Tom Hiddleston Shares His Thoughts On New Director For THOR Sequel!

Tom Hiddleston Shares His Thoughts On New Director For THOR Sequel!

Talking more about Loki's role in Joss Whedon-directed comic book adaptation The Avengers, actor Tom Hiddleston also shares his thoughts on Patty Jenkins helming THOR sequel. Check it out...

By WolvieCBM - Oct 15, 2011 08:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Avengers
Source: strictlycinema.com



Now that Disney and Marvel Studios have finally revealed that Patty Jenkins will be directing THOR sequel, one of the actors who is already confirmed to reprise his role in the film is Tom Hiddleston, playing the God of Mischief. Talking to StrictlyCinema.com he shared his thoughts on the new director, plus talked a little bit more on Loki's role in Joss Whedon's The Avengers.

On Patty Jenkins directing THOR sequel, he said:

"[She is] an absolutely amazing director" and that 'Monster' is "one of my favorite films. I'm so excited that Marvel has given the reigns to a director who has such of an incredible grasp of story, performance and complexity. I think her handling of the characters and the arc of the story in 'Monster' and what the story is about on the whole is really, really fascinating. I'm sure it's going to take us on another adventure somewhere that's entertaining and funny in some capacity, and the fact that Patty is at the helm is really, really exciting."


THOR sequel will be released on November 15, 2013.


As for Loki in The Avengers, he added:

"It's a jealousy that is borne out of a spiritual leeriness and his sense of confusion as to where he belongs in this universe. In the absence of a place like Asgard, he misguidedly tries to form a community of his own. But given that he's a born prince and (ultimately becomes) a king, he decides that his community is going to be on Earth and he will rule the human race as their king. There's a degree of self-possession to his villainy. In 'Thor,' he was almost a reluctant bad guy. In this, he's knows he's the bad guy."


Starring Robert Downey, Jr., Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston, Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Samuel L. Jackson, Scarlett Johansson, Jeremy Renner and Cobie Smulders, The Avengers is set to hit theatres on May 4, 2012!


Continuing the epic big-screen adventures started in "Iron Man," "The Incredible Hulk," "Iron Man 2," "Thor," and "Captain America: The First Avenger," "Marvel’s The Avengers" is the super hero team up of a lifetime. When an unexpected enemy emerges that threatens global safety and security, Nick Fury, director of the international peacekeeping agency known as S.H.I.E.L.D., finds himself in need of a team to pull the world back from the brink of disaster.
Josh Brolin Talks Possible Thanos Return In AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY And Why He Doesn't Regret Saying No To LANTERNS
Related:

Josh Brolin Talks Possible Thanos Return In AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY And Why He Doesn't Regret Saying No To LANTERNS

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI Actress Tilly Norwood: It Has No Life Experience To Draw From
Recommended For You:

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI "Actress" Tilly Norwood: "It Has No Life Experience To Draw From"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
IDKwhatToChoose
IDKwhatToChoose - 10/15/2011, 8:52 PM
Great Actor
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 10/15/2011, 8:58 PM
IMO, the standout scenes for Loki in Thor were his emotional conversation with Odin and the scene in which he lied to Thor. Hiddleston did a great job with the vulnerability and the manipulative sides of the character. That said, I'm excited to see him go full on evil in this.
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 10/15/2011, 9:02 PM
Tom Hiddleston,Loki Thor,Avengers
Tom is the man!
Supes17
Supes17 - 10/15/2011, 9:05 PM
Wait, why was the other director replaced again?
DarrkEvil
DarrkEvil - 10/15/2011, 9:06 PM
@Budwulf
LIVIN LA VIDA LOKI...LOLZ !!! that's the best thing since the avengers trailer....
tazmaniak
tazmaniak - 10/15/2011, 9:08 PM
Am I the only person who wants to know how she got on Marvel's radar?I mean, she's a good director, but she directed 1 film 8 years ago.And in the last 8 years she's only directed 4 TV episodes.In the last 5 years, she's directed 1 TV episode and part of a movie anthology.

And add to that the fact that she's only done drama and comedy.No action, adventure, sci-fi or fantasy.

How does someone who hasn't made a film in 8 years and hasn't done anything resembling a comic book film land one of the most epic of superhero movies?

That's a huge leap in career and genre.She must have really impressed them.I just hope she doesn't get overwhelmed by the scale of this film, or worse, tone down the scale to something more manageable.
PartyHard
PartyHard - 10/15/2011, 9:13 PM
I'm glad they got an actor that understands the character so well.
IDKwhatToChoose
IDKwhatToChoose - 10/15/2011, 9:17 PM
@tazmaniak: solid points. But giving Marvel the benefit of doubt until they put out a movie like Green Lantern
Kayo
Kayo - 10/15/2011, 9:22 PM
can't wait to see this guy again on The Avengers.
Talontd
Talontd - 10/15/2011, 10:02 PM
@Supes17

He was never "replaced", he was only signed on for one film and optioned for two more. But let's be honest, THOR was good....even very good, but it certainly wasn't great. BRANNAGH handled the direction, actor delivery, scope, and comedic aspects brilliantly but he dropped the ball in a few areas. The character dev, relationship dev, pacing, action scenes, editing, and probably most profoundly, the score of the film could have been better.

Some of those are absolutely other peoples jobs, but ultimately.....he's the director and approved of it all.

I love THOR, it was very good....let's hope PATTY JENKINS can make THOR 2 great...
TayDee
TayDee - 10/15/2011, 10:20 PM
Loki shouldn't be in the sequel too much. Save the sequel for the enchantress and Skurge
headlopper
headlopper - 10/15/2011, 10:22 PM
Man , you can't ask these actors their opinions of other's involved in whatever project their in together; you know what the response is going to be!
"Oh, he/she is a wonderful actor- so AMAZING-!",or "...an incredible director, truly gifted!"
I mean asking these people what they think about crap their in is like asking a mother if she thinks her baby is ugly.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 10/15/2011, 10:34 PM
What I really liked about Thor was that it was really outside of the box. Not formulaic like Cap and even Iron Man. The love interest here is already obviously attracted to him, practically throwing herself at him in fact, and when she sees for certain that he isn't crazy - she is the possessive one. But what shined more than anything else was Loki, and that's all Tom Hiddleston. Let's hope we see more of him in the future.

You know what's funny? The "Howling Commandoes" were to be featured in Captain America, and in some part, sure, but Sif and the Warriors Three really took on that role. I'm wondering if the Howling Commandoes' role was reduced in favor of avoiding that same mechanic.

I'm not bashing any of the Marvel movies, I love em. I just really connected with Thor.
EarOne
EarOne - 10/15/2011, 11:11 PM
Tom Hiddleston, Hugo Weaving, Tim Roth and Mickey Rourke...will we see THEM assemble in The Avengers 2..??
RacerREX
RacerREX - 10/15/2011, 11:14 PM
@Tainted87 Wow, I must have seen a completely different movie! When exactly did Jane "practically throw herself at him"? The character Kat Denning played was thrown in for comic relief and to drool over Hemsworth's bod, not Natalie. Jane was too wrapped up in her science and discovering what was really going on to even think of any romance until almost the end of the movie. And that romance was formulaic and cliched. It was so ham-handedly forced on the audience at the last minute it seemed laughable. I enjoyed Thor too but I felt they handled that aspect of the film very badly. It was romance for the sake of having romance in the mix, and not led up to with any substance at all. The opposite approach would be how they handled it in Raimi's Spiderman. I am hoping for a better in Thor 2 with a Jane, Thor, Sif triangle, a midst the over the top action!
RacerREX
RacerREX - 10/15/2011, 11:16 PM
bring back the edit button people! sheesh!
Macksimus
Macksimus - 10/15/2011, 11:16 PM
...Hiddleston's Loki is one of the greatest comic book movie villains of all time. I'm glad we'll see more of him in the Avengers and Thor 2.
loki668
loki668 - 10/16/2011, 12:15 AM
I'm sure Lordbaphomet is the mightiest dungeon master in his mother's basement but his trolling wouldn't faze a three-year-old.

Having said that, I am curious to see how Patty Jenkins does with this advancement in her career. A good and solid movie will only help her career, while a shit film will curse her to direct a Green Lantern sequel.

Lord Loki has spoken
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 10/16/2011, 12:20 AM
@RacerREX
Point being, Jane is not a pursuit. She's very into him, from the beginning - at first because of his involvment with the "wormhole" which developed into "pretty sure I don't think you're THE one, but you're damn sexy".

Yeah I guess you're right, it was a teeny bit forced. But compare the love interests from Iron Man, Incredible Hulk, and Captain America... to Thor.

Pepper has had a lasting relationship with Tony that has flown over the professional borders, is given his approval to take charge and control of this relationship, and eventually gives him a smooch. I liken this to Moneypenny and Bond, only with the roles reversed. Pepper doesn't want to be Tony's mom.

Betty is a wreck. She's already involved with Bruce when he has the incident, and after he's forced to go into hiding, she supposedly moves on. To me, that's representative of either a sensible woman or a sociopath. Bruce comes back and she basically ditches her current boyfriend (the relationship is serious enough that they LIVE together!) to go help him maybe find a cure (but really just to catch up). How long would she manage on the run, I do wonder. And what happens if Leonard shows up with green hair?

Peggy has the benefit of knowing Steve before and after Operation Rebirth and sees him as a curious good-natured boy who WANTS to explore what he sees as manhood. After the vita-rays, Steve is able to do just that, and she is initially impressed. They would need to work on their communication a bit more considering how often one another ends up decidedly jealous. It's a shame she won't be around too much, as she was on the same level as Steve, and I think they could have had a relationship.

I like that Thor/Jane isn't a serious relationship. They care about each other, they're attracted to each other, and they seem to want something to be there, but it wouldn't be the end of the world to them if it didn't work out.
jazzman
jazzman - 10/16/2011, 3:30 AM
@tazmaniak

good question. but i also say Jon Favreau and Joss Whedon wasnt everyone cup of tea at first before Marvel sign them up to direct their movies.
marvel72
marvel72 - 10/16/2011, 4:21 AM
saw monster for the first time yesterday,very good movie i'm sure patty jenkins is the right choice.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 10/16/2011, 5:26 AM
@tamaniac Perhaps she got the job via the producers casting couch?? I have no idea but its rather strange putting a director with only 1 full film under belt in charge and a few talking head tv shows in charge of a and technically complex action film. Not that she can't do the job but she without a doubt has very little experience under her belt for a film like this. I will have to watch monster but even if its great Its still like giving a one film director the reigns to a James Bond film with a huge budget
tazmaniak
tazmaniak - 10/16/2011, 8:26 AM
@jazzman, that's true, but it wasn't due to lack of experience, it was because certain people didn't like them as creators or didn't have that much faith in them.

Joss Whedon has been at this for 15 years, writing and directing episodes of Buffy, Angel, Firefly and Dollhouse, not to mention he's directed Serenity, a sci-fi, action-adventure film.Add in his comic book work and he almost owns this genre.

And while Jon Favreau didn't have a lot of credits before Iron Man, he did direct Elf(a comedy) and Zathura(sci-fi/adventure) and that's what they made Iron Man into.A comedy-tinged sci-fi adventure film.

I'm remembering an interview where Ben Affleck spoke about directin Man of Steel or a movie like it.He said after only directing 2 dramas, he wasn't quite ready for it.He needed to get a few more under his belt first.But she appears to be ready.

I'm not that privvy to how studios go about picking directors.I mean, how do you know that director is right for that film?I can understand when a director has a list of credits similar to the film he's being approached for.You can see the type of work he's done in the past.You could look at Jurassic Park 3 or The Rocketeer and see that Joe Johnston could probably pull off Captain America.Or you have the directors that will film a proof of concept piece or a short like Robert Rodriguez did with Sin City or Joseph Kosinski did with Tron.

Her work shows that she can handle comedy and drama, but it doesn't show she can handle the other elements of the film.

I am looking forward to her take, though.
Bodwulf
Bodwulf - 10/16/2011, 8:57 AM
I would like to see loki in Thor two but where he has to help Thor, Sif, warriors 3, and Balder save the universe from Sutur!
Fogs
Fogs - 10/16/2011, 3:04 PM
^^ trudy - yea, now he'll try a comeback over my ownage over him on that robocop article... Talk about procrastination.
Joeline
Joeline - 10/16/2011, 4:15 PM
Im certianly not a fountain of facts here, but I was under the impression that Brannagh didnt continue his options becuase, like other Marvel directors, he balked and the limitations imposed on keeping the 'MCU links' in the movies.

@RacerREX
To be honest I totally agree. While I enjoyed Thor, i laughed at the forced, unbelievable love interest between Thor and Jane. It was lacking in emotion, passion and development. That said, I expect that relationship will be developed significantly more in Thor 2, and that may be why they have changed to Patty. The Thor/Jane relationship is a very important part of the Thor comics. Thor 1 was the Thor-Loki family breakup that layed the groundwork for Thor as a character and his involvement in Earth, so it would make sense to build on his 'Earth based' relationships in Thor 2.
Joeline
Joeline - 10/16/2011, 11:09 PM
@Bropous Seriously? She didnt even keep her eyes on him past till he walked up to her without his shirt on. She was more scientific 'you crazy but might help me' look. And honestly, Thor was about as interested in her as he would be in any wench that started throwing himself at him (he was and is def a bit of a womaniser, he's a viking god after all). I mean, besides a few eyes they started sharing after the whole 'laying next to each other under the stars thing' (which was corny btw) there was very little connection or emotion showed between them until the final scene when he 'died'.

Oh and I have to say, the 'idea' that you may be compatable and have chemestry is suddenly so powerful you will make promises and angst over not seeing each other again? They had what 2 days together tops?

Of course she starts getting soppy eye'd and all over him once he turns INTO A GOD!

Still, like i said, i think their relationship will be developed more in Thor 2.
Joeline
Joeline - 10/16/2011, 11:11 PM
ah BTW, is it really bad of me that i wanna say bad things to get them awesome little troll pics under my name? Sooooo not a deterent :p
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 10/16/2011, 11:39 PM
I understand what you're saying, but this is what I actually enjoyed about it. It was more of a fling than an actual romance. I don't think every superhero should have some ginormous commitment to a man or woman, if that were the case I think I'd lose interest fast. Being "in a relationship" shouldn't be something on a checklist of superhero requirements.

It's really why I didn't like Bruce/Betty in The Incredible Hulk. Betty, believe it or not, is NOT the great big staple of the Hulk mythos that she's made out to be. THAT was forced. Especially considering she was already with another guy, and Bruce wasn't particularly interested in getting back together - the whole idea of it "just happening" was unacceptable to me.

Look at Cap. We all anticipate the sequel chock-full of flashbacks, meaning Hayley Atwell would be reprising her role as Peggy. Considering how their would-be relationship is consumated by their kiss goodbye, the sequel isn't going to show much apart from eye-sex and flirtation. EVEN SO, how would you take Steve keeping a picture of Peggy with him during WWII flashbacks, while getting involved with Sharon in the modern era?

A love interest isn't needed. What I appreciated was the fact that Thor and Jane were NOT serious, and their "relationship" was not some prize. He charms his way in, rather than jumping to her rescue or proving heroic.

(And yes, she was ogling him.)
1 2
View Recorder