key Line

Stark


Tony Stark and Steve Rogers' reunion is brief but extremely emotional, and we learn that the former is still holding a grudge as he rants at Captain America and brands his former ally a "liar." 

"I think that was one of Downey's most inspired performance moments in the movie," Anthony says, confirming that the actor actually improvised that particular moment. "He very much reverts to, this is the guy who felt forsaken by his father – you can see his intimacy and trust issues in that moment when he turns on Cap. Downey performed the scene with a lot of energy. We didn't do it many times, because he was expending himself so, so much. He understood it very well."
 

"The Snap" Wasn't A Cliffhanger

Thanos-3


Marvel Studios kept us all hooked for an entire year as we waited for Avengers: Endgame to be released, but the movie's writers don't necessarily believe Infinity War ended on a cliffhanger. 

"Heroes lose all the time at the end of act two, and it usually lasts five minutes and then they're back out of it. We didn't want to do that," McFeely explains. "It seemed like a cheat. People accuse that first movie of being a cliffhanger, but I'll go to my grave saying it's a tragedy. A cliffhanger implies that you're going to resolve it quickly, and we did not want to do that."
 

"What If?" Comics Inspired The Time Jump

Thanos-33


We know that a What If? animated series is coming to Disney+, but McFeely reveals that those comic books inspired the "Five Years Later" time jump that introduced a very different version of the heroes.

"By jumping five years, you get to have 'What if Tony got married and lived happily ever after?'; 'What if Hulk became basically the only super-hero and was smart?'; 'What if Cap seemed like he might want to give up?'; 'What if Natasha never left the house and was the last woman on the wall?'; 'What if Thor became a fat drunk?'," he says.

"That was the idea to do that, but not as What If – keep the stakes. That all happened, it's all part of canon."
 

A Subtle But Genius Change

Hulk-4


Here's something you'll be keeping an eye out for when you watch the movie again. Apparently, once Avengers: Endgame moves into the future, the movie's visuals change to reflect that. 

"At 'Five Years Later', you'll notice it gets a lot bluer, cooler tones. We wanted a more depressive mood," Joe reveals. "The intention was to let the characters and the audience feel the effects of Infinity War, and then slowly transition into a different tone – you'll notice the movie starts to get funny around Hulk and the diner, where the tone is becoming hopeful again."
 

The Thinking Behind Stan Lee's Cameo

Lee


Avengers: Endgame features Stand Lee's final cameo in the MCU and he appears as a younger version of himself back in 1970. As you might expect, his appearance is based on photos of him from the time. "We had particular nostalgic fun with this cameo because we were going to the past," explains Anthony.

"We started to look at old photos – our visual effects team is so fluent with de-ageing techniques," he continued, confirming that VFX was used for the scene. "We allowed ourselves to become very inspired and excited by old images of Stan. It was great fun."
 

Iron Man's Scrapped Trip To Asgard

Heimdall-1


One the filmmakers decided to focus on a time heist, they just had to decide which movies to revisit. It sounds like Thor: The Dark World was settled on quickly, but an earlier version of the movie would have featured Iron Man paying a visit to the God of Thunder's home. 

"Technically in Thor: The Dark World, the Tesseract is in the vault as the Aether is also there," says McFeely. "So that sent Tony to Asgard, and he had an invisible stealth suit, and he fought Heimdall, who could of course see him. I think Joe [Russo] went in and said, 'Why don't we go in to Avengers? It's the biggest movie, it's the most fun, let's go.'"
 

Why Thanos Has Less Screentime



Thanos was the main character in Avengers: Infinity War but he takes a back seat in Endgame. "It’s definitely an Avengers movie, where the other one wasn't," McFeely reasons when asked to provide an explanation. "We had to give ourselves permission to backseat the villain a little bit. I don't think anyone in the first half of the movie is going, 'Oh I wish there was a villain'. You're rolling around in the loss and the time heist, and you think it's sort of Avengers against nature."
 

Black Widow's Redemption

Widow23


We know that Hawkeye was originally going to be the one to take the plunge on Vormir, but Joe has now elaborated on the decision for it to be Black Widow instead. "Natasha is fascinating because she used to be a villain. It's not something you've seen on screen before, but she had a life prior to this that was the wrong life," he says.

"The character had their identity stripped away and was turned into an assassin, then found a new family through her membership in the Avengers. It just seemed an incredibly heroic choice for her to make knowing that she had to sacrifice herself to preserve the future and the family." He also notes that Natasha is ultimately the better fighter so she would always beat Clint.
 

