Ror Reviews: Catwoman #1

Ror Reviews: Catwoman #1

Blood and boobs, but is there brains too? This issue has caused a bit of a stir so I decided to make it this week's New 52 review. Click to see if I think the controversy is justified..

Review Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Sep 22, 2011 04:09 PM EST
Filed Under: DC Comics

Ah Selina Kyle, the bane of many a young fanboy's sock drawer. As Josh details in his article below, Catwoman #1 has stirred up a bit of controversy. Basically some critics and even a handful of fans are upset at the amount of gratuitous semi nudity and sexual content. Yeah, very upsetting! Having read a few reviews online and deciding that many of them haven't got a clue what the Hell they are talking about I decided to give you guys my take on this first issue by Judd Winick and Guillem March.





I understand a comic, movie, anything drawing criticism for being overly violent or sexual IF the other aspects are not up to scratch. Obviously in those cases the sex and violence is there purely to compensate for having a rubbish story etc. But I really think that is an unfair assessment of Judd Winick's Catwoman. First of all, it's Catwoman we are talking about. If you open a Catwoman comic and don't expect a bit of raunch then I don't know what to tell you. That is part of the character. But what is also a part of Catwoman is her intelligence, wit, and propensity for extreme violence bordering on insanity. Guess what? We get all that too.

This first story arc begins with a bunch of thugs torching Selina Kyle's apartment. She goes to her friend (also her "fence") Lola's where she picks up a new place to crash and a job while she's at it. This takes her to a local nightclub to spy on some Russian mobsters. She poses at the bargirl and listens in on their conversations (she speaks Russian unbeknownst to them). Then she recognizes one of them as a man she believed to be locked away for a brutal crime committed right in from of her eyes as a child. Needless to say justice is dealt. But when Catwoman returns to her digs a familiar face is waiting.

As I'm sure you are aware that familiar face is Batman and they screw each other's brains out. Not in any kind of graphic detail of course, it's merely implied. But we do get a few T n A shots..indeed we do right through the issue. Is there too much? Maybe a bit, I suppose it does get a little over the top and the last couple of panels really are just there to titillate but so what? If you are reading through this issue and those panels make you put down the comic in disgust I think you flat out just need to lighten up and stop taking things so seriously. Obviously if the next issue is just more of the same then that is one thing but I'm at least willing to see where it goes. The fact that Winick also gives Catwoman some great dialog and we are always invested in the story means that it's all part and parcel of Catwomam using her ample charms to her own advantage. Also the art by Guillem March is top notch, at times even stunning.

This isn't a GREAT issue by any means but it is a lot better than many reviewers have given it credit for simply because they were turned off by it's more graphic content. When there is substance there too, albeit not a lot of it, that has to be taken into consideration. If you are looking for a fun, decently written, good looking, funny, sexy comic then pick it up. It's Catwoman. It does exactly what it says on the tin.






By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com



DC Comics Rumored To Relaunch BATMAN And SUPERMAN In 2025 As First Look At BATMAN: HUSH 2 Is Revealed
Related:

DC Comics Rumored To Relaunch BATMAN And SUPERMAN In 2025 As First Look At BATMAN: HUSH 2 Is Revealed

BLACK CANARY: BEST OF THE BEST Interview: Tom King & Ryan Sook Discuss Their WWE-Inspired Comic (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

BLACK CANARY: BEST OF THE BEST Interview: Tom King & Ryan Sook Discuss Their WWE-Inspired Comic (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Speedy
Speedy - 9/22/2011, 4:38 PM
Thank you for giving it a fair review, and not saying "minor sex scene... in a kids comics!!! Oh the horror".

Glad to see someone else on here realizes that 2010's comics are not for kids. 60s or 70's comics, sure, but not modern comics. No sir.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 9/22/2011, 4:43 PM
It's rated T+, which means older teenager. If parents are buying, or shops are selling the comic to children then that's their problem.
scmittydude
scmittydude - 9/22/2011, 4:44 PM
i only go pick stuff up once a month so the only DC stuff i've picked up were this, batman and suicide squad. i liked all of em. i thought this issue was cute. it's certainly not for kids, but it's not pornography either.
scmittydude
scmittydude - 9/22/2011, 4:45 PM
those were the only things left. i was looking forward to red lantern but i'll wait for a second printing. my shop was selling it for ten bucks...so that ain't gonna happen
JackJNapier
JackJNapier - 9/22/2011, 4:46 PM
i totaly disagree with this review, this issue was shit. I love Winicks writing, but this wasn't good.
Jordanstine
Jordanstine - 9/22/2011, 4:46 PM
From another board:

"Finally, DC is getting tired of being the family friendly WCW of the 90's and are going for the WWE Attitude Era!"

OdinsBeard
OdinsBeard - 9/22/2011, 4:49 PM
always love me a Ror article. one of the good ones.
DrCKasady
DrCKasady - 9/22/2011, 5:01 PM
good review. better than the other one for sure. im sick of people watering down things for the youth. most of the worlds greatest kids stories started at blood and violence.
CaptainAmerica1945
CaptainAmerica1945 - 9/22/2011, 5:16 PM
Hey this is DC's way of being Hip and Trendy. Some will be offended and others may like it.

Since I fall into the first category, I would suggest you do what I will do, and not buy the comic. If enough of us do this, DC will get the message.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 9/22/2011, 5:28 PM
Yeahhh, it says T+ on the cover. So again, it IS the responsibility of the parent and the retailer to be aware of that before they sell/buy. It's like anything..computer games, movies..some are going to have sex and violence and not be suitable for kids. Are we supposed to bad the items just because some idiot parent buys them for their children? Also, there isn't anything shocking in this comic at all, just a few slightly over teh top shots of Catwoman's T n A , CLOTHED.
OtakuPapi
OtakuPapi - 9/22/2011, 5:35 PM
Bring On The Realism Loving The New 52
TheBlitzkrieg
TheBlitzkrieg - 9/22/2011, 5:37 PM
@Kevberg

"Last time I checked, there's NOTHING on the books that say for what ages."

Wrong, mein freund. Not ALL comics have them but MANY do actually have a rating near the barcode of the book that explicitly states what the rating of the book is. Most these days are rated T for teen because the superhero audience, at least in comic books, is no longer kids.

I remember being 7 and trying to swipe images of Spidey comics during the Carnage saga and even when I DID manage to get my hands on the book, all I saw were images but I wasn't able to process the information given like I can now. What difference does it make? Do we seriously have to live in such a sheltered society that kids can't get a small glimpse under the curtain? They're not going to understand. I mean seriously, Animainiacs and Batman TAS were not entirely made for kids, ESPECIALLY the latter, kids just happened to be part of the audience. There was blood (though not to any excess), violence, the concept of death, and even sexual undercurrents. You're beating a dead horse trying to make comic book writers change their opinions on a website because you probably won't.

That being said, would I give this comic to a kid? GOD no, but at the same time I wouldn't give my kids ANY comic books. Most can barely read and with ADD being all over the place, they're just going to look at the pictures, try to read, and then give up on it. If that be the case, we got film and television. If they continue to love comics to where they can read just fine and understand everything then I'll give it to them because EVERYONE KNOWS THIS IS JUST FANTASY AND CAN NEVER HAPPEN. Once more I was 7 and knew there was no chance in hell superheroes could be real. Unless you were criminally insane or just plain stupid.
SwingsetKnight
SwingsetKnight - 9/22/2011, 5:40 PM
Liked the comic. It wasn't legendary, but as a guy who's actually a fan of Catwoman purely for her attitude (yes, we do exist), it had some great lines. Particularly the talk between Lola and Selina. It was witty, impulsive, fast-paced, a little brash: all the things I read Catwoman for.

Now I'll admit plot was a weak point, but it's the first issue. Characterization and art were great.

So there you go, squawking parents. If you've given this comic to your 8-year-old, rest assured that behind the boobs lurks some more or less decent writing, imho.

Although I'm not really sure how anyone can be pissed about Catwoman's premiere next to nympho Starfire.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 9/22/2011, 5:47 PM
Kevberg, this is kinda a pointless argument because you haven't even read the issue. Don't you think it might help if you did? And I never said it was anyone's "fault", there is nothing to take any blame for here! If someone is offended by this it's there own problem. As I said, there isn't anything that shocking. That is down to personal opinion but it is a fact that kids will have seen much worse than anything that appears in that comic on daytime tv.

Even if you want to take a blame stance, who would YOU blame? DC? For making a comic with a bit of a more adult twist? Please.
One2three
One2three - 9/22/2011, 6:03 PM
@kevberg
You are definately a prime example of a ultra conservative narrow minded prude. Why don't you go live on an omish farm. There you wont find any big bad mean dc or sex. Theres absolutely nothing wrong with humans expressing love, compassion and intimacy, especially in a comic strip. A reader will take much more of a positive feeling on humanity from that, as apposed to violence. Considering how very minor this is, wow. Its backwards thinkers like yourself that stunts the progression of society.
TequilaMan
TequilaMan - 9/22/2011, 6:25 PM
Thanks to your review I think I'll be picking up Catwoman #1
Blagyver
Blagyver - 9/22/2011, 6:26 PM
That people on this site are openly saying that this is okay is disgusting.

