Jonathan Majors GMA Interview Preview Faces Online Backlash: "It's Been Hard"

Jonathan Majors GMA Interview Preview Faces Online Backlash: "It's Been Hard"

A brief preview of Jonathan Majors' first interview since his assault conviction has been released, and to say it hasn't gone down very well would be quite the understatement...

By MarkCassidy - Jan 05, 2024 11:01 PM EST

We got word earlier this week that Jonathan Majors had scheduled his first interview since being found guilty last month of assault and harassment of ex-girlfriend Grace Jabbari, and a brief preview of the segment has now been released online.

The Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania and Loki star was found guilty of two misdemeanour counts of harassment and assault, as well as not guilty on two additional charges of intentional assault in the third degree and aggravated harassment in the second degree.

The video clip sees host Lindsey Davis ask Majors why he chose to break his silence when he did, and for his reaction to the verdict. The voiceover then reminds us that the Loki actor has been "convicted of assaulting his ex-girlfriend."

"It's been hard," Majors responds, as we see him wipe a tear away from his eye. Davis then asks, "do you think you'll ever work in Hollywood again?"

The clip has not gone over very well online (to say the least), with many wondering why anyone in a PR position still associated with Majors would give the go-ahead to release a snippet which is clearly attempting to garner a certain amount of sympathy for a convicted abuser. It would certainly seem like a misguided effort to sway public opinion in the actor's favour, but it is worth keeping in mind that the full interview might well tell a very different story.

The interview will air this Monday on GMA, then later on GMA3: What You Need To Know, with an extended version streaming on ABC News Live’s Prime with Linsey Davis that evening. IMPACT x Nightline will stream a half-hour special on Hulu on January 11th, which will include more unaired footage from the interview.

Check out the clip in the player below.

Majors is done as Kang (obviously), but there have been conflicting reports about Marvel's plans for the character, with the latest rumor claiming that the studio does intend to recast the villain (Colman Domingo was mentioned as a possible replacement).

As for the next Avengers movie, it's believed that The Kang Dynasty subtitle has been dropped (no surprise there), and the project is being referred to internally as "Avengers 5" for the time being. To what extent the current story will be altered remains to be seen, but Marvel revamping it as "Secret Wars Part 1" is sounding more and more likely.

Jeff Sneider has heard that "Secret Wars is basically shaping up to be a giant five-hour movie with a year-long intermission.”

As we know, Loki writer Michael Waldron was hired to pen a new draft, but reports indicate that the events of Loki season 2 are still going to inform the main plotline, which means Kang would remain on as a central character.

Will you be tuning in this Monday to find out what Majors has to say? Drop us a comment down below.

RUMOR: AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY Would Have Effectively Served As SHANG-CHI 2
Related:

RUMOR: AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY Would Have "Effectively Served" As SHANG-CHI 2

Simu Liu's SHANG-CHI Was Reportedly Going To Be A Major Focus Of AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY
Recommended For You:

Simu Liu's SHANG-CHI Was Reportedly Going To Be A Major Focus Of AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
DocSpock
DocSpock - 1/5/2024, 11:36 PM

Rich a$$hole with no self control. He deserves what he gets.

SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 1/6/2024, 8:35 AM
@DocSpock - It's an interesting approach because after the Chris Brown and Rihanna incident, Chris Brown did the same. Except he went into CNN with his lawyer to try to "clear his name". It did more damage than repair. Chris Brown is still blacklisted from many events and performances. The same will happen with Majors.
HulkisHoly
HulkisHoly - 1/6/2024, 10:14 AM
@SonOfAGif -

This all just reminds of something out of Bojack Horseman
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 1/6/2024, 12:29 PM
@DocSpock - Respectfully, I don't know if that's true. I think I got all the facts straight and it really just seems like she was the one that lost control and hurt her finger in the process. He was literally running away from her and she chased him. Even the jurors landed on a mixed verdict.

I've not been in this exact situation, but relationships can get heated like this. It's pretty normal for people to experience the very human emotion of anger. And unfortunately self control is hindered. But honestly, this didn't at all warrant Majors getting fired from Marvel Studios.

