Dwarfs, No More! SNOW WHITE Makes Some Huge, Likely Controversial Changes To The Classic Cartoon - SPOILERS

Dwarfs, No More! SNOW WHITE Makes Some Huge, Likely Controversial Changes To The Classic Cartoon - SPOILERS

Snow White has been a source of controversy for some time, but putting the politics to one side for a moment, that's likely to pale in comparison to the backlash these changes to the 1937 movie will cause.

By JoshWilding - Mar 21, 2025 11:03 AM EST
Filed Under: Disney
Source: Toonado.com

Taking aside all of the supposed controversies surrounding Snow White, many Disney fans are unhappy with the movie starring Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot not because of politics or skin colour, but what appears to be a series of sweeping changes from the original 1937 cartoon. 

Leading up to the movie's release, it was reported that the Seven Dwarfs had been completely scrapped to instead focus on a group of "politically correct" Bandits (they were supposedly later added in reshoots, explaining what some have described as nightmare-inducing CGI).

Zegler's comments comparing the original Prince being a "stalker" also raised eyebrows, but just how extensive are the changes?

Disney has come under fire for making shot-for-shot remakes of its animated catalogue of titles but as soon as they start shaking things up, the backlash comes quickly and is always very loud. 

As we first explained on Toonado.com, Marc Webb's remake makes many changes, starting with the origin of Snow White's name. No longer given that moniker for being born with skin "white as snow," this version of the Disney Princess was instead born during a snowstorm. 

As expected, The Prince - who only played a small side role in the original movie and was never given an actual name - has been ditched in favour of Jonathan, a thief who is revealed to be an actor leading a struggling group of his fellow artists through a tough world. The romance is still there and he's given more to do. 

The Seven Dwarfs are not "dwarfs" (or little people) but a race of fantasy creatures who live for centuries. They also have magic powers, primarily used to help them find valuable jewels. Dopey, meanwhile, can talk now and narrates the final act. 

The death of the Evil Queen is also different. In place of a lightning strike that sends her plummeting to her death, she dies after shattering the Magic Mirror and turns to dust before seemingly being dragged into it. That's just one of many changes to the final act as events are shifted around in a bid to tell a better story. 

Rather than the Evil Queen dying before Snow White is awoken with "true love's kiss," this movie has a whole final battle after that and a confrontation between the movie's lead and its villain. Snow White is then named ruler of the kingdom. 

Songs are also switched up and, while most of the classics are in there, the movie is ultimately a very different beast when compared to its animated predecessor. For better or worse, but perhaps the latter based on reviews

Snow White is a live-action musical reimagining of the classic 1937 film. The magical music adventure journeys back to the timeless story with beloved characters Bashful, Doc, Dopey, Grumpy, Happy, Sleepy, and Sneezy.

The movie is directed by Marc Webb and produced by Marc Platt and Jared LeBoff, with Callum McDougall serving as executive producer, and features all-new original songs from Benj Pasek and Justin Paul.

Disney's Snow White opens exclusively in theaters March 21, 2025. 

SNOW WHITE May Fail To Hit $100 Million At Domestic Box Office After Disasterous 60% Drop
Related:

SNOW WHITE May Fail To Hit $100 Million At Domestic Box Office After Disasterous 60% Drop

LILO & STITCH: Experiment 626 Takes A Bite Out Of Marvel And STAR WARS On Awesome New Poster
Recommended For You:

LILO & STITCH: Experiment 626 Takes A Bite Out Of Marvel And STAR WARS On Awesome New Poster

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
AnEye
AnEye - 3/21/2025, 11:16 AM
.......what in the hell lol?
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 3/21/2025, 3:24 PM
@AnEye - To be fair, it is a story about a guy who sees a sleeping lady and thinks "boy, I'd really like to make out with that"

Brett Kavanaugh vibes
AnEye
AnEye - 3/21/2025, 3:33 PM
@UncleHarm1 - Hmmm I'm pretty sure the lead was a woman named Snow White, who was poisoned by an Evil Queen, because Snow was considered better than her.

But nice try though.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 3/21/2025, 4:46 PM
@AnEye - User Comment Image

Pictured: date rape
AnEye
AnEye - 3/21/2025, 5:07 PM
@UncleHarm1 - So.......ONE SCENE....out of an 83 minute film?