Let's break this down:
What bugs people isn't that Batman and Catwoman had sex. What bugs people is how tastelessly it's handled. It IS possible to make sex in comics tasteful. Look at Watchmen. Look at, as referenced in the ComicsAlliance article that's been going around, the Black Cat issue of Spiderman where they have sex.

This is a disgusting drawing. This isn't there to further the story, it isn't there to give character development. It's here to look "sexy"...but it doesn't. It's awkward, gross, and in poor taste.

And let's be clear: I'm no prude. Hell, I watched porn earlier today. What's so disgusting about this isn't that Batman and Catwoman had sex, it's how tastelessly it is handled.
myconius
myconius - 9/22/2011, 6:32 PM
besides Batman #1 ...... this was the comic i had the MOST fun reading!!!!

it was a GAS!!!!!!!!


so outrageous!!! it was perfect!!!
myconius
myconius - 9/22/2011, 6:37 PM
anyone who says Catwoman should not have her own comic???

i say ............too bad! she has before, and she always will!!!

long live the Gotham City Siren Felonious Feline!!!
One2three
One2three - 9/22/2011, 6:38 PM
@kevberg
Nice rebuttle... Didn't expect much better from someone whos so blindly ultra conservative or didn't read my post.

@blagyver
How is this distasteful? They need each other, they expressed that, they have desires like humans do, no crude dialogue, no nudity, they shared intimacy and affection.

I'm tired of argueing with prudes, how is this wrong, I do not get it. This is probably the most healthy thing for a anyone to see in a comic than steady violence?? Whatever, I'm done.
Blagyver
Blagyver - 9/22/2011, 6:39 PM
@One2ephu

I hate sounding like a broken record, but read this article. It is worth your time.

http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/09/22/starfire-catwoman-sex-superheroine/

Blagyver
Blagyver - 9/22/2011, 6:40 PM
And I'm personally sick of anybody having an issue with this being labelled a prude. There's a difference between being a prude and wanting a touch of class where it's expected.
WakeUp
WakeUp - 9/22/2011, 6:47 PM
out of all the new #1s Suicide Squad #1 is probably the only one that made me want to keep reading the series.
One2three
One2three - 9/22/2011, 6:47 PM
@blagyver
I'm not even gonna waste my time reading someone else's rubbish. I have a very positive and expressive outlook on life and humanity that cant be caged be someones restricting pushy restrictive outlook. I have a girlfriend here and shes actually intrigued by the romantic outlook and dialogue between the two. This is life, on paper.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 9/22/2011, 6:49 PM
Ok, Blagyver the problem is you didn't just say that you had an issue with this, what you said was it was "disgusting" and so was anyone that thought it was ok. Umm, yes that is a little prudish my friend, not to mention reactionary. Please explain to me how some drawings of clothed characters being intimate..no bad language, no full nudity, no actual sexual contact aside from lips and hands..is disgusting? Are the pics there to get attention? Of course they are! You can do both and still tell a decent story which this issue did. Wait..you did read the issue right?
One2three
One2three - 9/22/2011, 6:49 PM
@kevberg
Clever, your intelligence dwindles on every post!
Blagyver
Blagyver - 9/22/2011, 7:00 PM
@Ror I'll admit upfront that it was a knee-jerk reaction to say that. I just feel like....put it like this. It's a recurring theme in the new 52: Powergirl. Formerly relatively strong female character that managed to be strong despite her physical appearance. Now she's Mr. Terrific's sex buddy (and personally, I think she could do better than Mr. Terrific. What the hell?) Starfire. Formerly a well-developed character that had very defined views on physical and emotional relationships. Now she's an emotionless sex tool.

And as far as Catwoman...I won't say much besides the fact that I think you missed what was going on in the pelvic area. That's pretty clearly penetration. As far as nudity, look at the first two pages of the comic. There's no nudity, no. But the first two pages, we literally do not see her face once. Just her boobs and her ass once.

Between this and having hardly any female creators on staff anymore (while Rob Liefeld is given a new series)....

I apologize for the aggressive aspect of of what I wrote earlier and I'd like to debate this intelligently. I personally have an issue with the way that these superheroines are being depicted right now.

@One I'm done. Having a positive outlook has nothing to do with it. If calling out DC on what comes across as straight up degrading women makes me a depressive bore, I'll put on a Morissey album right now.

@WakeUp Sidenote: Agree in full. That issue was an absolute blast.
1 2
View Recorder