Is Brett Ratner bound for the Daredevil Reboot?

Is Brett Ratner bound for the Daredevil Reboot?

When the story broke on Wednesday that David Slade was leaving the reboot of Fox's failing Daredevil franchise, the news was greeted by comic fans with a grain of salt.

Editorial Opinion
By AwesomePromoz - Jul 13, 2012 09:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil
Source: Deadline

When the story broke on Wednesday that David Slade was leaving the reboot of Fox's failing Daredevil franchise, the news was greeted by comic fans with a grain of salt. Fox are under a time constraint to get this movie into production, apparently by this autumn, or they risk losing the rights to Daredevil back to Disney's Marvel Studios division.

Fox seems to be scrambling to sign up a gifted director who can work with an already existing script and get the film into production immediately. Now, this is where it gets scary: I can think of at least two precedent setting incidents, one under the Fox umbrella, where a last minute production had to be whipped up.

The first was the infamous, yet now beloved, Fantastic Four film produced and directed by Roger Corman in 1994. Corman's film was never intended to be released, but just filmed and kept on a shelf to retain the property rights until a Fantastic Four film could be produced that did the property justice. It has since made the rounds at conventions and on the internet on bootleg VHS, DVD, and on file sharing sites. In the meantime, New Horizons studio let the property rights lapse and fall into the hands of Fox Studios. The rest is history; a FF film and sequel were released to decent box office results, despite loathsome script and casting errors, causing much pain for Marvel comics and movie fans. Now this series is being rebooted by Fox under the artistic guidance of Chronicle's Josh Trank, which at least gives fans some solace that these beloved characters will be treated with respect this time around.

Accompanying the news that their Fantastic Four production had found its director, Fox released word that their Daredevil reboot had lost their helmer to the NBC network, and their new TV production of Hannibal, the Thomas Harris killer/cannibal property. Rumors are circulating that Fox is happy with their Daredevil script, but the studio has just 2-3 months to get a director, budget, locations, and cast & crew hired to get rolling! Not to mention that Fox has set a precedent of these situations before, including their currently-lensing Wolverine production that lost Oscar-winner Darren Aronovsky, and their abominable X-Men: The Last Stand, where critically respected Matthew Vaughn left, refusing to work under time-constraints, and was replaced by hired gun Brett Ratner, most famous for his Rush Hour series of Chris Tucker starrers.



You can see now why I'm a tad reticent about this director situation... Fox has shown a track record of rushing their films into production without a properly developed script. They are also famous for playing fast and loose with Marvel continuity (Dr. Doom's origin, Havoc is Cyclops' dad, etc.) and, worst of all, they have a history of hiring Brett Ratner.

"No, they wouldn't do that!" you protest, but do an IMDb search and have a look at Ratner's production schedule: his movie Rogue is completed, and his Untitled Farrelly/Wessler Comedy is in post-production, leaving him open for all of 2013! I'm thinking it looks not only possible, but probable, that his name is bandying around the Fox Movies office as of this moment!

With the production is such disarray as it is, I don't really understand why Fox is persisting in retaining intellectual properties that they neither respect nor understand! X-Men First Class was their best offering to date, despite running roughshod over comics continuity, and it didn't even make back its production budget domestically. Daredevil 2003 made a profit but it was reviled. If the film starts before the end of this year as expected, then the earliest it could be released
is Christmas 2013 where it would be demolished by The Hobbit, or in spring 2014 when it will come head-to-head with Marvel Studios' Captain America 2 juggernaut.

Fox needs to let this go. They seem to be attached to these properties, wishing to either recapture the success of X2, or emulate Marvel's The Avengers phenomenon, which is not just due to their careful construction of a shared cinematic universe, but to the massive conglomeration of A-list star power that the film possessed, and the vision carried forth by the auteur-like control of Joss Whedon.

It's not going to work Fox. If the Daredevil reboot script was any good, then no filmmaker would let it escape them to do TV. Why can't this studio respect the nigh-sacred inseparability of the script and director? The writer writes, but the director brings it to life and this process is an intrinsic necessity!