Dead Characters Will Not Be Rebooted



If you're expecting a new Tony Stark to show up in the MCU somewhere down the line, guess again. "It's the nature of the MCU," argues Markus. "It's not a place where you can reboot one and suddenly Iron Man is 15 years old and everyone else is still the same age. The characters have to pass out, and the universe has to still stand."

"So if you're going to take people off the board, they've got to go for real,"
he continues. "Granted, these are movies. I understand that somebody has made some kind of announcement that has the word 'Vision' in it, so I mean..." That's a reference to WandaVision, but there are many ways an android can return. 
 

Why They Didn't Kill Captain America

Captain-America-21


We all went into Avengers: Endgame expecting Captain America to die, but he instead gets a very different sort of ending. "Once you kill a beloved character like [Tony], you've got to have hope at the end of the movie in some regard, and the only person to give you that hope is the other co-lead," Joe explains.

"Had we killed both the leads, I feel like people would have been walking out into traffic after the film. The intention is not to destroy people, it's to hopefully tell a complex and dimensionalised story in a way, that makes them feel a varied range of emotion." That ultimately makes perfect sense. 
 

How Endgame Changes Infinity War's Ending



Doctor Strange reveals that there's only one possible future where The Avengers will defeat Thanos, and McFeely has now pointed out a moment in Infinity War that now takes on a very different light.

"Cumberbatch takes a really long pregnant pause. And now that you know that he’s looking ahead to Endgame and Tony dying, and he says, 'One', you will only read it as, 'You have to die – there's no other way.'" It's pretty grim to think he knew that Iron Man would ultimately die, and it will be interesting to see what sort of fallout, if any, there is from that. 
 

Why Iron Man Didn't Have Any Last Words

Iron-Man-444


After telling Thanos "I Am Iron Man," Tony Stark doesn't get any emotional last words and instead says a silent goodbye to Spider-Man, War Machine, and Pepper. "Robert was like, ‘I'm not going to say f*cking anything. I don't want to talk, because it doesn't feel honest to me," Joe reveals. "And I don't think in that moment that he'd have the ability to speak.'"

"He was like, ‘I'm going to lay here, and you can let it unfold with the other characters, but I'm going to barely interact because that feels like a truthful choice to me.'" The directors agreed and Anthony adds: "To have a character in that much pain, on the verge of death, it was important for us to create the feeling that when you looked at Tony Stark in that moment, you knew he was dying, and you had to process that in that moment."
 

An Alternate Take On The Portals Scene



Apparently, an earlier version of Avengers: Endgame put that big Portals scene in a very different part of the movie. "They snapped it, and bam – everyone's there, and then Thanos attacked," explains Markus. "It was fine, but the way it is currently makes it feel like the movie's not done. If you resolve it, then it's just a skirmish afterwards. But because you have not completed the primary task – everybody is not back yet – it still feels like there's a lot in the balance."
 

Captain America Lifting Mjolnir Was Kevin Feige's Plan

Captain-America-22


If you want to credit anyone for Captain America lifting Mjolnir, it's Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige. "I'm sure it was probably in Kevin's mind well before [Ultron], which is why he probably asked Joss to include something like that," Joe says. "At some point he wanted to see Cap worthy."

"But it's one of those things that you can only pay off with 10 years of storytelling behind it,"
the filmmaker continues. "To know everything that Cap has gone through, and to see who he is as a character and all the choices that he's made, he is worthy. Even though he's made mistakes, which is I think fascinating – even in Civil War when he admits to Tony that he withheld the truth from him, it doesn't alter the fact that he's worthy."
 

A New Thor

Thor-34


While we've heard for a while now that it was always the plan for Thor to retain his new look, it sounds like we can forget about him getting back in shape by the next time we see him. 

"The end of Thor's journey is not simply a return to who he was before he became depressed," Anthony confirms. "The end of Thor's journey is the arrival at a new state of understanding of himself and his world. He's yet another character moving forward. The idea of simply changing him back I think undermined the idea that that’s not who Thor is anymore."
 

A Secret Wars Homage

2323728


Ever since Avengers: Endgame was released, fans have wondered whether The Hulk holding up the Avengers Compound while it collapses around him could be a nod to a certain comic book.

Well, Secret Wars mega fan Joe has now confirmed that it is "one hundred percent" a reference to the comic panel and now we just have to hope him and Anthony one day get to adapt the whole thing.

Many thanks to Empire Online for the quotes used throughout this post.
AVENGERS: ENDGAME Concept Art Confirms Marvel Studios Scrapped A Battle Between The Hulk And Thanos
Related:

AVENGERS: ENDGAME Concept Art Confirms Marvel Studios Scrapped A Battle Between The Hulk And Thanos

AVENGERS: ENDGAME's Cut Morgan Stark, Katherine Langford, Rumored To Be In Line For Upcoming MCU Return
Recommended For You:

AVENGERS: ENDGAME's Cut Morgan Stark, Katherine Langford, Rumored To Be In Line For Upcoming MCU Return

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Ronan3Accuser
Ronan3Accuser - 6/8/2019, 3:37 AM
Kumkani
Kumkani - 6/8/2019, 3:48 AM
Why Thor Reunited With Frigga Instead Of Jane Foster

Natalie Portman wasn't available
JonC
JonC - 6/8/2019, 11:25 AM
@DnA - she actually did new voice dialogue for EG
Kumkani
Kumkani - 6/8/2019, 3:48 AM
Jokes aside I love reading all these stuff. Always nice to know the thought processes behind a great film.
BrokenMachines
BrokenMachines - 6/8/2019, 3:51 AM
The writing for this film-PHENOMEN0L
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 6/8/2019, 3:54 AM
In the endgame now.

Ronan3Accuser
Ronan3Accuser - 6/8/2019, 4:04 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - one of the best films ever. Still love watching it.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 6/8/2019, 4:22 AM
@Ronan3Accuser -

Ronan3Accuser
Ronan3Accuser - 6/8/2019, 4:44 AM
Vigor
Vigor - 6/8/2019, 4:08 AM
The two personas of thanos in infinity war and endgame, were almost like we were getting two versions of thanos. The philosophical and at peace one from infinity war, and the brutal typical villain one from endgame

I loved them both. Over time, thanos becomes more and more my favorite mcu character. Maybe above cap
DoubleD
DoubleD - 6/8/2019, 4:24 AM
AND Professor Hulk was in the Infinity War comic's.

Marvel and Russo's stayed true to the comics.
Unites
Unites - 6/8/2019, 4:37 AM
These quotes are from old interviews. Right?
dt41
dt41 - 6/8/2019, 5:13 AM
Downey’s scene where he goes off on Cap, calls him
a liar, and collapses....if that’s not an Oscar worthy performance then I don’t know what is...the Academy better nominate him for Endgame. The dude deserves it. .....everyone loved Iron Man!
Ronan3Accuser
Ronan3Accuser - 6/8/2019, 5:15 AM
@dennist41 - If the movie doesn't get nominated for best picture and Black Panther did. Now that would be a travesty.
bs77
bs77 - 6/8/2019, 5:30 AM
I loved Tony's death. It was surprising to me and it felt right for the character. He was always the one with the quip during heated battle, and him just laying there without any wisecrack really showed how serious this moment was. RDJ made the right call. Besides, I really do get tired of the "deathbed speeches" in movies. Even DP2 made fun of it.
WeaponXCII
WeaponXCII - 6/8/2019, 6:01 AM
"Lead Characters Will Not Be Rebooted"

So... we're never gonna have Iron Man in the MCU again??? Even if/when they reboot it???

zachshivey
zachshivey - 6/8/2019, 6:13 AM
Avatar was rereleased into theaters for a 2nd run. Endgame almost beat their record in one flight
ARMUS
ARMUS - 6/8/2019, 6:41 AM
They've actually out explained Zach Snyder at this point, well, no, what we meant by this is, having to explain so much about a film post release is never a good sign. So much of the film irritated me, so much they still have to explain,- like why do the Avengers hate Tony Starks Daughter, Why do the Avengers hate Tony Stark and Natasha, people will say otherwise, but to me, with logic, they're wrong, Fans all insisted Gamora and Loki were really dead, what happened? An early version was brought forward, hell, Gamora fought in the final battle, they established a new invented non scientific reasoned time travel with no Butterfly effect, can remove someone from the past without effecting the future, Avengers knew this, OK Avengers, heroes, go get a Tony twenty minutes before he dies, don't let his Daughter grow up without a Father, the time machine is literally in the Garden, go get Natasha twenty minutes before she died, they must hate them not too. Cap knew Peggy found love and had a happy life but selfishly went back and took it away from this guy, probably removing their kids from that timeline, Cap had feelings for Sharon Carter, spent more time with her than Peggy, but now knows her as his young niece, ah puke! so many logic problems.

I posted this comment a little while ago, but it appeared to be deleted for no reason, it does not attack other users, does not incite flame wars, does not hijack threads, it's an opinion based on the article written, can't be spoilers, spoilers is written in the headline, assuming we're not in Nazi Germany opinions should be permitted.
Victorg1983
Victorg1983 - 6/8/2019, 10:07 AM
@ARMUS - I think if the go back in time and get Tony before he dies THEN he is not there to do the snap to kill defeat thanos so it would change things in a big way ... thanos wins .... with that being said thing should have changed just from the fact that gamora from 2014 went to 2023 that would means that she was never there in 2018 for the soul stone...
ARMUS
ARMUS - 6/8/2019, 3:07 PM
@Victorg1983 - No, wouldn't change anything, they had established effecting the past doesn't change the future at all in their created gobbledygook time travel, taking Gamora from the past didn't stop the events of Guardians one from happening, even though Gamora brought forward was from pre that event, Nebula killed her younger self, it didn't change history, that Nebula still attacked the Guardians in 1&2, they've created a really dumb plot point, it's so stupid it actually makes the Avengers look like morons for not getting an earlier Tony and Natasha, according to events like Gamora, Nebula and Loki it changes nothing in the present at all, past Thanos was killed, but past Thanos still attacked New York in 2012.
KungFuKoala
KungFuKoala - 6/10/2019, 7:35 AM
@ARMUS - Technically you are right. But I think they made it pretty clear that changing the past would create a different timeline for everyone existing in that past. Hence why they agreed to go back and return the stones (and Mjolnir) to where they'd taken them from.. they weren't selfish and went back and did as promised.

If they went back and took Tony, let's say, just before Hulk snaps the gauntlet... you have to accept that would make a new timeline whereby Thanos still shows up but this time he wins and wipes out the entire universe.

The more logical thing to do would be for Doctor Strange to use the time stone to reverse Tony's snap, all while having Thor stand immediately behind where Thanos will reappear and then simply take his head off just before he can utter the word "inevitable". I'm confident the Avengers and their army could clean up the rest of Thanos' minions no problem, even without the Infinity Stones at their disposal.

So that would leave you with
a) the Vanished having returned
b) Thanos defeated
c) Tony Stark revived
d) and opportunity to return the stones and Mjolnir to the past

They could even do something similar with Natasha - have Cap and Doctor Strange travel to Vormir and let him do the same thing to bring her back (although that would return the soul stone and therefore we'd end up with two soul stones! Awkward)
Victorg1983
Victorg1983 - 6/10/2019, 12:27 PM
@ARMUS - well that is why I just feel like the time travel thing is just a dangerous plot to introduce and in a way kind of lazy I would have much preferred they went about it another way. But again I guess its one of those things you are suppose to not too much thought into it maybe I guess.
Rosraf
Rosraf - 6/8/2019, 6:58 AM
I like the idea of What If? inspiring the timeline.

Also, this only scratches the surface of how Endgame re-interprets Strange’s lines from Infinity War. “I’m sorry. It was the only way,” being one of the more obvious. Also, Stranges earlier comments about “if I have to choose between saving you or your friends or the time stone, I will not hesitate to protect the time stone.” They clearly chose all of Strange’s lines very carefully with the full 2 movie story arc in mind.
Rosraf
Rosraf - 6/8/2019, 7:24 AM
@Rosraf - Actually, even more on the nose, “I will not hesitate to let either of you die.”
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 6/8/2019, 7:18 AM
Personal take :(which means the quality of the movie wouldn't be effected just stuff I wished happened) I'm not sure the 5 year jump was needed other than to make antman and Tony's children age up. The way the world was after 5 years could've been the same in real time. If

Also, I feel like the avengers assemble moment is epic but he said it after everyone assembled on their own. It would've been cool to see the real avengers squad have to assemble to get the gauntlet from thanos and that's why he said it.

If present thanos would have seen what the avengers were doing wouldn't he of acted the same as past thanos? Past thanos was still pretty chill and philosophical at times. He saw himself dying but was still so at peace with his mission being completed.

With them killing iron man and making Cap old I don't think they necessarily gave us hope. I didn't see that as hope I saw that as Cap getting the ending he deserved but that's not hope.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 6/8/2019, 10:50 PM
@MyCoolYoung - I do get what your saying, but at the risk of losing Tony Stark, they brought everyone back, and with a newfound appreciation for what they had and previously lost. Stark's recorded message before the funeral (along with showing people across the globe being mirthful together) was all about the hope restored because of Earth's Mightiest Heroes doing what they had to. And Cap getting to finally have to life he's yearned for, well the hope is in just that. Oddly, the hope is in that he didn't die. But it also makes the fact that Stark got his happy life and then had to lose it even more tragic on his end.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 6/9/2019, 6:03 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - I absolutely loved Stark's speech I randomly turn it on all the time and that part was really hopeful and makes you yearn for the future but after that is the funeral so another downer.

I don't know I guess I'm just not ready for cap to be gone but I do get what you're saying and appreciate the reply
1 2
View Recorder