Again, nice try.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 3/22/2025, 11:38 AM
@AnEye - Yeah, one scene of date rape in a kids movie. What you'd be offended only if it took up more screen time?
AnEye
AnEye - 3/22/2025, 12:18 PM
@UncleHarm1 - Yes, a movie made in the 1930s before you and I were born, had an animated scene that is considered date rape in “modern social culture”. Key year is 1930s, a different place and time you or I would understand today.

Again…nice try though 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 3/22/2025, 12:34 PM
@AnEye - So what ur saying is cultural norms change over time? Like back then all movies were about white people, but now we try to be more inclusive? Or make changes to the story in an awkward attempt to avoid offending the Little Person community as "dwarf" is considered a derogatory term to a lot of people?
AnEye
AnEye - 3/22/2025, 12:59 PM
@UncleHarm1 - I mean it’s pretty obvious culturally norms do change overtime.

Cigarettes had commercials that even included The Flintstones to sell more cigarettes throughout the 50s and 60s. Acceptable to smoke indoors anywhere, until more than 20 years ago that changed.

So yes they do change which is why that scene in the movie stayed because no one had rape in the mind when trying to watch a kids movie in the 1930s
CoolUsername
CoolUsername - 3/22/2025, 1:29 PM
@UncleHarm1 - this website has become a liberal cesspool. In case anybody is wondering why traffic to this site is down.
DenvertheDino
DenvertheDino - 3/22/2025, 5:56 PM
@CoolUsername - It's been heading down the drain for a long time. Democrats are running the show here and the bias shows.
campblood
campblood - 3/22/2025, 8:32 PM
@UncleHarm1 - and she was like 8 years old in the original fairy tale so we had grown men lusting for a child
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 3/23/2025, 11:30 AM
@campblood -
@DenvertheDino -
@CoolUsername - User Comment Image
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2025, 11:18 AM
Yeah whatever this is an adaptation of a long ago fairy tale the Disney animated version isn’t even accurate to the original anyway
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 3/21/2025, 11:22 AM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - yep

Also it’s a story that has had many adaptations across various mediums so one more is not gonna bring about the end of the world.
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2025, 11:28 AM
@TheVisionary25 - exactly but also I know the usual suspects are gonna act like this is the worst thing to ever happen for a movie they weren’t going to see anyway
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 3/22/2025, 8:30 AM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - Anyone expecting a direct copy of the original OR a true to original source version were fools as in many ways the stalker comment about the Prince isn't far off the mark hence why most adaptions since have made changes or excluded the 'love interest' as the Prince was always a weak element with issues attached to him. I mean in the original source the Prince stole her believed dead body, a latter version changed that (as body snatching was super bad, implied necrophilia not so much it would seem during that era) to buying her body from the Dwarves (both cases he didn't appear before finding her in her glass coffin). There is supposedly earlier version that the brothers collected where it was more than a kiss that dislodged the apple, the first couple versions published it was dislodged by the carriage bouncing over a tree root with the 1812 version, the prince becomes so obsessed with Snow White that he carries her coffin wherever he goes, until one of his servants, in anger, lifts Snow White from the coffin and strikes her on the back, causing the piece of apple to come out of her throat. Any inclusion of a kiss, true love or otherwise, was an alteration Disney invented and hard to call it true love if he never met her prior to finding her body (I know Disney added the Prince hearing her sing near the beginning but even that didn't seem enough to qualify as 'true love' from only one brief encounter).

TLDR I've seen some great adaptions of the story by other studios that diverge a lot from the source/animation so was also not expecting this to be a standout version of it in either direction.
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/22/2025, 5:50 PM
@Apophis71 - I 100% agree with everything. We gotta take adaptations as they are and criticize from there . Starting with the position of “it’s not the original” is so ass backwards to me
TheyDont
TheyDont - 3/21/2025, 11:19 AM
Should have just made it porn.
TheJok3r
TheJok3r - 3/21/2025, 11:19 AM
stupid decisions made by stupid "creatives".
MikeyL
MikeyL - 3/21/2025, 11:23 AM
I feel like there’s no winning when it comes to making the live-action adaptations. If you make changes, people are angry that it’s not the original cartoon they know. If you keep it the same, people are angry that it’s just a live-action version of the original cartoon they know.