I promise you that no Oscar winning director in modern times has worked as a gun for hire, nor any that respects the material they generate. Maybe Fox needs to focus on just one Marvel property; they got off to a decent start with First Class. If they give Whedon-like control to Trank, then maybe they can handle two franchises (as long as they don't botch Dr. Doom's origin again) but they need to recognize that this Daredevil reboot is a stunt they can't survive!
DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Said To Be As Problematic And Scary As The World Of GAME OF THRONES
Related:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Said To Be As "Problematic And Scary As The World Of GAME OF THRONES"

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN & IRONHEART Trailers Screen At Disney Upfronts - Here's A Breakdown Of What Was Shown
Recommended For You:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN & IRONHEART Trailers Screen At Disney Upfronts - Here's A Breakdown Of What Was Shown

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/13/2012, 9:51 PM
So um, just exactly when was it that the Fantastic Four movie became "beloved"? I must have missed the memo that day....
Jaywing
Jaywing - 7/13/2012, 10:07 PM
Haha my thoughts exactly CORNDOGBURGLAR. I don't care which studio does daredevil... Just do it right. One of my favorite marvel characters. Michael C. Hall is my dream choice for the role
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 7/13/2012, 11:34 PM
@Comdog - I'm invoking editorial license here, thanks!

@Jaywing - I read some musings on Michael C. Hall on another article, and I do like the suggestion. He might be too old though? What about Aaron Paul?
Jaywing
Jaywing - 7/13/2012, 11:38 PM
Aaron Paul is a brilliant actor. I think he would make an incredible comic book character on screen!. Excellent suggestion!
BANE5000
BANE5000 - 7/14/2012, 2:21 AM
When all else fails, hand it over to Brett " Douchebag King " Ratner

CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 7/14/2012, 4:55 AM
@ jollem

Is that a joke?
jessepostal
jessepostal - 7/14/2012, 6:36 AM
@jollem, I got your back bud, I never understood the hype of x2 and didn't get the hate of x3, actually I think I've watched x3 the most.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/14/2012, 7:17 AM
Ratner could have done SO MUCH worse on X3. He was hired last minute to direct a movie he had no control over, with a crew who thankfully accepted him with open arms, but come on, cut the guy some slack.

It would be different if he wrote the script and was part of the production from the very start - then I would be less forgiving.

I think most people hate it because Dark Phoenix was underdeveloped, as were the rest of the Brotherhood mutants. I didn't see it 4 times in theaters like I did with X2, but I think it's pretty awesome nonetheless.

---

While I completely disagree with Fox's methods of getting things "done", and likely they don't care too much about Daredevil as evidenced by all the behind-the-scenes footage on the DVD and the whole entirety of Elektra.... 20th Century Fox should fundamentally keep the rights.

Or some other studio that isn't Marvel/Disney, preferably one that cares. That's not to say Marvel/Disney doesn't care - they've proven otherwise. But consider the volume. In 2008 and 2011, there were 2 Marvel movies, while this year, there was the Avengers, Ghost Rider, and Spider-man.

If Marvel had the rights to every character, not every character would see the light of day. They are too busy, and operate on a budget like everyone else. Suppose that Marvel/Disney bought Spider-man - would we ever see the Hulk again? It pays to be selective.
Ghostt
Ghostt - 7/14/2012, 7:19 AM
I heard rumors about this unusual phenomenon in which some people enjoyed X3 better than X2, but I did not think it was true. very strange indeed.

Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/17/2012, 6:37 AM
@SotoJuiceMan
First, he's not exactly blind, and second, that was the least of the movie's problems. The studio was NOT behind the film in the first place, and Mark Steven Johnson had to repeatedly defend the character's existence. In the behind the scenes footage, MSJ is repeatedly denouncing Fox for screwing with the project.

The tragedy is that the director's cut was SO very close to getting Daredevil right - and it went into some seriously dark territory. It just needed focus, and to NOT have Elektra there at all.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/17/2012, 11:41 AM
I'm not saying MSJ is a great director, and no matter what I say in his defense, I HATED Ghost Rider - and that's from someone who never read a Ghost Rider comic.

I just think someone who stands before a board of laughing executives and make an effort to prove them wrong about the character is someone worthy of respect. I actually liked Daredevil, and yes, I have read the comics. They wrote Elektra in the style of Echo, even gave her a similar costume. That was the producers, not MSJ, who clearly didn't care too much about the character to make her likeable enough.

Anyway, I don't want MSJ to go back to Daredevil. I want Charlie Huston to write the script and then chain Danny Boyle to the director's chair.
View Recorder