AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Cost Around $450,000 A Day While Shooting...And Still Went Over Budget

AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Cost Around $450,000 A Day While Shooting...And Still Went Over Budget

Avengers: Infinity War directors Joe and Anthony Russo have revealed just how high day to day costs were on both this movie and Avengers 4 so get your calculators out because these movies cost a bomb.

By JoshWilding - May 06, 2018 01:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Avengers: Infinity War
A couple of years ago, we heard that Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers 4 had a combined budget of $1 billion. While we've since heard that the former cost Marvel Studios around $300 million to make (making it one of the most expensive movies of all-time), the Russo Brothers have revealed that the average cost of production on a day to day basis was upwards of $450,000 - enough to buy a house!

"The cast gets all of it," Joe said when talk turned to the budget in the video below. "We give most of it to Downey," Anthony added, poking fun at the huge sum Marvel Studios pays Robert Downey Jr. 

"It does break down that way where the cast does get a big percentage of it. These movies have been incredibly successful, there’s 18 of them, and typically as movies succeed, the cast can get more expensive," Joe went on to explain. "The VFX are incredibly expensive on a movie like this, well into the hundreds of millions. So between those two, those are the largest categories that take most of the money. Then there’s just the day-to-day running of a production that can be very expensive."
 
Both Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers 4, "shot for a year straight from January to January with about two weeks in-between," Joe said, revealing that it took "350, 400, 450,000 a day just to keep the production running." He then confirmed that they still ended up going over budget with Anthony admitting: "The irony is like no matter how much money you have, at some point you run out of money. So it’s pretty crazy." Joe adds that, "It really is like a sprint to the finish, these movies."
 
What did you think of Avengers: Infinity War? Was it worth the money? Share your thoughts below.

Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments
Related:

Marvel Fan Spots AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR VFX Blunder Which May Ruin One Of The Movie's Biggest Moments

AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Star Paul Bettany Shares A Shocking Revelation About The Vision's Death Scene
Recommended For You:

AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR Star Paul Bettany Shares A Shocking Revelation About The Vision's Death Scene

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Ineedrevelation
Ineedrevelation - 5/6/2018, 1:22 AM
Money well spent
OptimusGrime
OptimusGrime - 5/6/2018, 1:24 AM
Worth every penny
Luminus
Luminus - 5/6/2018, 1:28 AM
Idrisman
Idrisman - 5/6/2018, 1:31 AM
Should have spent more money on the visual effects. Thanos looked amazing but the vfx on the children of Thanos and Mark's face on the hulkbuster looked terrible.
JohnCastillo
JohnCastillo - 5/6/2018, 2:32 AM
@Idrisman - Not all the Children, Ebony Maw and the big guy looked good, the other two at times their cgi was weak, and yh Bruce in the Hulkbuster too. But I give it a 90% on CGI which is great for the amount of CGI the film had in it. Lets not forget Rocket and Groot who always look good. Thanos was stunning
willyburz
willyburz - 5/6/2018, 4:11 PM
@JohnCastillo - I thought they all looked great and creepy. People keep talking about Proxima, but I felt she looked great, and her movements were almost android like, and creepy. I had no problem with it at all, as she moved differently over all, and stayed consistent through the film.
JohnCastillo
JohnCastillo - 5/20/2018, 2:30 PM
@willyburz - That's interesting cause i found her weird movements to be dodgy cgi work and not cool creepy android look, considering she wasn't an android and all.
Mercwitham0uth
Mercwitham0uth - 5/6/2018, 1:32 AM
Jesus tap dancing Christ! Well they'll be making that money back no problem.
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 5/6/2018, 1:33 AM
so? the movie is printing its own money by this point. totally worth it.
Kevwebsz
Kevwebsz - 5/6/2018, 1:36 AM
Just seen it again. Weirdly the second time the audience felt more alive. Laughing more, cheering (no whistlers thank god), audible crying during deaths and especially during the end then round of applause. Can't believe part 4 is less than a year away.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 5/6/2018, 2:06 AM
I figured the cast would be expensive. Great to see such an ensemble cast and the crew pull it off. They deserve every penny they make. Might not be my favorite (marvel) movie in terms of story, characters, world and feelings, but it might be in terms of production
JosephCronos92
JosephCronos92 - 5/6/2018, 2:23 AM
Money well spent, i mean yeah there were a couple of Banner's floating head in Wakanda lol but i didn't give a shit at that point, everything else looked gorgeous and the story was visceral af so yeah, all good.

