The Relevance of Lesser Heroes

The Relevance of Lesser Heroes

With so many heroes appearing in CBMs, only some of them will be fleshed out. Other characters are only there for show. Is it important to have characters appear just for fanservice? (Avengers: AOU SPOILERS)

Editorial Opinion
By Bakersfield - Jun 11, 2015 02:06 PM EST

Dignity is defined as "the state or quality of being worthy of honor or respect."

  Many of the Marvel cinematic characters have earned the respect of audiences. When we look at the increasing number of films, they hold a gravitas. Iron Man went through personal trials and growth to earn where he stands in this universe. Captain America fought nazis and has been fighting for truth and justice. Even Hawkeye has done his part to try to save the world [all with a baby on the way]. But what exactly has Falcon done? How quick are we to accept Scarlet Witch because she had a sob story and her brother died? Does that really absolve her of her crimes as a member of HYDRA?

  I really think Marvel (and fans) should look a little deeper into the relevance of the lesser heroes. Sure, this is a world that is quickly filling with remarkable individuals. Even more surely, we understand that they don't necessarily have the time to flesh out every new character that comes along or we'd need ten extra films or tv shows just to explain every character's rhyme or reasons. It just takes away from the experience to create characters that are hollow or expendable.


  For example, Quicksilver is introduced into the MCU and killed in the same film. That doesn't show us that the Avengers face any real trouble, it only sparks the advent of redshirts within this series. The original team might get beat up, bruised, or run away like Banner---"I didn't run away, Lana! I'm an adult, I left."---but they'll be okay. Or so it seems, unless Captain America: Civil War changes all of that. If he is killed in this film, it will allow the lesser heroes to step up and fill higher roles. And if he doesn't die, we still have the opportunity to allow other characters to play larger parts. Characters like Falcon, Black Widow, Hawkeye, Scarlet Witch and Vision all have a chance to really define themselves here.

  The Winter Soldier already has earned his place. In the first Captain America film, we see the Steve respects Bucky and looks up to him. It's the friendship with Bucky that inspires Cap to do what he does. And we actually get to see all of this in action. But Falcon is essentially just a guy who says "Yeah, I'll help". We know almost nothing about him. What drives him? Why should we care? What connection does he have to the comics? We don't know. We shouldn't. And he doesn't. Comics are not film. This is a whole new universe and the characters have new motivations and new reasons to do what they do.

Every single one of those questions leads me to what I'm worried about most: Spider-Man.

He has no gravitas in this universe of films. None of the main characters know who he is and if Nick Fury references the Ultimate Comics or introduces him in some sort of way that implies he's been looking into him, we still have no background for this universe. In that way the character has earned no dignity or respect from the other characters or this world. The audience is left to take in whatever exposition that Sony and Marvel want to throw our way. And that's the other issue with this character..Sony owns him. See, the deal, from what has been explained, is that Marvel can use the character and that he does officially exist in the MCU, but he's still Sony's and under their direction.

Can he really have that big of an impact on this story or these other characters when he's a rental? It was a big enough deal just to get him to appear and be a part of this world, let alone to heavily influence the ongoings. It is the opinion of this writer that Spider-Man will not play as heavily a role in this film as many fans would like. I think they're going to end up replacing Spider-Man's role in the story with Black Panther's. Why? As I have said, comics spidey is not movie Spidey. And in this MCU why should we care about this particular 16 year old in tights and who he sides with?

Why should we be invested in a mind controlling witch that was willing to side with nazis and world ending robots just to kill Stark? At the end of the day what will become of the naive Jesus-esque robot and why does it matter since he's technically not real (even in this fantasy world)? Black Widow is canonically 26, sterile, and has no super powers, what more does this character have to offer in a world where most of her team can fly or shoot lasers?

I'm not bashing these characters, films or the concept. I'm asking fans to just demand a bit more. And for the studio to try just a little bit harder. Batman and the Joker are game changers. It's funny because DC knows that. The introduction of those characters will drown out everything else. If Marvel isn't careful, they will lose what they have built to a killing joke.
SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: Tom Holland Credits Robert Downey Jr. For Stopping His CIVIL WAR Scenes From Being Cut Down

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR And TFATWS Actor Daniel Brühl Is Very Confident Zemo Will Return To The MCU
Recommended For You:

CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR And TFATWS Actor Daniel Brühl Is "Very Confident" Zemo Will Return To The MCU

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

pesmerga44
pesmerga44 - 6/11/2015, 2:18 PM
Sorry I really do believe the story we have been given that Sony still has creative control of Spider-man is a whole bunch of bullshit. I believe Marvel and Disney are throwing Sony a bone to save them what ever little face they have left to let the public think they have any control at all. Sony as an overall company is doing terribly they have lost all but three of their companies Playstation, Pictures, and a company that makes a specific part for Iphone. Now with the hacking scandal Sony Pictures is not doing well. Sony had no real control in that situation and they were the ones crawling to Marvel and Disney to make a deal.
sikwon
sikwon - 6/12/2015, 6:07 AM
The one character you should be worried he least about is Spiderman. And how many movies can really take the time to flesh out every single character, for you to care about every single character. Big or small? They simply cant.
HulkOnion
HulkOnion - 6/13/2015, 11:15 AM
I think audiences have had spiderman fleshed out enough for them


Doesn't matter if it's a new universe
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 6/14/2015, 6:28 PM
Ok, sorry, but most of this is just stupid, and frankly kind of all over the place. First of all, Scarlet Witch never sided with Nazis. By the time of these movies, Hydra has almost nothing in common with Nazis except wanting to control the world. Heck, Red Skull basically broke with Hitler in TFA. Scarlet Witch sides with Hydra because they are Stark's enemy, and she has good reasons for hating him. Even Capt. America understands her motivations for being experimented on. She views her country as being at war. As for siding with Ultron, she only does so when she believes he wants to just kill the Avengers. The moment she discovers his true intentions, and realizes that the Avengers truly do try to protect the innocent, she switches sides.

As for the other characters you mentioned, yes they do bring stuff to the table. Frankly, after Cap, Black Widow and Scarlet Witch are my 2 favorite characters (oh, and Black Widow is in her early 30s. She was born in 1984. And exactly what relevance does her sterility have on her bringing something to the team?)

I'm not even entirely sure what the point of this was, unless you just think that characters shouldn't be included unless they're really important and are given lots of development. I frankly hate fan service, and I don't view any of these characters as fan service (except maybe having Falcon at the party.) They are all important, and yes they do all bring something to the table. And they are being developed, just more slowly over several movies instead of all at once. If you care about them, then don't watch.

A couple of more things. As far as Spiderman goes, I hope you're right. I don't want him to have much more than a cameo in Civil War, and I hope he never has as much relevance in the MCU as other characters. Seeing him every now and then is fine, but I don't want him overshadowing Cap or Thor or any of the other Avengers. And finally, you seem to be one of these fanboys who think that if a character is killed in the comics, he has to be killed in the movies. That is just stupid. The last thing I want to see is the death of Capt. America or the death of Superman. And I don't want to see the killing joke either. If they want to establish that Jason Todd has already been killed that's fine, but I am strongly opposed to killing off major heroes. I don't think kids should see that, and I think there would be a huge backlash from general audiences. Faking a death is one thing, actually killing someone is different.
Lhornbk
Lhornbk - 6/14/2015, 6:30 PM
Oops, I meant if you don't care about them, don't watch.
View Recorder