If there's something I've missed or overlooked let me know. But based on what I know this is my opinion on the matter.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/6/2024, 1:05 PM
@Tonic24k -
Retrotoneo
Retrotoneo - 1/6/2024, 2:33 PM
@DocSpock - Its not a good look to claim that person of color should have self-control. Especially when there is video evidence showing him trying to get away from a white woman trying to assault him.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 1/6/2024, 8:38 PM
@Retrotoneo - why does it matter what race they are?
levi3man
levi3man - 1/7/2024, 3:25 AM
@DocSpock - Im curious
1: What would you have done in the situation Majors was in which Grace Jabbari in that car.
2: What do you think happened considering you are saying he has "no self control"
levi3man
levi3man - 1/7/2024, 3:34 AM
@Ryguy88 - Because it appears that the police saw the situation as Big Black Man, little White girl on the floor of apartment, he must of beat her in there this morning or last night. Meanwhile, he was in his own Hotel room after the car altercation. She was out partying, went back to his apartment, passed out in closet. He came back in the morning to HIS apartment, couldn't get it, asked reception to help unlock door, saw Grace in a state, looked suicidal, He called police. Police arrested him based on what they saw in room. The car altercation the previous night was not on their mind but the court case then REACHED to the events of the previous night for charges, Different to the initial cause of arrest.

The Jury didnt believe Jabbari events but believed the eye witness that She was beating him. Also they say that as Majors was getting away he pushed her back into the car to get away from her. The pushing as you can see from the video was the "reckless assault" he ws trying to get away from her, she was beating him, ripped his jacket scratched him, and subsequently he ran many blocks to get away from her. Her finger: he snatched the phone back out of her hand. These are the events after watching the trial each day. Meanwhile @DocSpock would have you believe he just beat her to a pulp.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 1/7/2024, 8:17 AM
@levi3man - this incident plus all of the archived texts shows a pattern of abusive behavior. I'd wager a guess that they are both bad people and have done wrong, but that doesnt exonerate Majors.
Demigods
Demigods - 1/7/2024, 9:20 AM
@Ryguy88 - are you insinuating that rich people in Hollywood and disingenuous, terrible people?!? Sir, these are our lords and saviors that tell us what to believe and how to feel about things! They're infallible and we should all be more interested in their drama than anything else going on in the world, let alone our own backyard. We need to know the details about the abusive relationship between these two [frick]ing jerk off, self-important, [foo foo]s! That's what's important, is the theater surrounding people who's whole job it is to perform theatrics.
Retrotoneo
Retrotoneo - 1/7/2024, 5:03 PM
@Ryguy88 - I'm sorry, but that is most willful ignorant thing you could have possible said.
Retrotoneo
Retrotoneo - 1/7/2024, 5:04 PM
@Demigods - Right, because his celebrity that must means he can't be victim of racism. Sure, that make sense.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 1/7/2024, 7:37 PM
@Retrotoneo - you're delusional if you think his race is having a negative impact on this situation.

@Demigods - I just want them to sort this thing out so they can all get back to lecturing me in my free time.
Demigods
Demigods - 1/8/2024, 2:56 PM
@Retrotoneo - haha yeah, he was only convicted because racism. That's the only reason that a jury was unanimously convinced of his guilt. I'm sure there wasn't a single racially sympathetic soul on the jury made up of NYC denizens. It's ONLY because of his race. lol... [frick]ing clown world.

Dude, do me a favor and look up when the term "racism" spiked in the US news media, then tell me you're not falling victim to one of the best psyops in history.

For the record, I'm NOT saying that there's no such thing as racism, or that there aren't TONS of instances or racism that boot lickers on the right completely justify as "resisting," or some other horse shit. What I'm saying is that if you think that every instance of a black person being convicted is racism, you're an idiot.

His celebrity status insulates him from any REAL form of punishment, while he then talks about how hard it was.

Look, there's a part of me that feels for him. Honestly. If you're a celebrity, you're constantly under a microscope, and with cancel culture, one mistake ruins your life (unless that mistake is [frick]ing children, then you're fine and they're all too happy to look past it). At the same time, I hate Hollywood and almost every phony [frick] in that plastic bull shit town and business.

If you think a single soul involved in the decision making of show biz is a decent person, you're naive, at best. Never forget that Disney tried buying the rights to Die De Los Muertos when Coco came out... but then this shit company wants to virtue signal to us.
Demigods
Demigods - 1/8/2024, 3:00 PM
@Ryguy88 - exactly! I need our lords and saviors from entertainment to tell me that I'm a piece of shit for not car pooling to cut carbon emissions, because otherwise, they might not be able to fly private jets as much or sail their yachts around the mediterranean! And I need Disney to tell me that I'm a pos cultural appropriator, while they literally try to acquire the rights to Die De Los Muertos because they made a movie about it. Hopefully it all just goes under the rug soon, so we can add him back to the roster of celebrities telling us how to think.
AvalonX
AvalonX - 1/5/2024, 11:44 PM
He has the worst people behind him. Its a little soon for the apology tour.