Thor's arrival was so atonishing, that momentum alone's worth the price jaja.
RedHood92
RedHood92 - 5/6/2018, 2:44 AM
Did you guys notice the reshoots. Captain Americas beard looked a little off when he was in Wakanda and of course Bruces floating head and the Hulkbusters heads up display. and I also watched a podcast on YouTube when talked about Infinity War and some dude said that they planned the reshoots because of Black Panthers success to add more T'challa and Wakanda. They didn't know Black Panthers success would be so big. This is just me nit-picking but it didn't pulled me out of the movie.
Kurne
Kurne - 5/6/2018, 2:51 AM
@Redhood92 - Cap's hair and beard look different in some parts, also T'Challa
s hair length.

Black Panther's success didn't change anything though. I remember when they were shooting this last year with the cast posting photos all over social media, I think it was like through April or May. Wakanda was always going to have its big role. It was featured in the very first trailer back at D23.
RedHood92
RedHood92 - 5/6/2018, 3:20 AM
@Kurne - that's good to know but some scenes like Captain America saying ready next to T'challa in the the trailer weren't in the movie. I know they cut it because of pacing, and also i read. one of the commenters here said that some scenes were for Avengers 4 like them running to the camera.
JustAChillFan
JustAChillFan - 5/6/2018, 7:03 AM
@Redhood92 - Reshoots for infinity war could not have happened after Black Panther came out, 2 months of shooting and then VFX is impossible for a movie this scale (just look at Justice League). If I recall Reshoots for infinity war happened around July and maybe went into October due to the massive cast.
Doop
Doop - 5/6/2018, 3:37 AM
Marvel really did a great job building up this movie with its other projects can’t believe they really figured out a formula that works
KWilly
KWilly - 5/6/2018, 4:24 AM
@Doop - Marvel is like Mr. Krabs with the secret formula. And DC is like Plankton hopelessly trying to steal it, and fails every time.
RedHood92
RedHood92 - 5/6/2018, 4:30 AM
@KWilly - WB/DC everytime Marvel wins big at the box office:

RolandD
RolandD - 5/6/2018, 6:52 AM
@Redhood92 -
@KWilly -
Thanks for restoring my faith in the comments pages. It’s not enough to celebrate the MCU’s success without a a DCU slam.
KWilly
KWilly - 5/6/2018, 7:23 AM
@RolandD -
RedHood92
RedHood92 - 5/6/2018, 7:53 AM
@RolandD - No problem my dude
RolandD
RolandD - 5/6/2018, 8:04 AM
@Redhood92 -
@KWilly -
Lol
Asturgis
Asturgis - 5/6/2018, 4:17 AM
That's actually not that much.

Let's say they weren't counting weekends in that equation, and take another 2 weeks off, that's roughly 280 days of shooting, so 280x450 (and they said it was between 350 and 450 so I'm rounding it up), which makes 126 million. Even if we counted a full year, 365x450 makes 164 million. That really doesn't sound like that much, that's less than Valerian or God knows what else.

Maybe that's just literal production cost, and there are other things to take into account? Because I would be surprised if that was the total budget. If so, that's a complete steal. I'm sure they made that back in presales and diffusion rights before the movie was even released.
SupermansTrunks
SupermansTrunks - 5/6/2018, 4:26 AM
@Asturgis - That would be on set production yeah
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 5/6/2018, 4:39 AM
Most of it went to RDJ?

Its funny because its true :D

billnye69
billnye69 - 5/6/2018, 4:51 AM
"no matter how much money you have, at some point you run out of money."

Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos disagree.
marvel72
marvel72 - 5/6/2018, 5:58 AM
Money we'll spent if you ask me.I enjoyed every bit of it.
TexasAvenger
TexasAvenger - 5/6/2018, 6:02 AM
This is just chump change when you make the best movie of all time.
TheOtherOn
TheOtherOn - 5/6/2018, 8:07 AM
@TexasAvenger - Congrats if this is the best movie of ALL TIME for you. What about other MCU movies came out before this? Were those also best of ALL TIME until then? I hope you won't change your opinion after watching upcoming MCU movies.....
TexasAvenger
TexasAvenger - 5/6/2018, 9:43 AM
@TheOtherOn - Me vale verga lo que digas. 😁
1 2
View Recorder