Why Fellow User TChalla Needs To Relax About The BLACK PANTHER Movie

Why Fellow User TChalla Needs To Relax About The BLACK PANTHER Movie

Earlier today, fellow CBM user TChalla posted an article expressing his concerns for Black Panther's relevancy in the MCU. Hit the jump for why we can lay these concerns to rest!

Editorial Opinion
By GliderMan - Mar 12, 2015 11:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Black Panther

First off I want to make clear this is not a jab at TChalla. The article in question already had so many comments, and I didn't want my thoughts to be lost amongst everyone else's, as it would take considerable time to piece my argument together. TChalla is an excellent article writer and I thoroughly enjoy every thing the dude publishes here. With that made clear, let's get started!

November 3, 2017... ah, what could have been, am I right? After years of fans screaming for a Black Panther film, Kevin Feige and co. announced that we would be getting this film about a year and a half after his first appearance in Captain America: Civil War. While it was never explicitly stated, it was strongly hinted that ol' Black Panther would be taking the place of Spider-Man, being torn between the two opposing sides (as well as the nation of Wakanda playing a large role in it's revelation to the world).

This raised several expectations among the CBM community. As TChalla said himself:

You know... It just made me ask myself. "Is the Black Panther film really important to the Marvel Cinematic Universe?" Now here me out, the way Phase 3 was set up, Kevin Feige said that,"something I already showed you today contains an Easter egg that leads directly into Black Panther. He’s a bit of a prince, he may even become a bit of a king, but it’s all about how this isolationist country meets the world. Maybe it goes well, maybe it doesn't." That sounds like whatever happened in Civil War was gonna go straight into the Black Panther film! Then at that, the film was gonna take us RIGHT into Infinity War!


While this is all a logical argument, I don't think it's cause for worry. I too was aggrivated in finding out that several Phase 3 movies would be pushed back, and I still don't see why they don't release the Spider-Man movie in April 2017 rather than July. But let's back track a little bit and look at some other information.

Way back when, when the Sony Hack was still delivering all the goods, a bit of information spilled out about where Marvel would take Spider-Man. nailbiter111 had this to report:

If the deal goes through and Marvel gains control of Spider-Man they don't want Spidey's next solo film to be a continuation of the Captain America: Civil War plot just because he would be making a cameo in it. But, Spidey's new universe would "exist in a world where that story has happened" and "superheroes are now divided into two groups."


This quote indicates in a Spider-Man solo film, taking place after the events of Captain America: Civil War, there are STILL two opposing parties of superheroes. When Avengers: Infinity War opens up in theaters, the Superhero Civil War will still be going on--in some form or fashion, at least. I'd guess this would be the back-end of it, a "final battle" or something like that. This makes a lot of sense, as Age of Ultron is supposed to set up Civil War while still being relevant to the Avengers series itself.

With Avengers: Infinity War being a two-part film, there's absolutley no telling what's going to happen there. What kind of a cliffhanger will it leave? How much time will last? Just because Black Panther is now being released between the two movies doesn't decrease the character's relevancy. 

Here's what I'm trying to say: With every give, there is also take. The only downside to what's going down here is that now we'll have to wait that much longer to explore Black Panther. I'd bet that, due to Spider-Man's debut, Black Panther's role in Captain America: Civil War will be significantly less than it would have been. I doubt either character will take up too much of the movie, but without the Sony deal--yes, we would be getting more Black Panther, and we'd be getting him sooner. But because the Superhero Civil War will have a lasting effect beyond Cap 3, we will still be able to see the Black Panther movie deal with all the things Feige originally talked about: "He's a bit of a prince, he may even become a bit of a king, but it's all about how this isolationsit country meets the world. Maybe it goes well, maybe it doesn't."
The opportunity to tell this story doesn't change with the release date. While we have to wait a few months longer, we'll still be able to see this story, and watch it tie into Thanos and whatever the [frick] that big guy is up to.

Well guys, I hope this helped rather than confused. Do you think we should just wait and see, or is there's more to be worried about? Let me know what you think in the comment section below!

GLADIATOR II Star Denzel Washington Confirms He'll Star In BLACK PANTHER 3 After Ryan Coogler Wrote Him A Role
Related:

GLADIATOR II Star Denzel Washington Confirms He'll Star In BLACK PANTHER 3 After Ryan Coogler Wrote Him A Role

BLACK PANTHER Star Lupita Nyong'o Says Black Doesn’t Sell Myth Had Marvel Shaking In Their Boots
Recommended For You:

BLACK PANTHER Star Lupita Nyong'o Says "Black Doesn’t Sell" Myth Had Marvel "Shaking In Their Boots"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DannRamm113
DannRamm113 - 3/12/2015, 12:04 PM
An article about @TChalla before an article about Dexter, or any of his MANY alias? Damn.
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 3/12/2015, 12:07 PM
Lol'd at the title. Good job.
Pasto
Pasto - 3/12/2015, 12:08 PM
If anyone deserves an article telling them to chill, it's Dexter.
neihofft
neihofft - 3/12/2015, 12:26 PM
Remember this is about the guy who thinks Black Panther is going to be the best comic book movie ever and best movie in general because it has a black hero "who is better than Batman" because thats relevant.
Kintama
Kintama - 3/12/2015, 12:41 PM
@GliderMan

let him have his opinion, no need to write a whole article about how you think he is wrong.
Verzwei
Verzwei - 3/12/2015, 12:44 PM
Wannabe
Wannabe - 3/12/2015, 4:32 PM
I need to get in on this. People should be enraged.
kong
kong - 3/12/2015, 4:57 PM
I think it's pointless to get mad about stuff we don't know. We don't even OFFICIALLY know that Spidey will be in Civil War, so don't get a pack of twisted panties up your ass about something that's not even confirmed.

Oh and @TChalla, stop making all these 3 paragraph articles. Well written, but there's no need. If you spaced these out people will start calling you "Editorial King" and won't say that you're over-saturating the editorial section more than Marvel Studios and WB/DC are the film industry.

MyNameIsKhan
MyNameIsKhan - 3/12/2015, 5:35 PM
@Kong Round of applause. lol
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 3/12/2015, 6:05 PM
Ok, first, I think we got a partial answer as to why Spiderman isn't coming out in April 2017, but is waiting till July. Star Wars Episode VIII comes out in May 2017, which, considering Disney owns both, probably means GotG2 may move to late March/early April.

I was upset about the announcement for many reasons. Mainly, I think Spiderman is an overrated character and I'm tired of him. And I think general audiences are too. I still wish Marvel had just bought the rights and then shelved him till Phase 4. That would've given him at least a 6-7 yr break, which I think is needed. I don't like the idea of him being in Civil War, because I worry about him taking attention away from Stark and Rogers, and I still hope that it's either a cameo or an extremely limited role. Plus, it pushed back the Capt. Marvel film, which is the movie I'm most looking forward to after Civil War.

As to some of your other points, I think many place way too much stock in the Sony emails. Those emails are from months ago, a lot could have changed by now. So we may not have as divided a world as some of them suggested. My personal guess is that at the end of Civil War the registration act will be repealed, and there won't really be a "war" going on anymore. But, there will be hard feelings, and there might be 2 teams, the Avengers with Cap in charge and maybe a reincorporated Shield with Stark in charge. And part of the early portion of Infinity War will be overcoming those bad feelings to work together again. But, this is a total guess.

As for Black Panther, I don't think his role will be reduced that much in Civil War. Marvel made too big a deal of introducing Chadwick and saying he would have to choose. I would guess that he'll appear briefly in the first part of Infinity War, along with a post-credit scene leading into his movie. Not sure how that would work though. We'll just have to wait and see.
ClumsyToaster
ClumsyToaster - 3/16/2015, 1:49 PM
This article is dumb. Keep your arguments in the comments section and out of editorials.
View Recorder