Whether you like the changes or not with these, they are needed to justify making the live-action adaptations. That’s not to say all of them are great ideas or successful, but changes have to be made. Not for the sake of pleasing any specific crowds of demographics, but to give reason for there being a live-action version to begin with when the animated version already exists
AnEye
AnEye - 3/21/2025, 11:52 AM
@MikeyL - I get it. But to be honest, not all changes are automatically good or necessary. A live-action remake should justify its existence, but that doesn't mean any change does that by default. Changes should enhance the story, not just be different for the sake of it.

Cinderella and Jungle Book are good examples of smart updates that deepened the characters and story while still respecting the OGS. But when you have movies like Mulan or hell "Snow White," where the changes strip away what people actually loved about the original, which just alienates the fanbase instead of drawing them in.

There can be a middle ground where you can modernize and expand without losing the heart of the story. If the changes are weakning what people loved instead of improving it, then it's totally fair for people to push back.
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2025, 11:57 AM
@AnEye - ok but consider this : let a new gen have their own thing

We have to stop catering everything to people who came before it’s only stunting the ability to create new . We had our time with it let it go , go watch the original if you want that, damn the middle ground imo
AnEye
AnEye - 3/21/2025, 11:59 AM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - But what if new gen doesn't even care? Which judging by the estimates for this weekend....they don't care.

If the new gen is aware that this movie was a cartoon before...then why would they spend money to watch the new one in theaters when the OG is on streaming Disney Plus?
dagenspear
dagenspear - 3/21/2025, 12:09 PM
@MikeyL - I'd argue to change things to add to the characters and story and not just have a story be about something else moreso, or whatever, and if you're going to change it a lot, wearing the skin of the original like window dressing, to me, is nostalgia moreso to me. I'm all for seeing a new version of this, but they dressed it up to look like the original but were scared to do the original's story.
NonPlayerC
NonPlayerC - 3/21/2025, 12:37 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA @mikeyL @ShimmyShimmyYA - I see yalls point but when you go see a play that's based off a movie it's the same movie just acted out live. What exactly needed to be changed if they wanted to make a live action remake of the movie? they changed things out of fear that things from the old movie wouldn't be accepted by todays audience like the prince kissing a sleeping girl because it has analogies to date rape. they changed the dwarfs because there is controversies on how little people should be portrayed in movies. Im not one of the people that are up in arms about the movie but if you want something new for the new generation make a new character don't make changes to an old character that could be beloved by some. If you don't want to retell the exact events in the original make a continuation or prequel how they did with wicked. The only reason they changed things is because they were scared of how it would be accepted but they wanted the name recognition to insure it wouldn't be a complete bomb.
kirbyfan
kirbyfan - 3/21/2025, 12:49 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - NOPE! If you want NEW then CREATE SOMETHING NEW but when it comes to THE CLASSICS, KEEP THEM CLASSIC! As for the NEW GEN, create something NEW that's as good as the classics!
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2025, 3:45 PM
@AnEye - then it is what it is. Things need to be allowed to fail everything isn’t gonna hit
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2025, 3:46 PM
@NonPlayerC - but the animated one isn’t the original either so why is that fine to be created but this isn’t? They also made changes for the cartoon as well
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2025, 3:47 PM
@kirbyfan - then they should’ve never made the original cartoon
NonPlayerC
NonPlayerC - 3/21/2025, 4:02 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - point taken. In all honesty id love for a true R rated telling of the original Grimm version. the queen is force to put on red hot iron slippers and is force to dance to death. People were hard back in the day lol
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 3/21/2025, 5:54 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - @ShimmyShimmyYA - The problem here is remaking a beloved classic more than anything. All the people defending the original online didn't see Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs when it was released in 1937 during very different times. Everyone saw it each in their own decade at their own time of life and still walked away cherishing it in their own time. Like with The Wizard of Oz. Let the new gen have their own thing is all well and good, but even the new gen holds Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in a beloved regard.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 3/21/2025, 11:24 AM
We al win whit this movie but.Josh...josh Is a true jornalista
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder