BLACK WIDOW: The Reason For Disney's Uncivil Response To Scarlett Johansson's Lawsuit May Have Come To Light

BLACK WIDOW: The Reason For Disney's Uncivil Response To Scarlett Johansson's Lawsuit May Have Come To Light

Scarlett Johansson was said to be "shocked" by the response to her recent Black Widow lawsuit, and a new report may have shed some light on what led to Disney's rather pointed statement...

By MarkCassidy - Aug 18, 2021 01:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Black Widow

Scarlett Johansson was reportedly far from impressed by Disney's response to her recent lawsuit, and the reason for the Mouse House's rather pointed statement may have now come to light.

As we reported at the time, the Black Widow star decided to take legal action against the Walt Disney Co., alleging that her contract was breached when the Marvel Studios movie was released on Disney+ and in theaters simultaneously. Disney's response called the filing "sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic."

According to Johansson's representatives, the Avengers: Endgame star was "shocked" by Disney's statement, and Variety has now implied that the tone of the response might have something to do with the fact that Disney was "not given the courtesy of a heads-up that a legal complaint was coming." 

The respondent is not necessarily entitled to a warning that the claim is coming, of course, but Disney higher-ups may simply have been taken aback after their longstanding professional relationship with the actress. At any rate, this entire situation has understandably resulted in a lot of bad blood between both parties.

Marvel's Kevin Feige was also said to be "angry and embarrassed" by Disney's handling of the lawsuit, and Johansson's agent and CAA co-chairman Bryan Lourd has since released a statement of his own, hitting back at the Mouse House for "shamelessly and falsely accusing Ms. Johansson of being insensitive to the global COVID pandemic, in an attempt to make her appear to be someone they and I know she isn't."

"The company included her salary in their press statement in an attempt to weaponize her success as an artist and businesswoman, as if that were something she should be ashamed of," Lourd continued, adding that the lawsuit was filed as "a result of Disney’s decision to knowingly violate Scarlett's contract."

What do you guys make of this latest development? Drop us a comment down below.

BLACK WIDOW Star Scarlett Johansson Regrets Not Exploring More Of The Avenger's History With Hawkeye
Related:

BLACK WIDOW Star Scarlett Johansson Regrets Not Exploring More Of The Avenger's History With Hawkeye

BLACK WIDOW: Saoirse Ronan Addresses Yelena Belova Casting Rumors And Whether She'd Like To Join The MCU
Recommended For You:

BLACK WIDOW: Saoirse Ronan Addresses Yelena Belova Casting Rumors And Whether She'd Like To Join The MCU

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
FoiledCranium
FoiledCranium - 8/18/2021, 1:20 PM
Give her what she's owed. She put in the time and energy.

Disney knew damn well what they were doing.
PhoenixBlade
PhoenixBlade - 8/18/2021, 1:53 PM
@FoiledCranium - She signed a contract that stated she’d get a percentage of the box office. Disney are upholding their side of the contract. The contract doesn’t state that the film would be exclusively released in theatres. So legally speaking there’s no breach of contract. Morally speaking, Disney should pay up, but law isn’t morals. Law is language.
WeAreDenim
WeAreDenim - 8/18/2021, 2:37 PM
I’m team ScarJo
Tasmaniac
Tasmaniac - 8/18/2021, 2:39 PM
@SamaelSaint - Reportedly her contract stated exactly that. That’s the reason for the lawsuit.
Fogs
Fogs - 8/18/2021, 2:45 PM
@WeAreDenim

I'm team Screw Them Both Greedy Bastards.
Fogs
Fogs - 8/18/2021, 2:46 PM
Yest I'm more like @SamaelSaint's saying. If the contract was honored there's nothing else to say.
abd00bie
abd00bie - 8/18/2021, 3:38 PM
@WeAreDenim - I'm team me, give me the money instead
Itwasme
Itwasme - 8/18/2021, 3:47 PM
@SamaelSaint - she was paid. Disney included streaming in the BO numbers, so she was paid for that.

So the only question is if this broke the contract or not, which none of us have seen so we don't know.
Itwasme
Itwasme - 8/18/2021, 4:11 PM
@FoiledCranium - she was paid, they included streaming in the BO calculation.
Pigdango
Pigdango - 8/18/2021, 4:22 PM
@SamaelSaint - I haven't seen the contract, but I would imagine it probably does state that the film would be exclusively released in theaters. Otherwise, Disney's response would have been "read your own contract, dummy" instead of "She's insensitive because Covid."
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/18/2021, 4:41 PM
@FoiledCranium - As far as we know the contract promised a theatre release and a certain percentage of the profit. And as far as we know, that's what she got. We have no idea about the exact wording in the contract regarding streaming. That is a complete assumption on your part because you prefer that story, but it is equally likely that Disney is in teh right and Johansson is the greedy one trying to abuse the pandemic for money that she, the richest actress in Hollywood, certainly doesn't need.

I would love to know why everyone here just pretends to already know who is in the right. You literally can't.
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/18/2021, 4:48 PM
@WeAreDenim - Why the [frick] do we have teams? Both sides here are uber rich people and trying to win by throwing mud at the other side. Neither is the underdog. Neither has any moral high ground. It's on the justice system to figure out who is in the right, not ours.

This is not a sport. It's the law. You don't root for a team, you root for justice. None of us know what the just thing is here and it's honestly a super weird thing to get emotionally invested in.
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/18/2021, 4:49 PM
@Tasmaniac - Neither of you know the contract. Of course she thinks she is in the right. So does Disney. You can't just listen to what one side says, believe it and then speak your verdict. That's not how justice works.

Drace24
Drace24 - 8/18/2021, 4:50 PM
@Itwasme - Finally someone with a brain.
LSHF
LSHF - 8/18/2021, 4:57 PM
@Fogs - "I'm team Screw Them Both Greedy Bastards."

I'm team Not Without Their Consent.
dragon316
dragon316 - 8/18/2021, 5:05 PM
@FoiledCranium - don’t bet on it Disney won lawsuit against Japan with kombat white lion rip off don’t expect her get what she deserves
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 8/18/2021, 6:37 PM
@SamaelSaint - 100% correct.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 8/18/2021, 6:39 PM
@Pigdango - Apparently the contract does not say exclusive release in theaters. I read her complaint, and nowhere does it quote language in the contract about exclusivity. Rather, the complaint explains what the industry standard is. But the four corners of the contract will decide, not what the industry standard is.
WeAreDenim
WeAreDenim - 8/18/2021, 8:25 PM
Drace24 - I’m not emotionally invested. I’m just pulling for ScarJo to get a big pay day 💰. Have a coke and a smile and.. well, you know…


SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 8/18/2021, 11:40 PM
@Drace24 - lawyers and agency reps would not risk burning a bridge as large as Disney over that kind of false dealing. She would have been advised against it sheerly to protect their own skin in the game.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 8/19/2021, 12:03 AM
@FoiledCranium - seeing a lot of new and unfamiliar Usernames in this discussion all coincidentally defending the company.

Methinks there is some nefarious planting afoot here from Team Chapek.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 8/19/2021, 12:07 AM
@FoiledCranium - to be clear, obviously not directed at you but definitely directed at a few who have responded to you
Tasmaniac
Tasmaniac - 8/19/2021, 3:08 AM
@Drace24 - Oohh shut up, you pompous windbag. It’s a comments section. Get over yourself.
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/19/2021, 5:01 AM
@SauronthePower - ...Oh, honey. This is the exact kind of thing that celebrity lawyers like to do. Because there is a lot of money and reputation in there for them. They don't actually give a shit about their client's careers. As I keep saying: Everyone involved in this story is [frick]ing rich. There is no underdog, noone has the moral highground and noone deserves or requires your support.
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/19/2021, 5:02 AM
@Tasmaniac - By all means, continue talking bullshit then if its so important to you.
Fogs
Fogs - 8/19/2021, 7:51 AM
@LSHF - lol!
The1st
The1st - 8/19/2021, 8:48 AM
@FoiledCranium - This hasn't been spun as a gender issue has it? I just wonder if this happens to one of their male actors. It reeks of them thinking they could "get away with it".
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 8/20/2021, 8:07 AM
@Drace24 - @Drace24 - How cute. A prognosticator who fancies self intelligence. Every post critical of Johansson and praiseworthy of Team Chapek. Planters Gonna Plant.
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/20/2021, 8:50 AM
@SauronthePower - I don't know why you are calling me a prognosticator or a planter. Seems kinda random in this context. But I'm neutral on this. It's just that the entire discourse surrounding this is strange. Starting with the fact there are "teams" forming, which is utterly ridiculous. And so many people here make really biased and ill-informed arguments on behalf of Johansson and I'm allergic to bullshit, what can I say.
VictorAlonzo
VictorAlonzo - 8/20/2021, 9:28 AM
@Drace24 - 🎯
Bluesman
Bluesman - 8/18/2021, 1:26 PM
Well I'm not surprised by all this but I wish Scarlett the best and hope she succeed. If not, what can you do...?
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 8/18/2021, 1:27 PM
Incoming cringe from Roodi and TyrantWorkerMedia 😬
DTor91
DTor91 - 8/18/2021, 1:34 PM
@regularmovieguy - A whole dissertation no one will waste their time reading from the latter.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/18/2021, 1:27 PM
Shake the mouse upside down, they can afford it. She'll be alright, already cast in Wes Anderson's next movie lol
Drace24
Drace24 - 8/18/2021, 4:37 PM
@bobevanz - Yeah, because the richest actress in Hollywood is fighting for her existance here.
VictorAlonzo
VictorAlonzo - 8/20/2021, 9:38 AM
@Drace24 - right. 20 million and you are complaining. X-23 kicked more ass in one film than she did in seven. The sobering truth: you allowed your figure to get you paid. You stood next to characters that were far more interesting and rode the greatest 🌊 in cinematic history. Take the WIN and make peace with the legendary status gained.
1 2 3 4
View Recorder