EDITORIAL: Up For Debate - The Franchise.

EDITORIAL: Up For Debate - The Franchise.

Which popular franchise is in most desperate need of a return to form?

Editorial Opinion
By BattlinMurdock - Aug 01, 2012 03:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic



Franchises are nothing to sniff at; their staying power is in debt to the people who are drawn to the story and characters enough to come back and watch their adventures over and over. That being said, there are some obvious franchises merely used to cash in and suffer for it.

I certainly didn't ask for a fourth Pirates of the Caribbean, but that didn't stop it from making a bundle of money at the box office. The franchise currently sits at #5 on the list of the top grossing movie franchises of all time. Yet, what makes Johnny Depp's outings as a mascara-drunk pirate so endearing?

Honestly, what franchises were worth our time to begin with?



Obviously, Harry Potter (which currently sits at the #1 standing on the list) had an eager fan-base before the films finished off; but the movies themselves were generally regarded as critical and commercial successes; and so, more films were bound to come about. The same (aside from previous publication) came about for the original Star Wars movies, not hitting a snag until the late 90s when George Lucas decided that he hated people and released Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.



James Bond, cinema's longest running franchise (at 22/23 films) obviously has some great moments, but a few stinkers along the way as well. Casino Royale represented a true return to form that reinterpreted the character for a modern day audience to wild success. But audiences worldwide were willing to give Bond a chance even though we were given some major failures all throughout Bond's history (like that treasure Moonraker).

It was recently announced that another Rush Hour was currently in the mix, meaning that a sequel would probably appear sometime mid-summer in 2014. That's seven years away from its predecessor. However, that doesn't mean that it can't be successful, as MIB:III seem to win over most people (not I) after an almost ten year hiatus.



But what about films that have a major issue in that they're merely exact duplicates of the first? Look at the Lethal Weapon franchise (one of my favorites) or the Scream franchise. Neither seem to cover new ground, yet both are about the same when it comes to box office pull and critical/commercial success. Transformers seems to be in the same boat, promising more of the same (and to general distaste) but making lots of money doing so.

And of course, some are so left and right you never know what to expect (thank you, Mr. Burton, Schumacher, and Nolan). And there are some franchises that we'll never know how they would have turned out had they kept going. It seems odd after looking at Transformers, James Bond, and X-Men why Raimi's Spider-Man 4 wasn't given a bit more grace (and if not his vision, than another's, but keeping the same cast).

I pose the question to you: what franchises are you willing to forgive for their mistakes? What franchises would you like to see a return to form? What's your favorite moment in a franchise, and which franchise has been the most consistent? To check out where your favorite franchise stands globally, you can head over here.
About The Author:
BattlinMurdock
Member Since 3/19/2012
I like to chat about the Devil that does God's work and the Speedster who's late for dinner.

I write movies. And I can't fit my life into a description.

You can find me on Twitter @BattlinMurdock and you can check out my articles on WhatCulture! as well at this little hyperlink.
DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Related:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

Hope: First Trailer For Na Hong-Jin's Creature Feature Starring Michael Fassbender & Alicia Vikander Released
Recommended For You:

Hope: First Trailer For Na Hong-Jin's Creature Feature Starring Michael Fassbender & Alicia Vikander Released

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ekrolo2
ekrolo2 - 8/1/2012, 3:10 PM
Alien could use a good kick in the ass considering Prometheus was horrible.

Terminator could also get a movie out already considering its been 3 years since the last one, and we havent heard a peep since.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 8/1/2012, 4:19 PM
FYI, I'm stealing your image layout style for my next editorial (whenever that gets done).

To anshwer your queshtionsh, I'm alwaysh readeh to forgive the Jamesh Bond franchish for their incongruoush but inevitable mishtakesh ash they come.

Any series that begins going into the unknown really. The original Star Wars trilogy has a bunch of head-scratching moments, but it's STAR WARS.

I'm not at all lenient towards Batman, Spider-man, Superman, the Alien movies... series' and franchises that have at least a trilogy to their names. They've been around, they've had their time, and for anyone to produce mediocrity from something so SET... it just boggles the mind.

James Bond is something that usually follows a certain pattern: the first film to star a different Bond will likely be their best because they are trying their damnedest to make it work. In the next movie, their charisma will usually build a bit to the point of winning the audience over comfortably, but the stories will likely take a kick in the pants. Because they are so formulaic, however, and have been since the 60s, I can't critique a Bond movie unless it radically breaks the pattern, and for the worse. It's a true case of "if it's not broken, don't fix it".
mawilli4
mawilli4 - 8/1/2012, 4:48 PM
"not hitting a snag until the late 90s when George Lucas decided that he hated people and released Star Wars: The Phantom Menace." hahahaha
best line in the article.
oh, and I agree.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 8/1/2012, 8:25 PM
The first two seem to be the best whether they go beyond three.
"Lethal Weapon" went too far in to comedy. It became ridiculous in the third and couldn't redeem in the fourth.
Bond movies before Craig were just a series with nearly zero connections to previous movies.

I think comic book movies may need to become more serial like the previous Bonds so we're not as completely hung up on the actor(s) aging and other minor changes.

RidiculousFanBoyDemands
RidiculousFanBoyDemands - 8/1/2012, 8:31 PM
The Police Academy franchise...
breakUbatman
breakUbatman - 8/2/2012, 5:46 AM
Personally I find its less about the franchises mistakes and more to do with what a new film has to offer. For example AVP sucked but Predators did right by Predator, so the franchise is fine but AVP is dead to me.

By default any horror remake needs a return to form and Resident Evil needs to find some first.

Seriously though I'd love me some more Blade.
View Recorder