Plus, hes a scum bag so theres that.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/5/2024, 11:48 PM
@AvalonX - while I disagree entirely with where you are apparently coming from, I DO agree with your 2nd sentence
Retrotoneo
Retrotoneo - 1/6/2024, 2:32 PM
@AvalonX - His scum bag who is shown running away from the situation.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 1/6/2024, 8:39 PM
@AvalonX - sounds more like an "I'm the real victim" tour.
AvalonX
AvalonX - 1/6/2024, 8:54 PM
@Ryguy88 - oh for sure. You can see the true believers on this board still defending him.
Vigor
Vigor - 1/6/2024, 12:50 AM
@THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - pretty clear here, he was destined for something.... greater

ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 1/6/2024, 5:02 AM
@THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - Looks very similar to the panel in which Molecule Man gets his powers and unleashes the Beyonder.


MadThanos
MadThanos - 1/6/2024, 5:24 AM
@THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - you know, seeing this gif gave some thoughts that their plan was to make this Kang variant the Beyonder.

Apophis71
Apophis71 - 1/6/2024, 6:06 AM
@MadThanos - Normal rule of thumb with CBM, no dead body shown, not dead esp when you consider that even Antman's first villain came back (even if seriously questionable what they did with him). Heck He Who Remains we did see his dead body and still reincarnated due to Wibbly wobbly, timey wimey stuff.
Oberlin4Prez
Oberlin4Prez - 1/6/2024, 8:30 AM
@MadThanos - if that ends up being the case id be shocked given how things in the current slate have been playing out. Doesn't feel like there's much of any plan.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 1/5/2024, 11:49 PM
Kang WILL NOT RETURN
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 1/5/2024, 11:51 PM
Man. This whole situation is just sad. Worse yet, this stuff is being blasted by the media online and on network tv. If the dude actually thought for himself he would have figured out doing an interview like this was foolish and only makes matters worse. He just should have gone silent for a while, let the public opinion ease up off him eventually, and THEN maybe do an interview or a small 'indie' film to start a comeback.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/6/2024, 12:21 AM
@lazlodaytona - you really haven’t seen the public response to this

If you were REALLY seriously interested, I would suggest perusing some of the more demographically modeled social pages on FB and TikTok because the undercurrent has been really nasty against the conviction

Iger, Feige, et al HAVE to be aware of this which leads me to believe that there is some sort of tacit soft collusion going on behind-the-scenes to try and smooth out the mess
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 1/6/2024, 2:45 AM
@lazlodaytona - Exactly! Going silent would be much better, an example of that being this guy, brother!

lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 1/6/2024, 5:39 AM
@TheOtherOn - "Whatch ya gonna do when you mess up and they're coming after you!"
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/6/2024, 7:58 AM
@TheOtherOn - ‘THAT guy’ also cashed out to the tune of something like 108mil AND managed to bankrupt ine of the most notorious snooper sites of that era (with some serious backing, of course)
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 1/9/2024, 2:13 PM
@SauronthePower - That's a separate discussion tho, his "win" over that site was for privacy reasons. He still got few years of "time served" in the court of public opinion and eventually got some of his fans and dignity back after showing clear remorse.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/9/2024, 4:42 PM
@TheOtherOn - agree
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/5/2024, 11:52 PM
Someone yesterday mentioned a suspicion that perhaps The Mouse is attempting to tow the Gunn Line with this

Then I started seeing the same sentiment on Deadline

This makes me suspicious because, in reality, Iger should have shut all this down due to ABC/GMA being owned under the mouse corporate umbrella. There is absolutely NO way that this is just a strange coincidence
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 1/6/2024, 2:03 AM
@SauronthePower

They fired him five minutes after the verdict. Hes not coming back as Kang. If anything maybe they’re trying to salvage Magazine Dreams.
MadThanos
MadThanos - 1/6/2024, 5:21 AM
@SauronthePower - I agree and the one insisting is probably Kevin Feige.

This man never let go his plans. He doesn't really like to give up on something.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 1/6/2024, 7:53 AM
@regularmovieguy - I would think Iger wants a clean split given the five minutes

Not sure if I see Majors as down to compromise with someone/something who publicly just piled on
bobevanz
bobevanz - 1/5/2024, 11:55 PM
This reminds me of the R Kelly interview lol I'm fighting for my [frick]ing life!
1 2 3 4

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder