EDITORIAL: Evolution of A Character: Batman Villains in Film.

EDITORIAL: Evolution of A Character: Batman Villains in Film.

The Dark Knight Rises is soon to be released, so I have decided to do an article on the different portrayals of the villains, seen in the Tim Burton, Joel Schumacher and Christopher Nolan films.

Editorial Opinion
By Ashes2Phoenix - Apr 19, 2012 11:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman

The Dark Knight Rises, is one of the most anticipated films of the year. The hype surronding the film has not kicked into overdrive yet, so I thought it would be a good time to look back at some of the villains, that have been introduced in the Tim Burton, Joel Schumacher and Christopher Nolan films.

The Joker: Jack Nicholson



The first big screen debut for Batman came in 1989 and was directed by non other than, Tim Burton. The first villain Burton featured, was and still is one of Batman's most iconic and popular villains. The Joker. Jack Nicholson was cast to play the role and delivered a fantastic performance.

Nicholson's version of The Joker, was a wonder to watch and really made the character his own. The only criticism I have with his performance, is that, it felt like he was playing himself at times. Which, of course, many of you know is not necessarily a bad thing because he is a tremendously talented actor. In my view, he outperformed Michael Keaton and when I think of the film, his performance immediately springs to mind.
I watched the film only a couple of days ago and his performance as a whole has held up well. It doesn't feel outdated and can still be easily enjoyed by all viewers.

The Joker: Heath Ledger



When Heath Ledger was announced to perform, the role of The Joker, it was met with mixed reactions. Some believed this was a terrible casting choice and the movie would fail because of it. Little did they know, that this would be one of his last performances on film and would turn out to be one of his best. To put it bluntly, he knocked it out of the park.

This Joker was considerably different to Jack's. He was brutal, thug-ish and calculated. You were always wondering, what card would be hidden up his sleeve next?

What made this version of The Joker so mesmerising, was Heath's performance. Earlier I stated that Jack Nicholson felt like he was playing himself times, with Heath this was simply not the case. If I had not been told it was him behind that make up, chances are I wouldn't of known, he was that good. He completely embodied the role and in my opinion, may have given one of the best performances I have seen on film, during the noughties.




Catwoman: Michelle Pfieffer



In 1992, Batman Returns, the sequel to Batman 89 was released, with Michelle Pfieffer playing Catwoman. What can I say, this was possibly one of the most sexiest incarnations of the character to date. Mix tight leather, with a sassy attitude, sprinkle in some sexual provocation and you have accomplished every fanboy's dreams.

Pfieffer is another example of making the role her own. At times it was very hard to tell, if it was still her behind that getup. You could tell that she put a great deal of work into the character. I wonder whether she studied the movements of cats because her body language was spot on. She will certainly be a hard act to follow, when it comes to portraying Catwoman because she "nailed" it.

Catwoman: Anne Hathaway



There has been some real skepticism being throw around, in regards, to Anne Hathaway taking on the role, as Catwoman. I personally think this is very similar to the doubts being hurled at Heath Ledger, when he was announced to play the role of The Joker.

I think she will do a fine job, with the character. If this article is anything to go by, it is becoming increasingly apparent that each actor has given their own take, on their respective characters. Her costume is not as stylised as Pfieffers was but it fits into the Nolanverse nicely, in my opinion. It looks more grounded then I would have liked but I have faith, she will bring her own take on the character.

I am curious to see, what kind of role this version of Catwoman will play. What I have gathered from the promo stills and trailer, is that, she appears to have that thief quality that Catwoman is well known for. Although it seems more toned down, then in previous incarnations. In the trailer she is trying on a pearl necklace, which I think we can safely assume is not hers. I think the way she steals will be very similar to the way Cameron Diaz character does, in Gangs of New York. Also going back to the pearl necklace, is it possible that it is Bruce's mothers ? I will leave that for you to decide.




Two Face: Tommy Lee Jones



In 1995, Joel Schumacher replaced Tim Burton as director of the Batman series. With this came an abundance of changes. Gotham was no longer a gothic dark place, like depicted in Burton's first, two films. Instead it was replaced with neon lights and flamboyant set pieces. These however, were not the only changes. The characters themselves had undergone, some pretty wild redesigns, which I am sure many of you know and speak about, even to this day(bat nipples).

Of course like any new movie, naturally new villains were introduced. Two Face, who was portrayed by Tommy Lee Jones, was one of them. To be honest, I wasn't a very big fan of this portrayal at all. It seemed like he was trying to replicate, what Jack Nicholson did with The Joker. It would have been fine, if, Two Face was similar to the character but he isn't. Two Face, in my opinion, is a tortured soul. He was once a district attorney, that had been corrupted due to his brutal disfigurement. He is a divided individual and I don't think they portrayed this quality as well as it could have been.

Two Face: Aaron Eckhart



This has to be my favourite portrayal of Two Face to date. I think what worked out so well in this film, was, that we spent some time with Harvey Dent. The build up of the character was great. Hats off to Christopher Nolan for managing to keep, Harvey Dent's transformation, into, Two Face under wraps. I thought it would possibly be a cliffhanger at the end but I did not anticipate Two Face would actually make an appearance.

This is the way, I wanted Two Face to be portrayed. He was emotionally tortured and unstable making the character, extremely unpredictable. Aaron Eckhart, was a great choice because when he shouts, he has that ability to make the viewer feel the anger raging inside him. The actual design, is very reminiscent of Batman TAS and I thought they really out did themselves with it. What a great surprise it was.

The only complaint I have, is, I wish we could have spent more time with the character. He wasn't given quite as much screen time, once he becomes Two Face. A small gripe, I know but I have always liked Two Face as a villain and felt they could have filled out this side of his character, a bit more.




Bane: Jeep Swenson


Well what can I say? This was by far one of the worst portrayals of Bane I have ever seen. There is literally no substance to this character. This interpretation was extremely disrespectful to the fans, in my view. They made him a simpleton, when Bane in the comics, is meant to be both a physical and mental challenge for Batman.

What made things even worse, was the fact, his character was reduced to nothing more than a body guard for Poison Ivy. Whilst he does look similar to his comic book counterpart, that is the only thing that makes him identifiable as Bane. One of the worst villains portrayed in a Batman film? Most definitely.


Bane: Tom Hardy


Just a couple of years ago, it was announced that Tom Hardy would play Bane, the main villain of The Dark knight Rises. For me, this pumped my excitement to the max. I have been following Hardy's career for quite a while now and I am very confident he will do a great job, portraying this character. He was fantastic in Warrior and I am certain we can expect great things from this actor.

Now, what is quite different, is the way in which, Nolan has decided to depict this character. Instead of the traditional mask he has gone with a mask that helps him survive. Some people are not a fan of this change but I think it looks excellent. It makes him look intimidating and threatening. The intensity in Hardy's eyes, make it pretty clear this is someone you don't want to mess with.

Hopefully, this time Bane will be given the justice he deserves. By what I have seen in the prologue it appears they are doing just that. This is certainly not the Bane who was featured in Batman and Robin. This Bane is a mastermind. I know many people are not a fan of the voice but i think it really fits this character. I am very curious to see more of this character and if he is done right in this movie, I can see him becoming a classic.

There you have it folks ! Hope you enjoyed it and comment below, to let me know, which is your favourite Batman villain in films to date?
Brandon Sklenar Comments Again On BATMAN And Reveals His Favorite Bat Actor
Related:

Brandon Sklenar Comments Again On BATMAN And Reveals His Favorite Bat Actor

LILO & STITCH Remake Gets An Expanded Runtime As Fun New TV Spot Reveals Jumba And Pleakley
Recommended For You:

LILO & STITCH Remake Gets An Expanded Runtime As Fun New TV Spot Reveals Jumba And Pleakley

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

headlopper
headlopper - 4/19/2012, 11:42 AM
Boom!



Under-rated performance IMO.
Thanos005
Thanos005 - 4/19/2012, 11:45 AM
I think this article is a bit too early. We have no idea exactly how Selina Kyle and Bane will be portrayed yet. We have hope and ideas, but still don't know for sure. Great comparisons between other characters though.

While I'm excited for TDKR, I am not a fan of Catwoman or Banes design. I think the actors are good, but Bane doesn't look like Bane, he reminds me more of Mr. Freeze, relying on his own personal life support 24/7 basically. And Catwoman looks like the Catwoman from the 60s, which wasn't bad for back then, but that was 50 years ago. Updating a 50 year old costume just feels weird. But we will see what happens. Good article.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 4/19/2012, 11:54 AM
@headlooper. Yes, he is actually one of my favourite villains in the Nolanverse. The only reason I didn't add him is because he hasn't featured in any other live adaptions. Definitely under-rated though, Ciliian Murphy is a great actor !

@Thanos005. With the portrayals of Bane and Catwoman, I was only going with what I have seen thus far. I am glad you enjoyed the article buddy !
Irons
Irons - 4/19/2012, 12:34 PM
I agree with your minor complaint about Two Face. Nolan approaching each of the films as its own entity so far has obviously worked phenomenally, but it didn't allow for him to include Harvey Dent in Batman Begins. I think it would have been even better if we got to see him develop over more than one film.
Supes17
Supes17 - 4/19/2012, 1:25 PM
Yes I also agree. Harvey Dent would have been an excellent addition to Batman Begins, which would have made his fall and disfiguration more tragic to the audience.

However, Nolan was not planning on making a sequel to Batman Begins, and I highly doubt he had ANY idea of how big this franchise was going to become.
LoudNoises
LoudNoises - 4/19/2012, 2:08 PM
I kind of think that given the setup of Harvey Dent in TDK, that having him running around killing people for too long in the film would not feel right for his character. After all, he isn't a villain in this movie, he is "The White Knight". We are supposed to believe that Harvey was this great man who had everything he loved and believed in destroyed in an instant which sends him into a complete frenzy. Harvey had no intention of living which makes sense because he felt he had nothing left to live for, he just wanted revenge on the people that betrayed him. From the moment he wakes up in the hospital and realizes what happened, his downward spiral begins and his death is inevitable. If he spent half the movie as two-face I would keep thinking, this guy is going to come to his senses sooner or later and realize what he has done and he would end up killing himself anyways. For these reasons I just didn't think there was much room to expand on his alter ego Two Face in this movie.

@Ashes2Phoenix- Great Article by the way, good read!
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 4/19/2012, 2:40 PM
The only thing I didn't like about the Nolan movies is killing off Two Face because I want to see more of him.
blvdnoise
blvdnoise - 4/20/2012, 5:30 AM
@LOUDNOISES Precisely!
SpiderFan35
SpiderFan35 - 4/20/2012, 11:45 AM
@Thanos: I agree, I don't understand comparing things in movies that have not even come out yet. There is another recent article about the Spider-man movies comparing Raimi's movies to TASM, not sure how that is even possible yet.

While I appreciate the work that goes into these comparison articles I don't really see the point in listing facts that everyone on this site already knows. If an article is not going to educate or at least offer some very intersting and unique viewpoints or analysis, why should we read it?

@Ashes2phoenix: Not trying to be a dick, just offering my opinion. If I can offer some grammatical constructive criticism for the future, you need to learn the proper use of the comma.

http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/commas.asp



SpiderFan35
SpiderFan35 - 4/20/2012, 4:01 PM
@nowtheresaBATman: And I see that you have provided some potentially useful criticism or thoughts on the article for the author? Oh sorry no, you are just being a juvenile f*ckwad attacking my comments in some lame passive- agressive attempt to look like you are a nicer guy than me, instead of having the balls to actually say something of any substance. Well done.

That was trying to be a dick.



Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 4/20/2012, 4:31 PM
@SpiderFan35: I completely agree with you on my use of the comma. They definitely need some work, so thank you for posting the link!

In regards, to the article. I did it because I thought it would be a fun read and to give people a trip down memory lane at the same time. It was a look at the evolution of these villains on film. Now I know the film hasn't come out yet but there is enough to go by, in my opinion. I don't know the full personalities of the likes of Bane and Catwoman, so at the moment it is merely my speculation. The comparisons are more to do with looks with those particular characters than anything.

Finally, I would like to say that I take all criticism onboard. As I said, I am glad you mentioned my usage of commas because I would have continued doing it if no one had told me. Criticism is how we grow as an individual.
buttercup
buttercup - 4/21/2012, 5:31 AM
Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman > every other incarnation. Her work in that movie and my general preference for Michael Keaton as Batman means that "Batman Returns" is still my favorite Bat-movie.
SpiderFan35
SpiderFan35 - 4/23/2012, 10:44 AM
Ashes2Phoenix: Well said bud, you are a class act. I look forward to your next article.
View Recorder