EDITORIAL: My Picks For Marvel's Mystery 2020 Movies

EDITORIAL: My Picks For Marvel's Mystery 2020 Movies

Marvel’s Phase 3 has been revamped to include three new films. What are they? Hell if I know, but I'm going to give my two cents as to what it could be.

Editorial Opinion
By Hulksta - Oct 25, 2015 07:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Infinity War
Marvel has announced that three new films will be added to their film slate in 2020. We'll have gone through Civil War, and even Infinity War. So what comes next? Well lets discuss!

Guardians of the Galaxy 3


Probably the most likely of the films to be in 2020. It will have been three years since Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, and six years since the original. A three year turnaround time seems realistic. Plus, with all the lead up to Infinity War, it would be nice to see the Guardians in a film where part of the plot isn't just leading up to Infinity War. Perhaps adapt War of the Kings or The Thanos Imperative.

Spider-Man 2



Another likely bet. It will have been three years since the first Spider-Man film under the Sony-Marvel partnership. Marvel will also want to capitalize on the time they have with the web-crawler as there's really no guarantee that Marvel will get the rights again or if Sony will take them back at a certain point.

Thunderbolts


With The Avengers being the huge property that it is, it's surprising that Sony and Warner Bros are (or in Sony's case, were) the only ones trying to capitalize on the idea of villains teaming up. Marvel may not be able to pull off every member of the Thunderbolts, but even a very basic first iteration of the team would be fun to see on screen.

Runaways


The Runaways have been benched for years. They were supposed to appear in Phase 2 but lost out to Guardians of the Galaxy. Now, Marvel is focusing on the galactic stage, and it seems that there's no room for Runaways in their current path towards Infinity War. However, once they've done Infinity War, it would be good to see Marvel step back and give some of the lesser known franchises a try. The Runaways make sense, and after seeing what will be an epic two-part movie event, seeing a group of teens would be a welcome reprieve.

Iron Man (reboot)


It will have been seven years since Iron Man 3, and while it's tempting to see the character retired for a while, I think Marvel will want to re-cast the character and start off with a fresh take on the character. It would be great to see a fresh new talent tackle a character we've all seen for over a decade done with a different energy and style. Plus, starting Phase 4 (or ending Phase 3) with a redux Iron Man would be a great way to show that Marvel is changing their formula, if this is indeed the case.

(Agent) Venom


It's highly likely that once Spider-Man is introduced, that many of his side characters will start to get introduced. Giving Venom his own movie makes sense, especially as Agent Venom has become an increasingly bigger part of the Marvel universe as a whole. He's also a big part of...

Secret Avengers


Marvel has flirted with the idea (the opening of The Winter Soldier was essentially Secret Avengers). With the world being in a state of chaos in a post-Infinity War world, it would make sense for Captain America and some of the other Avengers to go below the radar.


Hulk Solo Film


What shocks me is that the supposed 'hurdle' of Universal's distribution of a Hulk solo film. It seems like something Marvel could fix with a little bit of cash if it was really holding back a Hulk solo film from becoming a reality. Either way, Marvel would be smart to figure out the logistics of a Hulk solo film as they move into Phase 4 and beyond.

Fantastic Four


Let's be honest. That's not happening.
Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments
Related:

Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments

AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Star Paul Bettany Shares A Shocking Revelation About The Vision's Death Scene
Recommended For You:

AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Star Paul Bettany Shares A Shocking Revelation About The Vision's Death Scene

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

urnotaslave23
urnotaslave23 - 10/25/2015, 8:13 PM
@Dr. Doom Unless they decided to reboot the whole Universe. Which I think might be a cool idea. Like the MCU was a trilogy, but instead of three movies it's three "phases". The only problem I would have with that would be that they'd kind of have to recast everyone.
LEVITIKUZ
LEVITIKUZ - 10/25/2015, 8:17 PM
Iron Man reboot is a no.
Marvel Studios wouldn't announce Spidey 2. Sony would.
Using Thanos in GOTG2 likely a no.
Marvel doesn't have Hulk solo rights.
Agent Venom a no. Peter's in HS with Flash in HS. Way too soon.
Mrcool210
Mrcool210 - 10/25/2015, 9:26 PM
@LEVITIKUZ Well Marvel does technically have the solo Hulk rights, But its just that Disney doesn't have the distribution rights. Universal does, so if a solo movie is made the deal would either be Universal would make all profit which Disney definitely doesn't want or Disney and Universal have to split, which is also a no no. Still, unless a new deal is made everyone is right, another solo hulk movie probably won't happen anytime soon.
Odin
Odin - 10/26/2015, 1:16 AM
Sam Raimi's Venom was better Venom than Agent Venom.
kinghulk
kinghulk - 10/26/2015, 2:00 AM
annihilation conquest for GOTG3
yourdaddy
yourdaddy - 10/26/2015, 3:44 AM
it's all probably just a bunch of sequels to solo films.
yourdaddy
yourdaddy - 10/26/2015, 3:45 AM
dr strange 2
black panther 2
guardians 3

/discussion
Hulksta
Hulksta - 10/26/2015, 4:50 AM
@DrDoom you could have it be a soft reboot with new cast and crew but acknowledge the previous films. RDJ's iron man would still be a thing but maybe bring in someone new into the armour.
mook
mook - 10/26/2015, 6:33 AM
Iron Man reboot is a silly idea that goes against what Marvel has been building with the MCU. If we did get an Iron Man 4 it would have to be with RDJ but personally I hope he becomes a background character - cameoing in other films, and turning up in the big Avengers movies.
superheronerdo
superheronerdo - 10/26/2015, 12:58 PM
For those that have been paying attention, Feige stated that the new goal is to feature two existing properties a year and launch one new franchise. Guardians of the Galaxy 3 and, if successful, Doctor Strange 2, which is also supposed to open up the alternate dimensional corner of the Marvel Universe in the same manner that Guardians of the Galaxy has opened up the cosmic corner of the Marvel Universe, sound like sure bets. The third new property might expand the Marvel universe in this new alternate dimensional corner. Question is, will it be a solo character or an ensemble cast. Blade and Ghost Rider have been recently reacquired. Namor would surprise everyone. Marvel has recently been leaning towards ensembles casts with team-ups, even in solo franchises, such as CA: Civil War and Ragnorak. A Runaways movie would target the pre-teen or teen audience with a long gestating franchise.
DarthOptimus
DarthOptimus - 10/30/2015, 1:23 AM
Instead of rebooting or recasting Iron Man, why not have Tony take on a protégé and mentor him the same way Hank did with Scott.

Nobody is ever going to be able to fill RDJ's shoes and they're not going to reboot the MCU anytime soon.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 11/1/2015, 9:16 AM
It is my understanding that the Spiderman deal only covers this first Spiderman film, and allowing Spiderman to appear in some MCU movies. As far as I know, it does not give Marvel any kind of permanent rights to produce more solo Spiderman movies or even keep using him in the MCU beyond a certain point. (Not sure what that point is, but it might be Infinity Wars.) So hold off on predicting anything about Spiderman. (I could be wrong. I do remember that Marvel could only use Spiderman once before the solo movie, which will be Civil War.)
View Recorder